Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!



Uber Has a Playbook For Sabotaging Lyft, Says Report

Stewie241 Re:Not Sharing (181 comments)

You are right - I mixed up my logic.

The OP indicated that B was a necessary condition for A. But this does not mean that B implies A. (there might be other necessary conditions for A)

2 days ago

Uber Has a Playbook For Sabotaging Lyft, Says Report

Stewie241 Re:Not Sharing (181 comments)

No, that's not what was said.

What was said was:
It is ride sharing IFF (if and only if) the driver would drive to the same location without the other people in the car.
i.e. A IFF B

This does not equate to B implying A.

3 days ago

"Intelligent" Avatars Poised To Manage Airline Check-In

Stewie241 Clippy for checkin terminals? (102 comments)

So is this basically clippy for checkin terminals?

about a month ago

Economist: File Sharing's Impact On Movies Is Modest At Most

Stewie241 Re:"Lower quality"? (214 comments)

I did gloss it over in my write up though I did not forget it. I somewhat addressed that in my closing question. To expand, I think that there are some people who just enjoy going to the movies. For whatever reason, for them, all the risks of the annoying behaviour that you describe together with the cost are shadowed by the pleasure of their experience. Maybe it is just about doing something out in public, or whatever. I dunno. If we assume this, then it is possible that the pre-release leak of the movie would incline their choice of movie (given that they've *already* decided to go to the theater) towards a new release that just became available in pirated form.

I personally find $25 to see a movie with my wife a bit hard to swallow and tend to only go on somebody else's suggest (to be social), but some people really enjoy the theater experience and would pay regardless of whether the film is available in pirated form or not.

My suspicion is that file sharing would only affect the segment of people who value being up on the latest movies but don't value the theatre experience.

As an aside, the report at provides some interesting statistics about ticket sale volume (in summary, "2012 U.S./Canada box office was $10.8 billion, up 6% compared to $10.2 billion in 2011, and up 12% from five
years ago.", "The 2012 increase in U.S./Canada box office was due to an equivalent increase in admissions (6%) compared to
2011, as admissions reached 1.36 billion,", "More than two-thirds of the U.S./Canada population (68%) – or 225 million people – went to the movies at least
once in 2012, consistent with prior years."

If you assume piracy has been increasing over the last few years then the stats that MPAA is releasing don't really seem to lead to the conclusion that it is affecting ticket sales in a negative fashion.

about a month and a half ago

Economist: File Sharing's Impact On Movies Is Modest At Most

Stewie241 Re:"Lower quality"? (214 comments)

The KPI they are looking at is box office revenue. So, yes, the trailers are obviously unskippable. But it could be argued that many people don't have the same quality AV setup in their homes that the theaters have. The quality is determined by two things - one, the quality of the source material and the quality of the venue and playback equipment.

Now what I wonder is whether the shared movie's availability helps draw more people to the box office, or whether it instead draws more people already going to the box office towards a particular film. i.e. does it make the pie bigger or does it increase the size of the slice that a particular movie gets?

about a month and a half ago

Goldman Sachs Demands Google Unsend One of Its E-mails

Stewie241 Re:why? (346 comments)

It depends how the headers were populated. It is possible to include both a recipient name and a mailbox specification in RFC 822. If it was addressed like:
Jane Smith then one could argue John Doe should not open the message.

As crazy as it sounds to do something like this on the Internet, there is precedence in some messaging services. Skype, for example, lets you delete messages after they have already been sent. Obviously there is no guarantee that the other person didn't read it yet, but if not, then it is effectively unsent. If it had been read, the other user has to go by memory unless they copied and pasted the email.

Google has the ability to do the same thing with mail sent to a GMail account in many situations. IMAP clients will tend to sync up and would likely go and remove the message at the next sync. If the user had not read it yet, it would be effectively 'taken back'. If the user had opened and taken a cursory glance at it they would in essence accomplish the same purpose. If the user has a POP client they are obviously out of luck.

What I wonder though is what sort of data it is and whether this is a sole measure of protection or an additional measure. Depending on how quickly they discovered the error and got a hold of Google, there is likely a very slim chance the message wasn't read at all. Further, they have no guarantees that the message wasn't copy and pasted or otherwise stored. Perhaps it is a best effort type of deal.

about 2 months ago

Bug In Fire TV Screensaver Tears Through 250 GB Data Cap

Stewie241 Re:Why do we have screen savers? (349 comments)

This isn't a monitor, it's a TV. And burn-in is an issue if you have a plasma TV. I would almost argue it is worse than old CRTs. I find the problem happens when you're watching Netflix and the show ends and you are off doing something else or otherwise occupied while it sits at the menu on the Roku.

