Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Has the Mythical Unicorn of Materials Science Finally Been Found?

Thakandar2 Re:The Invisible Unicorn Argument. (238 comments)

"I'm too lazy to sign up. if you think posting as AC affects the validity of my statements, then you have much bigger problems"

I didn't have a reason to question the validity of your statements until you suggested as much.

about 2 years ago
top

Has the Mythical Unicorn of Materials Science Finally Been Found?

Thakandar2 Re:The Invisible Unicorn Argument. (238 comments)

Sorry to be pedantic, but the molecules aren't self replicating as part of their nature, but they're reacting to processes that they are subject to from an outside force which swung the whole thing into motion somewhere prior to that molecule being subject to other forces like gravity/energy/etc..

There's no transformation in a second molecule based on the first molecule sitting in some space nearby without some kind of impetus or outwards force creating that change. That change is caused by the system of physics/chemistry/relationships between matter, and so if reality (matter, stuff, etc) simply always was, then it still, philosophically, had a point where it was either always in stasis (outside of time) or some input mechanism starting the process. Unless there is a completely enclosed reality between each "moment" or interactive space that doesn't bear any influence or relation to the next "moment of time or space", there really does have to be some event/force that changed matter either INTO the dense clump of stuff that was the big bang, or started it with the big bang.

I understand I keep using language like "event", "start" and "process" but there is some real limitation on linguistics when talking about some of this stuff.

Just trying to say that those molecules in space wouldn't react to the force of gravity and therefore create the clouds without some kind of order or system being put into place ahead of their interaction that then dictates what is going on in a somewhat intelligible way.

I'm a law student and obviously not a scientist... much more interested in the theological and logical implications of the argument.

about 2 years ago
top

Harvard Develops Drug-Filled, Injectable Sponge That Expands Inside the Body

Thakandar2 Commercial Ring Tone (24 comments)

Who lives in a cavity under the skin?
MED-ICAL SPON-GES!
Giving antibiotics in the cavity it's in?
MED-ICAL SPON-GES!
Is accelerated healing something you wish?
MED-ICAL SPON-GES!
Then wait for the studies to all get published!
MED-ICAL SPON-GES!
MED-ICAL SPON-GES!
MED-ICAAAAALLLL! SPOOON-GEEEEESSSS!

about 2 years ago
top

Thomas Jefferson: Scientist, Inventor, Gadgeteer

Thakandar2 Re:Thank Jebus he can't see the US today (220 comments)

I did realize it was a Deistic term, thanks. :)

I was addressing the supposed issue of separation of church and state, not wondering on the actual views of Jefferson or Madison. They didn't conform to any "orthodox" or mainstream definition of Deism either, but believed the relationship with God to be between each man and the Creator, which was quite Protestant if anything. For some reason they still attended church regularly all their lives, participated in communion and worship services, etc. Perhaps that's just them bowing to the peer pressures of their day and age.

But they were pragmatic visionaries as well, and knew religion had a big piece to play in both society and political science, so they decided to address the issue directly by ensuring people could worship or exercise as they wished, and be free of government endorsement/establishment of one religion over the other, rather than a complete separation of all government and religious acts or intents.

I don't think either Madison or Jefferson would mind giving money to a religious charity if it served the same goals the government institution was trying to accomplish, but that would be unconstitutional in the modern jurisprudence because it would be granting one organization a benefit, even if it was just a lowest bidder type situation.

more than 2 years ago
top

Thomas Jefferson: Scientist, Inventor, Gadgeteer

Thakandar2 Re:Thank Jebus he can't see the US today (220 comments)

I really thought I was logged in to post this, especially since I took so much time, but I posted as Anon. If you don't want to reply to the Anon, and would rather send a message, please send to me! Thanks!

more than 2 years ago
top

Rob "CmdrTaco" Malda Resigns From Slashdot

Thakandar2 Re:I grew up with Slashdot (1521 comments)

Nah... it must have been Sophmore or Junior by my uid. Oh well.

about 3 years ago
top

Rob "CmdrTaco" Malda Resigns From Slashdot

Thakandar2 I grew up with Slashdot (1521 comments)

I've been reading since at least 1997, when I was a High School Freshman and finally got a computer in my own room with an internet connection. I remember reading Slashdot daily, which eventually led to me trying Linux on my old 386/33 laptop and experimenting with other distros that were just no fun at all to install.

BUT, I learned so much from the different commentators that had an amazing breadth of backgrounds, whether it was an article about digital rights or some new finding by NASA. I loved that Rob and the others built this community of nerds, but that it encompassed so much more than just Linux or hard sciences, and became a real community. Heck, I even learned some HTML to make my few comments look better. SEE!?

