Beta

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Free Software Foundation Condemns Mozilla's Move To Support DRM In Firefox

andrew3 Re:I've Seen This Movie Before. (403 comments)

I don't want to stop you from running free software, the FSF wants to stop me from non-free software.

That's simply not true. The FSF:

  • * says that it's unwise for users to run non-free software. They also say that a user should be able to use their computer for any purpose (within legal limits, of course).
  • * says that developers of software should use a free license and should provide a copy of the source code whenever they distribute a binary.

about 2 months ago
top

Free Software Foundation Condemns Mozilla's Move To Support DRM In Firefox

andrew3 Re:GNU browsers (403 comments)

GNOME is indeed a part of the GNU project, which means they have two web browsers (GNOME Web, which is written from scratch and WebKit-based and GNU IceCat, which is based on Mozilla Firefox).

To my knowledge, the developers of IceCat have nothing to do with GNOME Web, and I guess they probably have different priorities for their respective web browsers. Also, I understand that Firefox was chosen as the base for IceCat because of its powerful add-on capabilities, which is important for the developers because they use add-ons for most of the added functionality of IceCat.

about 2 months ago
top

Free Software Foundation Condemns Mozilla's Move To Support DRM In Firefox

andrew3 Re:Once again the FSF does not understand (403 comments)

Except that RIGHT NOW, TODAY, Firefox supports a plug-in architecture which allows Adobe Flash and Microsoft Silverlight to run and play DRM-encumbered content.

And RIGHT NOW, TODAY, many computers support an x86 architecture which allows Windows to run and play DRM-encumbered content. Except that neither x86, nor NPAPI for that matter, were ever specifically designed to do that.

On the other hand, non-DRM uses for EME are entirely non-existent. Sure, you could have a free EME plugin, but what would be the point if the user has access to the key? Don't fool yourself - unlike NPAPI, EME is specifically designed to work with and proliferate the use of DRM.

about 2 months ago
top

Free Software Foundation Condemns Mozilla's Move To Support DRM In Firefox

andrew3 Re:Once again the FSF does not understand (403 comments)

If you don't like DRM, don't consume it. But stop trying to take away my convenience to do so, thanks.

There, fixed it for you.

about 2 months ago
top

Free Software Foundation Condemns Mozilla's Move To Support DRM In Firefox

andrew3 Re:Yawn. (403 comments)

Libraries have lent out non-free (in the FSF sense) books forever, without needing a technical mechanism to prevent copying.

A technical incapability does not make print technology "non-free".

On the other hand, digital restrictions management threatens to prevent far more than just copying, e.g. sharing of an e-book between friends and the right to own a book.

about 2 months ago
top

Free Software Foundation Condemns Mozilla's Move To Support DRM In Firefox

andrew3 Re:Yawn. (403 comments)

Just because it has DRM support doesnt mean you have to use it. Avoid DRM content and this won't affect you.

It's a bit like Facebook saying "if you don't agree to our Terms and Conditions, don't use our service". And their T&Cs are complete bullshit. Believe it or not, some of us actually believe in the freedom to communicate online without corporate surveillance and censorship. In the same way, saying that people who care about their right to fair use (legal in US), personal use of files e.g. transferring between personal devices (also legal), sociable sharing of files with friends (possibly not legal) should simply not have access to public material that can only be encrypted using proprietary DRM software is unfair.

The masses though WANT DRM content

That's a lie used by media companies to excuse DRM, and it's simply not true. The masses want access to their movies, music, e-books and cat memes and they will typically click "Yes" to anything that comes up on their screen to get access to their movies/music/etc. Most users, unfortunately, do not know what DRM is. That does not make them "WANT DRM".

If Firefox didn't support DRM, they would switch browsers to one that did (closed source such as IE

What's the point of a free browser if it encourages the user to give away their freedom? The user may as well use IE, there is no difference.

about 2 months ago
top

Free Software Foundation Condemns Mozilla's Move To Support DRM In Firefox

andrew3 Re:Yawn. (403 comments)

How can you claim mozilla stood for free software when it started as a closed source proprietary browser?