Does HDMI allow the video source to tell the TV to turn off the display after inactivity? I guess the device can turn off. I think TVs tend not to do that though. Instead, they power up the display and put a no signal message on the screen that often bounces around to prevent burn-in.

about 2 months ago

Smartphones To Monitor Schizophrenics

Stewie241 Re:controlling words (99 comments)

I'm sure that when they develop sensors to detect attitude and intentions the psychiatrists will avail themselves of it.

From what I gathered in the article this was about patients and/or their families coming to a doctor for help and using this as a tool for the doctor and patient to manage the patient's condition together.

This reminds of the article about Target's ability to tell if a shopper is pregnant (

The data being collected is obviously a typical outworking of an internal state. It seems useful in providing the psychiatrist with a clue as to when it might be a good idea to call in and checkup on a patient, or to have a family member drop in.

And yes, these are human beings with dignity. And obviously, there are complications with this particular condition that make things difficult, but if I had this condition I could imagine myself in my healthier times being interested in setting up a support system to prevent me from harming myself and/or others and ending up in the hospital.

about 2 months ago

London Black Cabs Threaten Chaos To Stop Uber

Stewie241 Re: Who the F gets to live without competition? (417 comments)

My point was that allowing services like Uber to become common place may make a regulated taxi service unviable, which may have a negative effect on a city's tourism and business. Also, time will tell how much or how little services like Uber will be taken advantage of, both by drivers who jerk around with passengers, and by riders who jerk around with drivers.

Further, it *does* seem unfair to taxi drivers who were told the only way they could legally engage in the business was to study for three years and pay a bunch of money to watch other drivers engage in the business without having done so.

about 4 months ago

London Black Cabs Threaten Chaos To Stop Uber

Stewie241 Re: Who the F gets to live without competition? (417 comments)

To play the devil's advocate, it is bad for tourism and business if you don't have a taxi system that can be relied on to be safe and clean. And, from the tourism perspective, appearance of so is very important. This is most likely rooted in history, especially for a place like London, but I can see it making sense for a city like London to want to ensure that tourists can count on having a pleasant safe ride at a predictable price when taking a taxi.

Not that an Uber ride isn't necessarily so, but without licensing and regulation, there is no way to ensure you have that consistent experience, and even if Uber sets standards, they are outside the control of the city.

I think a little competition is good, but you still need a way to ensure that licensed, regulated taxis are still viable so that tourists and business travelers feel safe.

As a taxi driver in London I would be pretty pissed off if I had just spent three years of my life studying to pass a test and was laying out $500 a year to run my business and had to meet rigid standards because I was abiding by the law and others were allowed to ignore those same laws.

about 4 months ago

Verizon and New Jersey Agree 4G Service Equivalent to Broadband Internet

Stewie241 Re:30 GB cap (155 comments)

Cost is prohibitive *and* bandwidth caps are ridiculous.

about 4 months ago

Verizon and New Jersey Agree 4G Service Equivalent to Broadband Internet

Stewie241 Re:30 GB cap (155 comments)

I don't disagree with that argument at all - the problem with LTE in general is that there is at least some notion of scarcity and the cost is prohibitive if you want it to serve as an alternative to regular broadband. Nonetheless, the problem is *not* that you have to get a phone service and tether to it.

about 4 months ago

Verizon and New Jersey Agree 4G Service Equivalent to Broadband Internet

Stewie241 Re:How? (155 comments)

You mean like that?

about 4 months ago

Netflix Gets What It Pays For: Comcast Streaming Speeds Skyrocket

Stewie241 Re:huh? (328 comments)

>> That's how the entertainment industry would LIKE people to consume their media. Paying them directly, then supporting them indirectly through ad revenue as well.

I've never really understood the reflexive reaction to this. The fact that cable companies/Hulu both charge money and show advertisements is not enough information to determine whether or not you are getting screwed.

It is quite possible that the advertising provides some revenue but not enough revenue to cover the entire cost. Suppose the cable programming, averaged across subscribers, costs the provider $30 (likely bears no resemblance to reality - just a figure for argument sake). The provider can mark this up and charge the subscriber $45. Or they can inject in advertisements and charge the subscriber $35 after markup.

