Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!



Comcast Training Materials Leaked

Orgasmatron Very normal (246 comments)

And has been for decades. Every customer contact is a sales opportunity. EVERY contact.

After the dot com bust (the first one), I had bills to pay, so I ended up in a call center for the local cable company. It wasn't quite the low point of my life, but it was in the running.

The call center was brand new, and the high speed data side was briefly allowed to operate normally, but soon company politics pushed out the (technical) director, and replaced him with a MBA (and EEOC-bingo winner).

We were all trained to sell, instructed to sell on every call, and evaluated on selling. This was policy from day one, but widely ignored in my department until the MBA took over.

I earned a reputation for solving problems. Incompetent or uncaring employees would fail to fix things over and over again, pissing off customers. After months of continuing problems, they would call to yell. Usually, they'd end up getting more excuses and empty promises. Sometimes they'd get me (or one of a handful of other fixers).

I'd mute my microphone until they were done venting, then I'd figure out what the hell was wrong, and get it fixed, often with a generous service credit to appease them for the months that we'd dicked them around.

Over a few months, I solved hundreds of problems (some going back for many months or years), probably prevented at least a couple of suicides (monopoly, it was us or nothing) and maybe a mass shooting or two (yes, some of them really were that angry).

One thing I know for sure is that none of those problem calls wanted a fucking sales pitch. "Mr. Smith, now that I've fixed the problem that has prevented you from using the service that you've been paying for these last six months, and you've put your guns away, can I upsell you into a premium package?" Yeah, right. Maybe they'd be interested in an upgrade in a few months, after we'd re-established a bit of trust, but not right away.

One of my randomly selected evaluation calls happened to be one of my problem calls. The recording followed the call through our system, so it started with 20 minutes of him yelling at one of the sales girls, then her calling me in tears asking to transfer the call, then him yelling at me, then me figuring out the problem and fixing it, then him thanking me, almost in tears himself.

I had an awesome score on that call, but still failed the review because selling was mandatory. I told my supervisor that he'd better screen my review calls from then on because I had no intention of following the policy. He could either run interference for me and keep me around until one of my interviews panned out, or he could write me up for my second and third strikes as they came up.

I was gone before my next review came up, so I have no idea what he decided.

I kept in touch with some friends, and still lived in their service area. The call center went downhill from there. They switched to a voice attendant, so even the people that were happy when they dialed their phones were pissed off by the time they managed to talk to a human. I know I always was. (At first they had a backdoor, swearing three times would get you to a human quickly, but word got out and they disabled that feature.)

Moving to a non-monopoly town (three[!] fiber lines in my yard! 75 meg up/down for cheap!) was the wisest move of my internet life.

2 days ago

Massachusetts SWAT Teams Claim They're Private Corporations, Immune To Oversight

Orgasmatron They might be right (534 comments)

I work for local government (in a different state). A number of cities and counties around the state have banded together to manage custom software projects, etc, using a legal device known as a "Joint Powers Agreement".

The JPA creates a legal entity, much the same way that a contract creates a trust. This entity is essentially a delegation of authority from the various local government entities that constitute it, so it has some strange properties. For example, it has bank accounts, employs staff, rents an office, etc, but does not file tax returns.

It also, as far as our lawyers can tell, is exempt from all data practices laws. This isn't the end run you might seem to think. If a data request comes in to the entity, the staff there tells them to contact the relevant member entity. The requestor can then ask me (for example), and I am obligated to collect the data from my systems, and from the organization.

Basically, the legal reasoning is that the entity doesn't own anything, it merely possesses things on the behalf of the member entities. This is also why it doesn't file tax returns.

I don't know the legal situation in Massachusetts, but these are principles that derive from western jurisprudence in general, rather than from the laws of my state, so I suspect it is pretty similar. No idea where the 501(c)(3) thing comes in. I suspect that is more about being able to accept donations than anything else.

Personally, I think the citizens of that state should ask their legislature to pass a law to require such entities to respond to information requests, if that entity is involved in police operations. It is in the public interest to be able to request data from a consolidated entity of this nature, rather than having to deal with each individual member entity.

about 2 months ago

NOAA: Earth Smashed A Record For Heat In May 2014, Effects To Worsen

Orgasmatron Re:records go back to 1880, very funny (547 comments)

The difference, of course, is that 0 and 1 are integers. They have infinite precision. Batting records are not +/- x, they are discrete; the records never indicate that a batter got 0.97 or 0.05 hits during an at bat.

