Beta

Slashdot: News for Nerds

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Lockbox Aims To NSA-Proof the Cloud

Eivind Re:I like the idea (292 comments)

Perhaps. But it's hard to say. Let me construct a scenario, and tell me how you (or anyone!) would notice:

Some ciphers work on blocks of fixed size, and add padding to reach this length if message is shorter. (example: message must be n*16 bytes, if not, pad message with random bytes at the end, until it is.)

Let's say I've backdored a program implementing such a cipher. The backdoor is this: Instead of padding with random bytes, I do this:

1) Take as much of the secret key as will fit in the padding-space. (if 9 bytes of padding is needed, I take the first 9 bytes of the secret key)

2) I encrypt this (using a algorithm that can encrypt any-length messages) using a second hidden backdoor-key.

3) I swap the last n bytes of the ciphertext with this encrypted partial-key.

Result: Message-size is unchanged. Encryption and Decryption works as specified. n-last characters (the padding) looks like random noise, and is supposed to BE random. How do you notice ? How do you detect that the last n characters is really part of the key, encrypted, and NOT random noise ?

(To make this more fun: I left one big flaw in the scheme there IS a easy way to detect that this shit is going on -- but there's also a way to patch that flaw, I'll explain that in the next message if you find the flaw)

about 10 months ago
top

Lockbox Aims To NSA-Proof the Cloud

Eivind Re:I like the idea (292 comments)

That still only works if you trust the hardware and software of that computer. The problem is that if the software you used to encrypt stuff was backdoored, it could leak the key (or fractions thereof) in the ciphertext.

It could do this only sometimes, so no amount of analyzing the ciphertext could convince you that it's honest. Perhaps it only leaks the key if run on a friday the 13th. You simply don't know.

The leaked key, could itself be encrypted so that only the entity planting the backdoor is able to "open" it.

about 10 months ago
top

Lockbox Aims To NSA-Proof the Cloud

Eivind Re: I like the idea (292 comments)

AES256 is entirely public. Furthermore, that's an *algorithm* not a piece of software -- the algorithm has been *implemented* hundreds of times, by hundreds of independent organizations, some implementations are open source, some are closed.

Furthermore, AES256 says precicely *nothing* about how to create a key, what it DOES say is how, given plaintext and key, you create ciphertext, and how, given ciphertext and key, you create plaintext.

Your claim that government could "have their own key" is thus nonsensical -- you can, if you like, create your aes256-keys by tossing a coin.

about 10 months ago
top

The Cognitive Cost of Poverty

Eivind Re:Poor people are poor because they're lazy (459 comments)

Precicely, and statistically plain dumb LUCK is the biggest of those factors. 95% of all Norwegians are wealthier than 95% of all people born in Ghana, yet where you're born is just luck.

The odds of staying in the top quintile if that's where your parents are, is something like 85% (in USA), the odds of climbing to the top quintile if your parents are in the bottom one, are about 11%. In other words, 8 times as good odds if your parents are already wealthy.

That's not to say impossible: 11% still does mean some people make it. But it says it's damn hard, and probably -also- requires luck (in addition to the hard work).

I'm fairly wealthy, me and my wife pull about $200k/year, and sure we've worked for it, but at the same time a LOT of it is just luck: Born in Norway and Germany. Educated parents. Good health. Quick learners. All of these things helped us enormously, yet we have them just because we lucked out in the lottery of life.

If we worked equally hard, but where born in a slum in Nairobi, odds are we'd be living on 2-3 magnitudes less. So while hard work matters, it's pretty arrogant to go around talking as if hard work is the ONLY thing that matters.

about a year ago
top

100% Failure Rate On University of Liberia's Admission Exam

Eivind Re:One more reason that such systems make no sense (308 comments)

Yes. And if Wikipedia didn't get their sources messed up, then between 15% and 30% of the students would not have qualified, if not for their lineage. Meanwhile 75% of americans oppose the practice, which makes perfect sense to me. The American mythical dream is about working hard to achieve your dream - not having positions and educations handed down to people based on who their PARENTS happen to be.

about a year ago
top

100% Failure Rate On University of Liberia's Admission Exam

Eivind Re:One more reason that such systems make no sense (308 comments)

That's an entirely different objections. Are grades actually particularly good at measuring a persons skills in a subject ? The answer, obviously, is "it depends".

