Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!



EFF Joins Fight Against Apple Lawsuit

Cool Hand Luke Only on Slashdot... (662 comments)

...would an argument fly that journalists protecting employees violating their NDAs and journalists protecting whistleblowers are equivalent behaviors.

An employee violating their NDA is potentially disseminating trade secrets, and is potentially harming the company. A whistleblower is disseminating illegal actions performed by a company. Can illegal actions also be trade secrets (i.e. can a whistleblower be an employee violating their NDA)? Of course! IANAL, but I believe one can not, legally, profit from illegal actions.

As far as I know,

  • launching a sub-$500 computer isn't a crime,
  • Apple could have been injured by dissemination of their business plans,
  • Think Secret profited by publishing these rumors before the launch of the Mini.

Information wanting to be free seems to be a mantra around here, but how can anyone advocate that

  • a publication (The Washington Post) protecting a whistleblower (Deep Throat) exposing illegal activities by our government (Watergate)
    is equivalent to
  • one company (Think Secret) making a profit from criminal activity (the employee disclosing trade secrets) against another company (Apple)?

more than 9 years ago


Cool Hand Luke hasn't submitted any stories.


Cool Hand Luke has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?