We could adopt the convention of saying that a given batter has hit 60-of-200 or whatever, but it is more useful to normalize that down to .300 batting average so that we can compare him to the guy that has 221-of-743. But in the end, the batting average is really just shorthand for the actual ratio of discrete events.

A temperature measurements is not a discrete event and temperature "averages" are not a simple ratio of them.

The average of 14 +/-1 and 31 +/- 1 is not 22.500, it is the range [21.5-23.5].

about 2 months ago

After Non-Profit Application Furor, IRS Says It's Lost 2 Years Of Lerner's Email

Orgasmatron Re:We'll its Bush's fault (372 comments)

Maybe it has something to do with the IRS not being in the White House, and not using the White House's email system.

Or maybe it has something to do with the article itself saying that the White House's email system archives everything, and has been in place "since Obama took office", which most people would suppose means 2009, not a year after the 2010 article discussing the system in the past tense.

about 2 months ago

The Mere Promise of Google Fiber Sends Rivals Scrambling

Orgasmatron Re:Monopolies? (258 comments)


I live in a semi-rural area outside of a small town that has never (or at least not recently) granted a cable monopoly. My house is serviced by two fiber networks, both relatively cheap.

I moved here from a big city that has had a cable monopoly since before I was born. No home anywhere in that city has access to even a single fiber service, but a few huge institutions have been able to get it recently.

A while back, the cable company pulled a move straight out of Thunderdome by threatening to literally shut everything down if the city ran their own fiber lines to connect their own buildings instead of leasing them.

There are two smaller cable companies that lobby the city council and the state PUC 24/7 in hopes of getting the monopoly lifted so that they can move in and compete. They have detailed plans for running their own fiber networks. Actually, the incumbent had to back off on the Master Blaster thing when the challengers offered to hire every trainable person in the region and work around the clock to build a new network and restore service citywide in 4 months.

So, yeah. If you think that economics prevents cable competition, instead of governments, you've been lied to.

P.S. Cities are swimming in public land, most commonly the right-of-way on a road, which is wider than you probably think. No cable, phone, or electrical distribution network ever really needs to use eminent domain.

about 3 months ago

The US Public's Erratic Acceptance of Science

Orgasmatron the struggle (600 comments)

Pay attention! There are people around you that do not conform to the current orthodoxy. They are, at best, ignorant twits, and at worst, enemies of the people. It is your duty to ridicule them and mock them. If they do not recant, you may need to increase your efforts.

Be careful about dehumanizing people that you disagree with. Someone disagrees with you too, and we all know what comes next in this movie.

There are damn few scientists doing science these days, but "scientists" willing, for a buck, to spread a thin veneer of justification over your own bias and hate are readily available.

about 4 months ago

MtGox's "Transaction Malleability" Claim Dismissed By Researchers

Orgasmatron Re:Dear slashdot, (92 comments)

No, there is no intention to tighten the blockchain rules at this time. This would cause a hard fork, and breaking compatibility with old versions is not considered lightly.

Mtgox's software is unique. The reference client, for example, can not be fooled by changing transaction IDs. The frequency of success at actually winning the race to get the modified version into a block only matters if you've written your own software that is totally reliant on transaction IDs.

There are two values, each with a 1 in 256 chance. 1/256 + 1/256 = 1/128.

Bitcoin tends to attract fame-seeking researchers making wild claims. This is no different. The paper would be correct if the claim was narrower, that "this one type of mutation out of the many kinds possible, and which no one has suggested as a culprit, was not involved". But the paper is written to make a much broader claim, and I haven't seen the authors going out of their way to mitigate that misunderstanding in the press, much the opposite.

about 4 months ago

MtGox's "Transaction Malleability" Claim Dismissed By Researchers

Orgasmatron Re:Dear slashdot, (92 comments)

I didn't say that mutated transactions didn't exist, or that the researchers haven't actually seen any.

They certainly do exist, and I have no reason to doubt that the researchers have found some in the wild.