Thanks for all the years and stories, Rob, and I pray the best for you.

about 3 years ago
top

Military Drone Attacks Are Not 'Hostile'

Thakandar2 Re:nobody cares if you killed their kid on acciden (892 comments)

The victims do care if their child was killed by accident, because the Americans apologize and offer condolences and money. Al Qaeda in Iraq or other terroristic militias just say "You deserved it."

more than 3 years ago
top

T-Mobile Joins the Capped Data Bandwagon

Thakandar2 Re:Does not seem legal... (112 comments)

Article 2 of the UCC is for goods, not for services. If you want to argue that you bought a phone, the UCC determines whether a transaction is for goods or services based on the majority of the worth of the transaction. If I buy a $1000 water heater and installation is faulty, but installation is a service of $200 worth, then it's still considered a contract for goods. Cell phone carriers make much more money on the service side than by selling subsidized phones.

IANAL also, but I did just finish my second semester of Contracts in law school.

more than 3 years ago
top

Is Science Just a Matter of Faith?

Thakandar2 Comments are about the wrong issue. (1486 comments)

Reading the higher moderated stuff, like 3+ on here, I don't see any people discussing the actual problem posed, which I repost below.

"How can we understand science, if we can't understand the language of science? 'We don't learn science by doing science, we learn science by reading and memorizing. The same way we learn history.'"

The larger problem is that there is a large dearth of explainable science in the world and a larger vacuum of people able to explain how these sciences work to the layman. That's what's important.

I'm somewhat educated having a bachelors and being in law school. I read a large range of material from scientific studies (if I can do it for free) to magazines, to text books, and occasionally have to learn the basics of something to be able to argue about the law on it since I plan on doing intellectual property law. According to census data, education and reading habit wise, I'm above normal. I mean, I figured out enough tags to make my paragraphs and add italics. You might not think that's great if you're reading Slashdot, but that's advanced coding to a lot of people using the Internet these days. But....

I know that there will never be increased funding for science unless there is some kind of popular understanding that can create a demand for it.

Ready for the car analogy? People will soon want affordable electric cars because gas, even in Texas, is getting closer and closer to $4 a gallon. But people understand the concept of batteries, transmissions, etc. Or, if they don't know how a gear box works, they at least know it's necessary to drive a car. These are things that impact them and are relevant, and are also things they can understand to a certain degree. If people can't understand it, they (in my anecdotal and statistically worthless experience) become curious (minority), apathetic (majority) or scared of it (many, but not majority).

If you tell the average person that Climatology is complex, and that they'll only understand it with 10 years of research even if they read the studies where this data is supposedly being presented, then people will not try to find out the details. Instead, they want easily handled chunks of information, which is why this specific issue is so politicized now. People don't have time, resources, and - most importantly - the desire to wade into the weeds and figure out what's going on.

It also doesn't help that there is a very real disdain for the plebes who don't have doctorates or who don't just trust the scientists' every word because they're scientists, damn you! That's possibly an exaggeration, but you can look at the comments for yourself. A good majority of the comments above in this slashdot article are nothing but very literate trolls, trotting out pithy statements about how Science is good, religion is Bad, and stupid people need to stop being stupid. No one is ever going to change their mind by being insulted.

Instead, people need to work, train, donate, and hope for a future where we have professionals that can explain their science in such a way that it becomes accessible. Discover and National Geographic usually do a good job of that, but are restrained by the commercial interests of needing to be interesting. If anything, scientists need to add advertising and marketing to their skills, or hire people who have those skills to drum up more resources for explaining and making science relevant to most people. It is impossible for someone to care how many great discoveries and modern luxuries came out of the space ship project if the person doesn't know that's how it came to be. People on Slashdot know this, but the average person, and especially the average high schooler, have no idea. (I substituted for a public school district for a year. There's history and science classes, but they don't ever talk about science and history in the same sentence.)

Make Science popular, then people will know enough to not have to accept the statements of Experts on faith. Make the science common sense.

more than 3 years ago
top

Student Sues FBI For Planting GPS Tracker

Thakandar2 Re:Law Student Analysis (586 comments)

I lost gas mileage. That tracker in the pictures was of substantial size. Did you see how many Rare Earth Magnets they had on it?

I lost exclusive access to my property (if I put it in a garage). Then it's just trespass without a warrant. Sounds like the person in the story had it in an apartment parking lot, though.

For the time that they "held" me in my apartment I wasn't able to use my items if they didn't have a warrant, which they seemed to not have according to the story.

I think you're right about the conversion.

more than 3 years ago
top

Student Sues FBI For Planting GPS Tracker

Thakandar2 Re:Law Student Analysis (586 comments)

Actually, I did refuse the governmental authorities all the time when I was in the Military. I worked in JAG (as a paralegal) and routinely told officers who outranked me, from Special Forces down to some supply Sergeant, to respectfully go stuff their orders in their ear because I knew my rights and what they were doing/requesting was wrong. I don't care how awesome some LTC in the Green Berets is, I'm not giving him blank, notarized documents. I'm not allowing that company commander to handcuff a soldier to the CQ desk and thereby make him AND me liable for some investigation.

