Remote Exploit Vulnerability Found In Bash
The environment bashes you for 99 Hit Points! You are dead.
Harvard's CompSci Intro Course Boasts Record-Breaking Enrollment
What was that my Comp Sci friend was quoting, something about Computer Science is as much about computers as Astronomy is about telescopes?
Massive Study Searching For Genes Behind Intelligence Finds Little
Great they did this. Don't know how well the study is designed. But if it is a good design, then maybe they should look for traits that High IQ people do not have.
If it is a bad design, do it again, better.
How Red Hat Can Recapture Developer Interest
Why do devs choose Ubuntu over Linux? (Ok, I'm baiting, but really why do they choose it?)
RedHat does have MySQL, so some of the presumptions of the post are false. True, RedHat now is moving into MariaDB a MySQL branch currently, fork in the future. But RedHat is a great choice for developers. What about Tomcat or JBoss? Their long support window and awesome packaging makes a great choice for risk-averse organization. I see lots of orgs adopting these app servers supported by RedHat.
I see it as a difference in startups and other businesses (those other businesses being shooting stars, cash cows, dogs, etc.). Startups _need_ to produce something fast, but it doesn't have to be maintainable, strongly supported, etc.
Gotta go, but keep in mind some of the assumptions here...
Microsoft's CEO Says He Wants to Unify Windows
Lay off people. Close up products. Anybody can do this. It's standard MBA algorithm, squeeze a little here and there. Bob Lutz says that's the style that ruined American automobile industries.
The whole of Microsoft's strategy was laid bare by BG a long time ago: Sell OS licenses. Office was used to create a feedback loop. Now, Active Directory is part of that.
RT runs office, so it supports that strategy.
Make me CEO; I'll charge $250,000 a year. Problems solved, miracles cost extra.
Free Software Foundation Condemns Mozilla's Move To Support DRM In Firefox
Am I too lazy to figure out what this means? What is DRM? If you create something cool I think you should get some credit for it if you want credit. If you don't want credit that's cool too. If there's a business that has employees, we should at least respect their limited time on earth. Producing high quality work (for me anyway) takes sacrifice of something. That's me though. I ramble, but is DRM a bad thing and why?
New PostgreSQL Guns For NoSQL Market
Martin Fowler discusses the NoSQL moniker and seems to agree with you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... It' NoSQL Distilled to an hour by Martin Fowler from NoSQL Matters Conference
Ask Slashdot: What's the Most Often-Run Piece of Code -- Ever?
What Makes a Genius?
"When Terman first used the IQ test to select a sample of child geniuses, he unknowingly excluded a special child whose IQ did not make the grade. Yet a few decades later that talent received the Nobel Prize in physics: William Shockley, the cocreator of the transistor. Ironically, not one of the more than 1,500 children who qualified according to his IQ criterion received so high an honor as adults." Simonton, Dean Keith (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-512879-6. Lay summary (14 August 2010).
Exceptional output requires access to tools, training, and environment (food, health, relationships) that enable the person to devote (obssess?) over solving the problems or creating something. And, the person's exceptional output must be recognized as such. So being highly intelligent won't make it. It may even be a hindrance. For instance, it would be easy to imagine the first ever person to be able to repeatedly create fire would not score well on any measure of intelligence today, but to the tribe, that person may not only be considered a genius but a god.
CMU AI Learning Common Sense By Watching the Internet
Ok, I'm incorrect. It did imply "learning things without being specifically taught" was common sense.
I do not believe this to be a good definition, as common sense is as much idiom than anything. Semantically, the phrase is derogatory, political, and a criticism on the value of intelligence versus many other things. That's my problem with the title. Assuming the TFA did not have an agenda, then it and of itself has no common sense. The irony is so palpable, it makes this wretch wanna wretch.
CMU AI Learning Common Sense By Watching the Internet
1. Common sense was not defined
2. There was little if no indication of the method for the analysis
Sears To Convert Old Auto Centers Into National Chain of Data Centers
No, it's stupid. But here's what they should do: spin them off into 501(c) 3's and turn them into solar-based (and other) charging stations for electric autos. Use this to start a new brand. Gently and carefully test and enter the brand into your e-stores.
Oh why is it stupid? I'm not sure. Probably better to turn those sites into Dr. Clinics, or blood-test labs. Get away from work to go to the Dr. and go shop!