I'm saying that if such an attack had been responsible for Mtgox's woes (which I and, I think, most others find extremely unlikely), they would not be visible using the methodology discussed in this paper.

about 4 months ago

MtGox's "Transaction Malleability" Claim Dismissed By Researchers

Orgasmatron Re:Dear slashdot, (92 comments)

In my opinion, this was most likely incompetence. Or, possibly Mtgox stole from their users (or Mark stole from his own company, which is the same, as far as I'm concerned).

It is extremely unlikely, in my view, that transaction malleability played much of a role.

A malleability exploit is something that people might be willing to accept as "could have happened to anyone", so I think it was tried as cover for incompetence of the more ordinary "not clever enough to safely hold other people's money" variety.

about 4 months ago

MtGox's "Transaction Malleability" Claim Dismissed By Researchers

Orgasmatron Re:Dear slashdot, (92 comments)

The signature is two values (r,s). These values are stored and transmitted as binary strings. They have a maximum length, but not a minimum. So, if your calculated r is less than 2^248, the most significant byte is all zeros, ditto 2^240 and the next byte.

The spec says to minimize the encoding, but openssl accepts the padded form. The bitcoin software started refusing to relay transactions with improperly padded transactions, even though they are still valid, if they make it into a block.

So, as the new version got more popular, the odds of a padded transaction being spread from mtgox to a miner decreased. Note that this only matters for less than 1% of transactions from gox, those that by chance ended up with unusually small values.

At some point, they basically never spread across the network, but were available through an API. The claimed attack is that people took these transactions, fixed them, and broadcast them. The fixed version would spread, but the original would not.

In this case, you would never see these as modified transactions by looking at the network, which is what this paper was looking at.

There are other ways to mutate transactions that are visible on the network, but they don't work very often, since it involves accepting a transaction over the p2p network, changing it, then broadcasting your version in hopes of winning the race to reach a miner first. These do happen, and the researchers do see them. But they aren't particularly useful for scamming mtgox (or anyone else).

Oh, and did you notice that less than 1% of transactions were vulnerable to the real attack? To extract large sums, you'd need to constantly churn huge bitcoin values into and out of mtgox, profiting on roughly one cycle out of every 128. This would have left huge traces in the blockchain, which no one has noticed so far.

about 4 months ago

MtGox's "Transaction Malleability" Claim Dismissed By Researchers

Orgasmatron Dear slashdot, (92 comments)

This paper has already been widely dismissed by the bitcoin community. Not that we necessarily think that Mtgox was actually hit by a malleability attack. Just that this paper is nonsense.

The very short version is that what these "researchers" were looking at isn't actually how the alleged bug would have worked.

about 4 months ago

More Than 1 In 4 Car Crashes Involve Cellphone Use

Orgasmatron Junk (367 comments)

This is a page out of MADD's playbook.

Accident report forms are used to collect statistical data. Like a game of Telephone, as you get further from the event, the more the "data" reflects the currently prevailing biases.

Here is an example, one that has been documented by researchers trying to figure out where bullshit MADD claims were coming from:

Drunk pedestrian steps out in front of a car, gets hit and killed. The "Fatality" box gets checked, of course. The pedestrian's alcohol box also gets checked.

Now a researcher comes along and compiles them into alcohol-involved vs alcohol-free.

Then a second researcher comes along and looks at the alcohol-involved accidents and counts how many of them were fatalities. Sadly, this guy doesn't bother looking at the primary data, he just assumes that the alcohol involved was in the blood of the driver that caused the accident.

Bam! A drunk pedestrian has morphed into a drunk driver. And since there is lots of money to be had by producing statistics that support neo-prohibition, and none to speak of for honest research, the "researchers" are rewarded for their apathy.

Now imagine a checkbox on the accident report form labelled "cell phone present"...

about 5 months ago

Researchers Find Problems With Rules of Bitcoin

Orgasmatron Wrong title (301 comments)

Should be "Researchers Find Their Biases".

Really, nothing new here. I blame the soft "sciences" for lowering expectations, science reporters for breathlessly reporting sensationalist drivel instead of digging in, and the global warming cabal for trying to pass off the output of their numerical models as "data".

