Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Nobody's Neutral In Net Neutrality Debate

bigpat Re:The people (129 comments)

Yes, unfortunately we have two political parties in the US who believe they represent their faction and not the people. They have made undermining the majority preferences of the people that live in their districts into something noble that they can sell to their supporters to raise money. Parties which were formed claiming to protect American values of Liberty and democracy now undermine our institutions.

Except for protecting and defending the constitutional rights enshrined in the constitution, a Congressman's ONLY job should be trying to understand what the majority of people in their district want and vote accordingly.

Sure Congressmen can and should lead on issues and argue for policies they believe in, but when it comes time to vote on legislation their own unbiased polling of their constituents should be what is the deciding factor. Instead we have politicians pandering to special interests based on their level of activism or whether they can raise money for them. With thousands of pages in many legislation there are bound to be contradictions. Still a Congressman good at their job should be able to explain what parts of legislation they vote for or against they would have otherwise supported or opposed if it hadn't been included with legislation they don't support. It is complicated, in part to obfuscate and bury unpopular laws within popular ones or vice versa, but it doesn't have to be that way.

yesterday
top

Scotland Votes No To Independence

bigpat Re:A glorious victory for all (471 comments)

I think what you say is mostly true, but as an American I do wish the UK would drop the K part. I don't believe government and tax supported Kings and Queens have any place in the modern world. Fairy tales told to children sure, why not. But if you want to call yourself King, Queen or Princess or whatever, then go ahead, but don't prop them up with taxpayer money.

4 days ago
top

Scotland Votes No To Independence

bigpat Re:Everyone loses (471 comments)

The alternative you suggest is that once the oil runs out that the rest of the UK will be providing Scotland with more money in government services than the Scots pay in taxes. That doesn't seem to be a viable or sustainable alternative either. Either way the Scots need a sustainable economy in Scotland and shouldn't be dependent on the taxpayers of England and Wales to prop them up. That isn't a plan. Sustainable economic and political unions are about mutual benefits not dependency.

4 days ago
top

Scotland's Independence Vote Could Shake Up Industry

bigpat Re:This isn't scaremongering. (491 comments)

You could argue the same thing for Detroit... if only they could devalue the Detroit national currency and print their way out of debt then they wouldn't have needed to go into default/bankruptcy and technically ruin their credit rating.

Or they could just settle on a budget that is actually sustainable and not have to borrow at a rate that is outpacing the growth in tax revenue.

5 days ago
top

Scotland's Independence Vote Could Shake Up Industry

bigpat Re:Not going to be as rosy as the YES! campaign sa (491 comments)

A smooth transition isn't a "handout", it would be in the best interest of both sides. Regardless of the outcome they still have to live side by side on the same island and will be a major trading partner. Amicable divorces are much better than pointlessly bitter ones.

about a week ago
top

Scotland's Independence Vote Could Shake Up Industry

bigpat Re:This isn't scaremongering. (491 comments)

I think it is quite clearly scare mongering or worse, threatening. The UK government agreed to this vote and they should be making assurances that whichever the outcome that the UK government will do its best to facilitate a peaceful and mutually beneficial transition. Two independent states can share a currency... the EU proves that currency unions are possible. And if the EU were to exclude Scotland, then that would be the first time the EU will have contracted instead of expanding which would undermine confidence in the EU itself just as it was regaining it. Certainly there will be costs to establishing and negotiating a transition, but to assume a worst case scenario and that people will act in a destructive way against their mutual interests out of some sort of royal spite is not helpful.

about a week ago
top

Scotland's Independence Vote Could Shake Up Industry

bigpat Re:Not going to be as rosy as the YES! campaign sa (491 comments)

I think it would be fairly cynical of the English side to allow a vote on independence and then screw over Scotland as an 'I told you so'. The best thing for everyone would be to facilitate a peaceful and mutually beneficial transition. That means cooperating with the Bank of Scotland to keep the Pound if they want to and doing nothing to make EU membership difficult. This isn't some sort of armed rebellion. The UK agreed to this vote. If the remaining UK screws over Scotland out of regret for allowing independence, then it would hurt the UK just as much as it would Scotland.

about a week ago
top

New Global Plan Would Crack Down On Corporate Tax Avoidance

bigpat Re: you are badly informed (323 comments)

Or 10% or 0%. The most equitable and progressive tax is the tax on individual incomes. Corporate taxes are always a shell game.

about a week ago
top

New Global Plan Would Crack Down On Corporate Tax Avoidance

bigpat Re: This is why my hair always stands on end (323 comments)

The perfect example of this is the tax on dividends which should be exactly the same rate as other income, but it was argued that it was already being taxed as corporate profits so the rate was set lower. The perverse effect is that people that actually make a wage or salary would pay higher income tax rates compared to those who can shift their income to dividends.

about a week ago
top

New Global Plan Would Crack Down On Corporate Tax Avoidance

bigpat Re: Most taxes are legalized theft (323 comments)

It is hard to convince people they are better off knowing how much is really being taken from them. But the worst things about indirect or obfuscated taxation are that it is harder to have an informed electorate when taxation is hidden so indirect taxes undermine Liberty and democratic systems and it is harder for even the most well informed to accurately judge whether the tax burden is equitable, progressive or regressive. As far as I can tell the tax system is primarily responsible for the erosion of the middle-class in the US because it is a regressive burden on the middle-class more so than the very wealthy. But try convincing a wealthy person that the higher tax bracket they see and combined taxation is actually less of a tax burden on them than the middle-class. Most people just don't understand how insideous and distorting indirect taxation can be to all our perceptions.

about a week ago
top

The FCC Net Neutrality Comment Deadline Has Arrived: What Now?

bigpat Re:What now? (131 comments)

When I say "corrupt" when referring to a body of government I usually mean systemically corrupt and not just the paper bag full of money under the table kind of corruption or the laundered campaign contributions or jobs for friends and family kind of corruption which corrupts individuals.

