Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Linux Users Banned From Diablo III Servers

Rimbo Re:Everything is an emulator (518 comments)

s/EXE format/PE format/

(for pedantic correctness)

more than 2 years ago
top

Linux Users Banned From Diablo III Servers

Rimbo Re:Everything is an emulator (518 comments)

How did this get to +4... does the modern-day Slashdot reader really not know the difference here?

WINE is a re-implementation of the Windows system-call library. Tepples is absolutely correct above: It's a reimplementation of the API, and no more a emulator than Linux is of UNIX.

An "emulator" is very specifically a program that reproduces the behavior of an entire system, hardware included. An emulator reproduces the system in software, and then you can run device drivers, etc. on top of it. The machine code you run on an emulator never gets executed as instructions on the host hardware -- it's executed as instructions within the emulator; the host runs the code of the emulator alone. DOSBox is an example of an emulator; it runs in software all of the hardware of an early x86 system including the CPU itself, so that you're able to run 386 games on *anything* that you can compile DOSBox for, even PowerPC, MIPS and ARM systems. I myself used DOSBox on PowerPC many moons ago to play old DOS games.

The next level up from that is a Virtual Machine. A virtual machine can only expose hardware that actually exists on your system, and your CPU actually switches between the different contexts -- your CPU is actually aware that it is running different systems on modern chips. The abstraction here is mostly at the driver level; your guest OS is typically using drivers provided by the VM software maker that interact with the VM software to expose the hardware's functionality. Whereas an emulator can emulate any hardware you do not have from the CPU on up, a virtual machine simply exposes your existing hardware, and lets your hardware do as much of the work as possible.

With an API reimplementation like WINE, you are still running Linux (or Mac OS, or whatever), and the driver layer is Linux's drivers (or Mac OS's, or whatever's). All you've done is add a library to the mix which:

1. Add a new kind of executable loader; in addition to a.out-format and ELF-format (and Mach-O on Mac, etc), you now have the ability to load EXE format files, and
2. Translate Windows library calls into the corresponding Linux (or Mac, or whatever) library calls.

So, in brief:
1. An EMULATOR (like DOSBox) emulates the hardware, and the programs are completely divorced from your system's actual hardware;
2. A VIRTUAL MACHINE (like VMWare) creates a virtual driver layer for your existing hardware that allows you to run different OSes simultaneously;
3. An API (like WINE) is just a new set of functions that add capabilities to your existing system.

There will be a quiz on Friday.

more than 2 years ago
top

U.S. Imposes Tariffs On Chinese Solar Cells

Rimbo Re:Yes, it will raise prices (345 comments)

Your first paragraph analysis is correct. In fact, I'm somewhat displeased that the comments China and others have made that criticize this decision are essentially left in the article at face value, and that we need people like you to put this explanation in.

The market was not at all free, nor was it a level playing field, prior to this decision. Oligopolies and monopolies are not free markets; playing fields where one side has a government flooding money into subsidies are not level. So, your criticism of the "free market" in the second paragraph is based on a misunderstanding of what a "free market" is; "free market" is not a synonym for laissez-faire. Yes, I'm aware that a lot of proponents of laissez-faire equate it with free market economics, but two wrongs still don't add up to one right.

There's a similar problem with Dougherty's comments in the article, warning of a "trade war;" it seems to me that we were already in a trade war. A very one-sided trade war, where we just let China hit us with subsidized goods and did nothing to respond. Of course the bully will whine like a little bitch as soon as they get hit back...

more than 2 years ago
top

Why Distributing Music As 24-bit/192kHz Downloads Is Pointless

Rimbo Re:The bit depth does matter (841 comments)

I think the real issue here is that I didn't make myself clear, because you seem to be addressing points I wasn't trying to make.

When I say "stair-step," I mean something entirely different from what the author means. What I'm saying is that when you sample, you also quantize; your amplitude is not continuous, but discrete. Ergo, information is lost.

I know the ear doesn't perform an FFT, but what it does is a frequency analysis. PCM data measures the position of molecules over time; an ear measures frequency and volume over time.

The point is, when you take two pitches, play them together, and map it as a waveform, you end up with a waveform that is far more complex than what an ear actually perceives. The ear perceives two notes, while the waveform describes a zig-zag that wiggles -more- often than the original pitches.

When error gets into those wiggles, while it can manifest itself as harmonics far beyond the range of human hearing in both amplitude and frequency (aliasing), it also manifests itself when the waveform is reconstructed as distortions in amplitude and in frequency of the original fundamental pitches. The more audible high-frequency sounds are in the mix, the more likely you are to get audible distortions that AA filters will struggle with.

The fact that you're needing to do AA at all is a symptom of using too low of a bitrate anyway. You can simply throw more bits at the problem and achieve the same effect, but without the necessity of having stupidly expensive DACs; and if you have the stupidly expensive DACs, then you can do more anyway. And storage space is cheap so... why is this even a discussion?

