Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Google Spots Explicit Images of a Child In Man's Email, Tips Off Police

ammorais Re:Well at least they saved the children! (790 comments)

Bullshit. The words don't make you do anything. Whether unconsciously or not, your actions are your own.

Please have a look on how panic works. It's not anything like you think it is.

The rapist is at fault. The end

So, people knowingly paying to watch children being raped have no responsibility whatsoever.
Correct me if I'm wrong because I truly believe this is exactly what you just said.
I'm sorry, but how can I put this?
You're a twisted fuck.

about 2 months ago
top

Google Spots Explicit Images of a Child In Man's Email, Tips Off Police

ammorais Re:Well at least they saved the children! (790 comments)

Demand forces no one to do anything. The fault lies with those who rape. It's like how if someone falsely screamed "fire" in a crowded theater and people panicked and harmed others in the panic, the ones at fault for causing the damage would be the ones who caused the damage, not the speaker. Our legal system obviously doesn't see it this way, but I disagree with the legal system.

Screaming "fire" in a crowded theatre is not freedom of expression. It's a deliberate act, that triggers a programmed panic response in most of us.

You are mistaking the action with outlawing the result. It's perfectly valid to break it up if real people are getting hurt, but unless they're taking down videos or images, that isn't happening.

You forgot to explain the responsibility of those that payed the ticked to watch.

Nope. I did not fail to consider that; it's just irrelevant to me. Go after the rapists, and stop trying to harass people who merely view or buy the content.

Those poor people that get harassed for watching an afternoon session.

Nope. Just someone who despises censorship.

Me too. Just not at all cost. And I don't stretch the concept of freedom of expression to fit my needs.

about 2 months ago
top

Google Spots Explicit Images of a Child In Man's Email, Tips Off Police

ammorais Re:Well at least they saved the children! (790 comments)

And then you go on to make the unfounded claim that a video magically made people rape children. I guess videos take control of people and cause them to rape.

GP wan't making that claim. What I see is a claim that the demand has a direct relation with THOSE(in the movie/picture) children being abused.

I find censorship disgusting.

How about on a live theatre? Won't be censorship too to make it illegal?
You're so intoxicated with your "no censorship" dogma that you failed to sense that people buying this movies/pictures are paying money to pedophiles to rape children.

Mere videos or pictures shouldn't be outlawed, even if they do sometimes encourage more to be made (That's the rapist's fault; videos or people buying them doesn't force them to make more.).

You're an idiot.

about 2 months ago
top

Google Engineer Wins NSA Award, Then Says NSA Should Be Abolished

ammorais Re:Don't forget (297 comments)

It's impossible to watch porn with TOR!!! To slow!

about a year ago
top

First Video Broadcast From Mt. Everest Peak Outrages Tourist Ministry of Nepal

ammorais Re:Their country, their rules (204 comments)

Their country, their rules.

Not valid here. Mt. Everest is something of worldwide importance. Nepal did not create it nor should they "own" it.

The only reason they can have "rules" is if those are for preservation of the ecosystem, but I don't see any violation in that context here.

Did you even tough about what you just wrote?
So what you're saying is because the Grand Canyon is of worldwide importance, we should ignore U.S. laws.

about a year ago
top

File-Sharing For Personal Use Declared Legal In Portugal

ammorais Re:U.S. law still applies (179 comments)

Those laws all look like pretty standard extradition terms, actually.

Yes they are, in countries that abolished the death penalty . Wasn't implying they weren't or trying to make them notable in some way.
Wasn't sure if GP was being sarcastic and wanted to point out that his assertion didn't even apply to U.S. citizens, even more to Portuguese.

about 2 years ago
top

File-Sharing For Personal Use Declared Legal In Portugal

ammorais Re:Bailout (179 comments)

[sarcasm] Perhaps if we send file sharing teenagers, or their moms to jail, we bail the crisis then. [/sarcasm]

about 2 years ago
top

University Receives $5 Million Grant To Study Immortality

ammorais Re:Oh. Tell that to brain scientist. (532 comments)

I have this question for quite some time. If our conscience is information, and if we are indeed a complex machine, then what prevent us from theoretically replicate/transfer this same conscience to a new machine/virtual environment . If we are information, why can't we continue after death then.
If we can continue , then what happens to the conscience that is in the body that dies. Does it cease to exist? Does it continues on the VM?
If I try both possibilities then I'm left with more questions.
If the conscience ceases to exist, then we aren't just machines, aren't we?
If the conscience continues in the VM, then were does the conscience resides?
I don't know, really and I'm not an expert in this, but I really would like to know.

more than 2 years ago
top

Do Companies Punish Workers Who Take Vacations?

ammorais Re:Frettin' over the grindstone (948 comments)

Oh god, this this this this this.

Its no wonder the world economy is in the state it's in, with all the pointless busy-work being done that is allegedly necessary to the functioning of business.

I sincerely think your comment is not interesting at all.
The world economy isn't in the state it's in because of slackers. That's a very "naive" / "over simplistic" thing tho say. People in the world didn't just stop being productive, or ended all being slackers from 2008 on.
Maybe next you will say that unemployment just went up in the western world because people are slackers who don't want to work.
Try world wide government's corruption and an implemented system that favorables assholes with money to lobby their way in to laws.http://slashdot.org/story/12/01

more than 2 years ago
top

Was the iPod Accessory Port Inspired By a 40-Year-Old Camera?

ammorais Re:RIP Steve Jobs (263 comments)

Coward

about 3 years ago
top

Was the iPod Accessory Port Inspired By a 40-Year-Old Camera?

ammorais Re:RIP Steve Jobs (263 comments)

Not a native English speaker duh!!!
Go fuck yourself, and your nazi spell checking.

about 3 years ago
top

Was the iPod Accessory Port Inspired By a 40-Year-Old Camera?

ammorais Re:RIP Steve Jobs (263 comments)

Fucken Apple Haters. Fucken Apple Fan Boys. You're all as fucked as each other.