Your Next Network Operating System Is Linux
TFA did not mention details. Linux has patent-inhibited memory management complications. The best networking OS will be able to handle 2^32 connections (or about 4.2 billion). No OS can come near this. Is Linux better than the alternatives? Never, as long as its memory footprint is inhibited by patents. A good networking OS will be scale-free. (for those graduate students looking for a thesis).
Thus, the best networking OS is the most fault-tolerant with the best throughput, and the smartest engineers behind it. No OS is fault-tolerant. Throughput is a function of memory (all things being equal), and the smartest engineers are probably challenged to maintain a quality of life that is satisfactory.
It's a great question of what the best NOS is. Keep it coming, but don't muddy up the waters with misinformation. If you do make a suggestion, provide real empirical support. (It's not my job to do this since I have not declared what the best NOS is. I do have my opinions though.)
How Science Goes Wrong
bump. Gaming the system is smart behavior (maybe unethical though). Just provide incentives to do the work in the best way. Just an idea, for example, and in no way perfect: If a scientist publishes (peer-review and all) results they get a credit, but if another scientist cannot replicate results they get 90% of that credit, leaving the former with 10% of the credit.
Also in an experiment you have inputs, transformations and outputs. Inputs being the data, transformations being the analysis, and the outputs being the result that tests a hypothesis. The Inputs (i) and transformations (t) must be made available for other scientists to reproduce the results. This too, can be gamified. If a scientist provides i they get a bigger credit. If they provide t, they get an even bigger credit.
In another way, the scientific process as implemented is also subject to the scientific method. It should be anyway.
What Are the Genuinely Useful Ideas In Programming?
Yes. Divide and conquer (or structured systems programming), and make your inheritor's life good (good karma).
A good compiler is good. Typing is a computer science term--not a reference to pecking at the keyboard.
Algorithms is a funky term. Ultimately it is a reference to doing things in discrete mathematics. Mathematicians really do give "it" away.
"...the rest is just a mixtures of ingredients...." This is a reference to making things taste good. It's relevant, informative, honest, and a description of doing the right thing. It's a moral attitude.
To sum it up for people not in the culture: Do good, engineer, break problems up into their component parts. To lazily invoke a giant, beauty is harmony of parts in a whole (Aristotle somewheres).
Obamacare Could Help Fuel a Tech Start-Up Boom
Health is a risk for any entrepreneur and their family. If we could spread that risk across everyone for potential entrepreneurs (i.e. Insurance), we cultivate entrepreneurs.
In my management class 101 (if my education is relevant), there are the traditional 3 resources: land, labor, & capital. The fourth is entrepreneurship. Cultivating entrepreneurs is like growing a garden, stewarding land, enabling labor, and freeing up capital.
Here are the risks: environment (hurricanes or blight for example), disease (think of plague, cancer), lack of investment markets (think of safety, information honesty, insider trading), and health to entrepreneurs (among other things).
But, the question remains, does healthcare improve health? What is health anyway? Isn't prevention of health issues the goal (think of entropy, the body never heals back to the same way even if it can heal).
As a very seasoned and young developer, it comes down to tip-toeing up to the problem. It's not a good idea to declare widespread solutions without empirical evidence. You creep up on it. That means, the Affordable Care Act, though it may be beneficial, needs to be tested in more places than Massachusetts (sp?) before you should install it on larger systems.
The Steady Decline of Unix
Vendor lock-in? The interwebs made Unix or it's posterity significant: Being able to quickly respond to the needs of the many made it relevant again horizontally as well as vertically. The openness fostered a new "software age" that was aligned with network effects created by the telecosm of the internet.
The price of efficiency made it cost-prohibitive to effectiveness: the joy of creation, creativity was sparked and found new soil where evolutionary pressure weeded out the lack of joy in freedom. Where collusion failed, cooperation succeeded. Subtle difference just as a program is sensitive to a misplaced byte.
Positive Bias Could Erode Public Trust In Science
Thank you for a reasonable reply. On #1 maybe this quote will clarify my point; "The consequence of these debates is that there is no universal agreement as to what constitutes the "scientific method"" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_scientific_method#cite_note-69
On #4, this is just from my direct experience, and I am too much of a coward right now to share. And a hint and warning how much idealism in science must be guarded and protected from the vagaries inherent in humans getting involved. :)
Your responses are fair. On the moral compass question, it is a bit mischievous, hopefully just showing how important verification is.
Positive Bias Could Erode Public Trust In Science
I doubt your doubt. (Cannot believe I am replying to a troll.)
acscott has no journal entries.