×

Announcing: Slashdot Deals - Explore geek apps, games, gadgets and more. (what is this?)

Thank you!

We are sorry to see you leave - Beta is different and we value the time you took to try it out. Before you decide to go, please take a look at some value-adds for Beta and learn more about it. Thank you for reading Slashdot, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Single Group Dominates Second Round of Anti Net-Neutrality Comment Submissions

Karmashock Re:Conservatives mostly don't like the involvement (160 comments)

and third time's the charm...

"There's no doubt that there are some folks who just really dislike me because they don't like the idea of a black President," Obama said.

1 hour ago
top

Single Group Dominates Second Round of Anti Net-Neutrality Comment Submissions

Karmashock Re:Conservatives mostly don't like the involvement (160 comments)

Again, you're exaggerating the disruption and it isn't helping your argument.

There is plenty of room for fiber to be run on the poles. And in any area where more people want to run fiber then there is space on the poles, then upgrade to a conduit system.

Until that happens, you can just bid the space on the poll out the same way you bid anything else out. How does the sandwich shop guy get commercial space in the mall? He contacts the land lord and inquires as to the price of a lease.

Do the same thing with the polls and the conduits. Lease the space out.

When the polls have hit maximum occupancy... then you say "sorry, that poll can't handle anyone else."

But at the same time, your city is now getting extra money because of all those poll lease fees it is getting. And that money can be put to digging a conduit system under the streets with greater capacity.

None of this is rocket science. We'd still be in the trees or whatever if we gave up as easily as you suggest we give up.

2 hours ago
top

Single Group Dominates Second Round of Anti Net-Neutrality Comment Submissions

Karmashock Re:Conservatives mostly don't like the involvement (160 comments)

Sorry if that quote from the new yorker is a bit garbled. they were using some odd characters.

This should be sanitized:

âoeThereâ(TM)s no doubt that thereâ(TM)s some folks who just really dislike me because they donâ(TM)t like the idea of a black President,â Obama said.

2 hours ago
top

Single Group Dominates Second Round of Anti Net-Neutrality Comment Submissions

Karmashock Re:Conservatives mostly don't like the involvement (160 comments)

Why is it that I'm the only person that knows how to use google?

Like... seriously. I typed this into google:
obama says race

And I got this:
âoeThereâ(TM)s no doubt that thereâ(TM)s some folks who just really dislike me because they donâ(TM)t like the idea of a black President,â Obama said.

http://www.newyorker.com/magaz...

The implication from the article is that obama's poll numbers are falling because he's black. Which is weird because the demographics of the country didn't shift that much during his administration. Which means somehow when white people vote for Obama it just people voting their conscience. But when they vote against him the only explanation is racism.

I can also cite Eric Holder making the same claim... and of course endless numbers of leftwing pundits which have been trying to sell this narrative for years.

2 hours ago
top

Linking Drought and Climate Change: Difficult To Do

Karmashock Re:It is only difficult when fallacious (184 comments)

In regards to CO2 being opaque to given spectrums of electro magnetic radiation... I don't think anyone disputes that. Even the most hardcore denialist couldn't really do that I would expect.

Everything... literally everything is opaque to certain spectrums of electro magnetic radiation.

Pointing out that CO2 is just like everything else in the universe... isn't really blowing my socks off here.

As to the scientist that inspired Gore, we're talking about the scientist that actually started the modern obsession with AGW. The previous scientists obviously didn't spark the fire. He's more significant to this discussion then the previous people. Especially since the claims you're making from the previous scientists are not in contention.

As to the IPCC, a significant amount of their research was traced back to WWF power point presentations. I believe one of the funnier examples was a claim about the Himalayas that came from a climbing magazine. You're not fooling anyone with this nonsense.

As to the politicization, hmmm... Al Gore. Is he a right wing or left wing politician? Okay... so lets not play the "you did it first" game because you already lost that one.

As to the japanese, here is one of the links:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

Again, if you step outside the echo chamber you'll find things change rather radically.

The Russians, the Chinese, the Japanese, and the Indians are skeptical or dismissive.

What you have left is a network of cross linked peer reviewed papers that all go through two choke points. One in the US and one in the UK. Everything is filtering through a very small selection of scientists.

We have gotten revolts throughout US meteorology programs mostly because climate scientists don't know how weather patterns work and they keep saying things that meteorologists know to be wrong.

And we've gotten revolts through the mathematics departments because the way data is handled is unsupportable.

Do you want me to throw lists of prominent meteorologists at you that have said the climate models are horseshit?

Would you like me to throw some mathematicians at you that say "this is not how you use statistics."

Because I can.

As to the output of models being good. There is no possible way they could be good since they've failed to predict anything with any accuracy under any falsifiable circumstances. It is literally impossible for them to be doing anything well scientifically until they are subjected to falsifiable tests. I thought you were done defending these models anyway? You said that in your first paragraph and then went on to try and defend the models using anything but science.

