Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Isaac Asimov: How Do People Get New Ideas?

Concerned Onlooker Re:Creativity vs Common Sense (146 comments)

It's amazing that it then took so long for the invention of the triple axel, however.

2 days ago
top

Intel Drops Gamasutra Sponsorship Over Controversial Editorials

Concerned Onlooker Re:gtfo (724 comments)

Please note that the person you replied to was not advocating for a law to be passed. The poster was advocating for a "movement." That's important. I would argue that social pressures are more important than laws for keeping people acting basically decently.

Yes, I am for free speech as well, but all speech has consequences.

about three weeks ago
top

Intel Drops Gamasutra Sponsorship Over Controversial Editorials

Concerned Onlooker Re:gtfo (724 comments)

How is misogyny a "non-issue?"

about three weeks ago
top

Mystery Gamer Makes Millions Moving Markets In Japan

Concerned Onlooker Re:Largest Ponzi Scheme Ever (113 comments)

"Further proving that the Stock Market is almost entirely disconnected from the underlying companies."

Exactly. I've been wondering for some time just what IS stock price based on? Since it's not based on the soundness of the company (the company doesn't even need to have a P/E!) it seems entirely based on perceived potential of the company and whatever news makes the traders nervous or ecstatic that day.

Therefore, it seems to me you're better off avoiding fundamentals and instead watching the news and reading sociology books. Oh yeah, and developing ways to do high volume trading one millionth of a second faster than you competitor.

about three weeks ago
top

State of Iowa Tells Tesla To Cancel Its Scheduled Test Drives

Concerned Onlooker Re:Rent a Tesla for $1 (335 comments)

"We don't live in a democracy, and never have."

As popular as it is to make this gripe this country was founded on democratic process. It's only somewhat recently that we became an oligarchy.

" The only way this will ever change is through aggressive 'petulance'"

Whatever that is, a better tactic would be to aggressively contribute to Lawrence Lessig's movement.

about a month ago
top

Apple Yet To Push Patch For "Shellshock" Bug

Concerned Onlooker Re:~/.cshrc (208 comments)

"Unfortunately, based on my extensive experience with OS X, I have to say that it is a big pile of shit. "

Don't stop there. Give us some real examples of why you think this. Because otherwise it kind of sounds like you're just making something up that sounds authoritative but really isn't.

about a month ago
top

Apple Yet To Push Patch For "Shellshock" Bug

Concerned Onlooker Re:Stallman would be proud (208 comments)

Partial output from running "man bash" on my Mac:

COPYRIGHT
              Bash is Copyright (C) 1989-2005 by the Free Software Foundation, Inc.

By the way, betwixt means between.

about a month ago
top

Why the iPhone 6 Has the Same Base Memory As the iPhone 5

Concerned Onlooker Re:There have been studies (264 comments)

Do you know why that is? Because the younger generation will do anything to differentiate themselves from their parent's generation. Even if means abandoning a good product.

about a month ago
top

Putin To Discuss Plans For Disconnecting Russia From the Internet

Concerned Onlooker Re:"Emergency" (241 comments)

"devices capable of emitting electromagnetic radiations"

Does this mean they'll confiscate the alternator on my car? And what about my brain?!

about a month ago
top

Study: Chimpanzees Have Evolved To Kill Each Other

Concerned Onlooker Re: Recent claims by whom? (224 comments)

So, in other words you didn't read the article.

about a month ago
top

Study: Chimpanzees Have Evolved To Kill Each Other

Concerned Onlooker Re: Recent claims by whom? (224 comments)

It sounds like you just made that up. What evidence do you base that on?

The good side of humans is part of our nature as well, and according to the trend it is an increasing part of our nature. Did you even bother to look at the article I linked?

about a month ago
top

Study: Chimpanzees Have Evolved To Kill Each Other

Concerned Onlooker Re:Recent claims by whom? (224 comments)

You should read the article I linked. It's much longer range than three or four generations.

about a month ago
top

Study: Chimpanzees Have Evolved To Kill Each Other

Concerned Onlooker Re:Recent claims by whom? (224 comments)

"All the hippies need to get over it and come back to reality."

The reality is that evolution isn't finished. We are possibly evolving into something much greater than what came before. Steven Pinker exhibits that the human race has overall experienced a decline in violence in the recent past. (http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/history-and-the-decline-of-human-violence/)

Maybe the reality is that the hippies were right.

about a month ago
top

Apple's "Warrant Canary" Has Died

Concerned Onlooker Re:Obama is but a puppet (236 comments)

"The huge machinery behind the NSA / CIA / FBI and all those alphabet agencies wants total control, and it has the enthusiastic support of private companies such as Google, Microsoft, Apple, Cisco, amongst others"

While I admit that we have a de facto oligarchy here in the US I have to wonder that if the above were true then why have a warrant canary at all?

about a month ago
top

How Flickr Is Courting the Next Generation of Photographers

Concerned Onlooker Re:Expensive and complicated? (97 comments)

Well, sort of. There has been a much larger outlay of cash necessary to break into digital photography. You may realize a break even point sooner if you would have shot lot of rolls of film, but the initial barrier to entry is much higher than it was for film cameras, which really only needed to be a light-tight box. Having said that, the price of good digital cameras has come down a lot since the late 90s, so what I observe is more of a trough where film was pretty much phased out yet digital cameras were still really expensive.

about a month ago
top

Sci-Fi Authors and Scientists Predict an Optimistic Future

Concerned Onlooker Re:SCI-FI used to be inspiring (191 comments)

"The current crop of sci-fi-writer-wannabes just ain't got the imagination to inspire"

I'm not sure there's even really a market for science fiction. What was that last Star Trek movie? I can't even remember the name of it now. It wasn't science fiction. It was an action flick with more explosions than ideas. It just happened to be set on a spaceship.