Granted, I don't think there's a need beyond 24-bit 96kHz. But I do think, for certain types of audio, 44.1/16 is pretty clearly not enough for everyone.

more than 2 years ago
top

Why Distributing Music As 24-bit/192kHz Downloads Is Pointless

Rimbo Re:The bit depth does matter (841 comments)

I'll grant to you that for most people AND for most kinds of recordings, what you say is absolutely true.

"For the 192 KHz fans out there, there is direct and proven mathematical reasoning for why 44 KHz audio is plenty."

Both you and the article say this, but my understanding of sampling theorem differs from the conclusions you both draw. The main issue is that Nyquist sampling theory is based around the idea that you are moving from a continuous to a discrete path in one dimension only. The theory that you can reconstruct frequencies perfectly is based around the y-axis being continuous. In digital audio, it isn't. So both of the graphs he has in the section "Sampling fallacies and misconceptions" are actually incorrect; a proper graph would show the "stair steps" being slightly off-center where the line goes (and off-center by different amounts). In fact, that he equates bit depth with dynamic range shows he really doesn't understand the mathematics of PCM audio very well at all.

What's more, despite the article author's excellent description of how we hear, he never really connects the FFT the ear performs to how it limits the effectiveness of anti-aliasing, and assigns to anti-aliasing algorithms magical properties that they don't have; heavy metal and string orchestra music in particular represent worst-case scenarios for anti-aliasing algorithms.

So the math IS clear, but it doesn't show what either you or the article author think it shows. It may not justify 192kHz, but it definitely justifies a sample rate greater than 44.1kHz for certain kinds of music.

more than 2 years ago
top

Wikileaks and Anonymous Join Forces Against US Intelligence Community

Rimbo Re:Is this article some kind of a joke? (268 comments)

Pretty much goes with what I said above, as in: I'm not sure which of those is really a revelation. #1 and #4 are just Stratfor's best guesses, like reading an "insider" report on a closed basketball practice on the 'net. #2 is just like hiring a PI to snoop on your wife. #3 and #5 are pretty much common knowledge. (Also: I think Burton's kinda nutty -- also easily-attainable knowledge for anyone who read his autobiography.)

Wikileaks and Anonymous keep bragging about this as if they'd exposed some private arm of government spying, when really, the government paying Stratfor is like a software development company paying for a Dr. Dobbs' journal subscription; when it's your profession, it's good to have external perspectives, even if they don't necessarily align with your mission and aren't informed on your specific details.

And on that note, Friedman's free weekly write-ups are some good bull; he'll usually spend the bulk of any given article providing facts for context before he delves into the op-ed parts, and so you end up learning a few things even if the rest of what he has to say is bunk. He's kind of the Chip Brown of Stratfor (re: the above comparison of Stratfor to Rivals.com).

more than 2 years ago
top

Wikileaks and Anonymous Join Forces Against US Intelligence Community

Rimbo Re:Is this article some kind of a joke? (268 comments)

Uhm... maybe that's because Stratfor is not an "intelligence" agency in the same way that the FBI or CIA are. They're just a private company trying to make a buck by selling their opinions.

They're basically Rivals.com, but focused on politics rather than sports. And about as much a part of the US intelligence structure as Rivals.com is.

That's why folks like AC above and myself are shaking our collective heads, wondering when Allen Funt is going to jump out from behind Julian Assange and shout, "Surprise!"

more than 2 years ago
top

James Randi's Latest Debunking Operation

Rimbo Re:Lot's of possibilities (498 comments)

Depends on what you mean by the terms. If you're talking about destructive sham cults vs. non-destructive, non-sham cults ("legitimate religions"), a few of the notable differences are:

  • Cults will typically require you to sign up or pay a fee in order to learn their teaching. Legitimate religions are up-front about all their beliefs.
  • Cults typically isolate their members from "non-believing" friends and family members, requiring you to break ties with "unbelievers."
  • Cults require you to believe precisely what the leaders tell you to believe; dissension is not allowed. Legitimate religions have congregations where you may experience a great variety of opinions, sometimes with only a handful of topics where you could find everyone agreeing.
  • Legitimate religions tend to expect their clergy and leadership to be held to a higher standard of behavior than their members, while cult leaders are not to be questioned ever.
  • Cults typically make it difficult, if not impossible, to leave; with religions, you just stop.
  • Cults will typically demand that you give up your "material wealth" to the founders. Religions may point out the value of tithing or pass the hat around, but they'll never kick you out if you show up every week and never contribute a thing.

The above looks almost like a point-by-point rebuttal of Scientology, but that's just an odd coincidence; Scientology is far from the first or only destructive cult to fit that definition. You can find mainline Christian churches that fit into both categories, although I think you'll find that most of them don't.