I've read a bunch of this crap, but not all of it. Just off the top of my head, the global consensus does not in any way resemble a state machine, and writing a paper using one to draw "conclusions" about the other is a study of gullibility, not of bitcoin. So far, that one is still my favorite academic "research" into bitcoin.

In many ways bitcoin is an experiment. There are indeed open questions. With the huge number of unknowns in the system, I will continue to be skeptical of people that claim to already know how the experiment will turn out.

about 5 months ago

$30K Worth of Multimeters Must Be Destroyed Because They're Yellow

Orgasmatron Meanwhile... (653 comments)

Actual intentional Fluke clones stream across the ocean in small lots from ebay every day. Some of these are presumably actual Fluke meters, just being sold by the factory directly, rather than through normal channels.

Plus the hilarious things like FUKE meters, which are very clearly inferior copies, but intentionally made to look similar.

And then the generic $3 meters in red, black, yellow, orange, green, whatever. Sometimes these come with a brand name you've never heard of, sometimes they are completely devoid of all identifying marks.

I'm guessing that way more than 2,000 of these have made it in the country so far this year, mostly with laughably and obviously bogus customs forms.

From reading the comments, it would appear that Fluke really did "invent" the yellow multimeter, and they have a legitimate concern about protecting their trade dress. But for most people (particularly those under 40 or 50), "cheap multimeter" (of any color) is a stronger brand than "yellow multimeter".

about 5 months ago

FSF's Richard Stallman Calls LLVM a 'Terrible Setback'

Orgasmatron Re:Consistent, yet counter-productive. (1098 comments)

Ugh. It seems like it must be a lot of work to be so completely wrong about this.

Under the GPL, if someone makes improvements to the software and then distributes it, they MUST provide the source of those changes to the community.

Under non-copyleft licenses, they can make the changes, distribute the changed product, and tell the community to fuck off.

It isn't about harming anyone, it is about ensuring that those who benefit from the community's work contribute back to the community.

about 7 months ago

Satanists Propose Monument At Oklahoma State Capitol Next To Ten Commandments

Orgasmatron Law (1251 comments)

Most legislative and judicial houses are decorated with historic laws and lawgivers.* In that context, the 10 Commandments are not there so much for their religious value as they are for their historic value. In practice, I suspect that it is the overlap that is most important here, with the 10 Commandments being the most important law code in the religious tradition that, like it or not, was and is the most influential in the US.

What historic lawgiving events are the satanists planning to depict? Yeah...

Now, if Tulsa's Babylonian citizens and Mardukists get together to fund a display of Hammurabi or his code, I'll personally pitch in.

* No, really.

about 8 months ago

Bitcoin Thefts Surge, DDoS Hackers Take Millions

Orgasmatron Re:dreamworld (305 comments)

I was going to consolidate all of your questions in this entire thread into a single reply that would answer all of them. But now I see that there is no point. You already know **all about** how bitcoin works.

Your dictionary must be different from mine. Mine would never let me claim to know **all about** something while I was asking basic FAQ-level questions about it.

Your musings about the unknown actors that pick blocks, and the unknown forces that cause the block subsidy to right-shift according on schedule were side-splittingly funny, when read **in context**.

That said, drop me a line if you ever learn the basics of bitcoin and still have questions.

about 9 months ago

Ask Slashdot: What's On Your Hardware Lab Bench?

Orgasmatron Scope is still critical (215 comments)

The scope still does everything. Other tools may have taken over some jobs, and may even be better at some things. But nothing can do as many jobs as the scope does, and I'm not even sure that a collection of tools can replace it entirely.

Also, building accessories for your scope is FUN. Tempted by cheap 8-channel logic probes? Don't buy one until after you've built a multiplexer for your scope. Other good projects include function generators, trigger modules (delays, holdoffs, strobes, logic, etc).

Buy a good soldering iron. Weller, temperature controlled. A couple of cheapo irons in different sizes and wattages can be handy too. Have a variety of good solder removal systems (bulbs, plungers, bulbs on hollow irons, braid). If you do surface mount work, find a decent Chinese clone of a Japanese (Hakko) rework station. My Aoyue 852 sees a lot of action.

