×

Announcing: Slashdot Deals - Explore geek apps, games, gadgets and more. (what is this?)

Thank you!

We are sorry to see you leave - Beta is different and we value the time you took to try it out. Before you decide to go, please take a look at some value-adds for Beta and learn more about it. Thank you for reading Slashdot, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

SteamBoy Machine Team Promises a Portable Console for Valve's Steam Games

Tinfoil Storage (75 comments)

Really cool concept but they are intending to make portable a platform that is made with PC levels of cheap and easy to expand storage in mind. Many games will be fine with 32GB, but some (I'm looking at you, Wolf New Order and your 40+GB download) would be no go. Unless they are able to build it in such a way that games could be installed on memory cards that are easily swapped. That would be interesting.

about 6 months ago
top

WISPS Mean Cable and DSL Aren't the Only Choices

Tinfoil Do your research (256 comments)

Depending on the technology, there are many things to consider before jumping into bed with a WISP. I get my service from an ISP with a wireless division, though it's not their core business. From my understanding, the technology used is a mix of 900Mhz and 2.4Ghz, depending on distance & line of site. The closer and clearer the LoS, the more likely they will put up a 2.4Ghz antenna. Otherwise, it's 900Mhz. Often it requires mounting on an antenna tower, unless it's cellular based.

Problems I've had with it are mostly related to bandwidth saturation. Quite often these wireless PoPs will be piggybacking on one another to a central location, so unless it's properly provisioned, be prepared to be frustrated. Also, many times the WISP will put their tower on a pre-existing structure and depending on security situations, they may not be allowed to go on-site unless the owners of the property are also on-site. Think places like central grain storage co-ops and the like.

My connection is a pretty poor value. I pay roughly CDN$70 for a connection that is, at most, 1Mbit. The upside is that it is synchro, so while my downstream is pretty low, my upstream is better than most. Ping times are all over the place, but that is more a function of an over-subscribed service than anything else.

Cellular based technologies are available here, but the caps are dangerously low with overages being charged at a pretty obscene rate. And it doesn't work with my pre-existing router, which is a big negative for me. Rogers Wireless is I think $25 a month, but that's for only 500MB if memory serves. I can't verify this at present since the Rogers website sucks hairy arse.

more than 5 years ago
top

What Do You Do When the Cloud Shuts Down?

Tinfoil Re:An old maxim: (203 comments)

Clever!

more than 6 years ago

Submissions

top

Tinfoil Tinfoil writes  |  about 8 years ago

Tinfoil writes "In a move to make themselves more popular, the RIAA is seeking to reduce the royalty rate paid out to recording artists. "During the period when piracy was devastating the record industry, the RIAA argues, profits for publishers rose as revenue generated from ringtones and other innovative services grew. Record industry executives said there was nothing strange about seeking a rate change that would pay less to the people who write the music." Of course, that piracy may have been largely averted had the industry adopted new technology much sooner."

Journals

top

New Camera, and it was good.

Tinfoil Tinfoil writes  |  more than 11 years ago

I have been looking to pick up a digital cam for about a year now. Prior to the, the consumer level cams were just crap, and the decent cams were a little out of this amateur photographers price range. I was looking for a sub $500 camera with optical zoom and compact flash. The zoom was a must but the CF was just a preference as I already had a couple 256 UltraCF cards kicking about. After consulting my wife, who is a photographer herself, she informed me that digital sucks and that I should buy a good SLR. Bah.

I took a trip to a friends camera shop and was confronted by far too many choices. I have dealt with both HP and Kodak digicams before so I started with them. The HP 812 and 720 just *felt* wrong and were plain ugly. The Kodak 4330 was pretty nice, but I really don't like the D-pad on the 4200 at work. The Olympus I looked at used Smartmedia cards.. Who uses that stuff anymore? Some of them also use the new xD cards, you know, the cards that are designed to be so small that you will invariably loose them after a weeks use. I wasn't kean on the Sony's MemoryStick either.

That left the Canon A60 and A70. Both very small, virtually disappearing in my gigantor hands, and both reassuringly heavy. In comparison to the plastic competition, the Canon has a metal body. Bonus! The hand grip is an excellent feature as well.

Ergonomically, I haven't used a better camera. While the HP 320 I have at work may be easier to use from the start, the Canon is logical. The A70 (which I ultimatly picked) has many more features than either camera at work and Canon has gone a long way in grouping the options well and not displaying so much information as to confuse the user.

With it's 3x optical and somethingx digital (ack, who uses digital zoom?) it totals up to 10x zoom. The zoom is controlled via a toggle on the top of the hand grip on the right side surrounding the shutter button. It's a single speed shutter and is pretty noisy. The auto focus quickly compensates for the zoom.

This camera also has the option to be fully manual. While my wife was quick to point out that fully manual meant twisting rings around the lense, not pushing buttons on a menu, it is much more than what I am accustomed to on a digicam. While not as flexible as a true analouge cam, it does give the user many variations from ISO film speed (50, 100, 200, 400), flash intensity, white balance, shutter speed (15 seconds to 1/2000th of a second) and F-stop. Wow. There is also 11 preset shooting modes, including movie and auto-stitch.

All in all, this is a great purchase. At roughly US$350 it can't be matched in my opinion. It is highly usable and full of features. 3.2 Mega pixel is plenty enough for me currently, at least until I can convince my wife to let me pickup a thermal wax (or any other exotic sounding) printer, 2048x1536 is fine. It doesn't write raw images, but it does have three levels of jpeg compression. The only problem I have with it is it's relativly slow shutter response after clicking the button. I will have to learn to anticipate this. It's significantly longer than either the Kodak 4200 or HP 320 that I have at work, but I am sure I will adapt. The option of adding extra lenses is a huge bonus, as is the under water case.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?