Beta

Slashdot: News for Nerds

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Do Apple and Google Sabotage Older Phones? What the Graphs Don't Show

TechnicolourSquirrel Re:Much ado about nothing (265 comments)

You're totally right, I shouldn't fall into these conspiracy theories, like believing my phone got instantly slower with iOS4 and believing everyone else who says the same thing. Instead I should believe that someone is hacking with my perception of time. Because that would be the only way for it not to be conspiracy theory. Obviously I should just ignore the evidence of my senses and my experience and believe your unsupported suppositions about what compiler options Apple uses for each phone image, and whether they are appropriate. Nobody actually has a clue as to what is the answer to that question, but I should just trust Apple because they obviously have my best interests at heart. To believe anything else of a corporation is obviously a conspiracy theory, as I have been saying all along.

17 minutes ago
top

Do Apple and Google Sabotage Older Phones? What the Graphs Don't Show

TechnicolourSquirrel Graph is search results, not speed measurements. (265 comments)

You know what? I never considered that. You're right, the probability of Apple misuing the software locks that have on our devices to push near-irrevocable updates that slow us down, something that is completely within their power and they would actually have to expend effort not to do, is approximately equal to the probability of Google predicting that someone would write an article like this and pre-emptively messing with their search algorithms, just on the off-chance that somebody might do a study like this. Every Apple defender should remember, when talking about Google. Apple might have verified near-total control of your device, and it might be plainly obvious to them how they could abuse it, but you should trust them blindly not to, because they are just that trustworthy. Apple has your best interests at heart. On the other hand, you should NOT trust Google blindly because maybe they are messing with searches they have no idea who is going to perform or why. Google might be psychic and be able to tell in advance what kinds of articles people are going to write and mess with search algorithms to throw them off. The mere outside chance possibility of this is enough because Google obviously does not have your best interests at heart. You see, it's all about trust. When you have trust in a company, you will let them in your underwear. When you don't, you don't even want their car in your neighbourhood.

yesterday
top

Do Apple and Google Sabotage Older Phones? What the Graphs Don't Show

TechnicolourSquirrel Nothing new... (265 comments)

Nothing new to this thread, either, but hey-- who reads, anymore, am I right?

yesterday
top

Do Apple and Google Sabotage Older Phones? What the Graphs Don't Show

TechnicolourSquirrel Re:Hardware ages too (265 comments)

Wow that's a great example, PopeRatzo, because the chintzy little ncurses-like OS on the original iPods is totally comparable to the UNIX-flavour OS X on a smartphone computer. I also hear original Sony Walkmans still work, so that and the original iPod thing totally disprove any conspiracy theories about companies abusing their trusted access to your device to try to pump sales. A corporation would NEVER do that, obvs

yesterday
top

Do Apple and Google Sabotage Older Phones? What the Graphs Don't Show

TechnicolourSquirrel Re:Planned obsolescence (265 comments)

No way does Microsoft do the same things as Apple, because there's no way that Microsoft could ever be equally as wonderful as Apple. Whatever evil thing that Microsoft does, that might -seem- similar to something Apple is doing...? I guarantee you that Apple is doing that thing differently in some way, that makes it actually virtuous, and for our own good, because Apple has our best interests at heart.

yesterday
top

Do Apple and Google Sabotage Older Phones? What the Graphs Don't Show

TechnicolourSquirrel Re:Weird premise (265 comments)

You're right. I should just pick one. It's not like Apple recommended one without warning me about any tradeoffs and then did everything in their power to make it impossible for me to take it back. Apple wouldn't do that to anyone intentionally. Apple cares, cheesybagelman! Agree or disagree?

yesterday
top

Do Apple and Google Sabotage Older Phones? What the Graphs Don't Show

TechnicolourSquirrel Re:It's not just the OS (265 comments)

You're right. My bad. It must be just me and the thousands of other users that have complained about this online for years affected graphs and whatnot. We are just isolated cases, of course. There is no performance issue. Nothing to see here, folks! Move along.

yesterday
top

Do Apple and Google Sabotage Older Phones? What the Graphs Don't Show

TechnicolourSquirrel Re:Impact on the Network? (265 comments)

You sure showed me.

yesterday
top

Do Apple and Google Sabotage Older Phones? What the Graphs Don't Show

TechnicolourSquirrel Re:Rely on Reputation? (265 comments)

