Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Japan Moves Toward Blocking Online Child Porn

CorporateSuit Re:HAVE YOU ALL FUCKING LOST IT? (374 comments)

And yes, your desire to break bones and report to the FBI anyone that dares even discuss whether child porn laws are appropriate speaks volumes about your common sense.

Any person who ADVOCATES child pornography and is, himself, not a paedophile is a GRIEVIOUSLY misled individual.

more than 4 years ago
top

Japan Moves Toward Blocking Online Child Porn

CorporateSuit Re:HAVE YOU ALL FUCKING LOST IT? (374 comments)

What you are doing (besides drooling on your keyboard) is called an "Appeal to emotion" and is usually done by someone who cannot argue the facts because they aren't on his/her side,

Perhaps you should remember that my fact-based post was modded "flamebait/troll" and the post you're responding to is the answer to that mod's emotional response? Tit for Tat and all that.

You're ignoring the issue completely. "Lock up anyone with a picture on his computer for 40 years" is not what I'm suggesting is it? What part of "seek help" did you not understand? You mention councelling, yourself.

NO no no... The point of that post... That post was made to wake someone out of their sleep. To evoke an emotional impact that will help someone realize that they're not the well-adjusted, ok person they thought they were. That can not be done with a dissertation. It must be done with a bucket of cold water.

more than 4 years ago
top

Japan Moves Toward Blocking Online Child Porn

CorporateSuit Re:HAVE YOU ALL FUCKING LOST IT? (374 comments)

In that hypothetical scenario, do you support prosecuting that 16 year old girl? Yes or No. BTW, if you say no, then you (by your own statements) are enabling sexual predators to rape a child. If you say yes you lack enough common sense for anyone to bother taking any more of your comments seriously.

Well, gee, let's see, um, so you basically are telling me there's no right way to answer the question you say I'm dodging? Obviously, not warranting your trap question with an answer was the best answer I could have given, and should speak volumes for my common sense.

more than 4 years ago
top

Japan Moves Toward Blocking Online Child Porn

CorporateSuit Re:Age of consent in Japan (374 comments)

Pornography and Sex are not the same thing.

more than 4 years ago
top

Japan Moves Toward Blocking Online Child Porn

CorporateSuit Re:HAVE YOU ALL FUCKING LOST IT? (374 comments)

I would do what is neccessary to protect a child from a sexual predator. I would do what is neccessary to keep enablers from allowing sexual predators to rape a child. You try to twist and walk your way around that, but in the end, you are knowingly fighting against a good guy -- and encouraging paedophiles. I hope you manage to realize that you're not being funny and you're not being clever, but that you are telling people that it's not that bad to masturbate to children. Actually consider that for a while. You know -- think about what you are advocating by arguing against me? You're not disproving anything I've said, but your are greatly degrading your own humanity. Your mother would be ashamed if she saw this.

Something for your consideration.

more than 4 years ago
top

Japan Moves Toward Blocking Online Child Porn

CorporateSuit Re:HAVE YOU ALL FUCKING LOST IT? (374 comments)

Wrong. In a premeditated murder the person actually dies - it's only a difference if you planned to do it, but there's an actual victim.

What's the difference between that and manslaughter then? The victim or the intent?

you guys fantasize about screwing children and you want society to accept and facilitate that.

Ad hominem attacks don't fly here, sorry.

Do you even know what an ad hominem attack is? I'm telling paedophiles that they should expect to be socially ostricised for being paedophiles! That's not an ad hominem attack! Not a paedophile? Then the argument certainly doesn't apply!

Appeals to anonymous authorities don't work either. If your argument relies on some sources, the onus to provide them is one you.

This isn't some bullshit courtroom drama. This isn't a game. The evidence is right out there for anyone to search who wants to -- and it's not my "burden" to provide it. Not providing the links when you can just google it doesn't make me wrong. I am right, and I will allow you to prove yourself wrong if you have doubts. Citing the sources won't change the truth.

more than 4 years ago
top

Japan Moves Toward Blocking Online Child Porn

CorporateSuit Re:HAVE YOU ALL FUCKING LOST IT? (374 comments)

No, it's not that. Maybe I just don't like to watch people tell me that child pornography is a victimless crime. Maybe I don't like that Slashdot has so suddenely entrenched itself with ADVOCATES of child pornography. As someone who considers himself a good man, I feel dutybound to at least tell these people what they are. If I could break their bones, I would. If I could arrest them, I would. If I owned slashdot, I would turn over what contact information I had on these people to the fbi. This is seriously psychological disturbed stuff -- not some fictional boogeymonster, but people who pleasure themselves to the idea of raping children. I am a human being, and that is why I am angry.

more than 4 years ago
top

Japan Moves Toward Blocking Online Child Porn

CorporateSuit Re:HAVE YOU ALL FUCKING LOST IT? (374 comments)

Right -- masturbating to children being raped has the same emotional impact as seeing someone get killed on TV. How did you get so smart with your head up your ass? Do you prefer typing, because talking makes your mouth taste like farts?

