Being Honest In Exit Interviews Is Pointless
Saying negative things about people is rarely in your interest.
Twitter: 'We Promise To Not Be a Patent Troll'
Dear Twitter: if you don't want to use a patent to beat other companies into submission, grant an irrevocable license for anyone to use it for FreeAsInBeer in perpetuity. No one would be able to prevent you from using the idea protected by the patent (defense + 1) and you wouldn't be able to prevent others from using it (offense - 1).
How Does a Self-Taught Computer Geek Get Hired?
Fast Company wrote about IGN looking in non-traditional places for excellent programmers: http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/160/ign-self-taught-coders. There are probably others like them.
How Artificial Intelligence Is Changing Music
In Soviet Russia YOU are the IP.
Microsoft VP Suggests 'Net Tax To Clean Computers
Tell you what, figure out a way to temporarily fund the government cybercrime squad using general funds. After 2 years on the job, ask the people who would pay if they support a tax to keep the cybercrime squad around.
If they want my vote, I'm going to need to see some impressive, worthwhile results.
Owners Smash iPhones To Get Upgrades, Says Insurance Company
Dear iPhone insurer: Your customers want to upgrade to the latest model each year, so just build a 'free' annual upgrade into your price. Instead of taking a hammer to their phones, your customers will send you their *working* phones (which you can resell) and you'll deal in bigger volume, perhaps enjoying some added economies of scale.
Publishers Want a Slice of Used Game Market
There's a really simple solution for the publishers: become the preferred buyer and seller of their own used games. It would offer them another opportunity to interact with their customers, sell them another game, see how long they are playing, and ask them about what they liked and didn't like. Oh, and they'll earn the revenue instead of Gamestop or Amazon.
Most Impressive Game AI?
My favorite 'AI experience' was the first time I encountered the marines in the original Half-Life single-player game. They chattered and moved as a team, they reacted to my grenades, they reacted to being hurt i.e. "man down!", "fall back!". I suspect, however, that level designers deserve the greater part of the credit for making those NPCs look smart (and fun to fight).
A game's systems work together to create an experience--in order for one to shine the others must be well designed, crafted, and integrated. Sometimes fixing a camera, tuning NPC stats, or adding some scripted chatter will do a lot more for the perceived intelligence of the opponent than a more sophisticated AI algorithm.
I think it's easy to lose sight of the ultimate goal (making a fun game) when coding AI, because, let's face it, making brilliant AI is a sexier challenge than paying attention to all the little details the make a level play well. Ironically, one of the problems in game AI these days is how to make the AI a little dumber (but not a lot dumber). It's easy to make a chess AI that will beat most people, but getting one's ass handed to one 30 times in a row is tiring to say the least. On the other hand, an AI that can be beaten handily isn't much fun either.