Look, think of any other field of science that has models and think about how easy it would be to prove to me that the models in that field are valid. Super easy. Why? Because they're valid and there is evidence of that.

In climate science you don't have any evidence of successful prediction or accurate modeling under falsifiable conditions. None.

That is death. That is your argument clutching its chest, its face racked in pain, and hitting the flour while people call the paramedics.

Will your argument survive? Will the paramedics get here in time? We shall see. Frankly, I think your case is a goner.

2 hours ago
top

Verizon "End-to-End" Encrypted Calling Includes Law Enforcement Backdoor

Karmashock Re:This should be free (158 comments)

Verification of identity is self evident if only the source and destination can decode a message. A man in the middle attack gets garbage if they don't have the key.

The only way a man in the middle attack works in this system is if you're passing keys back and forth and the man in the middle intercepts the key.

There are a variety of means of avoiding that besides using a trusted third party. After all, how do you know that the trusted third party isn't compromised?

They are themselves verified by having some key or other but whatever that is tends to be pretty easy to find out if you're determined. Which means it isn't a credible defense against a serious attacker. Against a casual attacker... sure.

How then does one avoid man in the middle attacks? Do not transmit handshake keys.

For example, let us say I am logging into my bank. My bank might ask me to type in some combination of account number, birth date, street address, phone number, into a box that generates a key. The bank knows what key will be generated because the algorithm is not secret. But the information the bank asked you to input as the key is something a man in the middle system shouldn't know. By typing that in or possibly using some sort of complicated captcha, you can generate a handshake key that an automated system without access to the bank's database won't be able to generate.

That key can then be used to exchange stronger encryption keys.

Beyond this, we should think more deeply about saving/storing BIG complicated encryption keys on devices used to do certain things. Say your tablet or pc or whatever. Why not store a 2 megabyte key? Beats the hell out of a 512 bit key. Possibly overkill, but a key of that size is going to be proportionally harder to crack because it won't repeat as often. The bigger the key the harder to crack.

And a key that equals the number of bits transmitted is literally impossible to crack... by anything... ever.

9 hours ago
top

New AP Course, "Computer Science Principles," Aims To Make CS More Accessible

Karmashock Gender specific courses are wrong... (191 comments)

... unless we segrigate the genders again which I think might be reasonable from grade school to highschool.

The hormones and learning patterns are different enough that it is problematic to have a one size fits all education program for both.

The boys operate under different rules especially at that age. Separate them out and it could improve all sorts of things. I think most of the experiments with sexually segregated education have shown dramatically improved educational performance. So... no reason not to do it really.

11 hours ago
top

Sony Leaks Reveal Hollywood Is Trying To Break DNS

Karmashock DNS is replacable (348 comments)

All they're going to be able to do is attack US DNS servers. But I can point my router at any DNS server in the world.

What is more, the entire DNS system can be bypassed with sufficiently detailed host files.

It sounds absurd but consider how cheap storage is these days? I could maintain a pretty comprehensive private DNS list on my own systems without burning that much HD space. What are we talking about here? Maybe a couple gigabytes? Map that into a fast database and you could literally point your computer to look up DNS entries locally.

Or if you prefer you could just have it look up blocked sites locally. Either way, the DNS pitch is counter productive. They're just going to encourage pirates to learn how to play with DNS.

11 hours ago
top

In Breakthrough, US and Cuba To Resume Diplomatic Relations

Karmashock Re:About Fucking Time (324 comments)

Only reason it took this long is that the last few times castro caused diplomatic incidents.

12 hours ago
top

Single Group Dominates Second Round of Anti Net-Neutrality Comment Submissions

Karmashock Re:Conservatives mostly don't like the involvement (160 comments)

I'd love to see Obama do that... the shock of all the republicans suddenly giving him everything he wants would be pretty priceless.

Republicans aren't opposing obama because he is obama... they are opposing him because they do not like his policies.

Suggesting otherwise ignores that republican policies on these matters haven't changed remarkably in decades which is long before Obama was even alive much less in politics.

12 hours ago
top

Single Group Dominates Second Round of Anti Net-Neutrality Comment Submissions

Karmashock Re:Conservatives mostly don't like the involvement (160 comments)

I'm afraid that is just the cognitive dissonce talking.

Obama likes to say that people only disagree with him because he's black or something equally offensive. But if anyone else were in his position doing what he's doing then the same political factions would be opposing him.

Republicans for example has been opposing moves like Obamacare for well over 60 years. Yet Obama suggests that republicans are only taking this position out of racism. It is intellectually unsupportable.

The same is true of the FCC actions.

12 hours ago
top

Single Group Dominates Second Round of Anti Net-Neutrality Comment Submissions

Karmashock Re:Conservatives mostly don't like the involvement (160 comments)

Who said anything about redoing the cabling every time you change providers you complete fucking retard? That is a CFR by the way. :D

The only cabling that would need to be redone would be at your house where in one cable was unplugged and another was plugged in instead. OH NOES! It might take all of 10 minutes! RUN AND HIDE!!! THE HUMANITY!!! AAAAHHHH!!!

