Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

3-D Printed Skull Successfully Implanted In Woman

Lairdykinsmcgee Re:Its transparent.... (132 comments)

Sunburnt brain... Now that's a super villain origin story if I ever heard one.

about 6 months ago
top

Creationists Demand Equal Airtime With 'Cosmos'

Lairdykinsmcgee Re:Two Minutes Hate (667 comments)

It's not hate, it's recoil. Time and time again, Creationism seeks to undermine legitimate scientific thought in order to shout its psychobabble at us and expect us to call it 'legitimate science.' Those who recoil aren't doing it out of hate or disgust, but well-founded fear-- the fear of what will happen when religious ignorance dresses up as science for Halloween and people actually take it seriously. It's not just ignorant though; it's irresponsible, because it affects public policy. Texas representative Joe Barton SERIOUSLY said that the 'great flood' from the Bible was evidence of climate change not being influenced by human activity. These are the ideas that are truly terrifying because they poison people's minds and any responsible scientific mind would do everything it could to assist in debunking these ridiculous ideas. Again-- not hate, recoil-- recoil out of fear on behalf of the whole of society.

about 6 months ago
top

Apple Demands $40 Per Samsung Phone For 5 Software Patents

Lairdykinsmcgee They are obligated to behave this way? (406 comments)

Some time ago, someone commenting on yet another patent conflict between Apple and Samsung suggested that Apple was obligated to defend its patents for fear of losing them. My understanding of this premise is that if a company owns a patent on some technology and does not defend itself against any potential forms of patent infringement, then that company could potentially lose that patent. Under these conditions, a company would be given incentive to fight any and all things that even resemble patent infringement just as a way to insure that they will never lose their patents. Is there any legitimacy to this claim? If so, this would simply say that patent law needed to change (which it surely does regardless), not that Apple's behavior needs to change.

about 6 months ago
top

Delayed Fatherhood May Be Linked To Certain Congenital and Mental Disorders

Lairdykinsmcgee Re:There are also significant risks to old mothers (192 comments)

I am a 24 years old male and in a serious relationship with someone who is 38 (female). Our situation is, of course, rife with stigma and expected impracticalities, but one of the larger ones we have faced is the dilemma of at some point having a child. We are both aware of the extensive research done on maternal age in relation to congenital problems and disorders, but we were always under the assumption that paternal age doesn't present too much risk. Obviously, my being young does not exactly 'decrease' the risk of the development of congenital disorders, but certainly it seems to not 'increase' that risk. Looking forward, it's a precarious and frightening decision for us to make for a number of reason, the risks involved with maternal age certainly being one of them.

about 6 months ago
top

Are You a Competent Cyborg?

Lairdykinsmcgee The Definition of 'Human.' (101 comments)

An important element to this conversation is what we do and do not consider to make us human. There are plenty of people walking around with pacemakers, prosthetic limbs, and metal in their skeletal structures. We don't question their humanity, and yet by definition they are 'cyborg.' If I have a contact lens, or hell a surgically implanted visual augmentation system, will my humanity come into question? Will it change who I am? If I walk around with a device implanted in my stomach that tells me how many calories I've consumed and the nutritional breakdown of those calories, will I no longer me human? The definitions of 'cyborg, trans-humanism, post-humanism' aren't the only things at stake when we talk about this. The definition of 'human' is also at stake. Changes in technology have always been incremental enough for human beings to perceive them, adapt to them, and become comfortable with them. It might be, before we notice it, that we will have adjusted to content of 'cyborg' before e adjust to the term 'cyborg.'

about 7 months ago
top

Oldest Known Star In the Universe Discovered

Lairdykinsmcgee The creationists! (141 comments)

Finally, we have proof that the creationists are wrong! Alert Mr. Ham!

about 7 months ago
top

Startup Out of MIT Promises Digital Afterlife — Just Hand Over Your Data

Lairdykinsmcgee Turing Test. (241 comments)

While I find the concept of achieving eternal life for the AI version of myself rather... well, stupid. I do think this startup starts up an interesting version of the Turing Test. I would be curious to see what the version of me they could create would seem like, and whether or not either strangers or family/friends could distinguish between the 'real me' and the 'AI me.'