The determination is up to the provider, really. Will they be more profitable with higher prices and fewer ads, or lower prices and more ads. The problem generally tends to be that it doesn't get factored in when the consumer is making a purchasing decision. It would be interesting to see if a TV provider could win customers by setting an advertising volume specification and comparing against competitors (i.e. our channels have 3 mins of ads per 20 mins and our competitors have 4 mins of ads per 20 mins). I'm really not sure it would make a difference or not. The challenge is obviously as well that programming is tailored to a certain time slot so there is an extent to which it is out of the cable provider's control, unless they add other filler material that is not advertising.

about 4 months ago

Canada Halts Online Tax Returns In Wake of Heartbleed

Stewie241 Re:Tax filing (50 comments)

I'm pretty sure they are all downloadable and printable. And you might be able to get one from the post office? I can't remember them ever mailing them out preemptively. Now they have stopped mailing out the remittance stickers or forms or whatever they are, which makes it a lot harder to pay your taxes at the bank.

about 5 months ago

Why Buy Microsoft Milk When the Google Cow Is Free?

Stewie241 Re:Big Labor's transparent motive (409 comments)

I think it is well within their limits to request cash rather than discounts on software but I think it is a display of ignorance on behalf of the union president.

If I produce SaaS and sell it at $50 per user per year to 1 000 users, then I can probably provide that same service for free to an additional 10 users at a negligible cost. I've already developed the software, I'm already provisioned a whack of servers - it is little additional effort and cost.

If I instead provide the money, then that is $500 a year for those same ten users - probably 50-100 times more money.

Now I do get the union president's point and I think the decision has to be made wisely. It is important to weigh into the decision the total cost - i.e. compare all available offerings and make the best decision based on the data. Don't choose Google just because it is free, but don't choose Microsoft or Apple or Libreoffice unless they are really the best choice (factoring in cost).

about 5 months ago

Woman Attacked In San Francisco Bar For Wearing Google Glass

Stewie241 Re:Rejects (921 comments)

Ah ha... so if I'm out at a bar, and somebody has their smartphone out and is say, checking their email, then I can object and have reasonable expectation that they put the smartphone away in their pocket or leave the bar?

It reminds my of an acquaintance of mine who wrote about his glass experience, saying that he was out at a street festival and was confronted by a street performer who was worried he was recording the show. The response was 'no, I'm not, but there are three or four other people around here with smartphones who are' and he pointed them out.

Obviously, seeing people wearing Google glass the first few times can be off putting (presumably), but I've heard people say more than once that they were pretending to do something on their phone but were actually taking video.

I think it's too late really to do much about this - people already have easy access to video cameras that are commonly carried around in public and give little to no indication that they are recording. The glass is just one more way to do it.

about 6 months ago

Under Armour/Lockheed Suit Blamed For US Skating Performance

Stewie241 Re:Dice Blamed for Beta (357 comments)

Hmmm... most condoms don't deal well with oil so that seems somewhat unlikely.

about 6 months ago

FSF's Richard Stallman Calls LLVM a 'Terrible Setback'

Stewie241 Re:...but if you want free software to improve... (1098 comments)

That's not completely true... the GPL does not at all obligate you to make your changes available to the original developer. It only obligates people who distribute binaries based on your work to also distribute the source that accompanies those binaries. I am in no way obligated to distribute my new binary to the original developer and as such am not obligated to distribute the source (though anybody who I do distribute the binary to may request the source and provide it to the original developer).

GPL emphasizes the freedom of the next generations, where BSD emphasizes the protection of the first generation.

i.e. if I write GPL software and distribute it with the source, and somebody else takes that source and modifies it, and distributes it, then they have to provide the source and the right to modify it. So users two or three (or more) links down the chain have the same freedom as the original user.

if I write BSD software and distribute it with the source, and somebody else takes that source and modifies it, then they have no obligation to provide the source, and thus there is no necessary benefit to lower generations. The BSD offers them no such guaranteed benefit.

GPL sacrifices the freedom of the first generation to protect the freedom of the future generations.

about 7 months ago



Joomla! 1.5.0 Stable Released

Stewie241 Stewie241 writes  |  more than 6 years ago

Stewie241 (1035724) writes "It is with great pride that the Joomla! community announces to the world the immediate availability of Joomla! 1.5 Stable [Khepri]. As a community of contributors, we have been through celebrations and tribulations. We have had fun, and we have worked hard. We have learned from and helped one another. What started two and a half years ago with a letter to the community has grown into a great opportunity for both the Joomla! project and community to benefit from these efforts and to consider our future.

Congratulations to all those who have worked extremely hard to get this landmark release ready!"

Link to Original Source


Stewie241 has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>