Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!



GPL To Be Tested by Mattel?

HRPuffNStuff GPL Does Not Apply ... (276 comments)

... if cphack includes illegally obtained code. You can't license code that you don't own.

Of course that is the essential issue -- is reverse engineering a violation of the original code license?

I was surprised that the authors of cphack bowed out, especially right on the tails of the ACLU. I'd love to see the ACLU spearhead a case that establishes once and for all that reverse engineering code can constitute a 'fair use' which is inherent to the right to own property, and no amount of license mubo-jumbo can make it go away.

more than 14 years ago


HRPuffNStuff hasn't submitted any stories.


HRPuffNStuff has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?