Testing 65 Different GPUs On Linux With Open Source Drivers
For me (a relative non-techie for this site) I find the more open-source I have on my computer, the easier it is to update the system without things breaking. I can just go to synaptic and check all updates and let it run. A lot of proprietary drivers don't play nicely with the package management, or require a manual install. Aside from that I also find them a bit glitchy, although there's no denying that if you need fps then there is no alternative.
So in summary, I find if you're not needing them for gaming/3D, then the open source drivers give a more consistent experience and mesh nicely with the rest of the system.
The Burning Bridges of Ubuntu
Why is it that the linux kernel, as an open source project, doesn't seem to receive this scorn, whereas so many other open-source projects do - i.e. gnome, kde, ubuntu ?
Is it because the linux kernel generally doesn't complete revamp things. Linus proudly announced that there would be nothing exciting in the 3.0 kernel.
Or is it because the linux kernel is more of a community thing? It sounds like Linus doesn't do much 'directing' - he simply agrees or disagrees with patches. The linux kernel is like a sandcastle built up very slowly by millions of ants, with no large interventions, such as a spade. Whereas other opensource projects seem to get razed and re-built on a regular basis.
On the other hand, when linus got frustrated with the version control system, he did entirely build his own one. But this isn't a fair comparison because the system they were using was not open-source.
If a desktop GUI took the kernel model of development - i.e. lots of very small incremental changes - would we want to use it? Is this xfce's development model?
On a slight red-herring, a lot of people here mention centos and red hat. What is Red Hat going to do for a desktop GUI? They can't seriously be thinking of going to gnome 3? MATE is probably not stable enough.
Linux Format Magazine Team Quits, Launches New Profit-Donating Mag
Yep - I remember!
I wish in the last few issues of AF they pointed out where they were heading, because I thought I had nowhere to go apart from Windows XP for 6 sorry years before I found Ubuntu 9.04 and LF again.
Linux 3.13 Kernel To Bring Major Feature Improvements
My thoughts exactly, as I type this on a slightly more modern T60p, after my I dropped my T40 and sheared off the hinge last year.
To be honest, I'd be happy if Lenovo would simply sell a laptop without an OS if that's easier for them.
French Police To Switch 72,000 Desktop PCs To Linux
Also work for a large healthcare organisation, and have thought the same thing.
I think the key will be webapps - almost all - even radiology - seems to be moving to webapps. Some still need IE6 though!
LinkedIn Accused of Hacking Customers' E-Mails To Slurp Up Contacts
It was embarrassing and prompted me to close the account. Clearly a violation of privacy. I think at the time I used the same password as for my email account.
Why Are Some Hell-Bent On Teaching Intelligent Design?
From the Bible: "In the beginning was the Word, the Word was with God, the word was God." ( John 1:1 ). The Word in my understanding is the basic physical laws that runs this universe. The same stuff scientists study. It was science who convinced me that there is some sort of intelligence out there which resulted in the formation of me and everything I observe. The religious people call this God, Spirit, and all sorts of other names, but it seems to be a universal human observation that we are likely not the top in the chain of command in the Universe.
I enjoyed reading your post. I'm not completely clear on where you stand after coming to the end of it, but I get the sense you are a theist, but believe in a God which represents the abstract laws of the universe - something which is greater than what we understand at the moment. I don't know if you've read Dawkins' book, The God Delusion, but he has a whole chapter devoted to theists or agnostics of this sort. He has several arguments against these ideas of God - they mainly go along the line of - if you believe in a God which created the universe and it's laws, but doesn't bear any current interaction with the universe, then your reasoning requires a God-creator, ad infinitum - this isn't a satisfactory explanation for the universe. If your God _is_ the laws of the universe, then your definition of God is sketchy and almost impossible to differentiate between what we discover in Physics.
Personally, I was brought up Catholic. Like yourself, I never bought into the beliefs 100%, but I did see how particularly rules were beneficial to society and the individual, and generally followed them. My belief of God was, I think, similar to yours - something higher and deeper to the meaning of the universe as we understand it at present. Maybe external to our universe, not necessarily conscious, not necessarily a physical being.
In more recent years, I have changed my mind on both premises. Yes, the bible can be interpreted in ways that fit your ethical belief system, but why do this when you can think for yourself? Yes, there are aspects of the universe that we don't understand on a fundamental level, but why call it God?
EU Proposes To Fit Cars With Speed Limiters
on speed cameras. When I started out I didn't see the harm in speeding on our UK motorways (although I was vehemently against speeding in residential areas), and was largely opposed to the average speed cameras seen round the M25 and M42.
However, after so many miles of experiencing idiots driving erratically - speeding up/slowing down - some doing 90+ others doing 50mph, and having to continually be on the look out, overtaking, changing lanes just so I could drive with a consistent speed, I've decided average speed check cameras are the way to go. They stabilise the whole traffic, and generally everyone ends up driving almost exactly 70mph. There is a lot less stress, fuel economy is better than at 70, and there's much less slowing down and speeding up, which is also good for economy and safety.
If average speed cameras work - why use electronic limiters? There are very rare occasions when you need a bit of speed to do something safely, particularly at slower speeds (i.e. overtaking a cyclist or slower moving vehicle), and if there are any errors in the system, it could put people's lives at risk. Better to let the driver weigh up safety versus a speeding fine in those situations.
Former Lockheed Skunkworks Engineer Auctioning a Prototype "Spy Rock"
"In 2002-2003, I was the Chief Technology Officer for a Boston-based hardware research and development firm, Advanced Wireless Automation (AWA)."
