Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!




Cliffton Watermore Re:prototype? (380 comments)

I love Python, but it isn't right to compare it with Squeak. Squeak can be ported to bare hardware, it can be re-written in itself, and its speed is comparable with native C complied code even with the bytecode compilation. The author of this story was mistaken when he commented that it could be "slooow". It is fully possible to write an OS in Squeak without undue slowness, especially compared to the current breed of bloated OSes written primarily in C and C++. Add to this the superior portability and true, clean OO thanks to Squeak's Smalltalk heritage, and you'll agree that Squeak is what Java wants to be when it grows up.

more than 11 years ago


Cliffton Watermore hasn't submitted any stories.


Cliffton Watermore has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?