By "pseudo-religion" you could also mean something that has all the trappings of religion but claims to be anti-religion, e.g. Maoism in China.

more than 2 years ago
top

AT&T Officially Ends Plans To Acquire T-Mobile USA

Rimbo Re:And there was much rejoicing !! (176 comments)

"Faux-G?" I get legit 3.5Mbps downloads at work on this "faux" G network. I'm pretty happy with that.

more than 2 years ago
top

Ask Slashdot: Entry-Level Robotics Kits For Young Teenagers?

Rimbo Re:Fisher Technik (153 comments)

I have a soft spot in my heart for FT, because when I was growing up, FT was vastly superior to anything Lego made. I had a lot of fun using FT robotics on my Apple //e. They also had the pneumatics kit, electromechanics, and a whole bunch of things that were far beyond what Lego offered then.

But...

It's not so much that FT has faded as that Lego has caught up in the areas where it was weak and remained strong in the areas where it had FT beat. Modern Lego models are a lot better at showing you how to put pieces together, and not just how to build the thing, than they used to be. The piece selection is more diverse, and the piece -quality- has improved greatly; they hold together better and come apart more easily. The new robotics kits, power functions kits and other stuff in the Technics line give Lego a lot of the things that came with FT (although not all).

The old FT that I kept for my son, and the new FT I bought for him, largely sits in a bin collecting dust while he discovers and builds entire new worlds with Lego. Even when I was a kid, Lego somehow was an every-day kind of toy, while FT was more a once-in-a-while kind of thing.

So... while I have admiration for FT and an emotional attachment to it, Lego is what dominates my 7-year-old's playtime. Maybe when he's older, FT will be a new challenge...

more than 2 years ago
top

Voyager 1 Exits Our Solar System

Rimbo Re:Beautiful (341 comments)

Didn't Pioneer 10 do this a while back? Is Voyager 1 really the first to leave?

more than 2 years ago
top

Half Life of a Tech Worker: 15 Years

Rimbo Re:One workers opinion at one company in a recessi (473 comments)

This is one of those times where the comments section in /. is more valuable than the article itself; in response to one person's opinion, here you get everyone else's, and in this case the audience is passionate and knowledgeable about the topic.

more than 2 years ago
top

The Sports Footage You Won't See Today On TV

Rimbo Re:Jesus H. Christ, (277 comments)

Right now, on over half of the plays, this is what you see: Quarterback drops back to pass. He's looking downfield, which is off-screen. He sees something, and makes the decision to throw/hold on to the ball/dump the ball off/run for it.

We, the viewers, have no idea what just happened. Now that passing dominates the game, without All-22, you can't even tell what's happening in the game any more.

The objections of current NFL folks, and your objections, are heedless of this simple fact, and this overrules all objections. Without seeing what's happening downfield, we might as well not be watching the game at all.

Fortunately, these objections don't translate to the college game (which passes just as much as the NFL does; the Big XII throws the ball even more). You can get All-22 footage in college. And I'd bet good money that a big reason for college football's growing popularity has everything to do with that.

In summary: I haven't posted on Slashdot in a while, and I just came here to say you shut your damn whore mouth. It's about time someone shone a spotlight on this problem, because as a fan of the game, this issue is ruining it for me. I hardly even bother watching the NFL any more because of it. Is that what the league wants? Confusion leading to disinterest?

more than 2 years ago
top

Dutch Psychologist Faked Data In At Least 30 Scientific Papers

Rimbo Re:Psychology is a science. (254 comments)

Probably because these people think that Xemu is real....

more than 2 years ago
top

Ask Slashdot: Ergonomic Office Environment?

Rimbo For me: TimeOut and Model M (235 comments)

TimeOut by Dejal is an app that I use that simply grays out the screen for 15 seconds every ten minutes, and for ten minutes every hour. It reminds you to look away from the screen, stretch, get up and walk, etc. I've found that while the timing of the screen-blanks is annoying (it does give you a way to "snooze" the breaks), the overall effect is that I'm happier and healthier at work.

As for a keyboard, I use one of the new black USB Model M designs now made by Unicomp. The extra muscular effort and tactile response somehow has been the best for keeping from having repetitive motion injuries.

I'd also recommend making sure your fonts are large enough to read easily. Small fonts are bad.

about 3 years ago
top

Evangelical Scientists Debate Creation Story

Rimbo Re:People still believe that? (1014 comments)

I was raised the same way. What I recall, however, was that there was a strong regression back into Fundamentalism during the 1990s, even in mainline and "left-wing" denominations. Fortunately, the pendulum seems to be swinging back the other way, with e.g. Rob Bell's "Love Wins" popularizing some of the more progressive theologies.

