Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

White House Wants Ideas For "Bootstrapping a Solar System Civilization"

RightwingNutjob Re:Get real (351 comments)

Interesting, but I tend to remain skeptical. If you're talking about sending up a Bridgeport that you're going to use to make a 5 axis 20ft^3 workspace CNC, I believe you. If you're talking about sending up a dwarf-sized little mill (I can't think of any at the moment, but there's a Taiwanese company that makes table-top mills for about 1k a pop) to build a Bridgeport to build a..., there I just don't believe you can make it work without contorting yourself through a lot of hoops and picking up a lot of extra overhead that makes it more sensible to send up the full-sized Bridgeport instead. But like I said, interesting. If you've got a link to a writeup, I'll read it.

5 days ago
top

Commerce Secretary: US Wants Multi-Stakeholder Process To Preserve Internet

RightwingNutjob Re:We are fsk'd (57 comments)

Nowhere in the constitution does it say that treaties can override rights. It's a court challenge waiting to happen. Also, treaties generally aren't voted on in secret, even if they're negotiated that way. In fact, I don't believe congress can legally vote in secret on anything. They can have classified meetings, but they can't pass secret laws.

5 days ago
top

The One App You Need On Your Resume If You Want a Job At Google

RightwingNutjob Re:Python (205 comments)

You can have my curly braces and my if...else...ends when you pry them from my cold dead hands!!!

5 days ago
top

Commerce Secretary: US Wants Multi-Stakeholder Process To Preserve Internet

RightwingNutjob Re:We are fsk'd (57 comments)

Difference being that stuff like that can and does change with administrations, but more importantly, is fairly transparent. It's not like you come in to work one morning to your job at wecriticizegovernmentalstupidityforaliving.com and ...what office? what website? It's always been a shuttered building. What boss? What lead reporter? Oh you must be talking about prisoner 24601.

5 days ago
top

White House Wants Ideas For "Bootstrapping a Solar System Civilization"

RightwingNutjob Re:Get real (351 comments)

In my most optimistic guestimates, 1000 falcon first stage launches would probably cost about 5-10 billion, assuming they're recoverable half the time and last half a dozen flights each. But even when not counting the cost of the second and earth departure stages, that only puts a few hundred to at most a thousand-plus kg of payload on the moon per flight. You need way more than that to have ISRU equipment *and the in-place industrial capacity to maintain it*. Hell, a CNC mill can run 1000kg. And you need a few of those, some lathes, saws, drill presses, air handlers, compressors, water handlers, etc. Do yourself a favor and walk through a machine shop attached to a college lab or a chemical plant or something and do a mass budget before you start declaring stuff feasible with current tech for reasonable cost.

about a week ago
top

White House Wants Ideas For "Bootstrapping a Solar System Civilization"

RightwingNutjob Get real (351 comments)

Unless you have a few trillion dollar coins stashed away somewhere that'll fund thousands upon thousands of chemical rockets, it's just not possible to do this. The only hope we have of actually getting to a place like Mars, or even the Moon, on a large scale (even with sufficient economic incentive to be there) would be new physics or a wild breakthrough in engineering, at least 30dB more than a re-usable SpaceX rocket would be. There's no guarantee that the former is even possible, and there is a guarantee that the latter won't happen without lots of deep thinking and hard work that needs an economic incentive to be worth-while, because it'll be very expensive and involve lots and lots of failure along the way. You can't force it, and you can't afford it, even if you confiscate everyone's possessions and tax everyone's income at 100%.

about a week ago
top

Torvalds: I Made Community-Building Mistakes With Linux

RightwingNutjob Re:LT LP (387 comments)

Someone's forgotten their fortan...

about a week ago
top

Torvalds: I Made Community-Building Mistakes With Linux

RightwingNutjob Re:LT LP (387 comments)

Also doesn't charge ahead with full-bore stupid against half the user and developer base's advice.

about a week ago
top

Commerce Secretary: US Wants Multi-Stakeholder Process To Preserve Internet

RightwingNutjob Re:We are fsk'd (57 comments)

Considering W made it a point to keep ICANN's governance under the commerce department (censorship by which is banned by the US constitution) and Obama gave it away in a grand gesture of appeasement, you're pretty spot on.