Build a bench power supply out of an ATX PSU. They make boards for this, or you can make your own interface box, or you can pop the cover, drill some holes for a switch, some LEDs and a row of binding posts/banana jacks. This will cover 90% of projects for 90% of people. If you need more, build or buy something more capable.

Have a good variety of components on hand: resistors, different types of caps, diodes, transistors, LEDs. Have a bunch of interconnects on hand: snap-off pin sockets and pins, IDC headers, power pole, quarter inch QC tabs. Depending on the work you do, IC sockets, inductors.

Have a ton of solderless breadboards for prototyping. I really do mean a ton. I make a lot of little things and then just leave them intact because buying a replacement breadbord is less hassle than making it as a PCB. Plenty of copperclad perfboard is handy too, in a variety of styles (individual holes, bus strip, IC breakout).

Look into ways to make PCBs at home. I prefer the glossy paper/clothes iron toner transfer method, but direct milling is easier if you have a CNC minimill. With a little practice, toner and etchant gives finer features than milling. If you need finer features yet, or plated vias, or more than 2 layers, or silk screening, or resist masking, or... you need commercial production. There are several services that do group buys on short runs and small pieces. They assemble a variety of designs, send them out for fabication, then split them out and mail them back to you. I've used dorkbotpdx quite a few times, but there are plenty of others.

about 9 months ago

Why Is Broadband More Expensive In the US Than Elsewhere?

Orgasmatron Re:Probably Obama. Or the Tea Party. (569 comments)


The town I live in is served by two cable companies. Both of them have full fiber networks, and service is dirt cheap. My house actually has three fiber pairs servicing it, one for TV, one for internet, and one for the other cable company. (I wanted my network ONT in a different spot, but haven't gotten around to redoing the coax inside yet, cable company had no problem putting up a second box.)

When the first company's exclusive franchise expired a while back, the second company lobbied for it not to be renewed. They then came in and wired up the whole town. No one complained about them doing it. The city didn't pay a dime for it. The old company had to cut prices to keep customers, and they did. A few years later, the new cable company came back and redid the entire town with fiber (this was a while ago). The next year, the old company ran fiber everywhere too.

Did I mention that my town is about 2500 people? Oh, and they did the rural areas around town too. I'm actually about 6 miles out.

The new company has detailed plans for fiber networks in every town in the area. Every few years they get another one to let their exclusive franchise lapse and they spring into action.

This "story" is a joke. Where the cable system has actually been deregulated to the point of breaking the government granted monopolies, internet access is cheap and awesome. Where the monopolies still exist, it sucks monkey balls. I'm not sure how anyone with access to a dictionary can consider a government granted monopoly to be "deregulated".

P.S. I have 50 down and 50 up for $45 per month. I could go much cheaper, or I could go much faster, if I wanted to. I used to live in a different city, where Charter has a monopoly. I paid close to $100 for 30 down and 5 up, which was top of the line there.

P.P.S. Oh, phone service is relatively cheap here too, from what I hear. I haven't looked into it myself because the notion of getting a landline seems quaint to me. Three companies providing phone service and all. But it isn't as cheap as you'd expect because phone service is mostly governed by the state public utility commission, which amusingly sets floors on what a company can charge.

about 10 months ago

Why Can't Big Government Launch a Website?

Orgasmatron Re:The reason is private insurance (786 comments)

"Something must be done! This is something, thus we must do this!". I've seen that notion expressed many times, but I was amused to find it in the constitutional debate from 225+ years ago.

There are ways to decouple medical coverage from employment that don't involve massive growth of government.

For example, they could transition the employer tax benefits of providing medical plans into a employer tax benefit for paying that out as cash (to be used in full, in part, or not at all for the employee to buy their own plan). That change alone would fix about 90% of what's wrong with the country's medical billing system.

That would resurrect proper health insurance, reform pre-paid medical plans (what people usually mean when they say "health insurance" these days), gut the administration and billing nightmare, and restore market pressure and competition to all levels of the process.

Malpractice tort reform and encouragement of HDHP/HSA plans would do the rest.

Note that all of these are things that would shrink the federal government and reduce federal power, so they are just as unthinkable as they are obvious.

about 10 months ago


Orgasmatron hasn't submitted any stories.


Orgasmatron has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>