about 8 months ago
top

25,000-Drive Study Gives Insight On How Long Hard Drives Actually Last

Lairdykinsmcgee Obligatory... (277 comments)

Long... Hard... How long can it last? That's what she said, that's what she said, that's what she said!

about 10 months ago
top

Twitter-Based Study Figures Out Saddest Spots In New York City

Lairdykinsmcgee Not Tweeting. (57 comments)

The saddest parts of New York City are not where people who own mobile devices and laptops convene. The saddest parts of New York City are where people are wearing trash bags, begging for food and shelter... They are not begging for attention by Tweeting their pretentious frivolity.

about a year ago
top

Former Director of the ISS Division At NASA Talks About Science Behind 'Elysium'

Lairdykinsmcgee 5.4 Trillion Dollars. (366 comments)

According to Wiki, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbes_list_of_billionaires, the 1,426 billionaires in 2013 have a combined net worth of $5.4 trillion. So those people could afford to build 6 of these structures and an additional one about half its size (assuming the cost to size ratio is linear).

about a year ago
top

GMO Oranges? Altering a Fruit's DNA To Save It

Lairdykinsmcgee GMO is scary... for now. (358 comments)

Genetic modification of crops in a formal sense scares people for now. But, this is a young technology, and current genetic modifications are made, to a certain extent, blindly. While these modifications have known effects, they are also bound or at least potentially bound to have unknown effects as well. The reason, however, that these do not scare me so much is that this technology will only progress, and we will only gain a better understanding of how these modifications are affecting our crops. Hopefully, we can make decent decisions ab out regulating this in the mean time, but I think it won't be terribly long before we can make genetic modifications that are solely safe and hopefully better for consumers. In terms of the historical progression of agriculture, there has never been a time in human history that we have NOT modified the genes of our crops; only, we have done this through controlled abuse of the relatively quick and convenient evolution of crops given their short lifespan (new generations are quick to rise). Barely anything we eat today would be naturally occurring in actual nature. We designed these things to occur through comparatively (to GMO) crude methods. Bigger watermelons, redder strawberries, beefier wheat, or what have you. GMO could be the next step in this progression of healthy and nutritious foods IF done correctly. All the same, with knuckle-heads controlling the direction of GMO, it could have vastly different and unknown consequences. I'm simultaneously nervous and interested to see where it goes with a little more time.

about a year ago
top

Rice Professor Predicts Humans Out of Work In 30 Years

Lairdykinsmcgee Re:Professor Moron! (808 comments)

I think you've misinterpreted this notion of a more robotic labor force as some sort of idealism, altruism, prosperity, instead of simple economics. He seems to want to say that robot labor will be cheaper than human labor; and here, your thesis is correct. Humans very often seem to value short term gain over long term gain, and more importantly personal gain over utilitarian gain. If a manufacturing company recognizes that it can make a bundle of profit off of laying off 90% of its human workforce in order to 'employ' machines, it very well might ignore the fact that this will put a lot of human beings out of work. This already occurs in outsourcing human labor in one country to cheaper human labor in another country.

This is not necessarily a Utopian idea to say that the undeniable rise in machine intelligence could possibly result in an incurable rise in human unemployment. There won't necessarily always be something for uneducated, unskilled workers to do in order to scrape by and make a living. We see more and more that higher qualifications are typically required for not so difficult work. College education instead of high school education is becoming a norm these days; how long until one must receive a master's degree in order to be considered economically competitive? This isn't to say that I know for sure that machine intelligence will entirely make obsolete human labor, but it seems rather plausible that if there is a cheaper (more consistent, safer) alternative to human labor, then companies that are admittedly not altruistic entities will not hesitate to make changes that will negatively affect the humans that depend on them for employment.

The question then would become, yes, what will the world look like at that point? What if we really do see consistent 25% unemployment? How do we support those people who could not help being replaced? Will we be expected to and will we even desire to rise to that new challenge? Will it be necessary, or will abundance of resources support that burden? ... What happens if unemployment continues to rise even higher than that?