If you consistently orgasm to a certain visual stimulus, you refuse to acknowledge that will cause some sort of psychological reinforcement to it?

more than 4 years ago
top

Japan Moves Toward Blocking Online Child Porn

CorporateSuit Re:Cencorship, etc (374 comments)

They made Iron Man 2 after the first Iron Man only sold 1 ticket! Demand NEVER dictates supply! I just fell off a turnip truck and this is exactly what I think!

Are you really this dense or do you just play it on slashdot? Most people seem to be dropping their IQs by about 60 in order to rationalize their fetish of banging underaged girls, today.

more than 4 years ago
top

Japan Moves Toward Blocking Online Child Porn

CorporateSuit Re:HAVE YOU ALL FUCKING LOST IT? (374 comments)

Mod me flamebait all you want, you sick fuck. Ignoring me won't change what a sick fuck you've become. My opinion doesn't change the fact that masturbating to children means you are a sick fuck. I wasn't the one who drew the lines, I'm just letting you know that you Are A Sick Fuck That Needs To Get Help Like NOW, you sick childfucker.

more than 4 years ago
top

Japan Moves Toward Blocking Online Child Porn

CorporateSuit Re:Show us the evidence or shut up. (374 comments)

Lets be realistic, the majority of human beings aren't that. And if the majority aren't crazy like that it makes no sense to create laws expecting people to act like that. Lets put it simple, if you saw someone murdered on tape you wouldn't go and murder somebody would you? Because you have a conscience right?

It has been shown, in multiple studies, that pornography leads to sexual deviancy and inconsistent expectations of sex -- and that individuals will seek out to attempt these acts. Pornography is based on lust and greed. Those two fellows tend to erode a person's sense of morality to the point where they, like you, completely lose their sense of morality. One year ago, you probably considered even the CONCEPT of having child pornography as something despicable. Now, if you bother to look, you're advocating the filth. It's not the world that's changed -- you've probably even degraded to the point where you'll tell me that there's not even such a thing as "right" and "wrong" because those are oh so relative!

The greatest flaw in your psychopathic argument, however, is your disregard for disregard. Normal individuals will see movies where people are murdered and banks are robbed. They will chuckle and label the deeds as "bad" or "misbehavior" and move on. Normal individuals, however, will not masturbate to pictures of death and thievery. Sexuality is one of humanity's most powerful stimuli, and it becomes very dangerous in the hands of people who have lost their sense of right and wrong.

more than 4 years ago
top

Japan Moves Toward Blocking Online Child Porn

CorporateSuit Re:Due process; always due process (374 comments)

"THEY CAME FIRST for the Rapists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Rapist. THEN THEY CAME for the Murderers, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Murderers. THEN THEY CAME for the human traffickers, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a human trafficker. THEN THEY CAME for me and by that time no one was left to speak up."

Go outside. NOW. You've overdosed on internet. Go outside.

more than 4 years ago
top

Japan Moves Toward Blocking Online Child Porn

CorporateSuit HAVE YOU ALL FUCKING LOST IT? (374 comments)

The posts on this article horrify me. 90% of them are, in fact, arguing that we should let people view child pornography, as long as they're "not distributing it". Have things changed so drastically since two days ago when I said that it was a slippery slope to this point? Did everyone decide to get together and prove my -1 post, modded "Troll" inappropriately, was a prophetic truth?

"As long as there's no victim things r ok! Duhr huhr! It's a thought crime!" So is the difference between manslaughter and premeditated murder! There's no philosophical debate here, you guys fantasize about screwing children and you want society to accept and facilitate that.

No, you sick fucks. No. Read up on any study done on the subject and you'll see how fantasy all so quickly leads to reality. Read on how pornography encourages, and leads to sexual deviancy (to the point where a very large margin of PROSTITUTES feel squeamish at what their clients request of them -- as you know, prostitutes are the biggest PRUDES of our western society!) Then come back here and read the posts on this article, and tell me that we're not sliding, very dangerously, down the slippery slope already.

more than 4 years ago
top

Proposed Law Would Require ID To Buy Prepaid Phones

CorporateSuit Re:orly? (615 comments)

Because freedom is fragile, and impossible for politicians to correctly protect.

more than 4 years ago
top

Pacific Northwest At Risk For Mega-Earthquake

CorporateSuit Re:Yet another reason... (457 comments)

You must be from one of the Northern states. One that doesn't border Mexico. They seem to be the ones doing all the complaining.

more than 4 years ago
top

Neuromancer Movie In Your Future?

CorporateSuit Re:Haters - No Keanu? (239 comments)

Instead, the role of Case will be played by Ben Affleck.