The argument within the church is ancient, predating Darwin; in the 4th century, St. Augustine of Hippo wrote an entire treatise, De Genesi ad Litteram, arguing that Genesis should not be interpreted literally, and his commentary on the matter sounds like something from the 20th century, not 1600 years prior:

If they find a Christian mistaken in a field which they themselves know well and hear him maintaining his foolish opinions about our books, how are they going to believe those books in matters concerning the resurrection of the dead, the hope of eternal life, and the kingdom of heaven, when they think their pages are full of falsehoods and on facts which they themselves have learnt from experience and the light of reason?

So... it's gone back and forth over time, even as the science behind it has changed.

more than 2 years ago
top

Have American Businesses Been Stranded By the MBAs?

Rimbo Re:Lutz is dead wrong (487 comments)

The "average" engineer, yes.

But the GOOD and experienced engineers I know recognize and understand the value of sales, management, QA, Tech Support, IT, accounting and PR, and understand how all of these together make a healthy, functioning organization.

The same can be said for the "average" salesman vs. the GOOD salesman, the "average" accountant vs. the GOOD accountant, the "average" IT guy vs. the GOOD IT guy, the "average" PR person vs. the GOOD PR person, etc.

Lutz isn't suggesting you put any old engineer into these roles. He's saying to put the ones who understand the basics of business –which one needs no degree or formal training to learn – in charge. And Lutz would know, more than most.

more than 3 years ago
top

Palin Fans Deface Paul Revere Wikipedia Page

Rimbo Re:Palin was right (767 comments)

That article is about conservative apologists trying to backfit what she said into history. Paul Revere didn't fire gunshots and ring bells on his horse ride - that happened AFTER he was captured and gave inflated numbers to the British. His ride wasn't about warning the British - that was an unintentional side effect of getting capture. He rode to warn the militia and ultimately get to John Hancock and Sam Adams.

Even the experts in that article don't really back her up - they says she basically lucky that some part of the store could be backfitted to match what she said.

To be fair, I don't believe she is as dumb as she appears. I think she intentionally puts on that stupid accent and plays dumb to win over the fly-over states.

When you use the phrase "fly-over states" without irony, that makes you as much as a dumbass as Palin.

Jerk.

more than 3 years ago
top

Is Sugar Toxic?

Rimbo Re:It's complete bullshit (1017 comments)

Thats what I took from the article; the only thing Lustig is being accused of is excessive showmanship and overstating how firm certain conclusions are.

Yeah, and even I picked up on that while watching the 90 minute video. But I also saw that the meat of what he was saying was true. Then I replaced soda with water and milk in my own diet, and lost 10 pounds within a few weeks. Added soda back in, and the 10 pounds came back.

Neat trick, eh?

One thing I did notice was that the consensus about what causes heart disease and diabetes was different in the 1970s in Europe than in the US. Compare the obesity rates of these two areas; is this some kind of grim, accidental, controlled experiment?

I wouldn't call it "controlled." There are far, far too many variables involved.

more than 3 years ago
top

Is Sugar Toxic?

Rimbo Re:Glucose anyone? (1017 comments)

And guess what sucrose is? It's a glucose molecule and a fructose molecule bonded together.

more than 3 years ago

Submissions

top

Court rules: SCO does not own UNIX

Rimbo Rimbo writes  |  more than 7 years ago

Rimbo writes "Groklaw reports that Judge Kimball has ruled that Novell owns UNIX, and thus has the right to waive any legal claims against Linux (as it has already done). This ends the SCO saga; as PJ at Groklaw says, "There are a couple of loose ends, but the big picture is, SCO lost. Oh, and it owes Novell a lot of money from the Microsoft and Sun licenses." Time for PJ to put on that red dress she promised us."
Link to Original Source
top

Rimbo Rimbo writes  |  more than 7 years ago

Rimbo writes "Suppose there's a place in the food court with a tray cart, the kind with the spring-loaded top that's shaped to fit a tray, designed for the storing of food court trays. Right above it, a helpful sign reads, "Trays," with an arrow pointing where the trays should be. Right next to that, there's a hooded trash can with seven trays stacked on top of it. For the sake of example, suppose the height of the trays just reaches the height of the tray cart, so there's no extra lifting or dropping involved to put a tray on either spot. What percentage of the population puts their trays with the others, on top of the trash can?"
top

Rimbo Rimbo writes  |  more than 8 years ago

Rimbo writes "Stephane's Principle: An experienced software engineer can do more work in less time with a language he must learn on the fly that is appropriate to the problem than with a language he knows well that is not. The conventional wisdom with software is to choose popular languages for projects, even where another language is more appropriate, to take advantage of the large numbers of programmers trained in that language. Is Paul Graham's experience an exception that proves the rule? Or should Stephane's Principle be the general rule for new software projects?"

Journals

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?