"Based upon my equity ownership in the company and the fact that all AWA computing resources were conducted on my own personal equipment using my own datacenter and my Internet connection, it is well within my right to auction off the backups related to the now-defunct AWA."
Soda Makes Five-Year-Olds Break Your Stuff, Science Finds
This article is a troll for scientists.
Ask Slashdot: Best Software For Med-School Note-Taking?
... I suggest you try to ensure you get handouts and then devote 100% of your concentration to listening and interpreting what you're being told.
If you write things down, you won't look at 90% of it. You will need it all in your memory at some point - either for the exams or when you're practising, so better commit it to memory in the first place. And, no, writing it down does not help with that.
My only warning is never to believe 100% anything anyone teaches you - no-one knows everything about everything, and the evidence and research is always changing.
New Linux Trojan in the Wild
Might be a stupid question here - but, I currently run Ubuntu 10.04 and use Google Chrome. How would this exploit present itself to me? Could I get infected from simply visiting a page? Clicking on an email in gmail? I'm guessing checking my emails in Mutt wouldn't lead to an infection? Would it present a dialog box that is or isn't decorated in my window decoration?
Talking On the Phone While Driving Not So Dangerous After All
Just to list a few:
For starters this is a retrospective, observational (being generous here) cohort study.
I'd like a bit more technical detail on how they ensured that they were measuring mobile calls from cars (they have assurance from the telecommunications company)
They note a 7% rise in what they believe to be car mobile phone calls at 9pm on Monday to Friday on a background of steadily decreasing phone calls from 8pm to 10pm, and they don't mention whether this spike is statistically significant.
The spike in the rise of mobile car use is of a maximum of 1/2 hour before the level reaches pre-9pm levels, and continues to decrease. This interval is short - to notice an effect the recording of the car accidents in their source would have to be pretty precise. Any errors in the reporting of car accidents is probably going to make a 30 min window period difficult to measure.
They haven't analysed the variation in traffic at different times in the evening, which makes comparison at different time periods difficult. If the traffic is less after 9pm, the rate of accidents per car could be higher.
But the main problem is:
To show 'no effect' you need to ensure that your study is powered to make this observation - which they have not done. A 7% rise in mobile usage over 30 minutes would need ?how many crashes to give a statistically significant result that rises above the noise.
To be fair, they mention some of these issues as caveats, but I'm not sure they had enough statistics input for this paper. I would like to see the confidence intervals, how they were calculated, what software was used and what the p-values are. There should be a statisticians name on the paper. Certainly, you can't conclude that mobile phones are not dangerous while driving - you can only say that they found no evidence to show this in this particular study.
IBM Opens Up POWER Architecture For Licensing
Anyone want to surmise whether we'll get a desktop machine anytime soon?
Quite fancy a 5Ghz desktop beast running Amiga OS 4.
Just imagine - Full - motion - video. Less than 0 second shutdowns. Deluxe paint loading quicker than you can thumb a floppy in.
Or you could run ubuntu and have the dash load up in the time-frame your short-term memory works in.
Canonical Seeks $32 Million To Make Ubuntu Smartphone
I will admit that if I see anyone with one of these Ubuntu phones, I'm going to be quite a smidgen jealous!
Canonical Seeks $32 Million To Make Ubuntu Smartphone
The problem is that the 'enthusiasts' who would be contributing to this have just recently had several slaps to the face from Canonical in the form of window buttons, unity, unity & unity. And amazon shopping lenses. 'This is not a democracy' is still rings in the ears. Now Canonical realise that they need the enthusiasts, who's toes they stepped on, to help with this venture into the mobile space.
To be honest, I hope they succeed. I think the concept of a phone that doubles as a desktop could very well be the future of the desktop computer for many people. The hardware also looks very nice (which is a necessity to tempt anyone off android/ios) - I agree with Shuttleworth that mobile screen resolution is getting out of hand, and I'd much rather the colourful OLED displays than the ridiculously high res LCDs (which then look laggy because the graphics can't keep up - see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmywUhu2Pus) and a sapphire glass screen sounds interesting (though will it be as strong as gorilla glass - I doubt it).
I wonder how many of us would have paid up if Nokia had done this with the N950?
EFF Sues NSA, Justice Department, FBI
here's the basic premise in the founding of the enlightenment model US (boiled down):
rights were given to you by your creator, not by your government.
Not true. Every person's right is another person's responsibility.
An anarchy gives no rights to any person (except maybe 'might is right'). Look at the animal world - what rights do animals have? Every right you can think of requires active intervention by a responsible person.
Giving GNOME 3 a GNOME 2 Look
Absolutely. I'm still on Gnome 2, but my plan is to move to MATE. Combined with something like Kupfer - there is little that combines it's productivity and speed.
Giving GNOME 3 a GNOME 2 Look
I don't agree - I've been using cinnamon on one of my laptops, and it's just not a replacement for gnome 2. It may be a replacement for those who used gnome 2 on linux mint, but for those who preferred the stock gnome 2 paradigm, MATE is a much better replacement.
Personally I continue to use gnome 2 on ubuntu 10.04 as my main 'get things done' laptop. We have a couple other laptops currently running cinnamon and unity, and were previously running gnome 3, gnome fallback etc... I think I need to give KDE a whirl. But nothing beats gnome 2 for speed and efficiency yet.
My plan is to upgrade to MATE - I think this will be the future of many desktops. But they will need to move up to GTK 3 (if they haven't done already).
Linux 3.11 Features Fall Into Place With Merge Window
It also had alt-f9 to minimize, alt-f10 to maximize, alt-f7 to move etc. which is really cool and still found on Gnome2/Mate and Xfce at least.
How did I not know this???!
Duncan J Murray has no journal entries.