Well of course Apple ate the dingos. Because that babies are future users, and Apple always has the user's best interests at heart. For someone who claims to understand what I'm being, you oddly failed to predict that Apple eating dingos is actually a very good thing.

yesterday
top

Do Apple and Google Sabotage Older Phones? What the Graphs Don't Show

TechnicolourSquirrel Newsflash (265 comments)

Totally. And to think, some idiots actually TRUST Apple's update recommendations. I mean, I know Apple wouldn't recommend anything against my interests, just to make more money, because that would be a conspiracy theory. But still, everybody knows that recommended updates are supposed to make computers run crappier. It's just common sense. Sure, Apple's products are aimed at the not necessarily computer-savvy, but there's not savvy, and there's being a TOTAL LOSER by trusting Apple.

yesterday
top

Do Apple and Google Sabotage Older Phones? What the Graphs Don't Show

TechnicolourSquirrel It's not just the OS (265 comments)

Absolutely. It has to be the third-party apps. After all, from a standing no-apps all-memory-released start, it takes my iPhone 3G with iOS4 only about 5 seconds to open the keyboard, and only 10 seconds to open the built-in iPod player. I count myself lucky I'm not waiting minutes every time. I mean, at least it's better than loading from a floppy. Gotta be those third-party apps, mm-hmm.

yesterday
top

Do Apple and Google Sabotage Older Phones? What the Graphs Don't Show

TechnicolourSquirrel Rely on Reputation? (265 comments)

Yes. Here's a good one. Backdoors aren't 'backdoors' when Apple has the keys. They don't exist, understand? There is just a wall there. No door.

yesterday
top

Do Apple and Google Sabotage Older Phones? What the Graphs Don't Show

TechnicolourSquirrel Built in obselescence (265 comments)

Yes. Linux does it too. Every single computer company pushes recommended updates directly to users without a warning, and then makes it as impossible as they can to downgrade back to what they had due to DRM-style software locks. I mean, Linux may not actually have any such locks, but hell, just yesterday, Linus Torvalds himself came to my house and said if I tried to downgrade Gnome 2 back to Gnome 1, he would personally send Richard Stallman and a couple of goons to beat up my pet animals. Save your cute pet animals! Buy Apple. They only use software locks to prevent you from taking back with their upgrade decisions Ã" NOT ANIMAL ABUSE.

yesterday
top

Do Apple and Google Sabotage Older Phones? What the Graphs Don't Show

TechnicolourSquirrel Re:Planned obsolescence (265 comments)

You did. You totally got me there. You successfully managed to fend off any suspicion that Apple is trying to cynically manipulate users into spending more, by pointing out that nobody has to install their surprise-slow updates. Instead, people could just not trust Apple and check the internet to see what update critics are saying. And that conclusively proves that Apple's motives are not questionable here. QED! BTW I have noticed that you are really smart, with your 'hyperboles' and your 'gotchas'. Do you have a blog or something?

yesterday
top

Do Apple and Google Sabotage Older Phones? What the Graphs Don't Show

TechnicolourSquirrel Impact on the Network? (265 comments)

Yes I agree, it's the Overarching Monolithic Network that simultaneously sets everybody's speed across the world for doing anything. Blame The Network. Not Apple. P.S. It's taking forever for me to open this PowerPoint document. Did somebody break The Network again??

yesterday
top

Do Apple and Google Sabotage Older Phones? What the Graphs Don't Show

TechnicolourSquirrel Re:Planned obsolescence (265 comments)

You're right. Users always have the option of just not trusting Apple at all and doing hours of their own research before going ahead with Apple's recommended updates that cannot easily be reversed at all. I clearly see your logic now. Apple is not at fault BECAUSE they CAN'T be trusted. Users should be able to figure out for themselves that the widely touted most user friendly computer company in the world cannot actually be trusted with a single update. Then they would understand why Apple is superior.

yesterday
top

Do Apple and Google Sabotage Older Phones? What the Graphs Don't Show

TechnicolourSquirrel Re:No need for a conspiracy (265 comments)

Yes, I agree. Apple obviously did the only thing it could do when it slowed everybody devices down by pushing more updates than they can handle. This helped them delay complaints from users about not getting upgrades for about a year, until finally there is an update that won't run at all. Pushing all our old phones to the brink of unuseability to delay inevitable complaints by about a year is just Apple's way of keeping its userbase happy, and has nothing to do with forcing people to buy new phones, which Apple isn't interested in AT ALL.

