Announcing: Slashdot Deals - Explore geek apps, games, gadgets and more. (what is this?)

Thank you!

We are sorry to see you leave - Beta is different and we value the time you took to try it out. Before you decide to go, please take a look at some value-adds for Beta and learn more about it. Thank you for reading Slashdot, and for making the site better!



Chicago's Camera Network Is Everywhere

SmellyCarney Re:That's what you get with corrupt democrats... (327 comments)

Check your history for context.

Benjamin Franklin: Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." (Nov 11 1755, from the Pennsylvania Assembly's reply to
the Governor of Pennsylvania.)

Thomas Jefferson: "Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither
inclined or determined to commit crimes. Such laws only make things worse for the assaulted and
better for the assassins; they serve to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man
may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." (1764 Letter and speech from T.
Jefferson quoting with approval an essay by Cesare Beccari)

John Adams: "Arms in the hands of citizens may be used at individual discretion in private self
defense." (A defense of the Constitution of the US)

George Washington: "Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the
people's liberty teeth (and) keystone... the rifle and the pistol are equally indispensable... more than
99% of them [guns] by their silence indicate that they are in safe and sane hands. The very
atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference [crime]. When firearms go, all goes,
we need them every hour." (Address to 1st session of Congress)

George Mason: "To disarm the people is the most effectual way to enslave them." (3 Elliot,
Debates at 380)

Noah Webster: "Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in
almost every country in Europe." (1787, Pamphlets on the Constitution of the US)

George Washington: "A free people ought to be armed." (Jan 14 1790, Boston Independent

Thomas Jefferson: "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." (T. Jefferson papers,
334, C.J. Boyd, Ed. 1950)

James Madison: "Americans have the right and advantage of being armed, unlike the people of
other countries, whose people are afraid to trust them with arms." (Federalist Paper #46)

Topic #2:

George Mason: "I ask you sir, who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people." (Elliott,
Debates, 425-426)

Richard Henry Lee: "A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves...and
include all men capable of bearing arms." (Additional letters from the Federal Farmer, at 169, 1788)

James Madison: "A WELL REGULATED militia, composed of the people, trained to arms, is the
best and most natural defense of a free country." (1st Annals of Congress, at 434, June 8th 1789,
emphasis added.

IMPORTANT NOTE: Back in the 18th century, a "regular" army meant an army that had
standard military equipment. So a "well regulated" army was simply one that was "well equipped." It
does NOT refer to a professional army. The 17th century folks used the term "STANDING Army"
to describe a professional army. THEREFORE, "a well regulated militia" only means a well equipped
militia. It does not imply the modern meaning of "regulated," which means controlled or administered
by some superior entity. Federal control over the militia comes from other parts of the Constitution,
but not from the second amendment. (my personal opinion)

Patrick Henry: "The people have a right to keep and bear arms." (Elliott, Debates at 185)

Alexander Hamilton: "...that standing army can never be formidable (threatening) to the liberties
of the people, while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to them in the use of arms."
(Federalist Paper #29)

"Little more can be aimed at with respect to the people at large than to have them properly armed
and equipped." (Id) {responding to the claim that the militia itself could threaten liberty}" There is
something so far-fetched, and so extravagant in the idea of danger of liberty from the militia that one
is at a loss whether to treat it with gravity or raillery (mockery). (Id)

The framers of the constitution made their views on firearm ownership abundantly apparent.
People like you are just closing their eyes and covering their ears.

more than 5 years ago

Obama's Election Means a Return of Vampire Flicks

SmellyCarney Reading Between the Lines FAIL (97 comments)

The new Slashdot crowd is not-so-much with the critical thinking. It's not "Democrats are blood-sucking vampires, Republicans are mindless zombies."

Vampire movie ==> Singular evil sucking the lifeblood out of the masses
Zombie movie ==> Mindless masses sucking the lifeblood (brains) out of a few individuals

Go take an English Lit class and learn to read a little bit further into the subtext.

more than 6 years ago



Apple Displays Fading from Glory on New iMacs

SmellyCarney SmellyCarney writes  |  more than 7 years ago

Smellycarney (160389) writes "Tastes may vary regarding the new black and aluminum look or the crazy laptop-like keyboard, but one thing's for sure: customers are not happy with the displays on the new 20" Aluminum iMacs. It seems Apple quietly slipped low quality TN (twisted nematic) LCD panels in to replace the higher quality (but more expensive) IPS (in-plane switching) panels that have traditionally been found in the 20" models and new owners are noticing a strong dark to light gradient from top to bottom of the displays. Is Apple manipulating it's product line to force the designers and photographers to more expensive models, or is this just further evidence of Apple trading quality for profits?"
Link to Original Source


SmellyCarney has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?