Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!



FreeBSD Project Falls Short of Year End Funding Target By Nearly 50%

SnatMandu Re:Obligatory (245 comments)

I think he's suggesting that *some* people like the *option* of fixing the software they use themselves. It's always nicer to get a fix for something from "upstream" somewhere, but that's not always possible. It's nice (a GPL-cheerleader might say "essential") to be able to fall back on your own elbow grease.

The relative quality of the code in question doesn't enter in to it. After all, what good is beautifully written and documented code if you'll never see it?

about 2 years ago

FISA Court Sides With ACLU Against Administration

SnatMandu Re:I wish I could join the ACLU (352 comments)

The emphasis is more on "Free" than on "State".

From, the first definition of "State" that's at all relevant. We could argue semantics of a state, but I don't think it's necessary:

5a : a politically organized body of people usually occupying a definite territory; especially : one that is sovereign

Certainly "Government" != "State" -- They are two quite distinct concepts. A Government is at least a property of, and at best is a tool of a State.

Based on the definition above, you need at least two things to be a state:

1) A body of people, and
2) A government (the property of political organization).

The government is the political organization of those people.

The plain text of the Law (the Second Amendment) reserves the right to bear arms specifically to the People, and not to the State, or the Congress, or anyone else (including "the Militia").

I believe that, regardless of whether it's more trouble than it's worth in today's civilization, the *intent* of the Second Amendment was to provide the possibility of organizing a Militia. The Militia is needed to protect the Freedom of the State (which is primarily comprised of people, not a government). The thing that the Freedom of the State needs protection from is The Government.

She ate the spider to catch the fly...

more than 7 years ago


SnatMandu hasn't submitted any stories.


SnatMandu has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?