yesterday
top

Do Apple and Google Sabotage Older Phones? What the Graphs Don't Show

TechnicolourSquirrel Re:It is HARD to support non-shipping devices (265 comments)

I have been falling all over myself with gratitude for Apple's better support, ever since I updated my iPhone 3G to iOS4. I was so impressed that it was the last Apple product I ever bought. I still have it today... somewhere. I'm so glad that completely user friendly fuck-ups granted themselves as much total control over my hardware as they could technologically muster. That's what USER FRIENDLY means duh

yesterday
top

Do Apple and Google Sabotage Older Phones? What the Graphs Don't Show

TechnicolourSquirrel Apple complaint from admitted fanboy (265 comments)

Why would Apple let you DOWNgrade your phone? Apple always knows best. To allow a DOWNgrade would be to question that.

yesterday
top

Do Apple and Google Sabotage Older Phones? What the Graphs Don't Show

TechnicolourSquirrel Planned obsolescence (265 comments)

Thankfully for us, in the new improved version, even if your device isn't obsolescing as planned, Apple can send it a command to do so whenever it wants, in the form of a software update. This is right and good because Apple knows whats best for us, and if you end up trapped into a very-difficult-to-reverse update you shouldn't have had, then it's buyer beware. Which has always been the case, right? So nobody should complain when Apple decides their devices have had enough and its time to spend more money. People trying to make old hardware still hunt are just pathetic and just don't understand Capitalism which says companies are just evil by nature and therefore not at fault for anything.

yesterday

Submissions

top

Photonovelists Start Running Into Each Other

TechnicolourSquirrel TechnicolourSquirrel writes  |  more than 5 years ago

TechnicolourSquirrel (1092811) writes "In a kind of fan convention replay of Man Bites Dog, one camera-wielding photo comic creator encounters another at Fan Expo 2008 in Toronto, resulting in some amusingly self-reflexive photoblogging that may demonstrate the value of the network effect in the field of photonovels. The blogger also has this to say about convention culture: "Far more this year than last year, the gamers were segregated from the rest of the convention-goers. Nonlinear geeks are not like linear geeks. The clustering vibe is as different as between a clan of badgers and a herd of buffalo. It shouldn't really be necessary to separate them — that takes care of itself. I would have preferred it if the organisers had used their floor plan to force a little more mixing".

[Note for Eds: This is a corrected version of the story I submitted earlier, in which I believe I mistakenly wrote 'Man Bites Bog' where I intended to write 'Man Bites Dog'. This is the corrected copy — you may post it or use it as a guide to correct the original timestamped version, or just reject both as you wish. Apologise for doing it this way — it was the only way I knew to be sure the same people would see it.]"
top

Photonovelists Start Running Into Each Other

TechnicolourSquirrel TechnicolourSquirrel writes  |  more than 5 years ago

TechnicolourSquirrel (1092811) writes "In a kind of fan convention replay of Man Bites Bog, one camera-wielding photo comic creator encounters another at Fan Expo 2008 in Toronto, resulting in some amusingly self-reflexive photoblogging that gives us a glimpse of the network effects we will probably see when basically everybody is doing a photonovel. The blogger also has this to say about convention culture: 'Far more this year than last year, the gamers were segregated from the rest of the convention-goers. Nonlinear geeks are not like linear geeks. The clustering vibe is as different as between a clan of badgers and a herd of buffalo. It shouldn't really be necessary to separate them — that takes care of itself. I would have preferred it if the organisers had used their floor plan to force a little more mixing.'"
Link to Original Source
top

TechnicolourSquirrel TechnicolourSquirrel writes  |  more than 7 years ago

TechnicolourSquirrel (1092811) writes "Forbes.com informs us that Media Rights Technologies is suing Microsoft, Apple, Adobe, and Real Networks for not using its DRM technology and therefore 'failing to include measures to control access to copyrighted material,' alleging that their refusal to use MRT's X1 Recording Control technology constitutes a 'circumvention' of a copyright protection system, which is of course illegal under the Digital Millenium Copryight Act. I would say more, but without controlling access to this paragraph with MRT's products, I fear I have already risked too much..."

Journals

TechnicolourSquirrel has no journal entries.

Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...