about a week ago
top

Lennart Poettering: Open Source Community "Quite a Sick Place To Be In"

RightwingNutjob Re:Systemd (993 comments)

Wrong attitude. What breaks? Probably nothing, yet. But if you want me to upgrade, you need to provide assurance to me that your shiny new gizmo will work in all my specialized use cases, not expect me to spend time verifying it will.

about two weeks ago
top

Fighting the Culture of 'Worse Is Better'

RightwingNutjob Re:Huh (240 comments)

The two sides are talking past each other. The "ooh shiny" crowd sees compatibility as an albatross and can't fathom why anyone would consider incompatibility as anything other than a cost of doing business on the path along forward progress. The other side can't fathom how anyone who's worked in software or engineering can be so cavalier about sacrificing compatibility for what may well be a passing fad.

Here's a hint: there's a right answer, and the reason one side doesn't see it is because they don't seem to share the experience and the background in engineering real solutions to real products that motivates one strongly to not want to do the same job twice when it's been done right once, at no small cost in sweat and tears.

I don't think there's a way to bridge that divide other than with time. Kids around my age and down, having grown up with participation trophies, tend to be hostile to learning from the mistakes of their predecessors, and haven't quite gotten to the phase of their careers when they can make and learn from their own mistakes just yet. I'm just getting there, but I work with hardware which is much less forgiving and makes you learn quicker. Pure software types in the "ooh shiny" crowd may not all be at the age yet where they've had their trial by fire and enough pushback from reality to temper their enthusiasm with an appreciation of the facts on the ground in regard to compatibility loss. Hence bullshit like systemd, binary format log files, and an "optional" attitude to POSIX.

about two weeks ago
top

Who's In Charge During the Ebola Crisis?

RightwingNutjob Re: Who's in charge? (279 comments)

I don't know. Hu?

about two weeks ago
top

Lennart Poettering: Open Source Community "Quite a Sick Place To Be In"

RightwingNutjob Re:Systemd (993 comments)

You wanna go rewrite all my legacy code for me that I got working with Linux? Go right ahead. If you fuck it up, you owe me money for time lost.

about two weeks ago
top

What's Been the Best Linux Distro of 2014?

RightwingNutjob Re:Debian (303 comments)

Debian 6. Before all the shiny shit infected Deb 7.

about two weeks ago
top

Lennart Poettering: Open Source Community "Quite a Sick Place To Be In"

RightwingNutjob Re:Systemd (993 comments)

People keep talking about "the year of the Linux Desktop". Guess what, Leonart is the only fucking person who is actually working on getting us there.

Screw your Linux on the Desktop. I use Linux for mission-critical compute nodes, process control systems, and engineers' and developers' workstations (ie serious work). I'm pissed already that the Ooh Shiny crowd has torn up my desktop environment (ie doesn't mess up all your mission-critical status displays at at an accidental mouse jerk), but I sure as hell will not abide the same crowd introducing bloatware into the boot system and making noise about breaking POSIX compatibilty at some point down the line. My workplace actually buys from RedHat, and

1. I will not recommend that we use RHEL 7 for anything and
2. If LP does get some non POSIX stuff into anything, I will recommend to my boss's boss that we draft a letter to RedHat demanding continued support for a POSIX compliant OS capable of network transparency on every graphical application we run on it. And maybe to fire LP for being a raging idiot.

Don't waste time on simple invective. Vote with your feet, and if you happen to do business with RedHat, vote with your dollars.

about two weeks ago
top

Why did Microsoft skip Windows 9?

RightwingNutjob Re:X, perhaps? (399 comments)

Also, Møøse bites can be nasti. And don't get me started on the bytes.

about two weeks ago
top

Microsoft Announces Windows 10

RightwingNutjob Its own worst enemy (644 comments)

Microsoft's OS division must really have it in for those bastards at Microsoft's OS division. I don't think any serious software company out there competes with itself as badly as microsoft does.

about three weeks ago
top

Microsoft Announces Windows 10

RightwingNutjob Re: Missed opportunity (644 comments)

And don't forget X11. Wayland-tards' complaints bitching and moaning notwithstanding.

about three weeks ago

Submissions

RightwingNutjob hasn't submitted any stories.

Journals

RightwingNutjob has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?