Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!



The Case For Perpetual Copyright

Radical Rad Re:no good case for perpetual copyright (547 comments)

copyright law exists to give incentive to artists to create socially and culturally significant works. perpetual copyright gives no such incentive, instead it provides incentive to create works intended to do nothing but generate profit.

And when something can generate profit, the tendancy is to take it to the extreme. I could see corporations copyrighting everything, even down to short sentences, in perpetuity. It would be a land grab. This has already happened with patents. You can't write a computer program anymore without using algorithms that someone has been issued a patent for, even though you didn't even know their patent existed.

more than 7 years ago


Radical Rad hasn't submitted any stories.


Radical Rad has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?