Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site --
learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.
We are sorry to see you leave - Beta is different and we value the time you took to try it out. Before you decide to go, please take a look at some value-adds for Beta and
learn more about it. Thank you for reading Slashdot, and for making the site better!
top Python 3.0 To Be Backwards Incompatible
which is the whole point of open source isn't it. 2.x will always be "free" and you can choose. a friend told me once that his firm did custom NT server (don't know or remember the specifics of the thing) install with their software (this was a long time back) and the firm pre-bought tons of NT licenses since they knew NT would be replaced and they wouldn't be able to get it anymore. that'll never happen with FOSS. and, that's the beauty of the free (beer and speech) market, if the product isn't to your liking, you get a new one that is more so.
Python 2.x isn't going anywhere, for exactly the reasons you bring up.
I wrote a LAMP app for my school, a simple tardy slip program. since I had older versions of A(1.3)M(3.x)P(4.x) on my ibook to develop on, and all we had were PC's at school, I downloaded an older version of fedora (I think) with the older versions. since everything copied over easily, install/set up was no problem. it's been up and running for a year and a half. could I do it with 2.x, 5.x, 5.x? sure, but I am not in the mood to rewrite.
b17bmbr hasn't submitted any stories.
b17bmbr has no journal entries.
UID 608,864 Member since ~ 2002
I am a high school history teacher, linux nut, web developer, and football fanatic.