Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!



AMD Athlon 64 FX-57 Review

Mold Re:Clockrate differences... (167 comments)

It's a bit more complicated than that, I'm afraid.

For example, the number of pipelines is important. For example, Athlons have nine (or did at one point, I haven't looked at this one specifically). 3 x86 decoders, 3 fp, and 3 int. A P4 has six. 1 x86 decoder, 2 fp, and 3 int.

What that means, is that an Athlon performs ~9 operations per cycle, or 9 * 2.8 Ghz = ~25.2 billion instructions per second, and the intel would do 6 * 3.8Ghz = ~22.8. Those are very, very rough estimates.

Of course, those numbers actually depend on what instructions are actually sent (if you send all integer instructions, the P4 would come out ahead, etc.)

There's more too. The amount of cache effects how often the pipes are used (more cache, less pipe usage, is less waiting, which is faster). The size of the pipes is important (you may be doing more per cycle, but the cycles take longer). How well they can estimate future instructions, etc. Lots and lots of other things too.

So basically, the Ghz of the processor doesn't mean a whole lot. There's a lot more to take into consideration.

more than 9 years ago


Mold hasn't submitted any stories.


Mold has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?