Seriously though... what the fuck do you think you're talking about. If I have a bundle of cables going through a street conduit or over on a pole... and I need to switch from one cable to another... why are you presuming any of this would be hard, time consuming, or messy?

I'll give a simple example of an office building. There is a utility room in most office buildings where most of these things are routed. Often they'll have more then one but lets just go with a simple example of one utility room. In that room, you have communications and power lines coming into the room and then those have to be routed to specific rooms or even jacks. All of this is labeled on the panel. Changing from one provider to another would require moving some of these wires around. Which is precisely what they do already when you add a service or change a service. Nothing here is really changing from a wiring perspective.

Going through the streets, you have a similar situation. ISPs already play with the cable as it is... they'll continue to do that. It doesn't need to be relaid every time you change service. I never implied that, never suggested that, and that is not my argument.

12 hours ago
top

Single Group Dominates Second Round of Anti Net-Neutrality Comment Submissions

Karmashock Re:Conservatives mostly don't like the involvement (160 comments)

Baseless insults by anonymous cowards... You wound me, sir.

If you presume to judge me, then actually form a falsifiable argument and do me the small courtesy of using your real FAKE name. I'm not asking for your actual name on your driver's license. But your handle on this board would be the least you can offer given I am offering that myself.

12 hours ago
top

Single Group Dominates Second Round of Anti Net-Neutrality Comment Submissions

Karmashock Re:Conservatives mostly don't like the involvement (160 comments)

As to regulation being required for competition... yes, but the regulation required is that companies do not literally commit acts of violence, contracts are honored, and advertizing is reasonably faithful to the actual product.

Which is something we have for every company already.

The issue with ISPs is not lack of regulation but too much regulation. Again, at the local level. It is almost impossible to lay last mile cable.

That is the issue.

Make that easy from a regulatory stand point and this issue will go away.

You cannot justify regulation because we have too much regulation.

That just creates a feedback loop of stupidity.

12 hours ago
top

Single Group Dominates Second Round of Anti Net-Neutrality Comment Submissions

Karmashock Re:Conservatives mostly don't like the involvement (160 comments)

Pointing out that the government has regulations on everything is not evidence that those regulations are required.

12 hours ago
top

Linking Drought and Climate Change: Difficult To Do

Karmashock Re:It is only difficult when fallacious (184 comments)

Actually, you're missing the point.

What the scientists are saying is that the droughts they're seeing do not appear to be unusual. They appear to be totally normal, predictable, and unmodified weather patterns.

If you want to blame these droughts on AGW then you might as well blame summer on AGW and winter on global cooling.

You cannot blame such weather patterns on AGW while retaining credibility. Choose.

Do you want to blame them on that or retain credibility?

Up to you.

12 hours ago
top

The Shale Boom Won't Stop Climate Change; It Could Make It Worse

Karmashock Re:This whole issue is like watching... (380 comments)

Think of an ecology... take energy or nutrition out of that ecology... now lets say you're eating 30 to 50 percent of all energy and nutrition in that ecology.

Are you going to imply that that has no impact on the populations and growth trends in that ecology? Come now.

You take money out of the system and you took money out of the system.

It is the folly of the Marxists to think they can rob peter to pay paul without pissing off peter.

You should really know better by now.

12 hours ago
top

Economists Say Newest AI Technology Destroys More Jobs Than It Creates

Karmashock Re:This silly person has no idea what will happen. (561 comments)

The major benefits to the 1 percent at the expense of everyone else is largely due to no one but the 1 percent having capital investment in the system.

Going forward, it should be if anything easier for common people to have capital investment in the system because the system is going to decentralize.

Think of the advantage of having massive cheap automation. Do I need to have a big factory if I can pack my workers in boxes? No. I can have micro factories that are closer to consumers or resources because my manufacturing doesn't need to be near large concentrations of labor.

And if my factories are smaller then they become closer to what small and medium sized businesses could afford.

Imagine fully automated car making robots. Big 3d printers with assembly capability. Now imagine that because these printers can print most of their own parts that all this crap is relatively cheap.

Your job of the future might be owning your own car company that makes 10 or 20 cars a year.

Just a wild example of something that might happen. I can't see the future any more clearly then the fool that wrote the article.

The point is that people are assuming the industrial models we have today will remain the same. Why would they?

Think about what massive automation will do to all these industries? Suddenly a big factory can base itself in an isolated part of the country because it only needs a tiny fraction of the labor. And if it can, then it should because the land costs etc are lower out there. And if the labor really ceases to be an issue then the economies of scale change. Most economies are scale are based on labor density. If labor isn't relevant then you don't need to build densely and really since density has problems you shouldn't be dense.

12 hours ago

Submissions

Karmashock hasn't submitted any stories.

Journals

Karmashock has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?