×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Take Two Shelves Manhunt 2

Wind_Walker Re:loss (350 comments)

I don't understand how the issue of free speech enters into the equation.

1) Rockstar makes incredibly violent video game
2) ESRB does its job and rates the game AO
3) Sony and Nintendo reaffirm their licensing agreement, saying no AO game will be on their consoles
4) Rockstar halts production of incredibly violent game

Could you show me the step where somebody's rights were violated?

more than 6 years ago

Submissions

Wind_Walker hasn't submitted any stories.

Journals

top

My first journal entry

Wind_Walker Wind_Walker writes  |  more than 12 years ago This is my first journal entry, and it is to protest the blatant misuse of power by the Slashdot editors. I'm sure you've all heard about this by now. More than 700 replies have been posted to this thread (including one of my own) and all of them knocked down to a (-1, Offtopic). If you assume that half of the posts are logged-in and the other half anonymous, that's 1050 moderator points devoted to moderating the responses as "Offtopic". Factor in the true moderators (i.e., those without unlimited moderator points) and you can easily reach 1500 modpoints spent on the replies.

Not to mention the more than 400 moderator points used on the original post, putting it up to +5, then down to -1 again as the Slashdot editors censor the views they don't want to see expressed.d

I'm not mad that it's being moderated, because moderation causes a lot of good on Slashdot. I'm mad because the editors are deliberately and systematically destroying that thread. Yes, the posts are not on the topic of Oracle's security. But why don't the moderators bitchslap all the other articles that have offtopic threads? The answer is because they don't want to. They want to see this post buried because it makes it quite clear that the moderators, despite all their high-and-mighty proclamations of "moderation by the users" and "freedom of speech", are censoring the site themselves.

It is likewise disgusting to think that the moderators have said nothing on the matter in public. They have not commented on their abuse of power, they have not given a reason why they feel everybody who responds to the thread is deserving of a hit to their karma, etc. etc. etc.

I have made my .sig a link to that thread, in the hopes of keeping it alive. This site disgusts me.

Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Sign up for Slashdot Newsletters
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...