Ask Slashdot: How Should a Liberal Arts Major Get Into STEM?
With your current background, you could get a job in technical writing. Every firm that does engineering needs people like you who:
* Understand the subject matter
* Can write about it readably
"Barbie: I Can Be a Computer Engineer" Pulled From Amazon
Jean McKenzie has been Executive Vice President of Mattel since September 2012. She was named President of American Girl Jan. 1, 2013. Prior to re-joining Mattel in 2011 as Senior Vice President-Marketing, she was President and CEO of Gateway Learning Corporation and Senior Vice President for The Walt Disney Company. From 1989-1998, Ms. McKenzie served in various executive positions at Mattel working on the Barbie brand, most recently as Executive Vice President and GM of Worldwide Barbie for Mattel.
Not sure if this makes the screw-up better or worse...
NSA Director Says Agency Shares Most, But Not All, Bugs It Finds
There shouldn't be just one organization with those two jobs. There should be an open, well-funded office in, say the National Institute for Standards and Technology that searches for vulnerabilities and has a responsible disclosure policy for everything it finds.
The Government has had this problem before - there used to be one body that handled both promotion and regulation of atomic energy in the US, the US Atomic Energy Commission. In 1974 it got broken up into two agencies, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the regulator) and the Energy Research and Development Administration (the promoter).
One In Three Jobs Will Be Taken By Software Or Robots By 2025, Says Gartner
Automation will take us last.
Do Specs Matter Anymore For the Average Smartphone User?
Voice recognition is the most processor intensive thing most users commonly do, and today everybody does it remotely on big servers, primarily because you need a bunch of data in RAM to do it fast.
We probably won't see this on phones until we get really low-power RAM (memristor-based, maybe).
Solar Plant Sets Birds On Fire As They Fly Overhead
The "bad for wildlife" question basically comes down to:
* how much mass you have to move
* how much land area you have to occupy
per watt generated.
Coal and hydro lose because they both require a lot of mass (water and coal) and a lot of area (dammed waterway, mines and transport).
Nuclear and geothermal win because they both require very little mass and very little area other than the plant itself - uranium ore has at least 1000 times the energy per gram as coal.
Any kind of solar is in the middle because of the large area needed to capture relatively dilute solar energy.
The World's Best Living Programmers
Given his major influence on:
And, as a throwaway on his Oracle bio page:
He designed the original EMACS command set and was the first person to port TeX.
Don't Want Google In Your House? Here Are a Few Home-Tech Startups To Watch
Realistically, your choices are:
* Facebook and their ilk, who will sell your individually identifiable data without a second thought.
* Google, who will absolutely sell your info, probably aggregated. At least they're upfront about it.
* Apple, who views their non-release of your data as a market differentiator and thus a valuable part of their brand.
As long as people choose Apple for privacy, Apple will value privacy and not sell their data.
Bill Gates To Stanford Grads: Don't (Only) Focus On Profit
That way you'll never be in my position of wealth and generosity, and my reputation will have less competition.
That's Gates for you - always competing.
Future of Cars: Hydrogen Fuel Cells, Or Electric?
which is $24,000 according to some blog postings with no supporting links. I couldn't find any better number with Google.
I bet the average new car price includes some $100,000+ outliers, so it's hoisted significantly above what the middle-class car buyer pays.
Kerry Says US Is On the "Right Side of History" When It Comes To Online Freedom
Unfortunately those are the only three choices here.
Skilled Manual Labor Critical To US STEM Dominance
Don't go thinking that learning trade X or skill set Y or getting credential Z means anyone is set for life.
There are no simple fixes for the current situation where anybody's livelihood(*) can be reduced in value by automation. All the old middle-class certainties like:
- I own a house, which is an asset whose value will only go up
- I have a college degree, which guarantees me a middle-class job
- I have trade labor skills that have been valuable for many years, and will be valuable for the foreseeable future
are no longer certain.