Your comment is irrelevant, because Firefox is now free software, except perhaps for the trademark license which the FSF considers potentially problematic. Whether the software was once distributed as proprietary software isn't really important at all.

On the other hand, Firefox binaries were once subject to an End User License Agreement, which made the binaries non-free according to the FSF. But they removed the EULA in 2008.

about 2 months ago
top

Ask Slashdot: How Do You Protect Your Privacy These Days? Or Do You?

andrew3 Re:Take the mobile phone battery out (319 comments)

Oh, and before anyone asks about the mobile phone paranoia, I should also add that some companies are already monetising your use of mobile phones and your movements. Expect this to become far more commonplace in the next few years.

about 8 months ago
top

Ask Slashdot: How Do You Protect Your Privacy These Days? Or Do You?

andrew3 Take the mobile phone battery out (319 comments)

I keep the battery out of my mobile phone when I'm not using it, which is 99% of the time. Apparently I am lucky to have a phone which makes it easy to do this. Various court releases, leaks, research papers and other publications suggest that mobile phones can easily be updated remotely by carriers (and maybe adversaries) to act as listening devices on command, which is why I do this.

I also use multiple web browsers for different purposes (e.g. one for normal web browsing when I don't reveal my identity, another for a few logins, etc.), use Tor, avoid using "cloud computing", use only free (-as in freedom) software, use encryption where possible, keep up to date with security updates, encrypt traffic in my local network (I don't trust my D-Link router very much), etc.

about 8 months ago
top

Microsoft Donates Windows 8.1 To Nonprofit Organizations

andrew3 There is always a catch (224 comments)

Microsoft also gives free Windows licenses to students through various programs. But there is always a catch. In this case, Microsoft wants its users to adopt its own formats and use its network services, essentially pushing users into an endless cycle of relying on Microsoft software and services, allowing Microsoft to push for unreasonable terms, include more privacy-invasive features to gain more information about their users, increased OS reliance on Microsoft's network/cloud computing, and, of course, to make more money. Making money on its own, of course, is not usually a bad thing, but when a company like Microsoft controls a significant portion of the market it is certainly bad. I hear non-profits and governments are also often more likely to adopt free (-as in freedom) software such as LibreOffice and occasionally GNU/Linux, which could explain why they are a target of this campaign.

Remember people: this isn't being done to benefit you, it's done to benefit Microsoft.

about 9 months ago
top

Facebook Testing Screen-Tracking Software For Users

andrew3 PR stunt (they've been doing it for ages) (115 comments)

Facebook has been doing this for ages. It started years ago with the hovercards (hovering over a person's face brings up details and alerts Facebook each time) and grew from there. A few months ago I observed using the Firefox Web Developer tools that Facebook was monitoring when a user hovered over a Like button (not necessarily clicked), advertisements, possibly tracking what part of the page the user was on, and more. Quick analysis from a curious user didn't reveal the full details of exactly what they were tracking.

Basically Facebook would rather give the news itself rather than letting someone else spill the beans. It's a cheap PR stunt, no more.

about 9 months ago
top

Visual Studio 2013 Released

andrew3 Re:zero cost? (198 comments)

It takes five minutes and none of the info you give them is verified.

Oh, so that makes it okay, does it? Almost all Microsoft services contain a termination clause which allows them to cancel a service for a user, or delete their account at any time.

That's right, the software on your computer is now being tied into Microsoft's services, so that the rights you once had disappear.

about 9 months ago
top

Visual Studio 2013 Released

andrew3 Mandatory registration (198 comments)

Writing a program in Visual Studio requires mandatory registration, or the program will refuse to start up. This also gives Microsoft to arbitrarily deny specific programmers the ability to publish a program.