I'm willing to bet not many these days would have the patience to site through 2001: A Space Odyssey, let alone the original Solaris.

about a month ago
top

The Future According To Stanislaw Lem

Concerned Onlooker Re:Eh... (196 comments)

"Why would any intelligent creature want anything to do with us?"

In the same way that some people here on earth study primitive societies there would surely be some alien anthropologists out there interested in us.

about a month ago
top

Congress Can't Make Asteroid Mining Legal (But It's Trying, Anyway)

Concerned Onlooker Re:LOL (213 comments)

"Yes, space is big, far bigger than you can imagine. "

You might even say "vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big."

about a month and a half ago

Submissions

Journals

top

Walmart

Concerned Onlooker Concerned Onlooker writes  |  more than 8 years ago Are you being criticized for poor ethics and morality? Are your customers dropping off because it is becoming widely known that you pay your employees so poorly they cannot afford health insurance and then make them work overtime for free on top of that?

What do you do? Do you improve your companys image by becoming more humane and ethical? No. You do this.

top

Point of view

Concerned Onlooker Concerned Onlooker writes  |  more than 8 years ago Conservatives are constantly looking to improve their position in the world. Liberals are constantly looking to improve the position of the world.

top

Extinguish the Human Race?

Concerned Onlooker Concerned Onlooker writes  |  more than 9 years ago Nanking. Auschwitz. Rwanda. CIA. Torture. Terrorism. United States genocide. Beslan. Sudan....

It's a huge list, actually, stretching back to the beginning of history and I'm sure well before.

My question is this: If you could completely wipe out the human race with a wave of your hand would you do it? One final egalitarian solution to the disgusting plague known as homo sapiens sapiens. I think I would.

top

Negroponte: What a piece of work

Concerned Onlooker Concerned Onlooker writes  |  more than 9 years ago It's unfortunate, but the world is probably shaped more by human excrement like John Negroponte than it is by decent people. How stupid does he expect people to be when he says he knew nothing of human rights abuses happening in Honduras? And just who are these animals that get off on torturing and murdering? When the U.S. talks of defeating terrorism the little hypocrisy meter just about jumps off the scale.

http://www.buzzflash.com/contributors/04/04/con04175.html
http://www.afrocubaweb.com/negroponte.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Negroponte

top

Profanity and the Public Airwaves

Concerned Onlooker Concerned Onlooker writes  |  more than 10 years ago Reading through the postings on the recent FCC story about regulating profanity one might have thought by the vitriolity of the messages that something really awful was happening. In fact, what everyone is calling censorship is not even close to that. It's also quite amusing that while people were ranting about censorship anyone who took an opposing view was modded into oblivion and suffered some very crass remarks.

The airwaves, I will remind you, are public. And just like in any public space we need to modulate ourselves, maintain a modicum of decency and mutual respect. I know there are those out there (apparently they all post on Slashdot) who will accept no limits, but anyone who has made it past adolescence can see the value of limiting friction in social situations. Choosing to make others uncomfortable is a sign of either immaturity or of pathological behavior. The airwaves are a public commons and enforcing a little decency is not the end of the world.

Indeed, for all those who claim that these words are "part of everyday language" I will refute that. Quite a while ago I had the realization that swearing was something that was inifnitely more fun to do than to listen to. I decided to stop. Like giving up any addiction it was difficult at first and then after a while I became amazed when I realized that there are so many people out there who are unable to express themselves without swearing. It may indeed be part of the vernacular but it is without a doubt an artless way to speak or communicate. In fact some people are simply unable to speak without interjecting the F word in at every opportunity. The funny thing is, it's used so much that it has lost any real communicative effect it might have had and it simply remains as a sharp, ugly blow to the ear.

In the end I don't really like seeing the FCC pulling a Hayes commission type of move on Howard Stern, yet I feel it so very difficult to get worked up in his defense. I listened to Stern once or twice and realized that his kind of damage was not for me so I simply tuned out, which is what I gather I am supposed to do. I voted with my absence. The bummer about that is that if it continues to get worse it leaves the airwaves devoid of anything that I and other people like me can listen to or view, and the public space has effectively been taken over by bullies. The very same types of people that would harrass you as you try to enjoy a public park.

True censorship is a heinous thing and if the FCC is really doing this because it disagrees with some things Howard Stern said then I am totally against that, but for crying out loud why does everything have to go to its lowest form in the name of freedom? Why don't people get as worked up when we aren't living up to our best as individuals, reaching for loftier goals, than when they feel their right to be crude and crass is threatened?

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?