In the systemically corrupt sense the FCC itself is a corruption of a representative form of government in that it is a complete abdication of lawmaking authority by Congress and the President to a commission made up of people who have made big money in the industry they supposedly regulate and to which they undoubtedly expect to return to make big money especially when they are rewarded by the industry for the regulations they craft. So it is both systemically corrupt in that it is a corruption of lawmaking authority which should be held by Congress and the president and not delegated to an unelected commission, but it is also clearly individually corrupt with most of the commissioners deep in the pocket and beholden to the industry they regulate.

about a week ago
top

The FCC Net Neutrality Comment Deadline Has Arrived: What Now?

bigpat Re:What now? (131 comments)

I think it is fair to say that the FCC is one of the most corrupt institutions in the US government.

about a week ago
top

NSA Metadata Collection Gets 90-Day Extension

bigpat Re: they really think... (73 comments)

Nobody thinks that this law does anything to curtail mass surveillance. They just added some language to make it appear to restrict phone call record collection, but since everyone calls the phone company and even terrorists can order pizza or call any one of a million phone numbers that are common to everyone, then restricting the number of hops to anything more than one "hop" means they can still collect every single phone record. This law is about distraction and plausible deniability for Congress people.

about two weeks ago
top

NSA Metadata Collection Gets 90-Day Extension

bigpat Re: Why bother? (73 comments)

Bingo. A change to the law gets the courts off the hook to declare mass surveilance unconstitutional. The current laws EXPIRE SOON, so any new law is a cynical attempt to extend mass surveillance. Anyone supporting a new Patriot Act extension now should be shamed publicly as an enemy of Liberty.

about two weeks ago
top

NSA Metadata Collection Gets 90-Day Extension

bigpat Re: Fucking Government doesn't care about US (73 comments)

The fourth amendment doesn't need to be "extended" by laws. The fourth amendment is a limitation on what laws and government action are constitutional. The current and proposed mass surveillance laws are a blatant violation of the 4th amendment and so are the actions of the Obama administration.

about two weeks ago
top

If Tesla Can Run Its Gigafactory On 100% Renewables, Why Can't Others?

bigpat Re: It's not horseshit. It's happening. (444 comments)

Yes, at this point I have no illusions that CO2 emissions will be reduced by concerted government actions. Best chance is that technology will help reduce CO2 enough to mitigate the worst potential effects.

about two weeks ago
top

If Tesla Can Run Its Gigafactory On 100% Renewables, Why Can't Others?

bigpat Re:Not just Reno (444 comments)

Renewables alone are going to be insufficient for the world's energy needs.

The energy needs of a world with no more people could easily be covered by renewables.

Easily... meaning after another 50 to 100 years of large scale fossil fuel emissions? Because even for developed economies with plenty of resources it is looking like 20, 30 or even 40 years to get to 100% renewables. Even if you believe that that would be a good thing for the environment, which I think that really 100% renewables would be a bigger negative impact on the environment than keeping a large percentage of nuclear is. That still means that developing economies are going to have to also have to stay away from coal, oil and natural gas for their own economic development.

about two weeks ago
top

If Tesla Can Run Its Gigafactory On 100% Renewables, Why Can't Others?

bigpat Re: Not just Reno (444 comments)

people don't understand until you tell them nuclear fuel is a million times more energy dense than chemical fuel.

Could have just left it at "people don't understand"... The PR problem is that nuclear is economically disruptive to the fossil fuel industry so there is a lot of money at stake in spreading fear uncertainty and doubt about nuclear. The industry doesn't really fear solar or wind, because it isn't a large scale or near term threat for fossil fuel dominance. Compared with even a single new nuclear power plant which can power a large part of an entire region with consistent electricity and combined with an affordable and economically viable electric car that combination could almost completely replace fossil fuels.

about two weeks ago
top

If Tesla Can Run Its Gigafactory On 100% Renewables, Why Can't Others?

bigpat Re:It's not horseshit. It's happening. (444 comments)

We don't have time for rational solutions!

Okay then... I propose a tax on solar panels which can be used to subsidize solar panels.

about two weeks ago
top

If Tesla Can Run Its Gigafactory On 100% Renewables, Why Can't Others?

bigpat Re:It's not horseshit. It's happening. (444 comments)

We can stop 80% of today's CO2 emissions (at least here in the US) in 15 to 20 years with a concerted large scale government subsidized build-out of capacity at existing nuclear power plants. That is the radical action that we need now.

about two weeks ago

Submissions

bigpat hasn't submitted any stories.

Journals

bigpat has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>