It depends on the subject at hand. It depends on what skills you're interested in. And it depends on how the grades are set. All of these vary considerably.

about a year ago
top

100% Failure Rate On University of Liberia's Admission Exam

Eivind Re:One more reason that such systems make no sense (308 comments)

You're just coming from different viewpoints. Universities in Germany are overwhelmingly financed by the state. As such, it's reasonable to ask that they admit students according to a objective, measurable standard as opposed to "whomever they like".

The latter would open the door wide for corruption, it has to be tempting for a private university to admit the children of well-known rich people, for example, both for the PR, and for the potential funding. That's incompatible with a meritocracy.

A anonymously graded entry-exam would be fine. But in my experience, the admission-process to many private universities is not really anonymous, and it seems to me the scope for corruption and basically choosing the richest kid rather than the best-qualified one, is high. (plenty of mediocre sports-stars seems to get in no problem, for example)

That's fine if you see university as a private institution that exists to do whatever it wants to do, including maximize profit. It's more of a problem if your univiersities are publicly funded and exist in order to educate students, prioritizing the best-qualified ones.

about a year ago
top

100% Failure Rate On University of Liberia's Admission Exam

Eivind Re:One more reason that such systems make no sense (308 comments)

Agreed. It's similar in Norway, but with the caveat that certain studies weigh the different grades differently.

Most studies just rank students based on average grades, with a bonus for those who've taken more than the required minimum of advanced courses. But a few educations prioritize certain grades higher.

For example, if you apply to become a engineer, they'll consider your grades in math and physics more important than your grades in history and gymnastics.

But they still all computer your score from the exist-exams in secondary school, so there's no entry-exams required.

about a year ago
top

100% Failure Rate On University of Liberia's Admission Exam

Eivind Re:One more reason that such systems make no sense (308 comments)

Indeed. Why have grades in secondary school at all ? There's basically two points to it. One is to give the students feedback on their performance. The other is to make it possible to (roughly!) sort students based on skills for higher education.

If the grades can't be used for the second purpose, you might aswell drop them entirely, and instead just give the student a summary of his weak and strong sides.

about a year ago
top

Dispatch From the Future: Uber To Purchase 2,500 Driverless Cars From Google

Eivind Re:worst idea since flying cars (282 comments)

That's just silly. Human drivers kill people all the time. What matters is relative safety. If a autonomous car is demonstrably safer than a average human driver it makes zero sense to allow the latter while outlawing the former.

about a year ago
top

Single Developer Responsible For Over 47k Apps In BlackBerry World

Eivind Re:heh (176 comments)

That's the thing though, I HIGHLY doubt they've got 60% of the corporate mobile email phone market. Unless you define that market in a so contrived way that most people who have a corporate-bought phone that's primarily used for reading email on the go, are not included.

Not a single one of the 10 biggest corporations where I'm at even offers blackberry as an option. They've all either standardised on Iphones or some Android-model, or they give employees a choice between 2-3 models, none of which are made by RIM.

about a year ago
top

Don't Fly During Ramadan

Eivind Re:Freedom to travel (1233 comments)

Absolutely. By going away from home, you do not only learn new stuff about the place you're going, you also learn new stuff about your home. A lot of things just aren't VISIBLE if they've been that way every day of your life, you just don't notice, and tend not to consider that alternatives exist.

I learnt a whole lot about my home-country (Norway) while living abroad for 4 years. Things that are hard to notice, when one country is all you *really* know. And no, watching movies or reading books or whatever is not at all the same as actually changing your location.

about a year ago
top

Single Developer Responsible For Over 47k Apps In BlackBerry World

Eivind Re:heh (176 comments)

Not in number-of-units-sold, no. But in brainshare ? Seriously -- at this point blackberries are "legacy", a few folks use them because that's what they're used to or that's what their bussiness is adapted to, but pretty much zero -new- users come in.

about a year ago
top

Can a Japanese AI Get Into University?