Also, in Texas, I can record conversations people have with me without their notice. I am unfamiliar with other states, which is why I was vague.

more than 3 years ago
top

Utah To Teach USA is a Republic, Not a Democracy

Thakandar2 I Pledge Allegience... (1277 comments)

...to the flag, of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands...

more than 3 years ago
top

Student Sues FBI For Planting GPS Tracker

Thakandar2 Law Student Analysis (586 comments)

From the article: "The Obama administration asked the court to change its ruling, calling the decision "vague and unworkable" and arguing that investigators will lose access to a tool they now use "with great frequency." -This is not a reassuring trend. If the objection was that it was vague and unworkable, that'd be fine. But their objection seems to be that it disallows them from using the GPS without a warrant - which is not fine. Voting for change wasn't supposed to mean "Change my ideals back to what the previous people did."

Also: ". . . the agents who showed up to collect the device were "hostile," threatening to charge Afifi if he didn't immediately cooperate and refusing his request to have a lawyer present" and earlier stated, the agents "demanded their property back." I might just be a first year law student, but if you leave your property in my car, and make no claims to it and abandon it, then it could be mine. Also, the agents only "pulled him over as he drove away from his apartment" probably to avoid the whole warrant issue of collecting it from his apartment. Yet, any time law enforcement shows up, it is my understanding that you don't have to give them any information besides the identify statutes require, like name and maybe ID if your state says so. So I'd sit in the parking lot, and not invite them into my home and tell them I don't want them to search my car without some kind of pretense. Also, I'd turn my smart phone recorder on since we were having the discussions in public.

Perhaps they could have just followed him with a tail to get all the GPS type info, or put a drone over him. I don't think there's an expectation of privacy for the outside of your car, but if it was found in the engine compartment, that might be different. I don't like adding to the car with a device... that seems like some kind of alteration, or trespass to chattels (personal property). Government tort exemptions probably apply for this kind of thing, whether it's constitutional or not.

I'm much more concerned with the adding a device to the personal property than I am the expectation of privacy claim. IF I wanted to follow someone all day, I could collect all the information about their whereabouts.

more than 3 years ago
top

President Obama On Mythbusters Tonight

Thakandar2 Slashdot Quote of the Day (416 comments)

"Mirrors should reflect a little before throwing back images. -- Jean Cocteau"

Is this about Obama, or the Myth Busters? I'm confused...

more than 3 years ago
top

My current stuffedness rating:

Thakandar2 Currently getting stuffed... (232 comments)

...because my mom brought my tray of food down into my basement so I wouldn't have to sit with the rest of the family. My mom and I think this is a win-win situation.

more than 3 years ago
top

WikiLeaks Releases Cache of 400,000 Iraq War Documents

Thakandar2 Re:Wow (676 comments)

Oh, also, misrepresentation is different than hiding. I don't allege the guardian was hiding things. That means they're deliberately trying to suppress something, like not ever publishing the longer story or denying that something true happened. They didn't do that. They misrepresented, as in, they had the facts and picked the ones they liked to present to further some kind of purpose.

more than 3 years ago
top

WikiLeaks Releases Cache of 400,000 Iraq War Documents

Thakandar2 Re:Wow (676 comments)

Lie? That infers malice.

Here is the story they had on their front page on the day the leak was publicized.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/oct/22/iraq-war-logs-military-leaks

Here is the excerpt from the story mentioning the helicopter.

A US helicopter gunship involved in a notorious Baghdad incident had previously killed Iraqi insurgents after they tried to surrender.

I can probably safely assume the guardian had the story you linked to on the same day I read the story they published on the front of their webpage because it was published on the same day (I'm not saying the Guardian is so lacking of credit that they would falsify publication dates).

If they had all this information and choose to leave out the relevant parts on the story that is going to be linked and read by the majority of the people, then they need to do a thorough scrub of their editorial principles and just report things as they happened in the future, even in their summaries.

The longer story states "enemy gunners try to make their escape in a dumper truck," then "then they came out wanting to surrender" and finally "The two Iraqis try to take refuge in a shack." There were several 2-13 minute delays in between each of those actions. All this language in this more specific story is more or less pulled straight from the actual documents. I am glad they published the details in full, but it doesn't absolve them of their lack of accuracy in other stories. You're assuming everyone read every story this place publishes, instead of just reading the summary article. The internet is a big place, and I'm glad there's people like you who can spend time researching all these things. People like the Guardian who research these things should spend the extra 20 words to be accurate.

Time magazine gave a similar one sentence summary that the Guardian did and didn't mention the second time the combatants fled. I didn't even misrepresent the facts in my one sentence statement that you claim is a lie. No reasonable person would think I have to read every single story the Guardian ever published when there are 399,999 other documents as well to read with facts in them. If I can't trust a publication to summarize something correctly when I have superior knowledge easily available, then I have no duty to continue reading the rest of their stuff.

more than 3 years ago
top

How often do you Google yourself?

Thakandar2 Slashdot results (225 comments)

...just did it and all I got were Slashdot posts. That's probably supposed to be depressing, but my Karma says it's good...

more than 3 years ago
top

WikiLeaks Releases Cache of 400,000 Iraq War Documents

Thakandar2 Re:Wow (676 comments)

Paralegal, not a lawyer. I don't give legal advice, I just state the facts.

more than 3 years ago

Submissions

Journals

Thakandar2 has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>