Fuck Haters of Apple Haters. Fuck Haters of Apple fan boys.
Well, fuck all hatters. You're all fucked.

I hate hatters.

hummm!!!

I hate hatters, therefore
I hate, therefore
I'm a hatter, therefore
I hate me !!!?

about 3 years ago
top

Bug With "Singing Penis" Is World's Loudest

ammorais Re:News for nerds, stuff that... gets hard. (117 comments)

It's not about the dick. It's about the size.
For sure the title should be something in this lines: "2mm Bug Is World's Loudest".
Even though, how can't you find this story interesting to nerds. Imagine the possibilities.
If a 2mm bug can do a 99.2 decibels sound, so can your ipod/notepad/phone/pad/[whatever future small] device.

more than 3 years ago
top

BBC Site Uses Cookies To Inform Visitors of Anti-Cookie Law

ammorais Re:Here's how it goes: (98 comments)

There's a lot of people on the Internet - billions, literally. The vast majority of them are not technically inclined; most have no idea how the Internet works or what cookies actually are.

And sometimes, you actually want cookies. For example, on a news site such as the BBC, you may want to be able to log in and post a comment... and then log out again and not have the site continue tracking you. How do you do that? Short of constantly disabling and re-enabling cookies on a per-site basis, there's no way. Expecting users to do that is idiotic and only shows that a serious disconnect from reality on your part.

Did you know you can still track people you without cookies? You can use a combination of user-agent/IP/browser/language to track you with considerable accuracy.
So your solution for is to ask people that don't know/want to know what are cookies, if they want cookies? How kind of question box you suggest?
Something like this perhaps?


Do you accept cookies? If you press YES this site will work
properlly, and we can track you if we want to.
If you press NO this site won't work properly, but we can't
track you trough cookies. We can still track you by other means
if we want to but not with cookies!

| YES | | NO |

more than 3 years ago
top

Judge Orders Former San Francisco Admin Terry Childs To Pay $1.5M

ammorais Re:Let the guy come here... (488 comments)

... I'll hire him.

Never mind him. Hire me, I can hold your passwords for as long as you want.

more than 3 years ago
top

How Windows 7 Knows About Your Internet Connection

ammorais Re:Mod Parent FUD. (434 comments)

On a Windows machine I can expect my relatives to install the software if I sent them the link to the download page. You'd think that installing simple stable software would be possible before you can talk about Linux usability?

You are actually saying that the windows system of installing apps is better than linux. The windows system(i mean the lack of one) is one of the main reasons Windows users get infected in the first place. Downloading software from unknown sources from the internet. All Linux distros have a central repository of trusted software with 2 or 3 clicks to install software.

I can't count the number of times I gave up on software install in Linux. Either it has to be compiled or it has a 100-item long list of dependencies

This is a lie, pure and simple, unless you are talking about LFS, all linux distros have a package-manager that resolve dependencies. There are the rare cases when you can't find a certain package on the package-manager and you have to install it manually. In this cases it's the software provider obligation to make it simple for your distro. All commercial software for linux have a simple way to install their app in the most popular distros.
Look at http://www.teamviewer.com/en/download/index.aspx for example. It has rpm's and debs. The install is simple and with one click in most systems.

I don't know where to start to list the things that just don't work in Linux. I really don't. I can typically resolve any problem that anyone in my Windows

That's because you are not a very bright person. OR/AND you are on the wrong line of business.You are possibly in a stage that can't learn anything different, so you reject everything that is different even if it's better.
GP is totally right. For a person who never used a computer, it find it easier to learn Linux desktop(of today, not 10 years ago) than windows. I find this true in my experiences because for all my relatives that I do free support.They all have Linux installed. Believe it or not the bothering ratio dropped enormously once I installed Linux, once they find out they could install apps with 1 or 2 clicks. I also recently migrated a small company to Linux(all desktops and servers) and there aren't any major adaptation problems.

more than 3 years ago
top

Dropbox Accused of Lying About Security

ammorais Re:Seconded (265 comments)

It’s not a matter of waking in the morning and say "Today, I'm going to screw over the little guy!"
It's a matter of waking in the morning and saying: "today, if I don't screw the little guy I'm screwed, because everybody does it, and I can't compete if I don't!!!"
It's the hole system that is broken.

more than 3 years ago
top

German Company To Install Linux On 10,000 PCs

ammorais Re:If import is imperfect, wouldn't export also be (328 comments)

I am aware of this. But just as OpenOffice.org/LibreOffice import of Word .doc/.docx is imperfect, I imagine that its export of the same formats is also imperfect.

At least at this point in this particulary company, this is a non issue, since I still give support to them, and this problem never happen. To be truthful they used MSOffice at a very basic level without any of the very advanced features(as I believe most office users do), so I really don't know the the perfection of saving advanced doc features in OOffice as a MS Office document. There is an issue with background images when they (wrongly) are embebed in MS Word document, with no margins.
That's why I've kept the MSOffice Box. But like I said in my original post, and becouse of the lack of problems they had on this transition, I belive the people adaptation problems are a myth or exaggerated.

more than 3 years ago

Submissions

ammorais hasn't submitted any stories.

Journals

ammorais has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?