Oh, and this, from the VS 2010 Privacy Policy, suggests that Microsoft can remotely target your computer after it does error reporting:

In rare cases, such as problems that are especially difficult to solve, Microsoft may request additional data, including sections of memory (which may include memory shared by any or all applications running at the time the problem occurred), some registry settings, and one or more files from your computer. Your current documents may also be included. When additional data is requested, you can review the data and choose whether or not to send it.

It's somewhat disappointing that Slashdot is used to advertise software like this. Fuck that, I'll stick with free (as in freedom) compilers like GCC, MinGW, LLVM etc. and free IDEs.

about 9 months ago
top

Would You Secure Personal Data With DRM Tools?

andrew3 DRM = encrypted for Microsoft software (101 comments)

Let's not forget what DRM actually is. DRM-encrypted files are encrypted so that, at least in theory, only one program can read it. That program can arbitrarily impose restrictions on the user. How does that protect the user at all? From themselves and from their friends?

Encryption is a good way of protecting your privacy. Encrypting for Microsoft is a good way of losing control of your data.

about 10 months ago
top

Inside the Electronic Frontier Foundation

andrew3 Shame that Slashdot blocks Tor (98 comments)

If Slashdot wants to promote and help EFF, they should stop censoring users from reading news on their own website.

At the moment, many attempts to access Slashdot via Tor give a blocked IP address message. So many Tor users can't read Slashdot at all.

I might be a little bit sympathetic if Slashdot temporarily banned IPs from posting when abuse is detected, but it's a real shame that IPs blocked by Slashdot can't read the news at all.

1 year,24 days
top

Saudi Arabian Telecom Pitches to Moxie Marlinspike

andrew3 A sign of problems in the CA system (128 comments)

From Ars Technica:

"One of the design documents that they volunteered specifically called out compelling a [certificate authority] in the jurisdiction of the UAE or Saudi Arabia to produce SSL certificates that they could use for interception," Marlinspike wrote in a blog post.

Clearly there is something wrong with the public key infrastructure on the web.

about a year ago
top

Debian 7.0 ("Wheezy") Released

andrew3 Re:Why Debian? (191 comments)

We're at Firefox 20 and Debian has only version 10.

From the Debian perspective there was only Firefox 10 ESR and Firefox 17 ESR. Since the freeze was made before 17 was released, version 10 was included.

about a year ago
top

Falling Windows RT Tablet Prices Signify Slow Adoption

andrew3 Restricted Boot (290 comments)

Windows RT is worse than Windows 8 because it doesn't give its users the freedom to boot another OS, or control the computer at its very lowest level. Sure, maybe most users don't care, but they should. If tech-savvy users boycott the Surface RT, maybe users will as well.

I can't yet see any reason for not allowing users to control their own device at its lowest level. Maybe an "unlock" option like a few Android phones do would prevent users from making unwise decisions.

I feel like I had to say something, because many of the comments here are aimed at the technical qualities of the Windows RT/iPad/other proprietary OS. This is missing the point! If people aren't adopting Windows RT at the moment, let's tell them why they should avoid it forever.

Also, I believe the FSF's petition to stop Restricted Boot is still open. Please take a moment to sign it if you have the time - it's getting close to 50,000 signatures.

-- some crazy free software user.

about a year ago

Submissions

top

Facebook Locking Users Out, Demanding Photo ID

andrew3 andrew3 writes  |  about a year ago

andrew3 (2250992) writes "Facebook is reportedly locking out users who are suspected of infringing their Terms of Use. Facebook addict Karina Moreno received a message upon logging into her account asking for her government issued photo ID. According to Chris Morran of The Consumerist online magazine, this change is due to a recent crackdown on fake, malicious profiles. Moreno insists she didn't violate any of Facebook's rules. Facebook later restored her account and apologized, saying her account was suspended by mistake."
Link to Original Source

Journals

andrew3 has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?
or Connect with...

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>