Eivind Re:Dragon Zakura (91 comments)

Of course ! The simpler a sentence is, and the smaller a vocabulary you use, the more easy it is to understand.

So if the assignment is: "Write a sentence that is as easy to understand as possible", then something like "I am a boy" should score top grades. It's among the simplest sentences you can write, and it uses only words that tend to be taught in the first couple weeks of english-class.

If you're trying to set a grade for how much english a person has learnt after several years of schooling, then not so much. Then they should actually demonstrate that they understand and can use both a larger vocabulary, and more grammar and syntax. (on a high level, you'd also want to get idioms and nuances right)

about a year ago
top

Can a Japanese AI Get Into University?

Eivind Re:Dragon Zakura (91 comments)

That I've experienced to. It's a *really* stupid way to grade someones language-skills, but it's an easy way to do it, just count the mistakes, so it's basically about caring more about ease of grading than whether grades are meaningful or not.

"My name is Eivind. I am a boy. I come from Norway. Norway is in Europe. Norway is cold." should *never* score higher than:

"I'm called Eivind and come from Norway, it's a coldish place over in Europe, thoug not as cold as some folks assume."

Yeah, the latter has more mistakes. But despite this it demonstrates far higher skills in english. Failing slightly at constructing a complicated sentence should be preferable to constructing a entry-level sentence perfectly.

about a year ago
top

What's Causing the Rise In Obesity? Everything.

Eivind Re:Failure to even Attempt to process the article. (926 comments)

That's not surprising. First, at 30 kcal/day, even if burn-rate was *entirely* contant, it'd take 100 days to drop a single pound. Even in a lab, controlling the diet of a person to within 1% margin over more than 3 months is close-to-impossible.

Secondly, your metabolism ain't *that* stable, nor is your level of physical activity. You burn 50-100 kcals a day just by fidgeting, it's hardly possible to accurately measure precicely how much people fidget over months.

A lot of other factors ranging from daylight-hours to temperature to how many days you where at work over those 3 months also influence your energy burn-rate.

about a year ago
top

Single Developer Responsible For Over 47k Apps In BlackBerry World

Eivind Re:heh (176 comments)

They are. They had 75% of the smartphone-market. Now they've got like 3% of the smartphone market.

Since that's a pretty big market, 3% is still plenty of devices sold, but it's hardly possible to have a steeper decline in marketshare than they've had.

about a year ago
top

What's Causing the Rise In Obesity? Everything.

Eivind Re:Failure to even Attempt to process the article. (926 comments)

I never claimed everyone will react the same way to the same stimuli, certainly we're different. Two people may both smoke, but only one of them gets cancer. Two might both overeat sugar, but only one gets diabetes.

about a year ago
top

Report: By 2035, Nearly 100 Million Self-Driving Cars Will Be Sold Per Year

Eivind Re:Fuel economy (325 comments)

The post I responded to said "why would you assume faster is better?"

I'd assume that the capability of going faster, is better because in the real world, that's how it is. Even if you have a higher speed-limit and can go faster, it's not worth it to do so all the time, and I explicitly said this in my answer: *sometimes* going faster is better.

about a year ago
top

What's Causing the Rise In Obesity? Everything.

Eivind Re:Failure to even Attempt to process the article. (926 comments)

Certainly, in principle that's entirely true. In practice though, our bodies have evolved to try *really* hard to extract as much energy as possible from the food we digest. To our detriment today, eating 500 kcals/day too much wouldn't matter if the body would just take "what it needs" and poop the rest.

There's no indication that consuming more calories will cause your body to digest significantly fewer of them. But it is true, like you write, that on very low calorie diets, your metabolism and thus energy-consumption will tend to fall. So you might eat 1000 kcal less, but your metabolism slows by 300 kcal, so your weight-loss is slower than expected.

about a year ago

Submissions

Eivind hasn't submitted any stories.

Journals

Eivind has no journal entries.

Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...