(*) If you're lucky enough to have monetary assets of $500,000+ that you can invest conservatively, and are disciplined enough to live on only the proceeds, you're pretty safe.
The US Public's Erratic Acceptance of Science
Listen to Authority's response
If Authority is right, accept it
Most people stop at the first step.
It Was the Worst Industrial Disaster In US History, and We Learned Nothing
One billion gallons is about 10 billion pounds.
There was 140,000 pounds arsenic in 10 billion pounds of sludge.
Concentration of arsenic in sludge is 1.4 * 10e5 / 1e10 = 1.4 * 10e-5
Or about 1 part in 100,000.
This is why they got away with it. Coal ash sludge is nasty, but not quite nasty enough to be a hazardous substance per se. Hell, one of the best ways to get rid of it is to add it to concrete, which is then poured where people live.
The figure you should worry about is the change in the arsenic level in the river after the spill. I didn't see that figure in the article.
Snowden A Hero? Gates Says No, Woz Says Yes
Both of them can choose exactly how much privacy they want, because they're both rich. Gates is maybe three orders of magnitude richer than Woz, but both of them are at least three orders of magnitude away from the American median income ($45K or so).
Also, neither of them can just go out in public in the US without being recognized.
That's the problem with the privacy "discussions" in the US - most of the people who can actually change things are members of a minority who gave up big swaths of their privacy, voluntarily, as an entrance requirement for their profession. They can say "privacy is an illusion - get over it" with a straight face, because they haven't had any themselves for decades.
They may be over it, but I'm not, and it pisses me off that they get to choose my privacy level.
Stanford Researchers Spot Medical Conditions, Guns, and More In Phone Metadata
... then Ms. Feinstein should have no problem with a FOIA request for the metadata for her cellphone.
I bet it would take about an hour to find a call from a lobbyist, received during a break in a legislative session.
Crowdsourcing Confirms: Websites Inaccessible on Comcast
Those are the possibilities, in decreasing order of probability.
As much as I despise Comcast, they are unlikely to deliberately block random DNS lookups.
College Board To Rethink the SAT, Partner With Khan Academy
Do you have a source for that other than "admission folks"? Casual web searching didn't find anything.
Vast Surveillance Network Powered By Repo Men
Government can afford to do scanning that doesn't make money.
Government can send people using deadly force after you.
Government can declare itself immune from the law if it makes a mistake.
It's much harder for non-governments to do any of the above.
Who's On WhatsApp, and Why?
He creates/offers/buys a free service that by its nature can learn a lot about its users. He then gradually relaxes privacy assurances and changes the sharing defaults to "we can do whatever we want with information we collect about you", and sells the info to advertisers.
Anybody who thinks this won't happen to WhatsApp hasn't been paying attention.
There are things WORSE than XML
As bad as XML is, I would be the first to admit it is possible to create a worse language for representing nested property lists. In fact, I encountered one in actual, operational use in my travels as a migrant information worker and NASA contractor.
The name of this atrocity is Object Definition Language, and it is a standard format for metadata that NASA attaches to many of its major remote sensing imagery products, as well as data from planetary probe missions.
You should really look at the PDF linked above to get the true flavor of this stuff, but I can give you a quick taste right here. S-expressions, XML, and ODL all are syntaxes for representing nested property lists.
S-expressions are what you get if you ask John McCarthy.
XML is what you get when you ask people who know and love HTML/SGML
ODL is what you get when you ask people who know and love FORTRAN.
I'm serious! The simple S-expression
would be this in XML:
and this in ODL:
object = foo
value = "bar"
end_object = foo
I got to know about this stuff as part of several tool-writing exercises where we were trying to make complex, deeply nested ODL intelligible to its scientist users. The "solution" we came up with involved parsing the ODL, translating it into XML, then hosing the XML through different XSLT translators to generate pretty HTML.
As a result of those projects, I now know more about ODL, XSLT, and DHTML than I really want to.