I'm not sure its moronic to ask these questions in a serious and critical way. In fact, I think there is every reason to. Worst case scenario, we're wrong. Best case scenario, we've had thoughtful discussion on a particularly meaningful and potent topic in development of human economics and the capitalistic concept of earning one's keep.

about a year ago
top

Deloitte: Use a Longer Password In 2013. Seriously.

Lairdykinsmcgee A new model for passwords? (538 comments)

I can admit immediately that I know incredibly little about this subject. So, I'm wondering if the cure for this issue is not necessarily longer passwords, but a different style of passwords? Ignoring the shear inconvenience of a model like any of the following, would they indeed solve the problem? 1) Require captcha every time we enter a password? 2) Include a captcha style word displayed on the page that is tacked on to the end of your personal password? (If my password is 'dogs1337,' and the captcha is 'gelmug,' the new password would simply be 'dogs1337gelmug') 3) Require two distinct 8+ character passwords? Any of the above would at least allow for a significant increase in possible password combinations if all we are worried about is the ability to brute force 8 character passwords. But, I suspect that might not be the only worry?

about a year and a half ago
top

Is the Era of Groundbreaking Science Over?

Lairdykinsmcgee Neuroscience anyone? (470 comments)

Physics has gotten a lot of attention in response to this question, but what about Neuroscience? As a field of science, the study of the human brain really only picked up speed about 100 years ago. And, that was more so in the hands of neuro-philosophy and psychology (Freud, Bergson, etc). Neuroscience only very recently began looking like what it does today; we have only just touched the surface of answering meaningful questions about consciousness, memory, thought, pattern recognition, emotion, perception. We have only just begun to realistically pose these questions in the context of science, as opposed to a context of philosophy of the mind. We may even find, once our understanding of our brains progresses, that we weren't even asking the right questions about these subjects to begin with. The one consistency about humanity's relationship with any field of science throughout history has been that, over and over again, we think we have figured mostly everything out and all that's left is the grunt work. But every time we reach that conclusion, the next generation of scientific progression flips it on its head. Humanity as a collection of thinks will always believe it knows more than it doesn't know and it will always be sheepishly mistaken. It may be the case that we are capable of answering most of the questions we know to ask (though I doubt this as well), but the bigger truth is that we haven't yet thought to ask the questions most worth asking.

about a year and a half ago
top

Drug Turns Immune System Against All Tumor Types

Lairdykinsmcgee Immortal Mice? (330 comments)

http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/11/29/0410239/aging-reversed-in-mice Not so long ago, Slashdot saw this story on how scientists were able to prevent the splicing of telomeres from chromosomes in mice in order to allow not only prevention of aging, but de-aging. The only problem was that these mice inevitably died from becoming riddled with cancerous tumors. So now that this development has occurred, are we one step closer to having mice that cannot die of natural causes?

more than 2 years ago
top

Vatican Attack Provides Insight Into Anonymous

Lairdykinsmcgee Re:Geniuses? (355 comments)

I can't speak to whether or not Anonymous utilizes sophisticated hacking tactics, because I honestly don't know. I can say, however, that if they really are as simplistic as you want to say they are, then that suggests a real problem for the security of some rather important and powerful organizations/corporations. They have supposedly meddled with Bank of America, Sony, NATO, the CIA? If the security of these groups is flimsy enough to be upset by some simple guess work and child-like pranks, what does that really say? Again, I don't know enough about it to give an opinion. It just seems to me that if they really are responsible for the things they claim to be, then it is probably likely that they have some clue as to what they're doing.

more than 2 years ago
top

Xbox 720 Might Reject Used Games

Lairdykinsmcgee Red ring of death? (543 comments)

Okay, so what happens to all of the games I bought when my 720 inevitably red rings? Do I get to buy all of those games over?

more than 2 years ago
top

EU Scientists Working On Laser To Rip a Hole In Spacetime

Lairdykinsmcgee Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd (575 comments)

Sounds like someone shot 10 high powered lasers -- delivering 200 petawatts of power for less than a trillionth of a second, and ripping open space time -- into your fruit loops.

more than 2 years ago

Submissions

Lairdykinsmcgee hasn't submitted any stories.

Journals

Lairdykinsmcgee has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>