Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Ubuntu: Where Did the Love Go?

Derek Re:What's going on? (778 comments)

Kosh, is that you? Fancy meeting you here! Last I heard you'd left the galaxy!

LOL!! Years of coming to Slashdot have now been validated. Thank you!

more than 3 years ago
top

How Do I Prevent Lan Party Theft?

Derek Re:Insurance? (758 comments)

So at what point does one become an official graybeard?

3 digit uid? 4 digit? a low 5 digit one?

Most of us at 4 digits and lower stopped using slashdot long ago because the load times for this site on our 1200 baud modems are terrible.

Back to gopherspace for me!

-Derek

more than 6 years ago

Submissions

Derek hasn't submitted any stories.

Journals

top

Cybercrime Bill Ups the Ante

Derek Derek writes  |  more than 12 years ago Text of the Cyber Security Enhancement Act: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:H.R.3482:

Atricle quoted from: http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,50363,00.html

Some forms of illegal hacking would be punished by life imprisonment under a proposal that Congress will debate on Tuesday.

A House Judiciary subcommittee will consider the Cyber Security Enhancement Act (CSEA), which ups the penalties for computer intrusions, funds surveillance research and encourages Internet providers to turn over more information to police.

CSEA, sponsored by Crime Subcommittee chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas), is one of Congress' more recent responses to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. Smith introduced the bill in December 2001, saying that it will "combat cybercrime and cyberterrorism and send the signal that if you engage in cybercrime or cyberterrorism, you will be punished."

[...]

Currently it's illegal for an Internet provider to "knowingly divulge" what you're doing except in some specific circumstances, such as when troubleshooting glitches, receiving a court order or tipping off police that a crime's in progress. The bill expands that list to include when "an emergency involving danger of death or serious physical injury to any person requires disclosure of the information without delay."

As an incentive for Internet providers not to be overly zealous in handing over terabytes of data to the feds, current law allows customers to sue for damages. But if CSEA took effect, an Internet provider's "good faith determination" that something smelled fishy would immunize it from lawsuits by irate customers...

top

Philips rejects "protected" CD's

Derek Derek writes  |  more than 12 years ago According to this article, Philips, one of the pioneers of CD technology, is going with me on this one. They intend for their burners to function normally with protected music CDs. Also, as owners of the CD trademark, Philips is requesting that the music CDs not bear the common "Compact Disc" logo, due to conformity issues.

Memorable quote: "We worry (the labels) don't know what they're doing."

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?