Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!



Why Space Exploration Is Worth the Cost

aelbric Re:fallacy? (276 comments)

First rule of cost savings is to look for efficiencies where they are most likely and will have the most positive impact. Wiping out NASA and all its benefits, jobs, downstream impacts, etc saves you 16B and costs you far more in the long run. Now, and this is completely an unsupported statement, I would be willing to bet you could find a 1% efficiency in the social programs or defense budgets without trying very hard. Without even changing funding levels, that's easily enough to fund NASA at the very least.

more than 6 years ago


aelbric hasn't submitted any stories.


aelbric has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?