Really? I heard it was going to be Will Smith.

more than 4 years ago
top

Happy Towel Day

CorporateSuit Re:Idle's the right place for this... (122 comments)

His books are some of the most manipulative literature I've ever read. Reading through the first chapter, you can see how he sets the stage just like a Vegas magician. Later, he acknowledges alternative explanations or opposing viewpoints only long enough to insult them and then squash them and will sign the death certificate himself without review. Perhaps, in 8th grade, you learned this as a pattern for "persuasive argument". He'll extend analogies for alternative theories to fairy tales and the stories of old fools, and then present analogies of his own, reasonable assumptions to historical figures who triumphed in the face of persecution. This is much more subtle, but not beyond detection.

My grandfather worked for Al Capone in the 20's in a speakeasy, and hustled pool to make money to get through engineering school. One thing he left me was the ability to spot a conman. Richard Dawkins is a very bright conman. I wonder how much of his tripe he actually believes.

more than 4 years ago
top

Decency Group Says "$#*!" Is Indecent

CorporateSuit Re:Do these people live in reality? (821 comments)

There are no "true and false Christians" - the Bible is a rorschach that will justify anything.

And that proves you know nothing about the bible. If that were true, then there would be no New Testament past the gospels (and most of the gospels could be reduced in content by at least 70%). Jesus would have had no problems with the Jews -- since they were just worshipping him, but not the same way as the Christians, and none of the Paulesian epistles would have been written because any way to practice Christianity was the right way! (Whereas, the Paulesian epistles were wholly written as corrective measures for the wards going astray in their seperate ways)

The bible is not the same kind of instruction manual for Christianity that it was for Judaism. It does not outline the proper ordinances for baptism, sacrament, church (synagogue) attendance, temple attendance, receiving the holy ghost as an ordinance, priesthood ordinations, correctly-ordered hierchy, and many other fundamentals. What's left are corrective measures and a few testimonies. Therefore, you can deduce that any christian church that bases itself off the bible (no matter how well-intentioned) cannot be the true church -- as they are simply the creeds and herecies that Paul spent so much of his time decrying -- including the Nicene Creed. The bible is, categorically, not a blueprint for establishing a church, and explains that nonauthoritative attempts are not acceptable in no uncertain terms.

According to the people who wrote the bible, being a "True" Christian and being a "False" christian were the entire point of the bible. Jesus didn't have to say anything if doing whatever you wanted, as long as you believed in his very existence, was enough to merit someone as a Christian. In fact, Peter made the point, in one of his epistles, that using the bible to mean whatever you want it to mean was a condemnable sin.

"Faith" is the belief that the sun will rise tomorrow as it did today -- though you have not yet seen tomorrow's sunrise. It is not faith to believe that all the streetlamps in your town will turn into candycanes overnight. It is a fine line, but it is not an arbitrary one. Saying that anyone who has a "faith" is therefore definitely "crazy" is your own Strawman, and you'd be a better man to be rid of it.

more than 4 years ago
top

Decency Group Says "$#*!" Is Indecent

CorporateSuit Re:Do these people live in reality? (821 comments)

They are as Christian as you claim to be, and unfortunately are much louder.

These people are insane AND christian. It's not the christianity that makes them a bother, is his major point. It's like if he said "The killer butchered the children and ate their hearts, that's inhuman!" and you come out and say "Well, he's just as human as you are!" -- it's an exercise in pedantry and ignorance to the context of sanity/normalcy that he was establishing.

more than 4 years ago
top

I suspect my current job will end when ...

CorporateSuit Re:No, no, no. I did that and it screwed me. (409 comments)

Close.

Whenever someone posts a job opening, nowadays, they get FLOODED with applications. HR (or anyone else involved in the hiring process) may take the first few resumes/cover letters seriously and consider each, but after they start seeing dozens piling up, they start looking for ANY reason to toss out a resume. It starts cutting down to:

  • Oh, we can't afford him. I'm not sure he really knows what we're offering for this position.
  • Oh, he lives too far away, and the commute will kill him, even if he doesn't know it yet.
  • Oh, with his skills, he won't have trouble finding a different job, so I don't feel bad throwing this one out.
  • We already have someone in the department with that name
  • Fresh out of school? We need someone with experience
  • Full of experience? This is more of a starting position.
  • Still has a myspace account? Are you serious?
  • I don't think someone with his qualifications will stay in this job after the economy picks back up!

There's nothing personal in this, it's prioritization of HR's time. With the deluge of applicants there are for any given job, there is simply not enough time in their day to seriously consider anyone who isn't a round peg for a round hole. This means you need your resume or cover letter to say something that will get their attention and say "We want THIS guy." -- so even if you have a mediocre review, they still want to consider you on the merits of how you presented yourself in the written form.

more than 4 years ago

Submissions

top

Favorite way to spend a cold day

CorporateSuit CorporateSuit writes  |  more than 5 years ago

CorporateSuit (1319461) writes "Huddling over a fire
Building a snowman
Complaining about global warming
Drinking something hot
Are there cold days in Azeroth?
I'm in Hell, you insensitive clod!"

Journals

CorporateSuit has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>