Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!



Favorite "Go!" Phrase?

bugnuts Re: R2, fire up the converters. (701 comments)

The proper phrase from that movie would be "this is red 5, I'm going in" or perhaps "Chewie get us out of here!"

about a month ago

Favorite "Go!" Phrase?

bugnuts Re: Go is the greatest game (701 comments)

Tesuji is clearly the best, especially delivered at high volume.

Had to scroll through comments to see if anyone had mentioned it.

about a month ago

TSA Prohibits Taking Discharged Electronic Devices Onto Planes

bugnuts Re:Actually makes good sense (702 comments)

At this point, hitting a TSA security line, rather than trying to pass through it, or just skipping that entirely and turning a good, honest, domestically available, AR-15 on a little-league crowd somewhere in Iowa would be at least as scary and way easier...

I concur. Everyone is upset about the imagery from the boston marathon, and it was downright scary. Now imagine if those two people had AR-15s and a backpack full of ammo instead, especially if they started at opposite ends of a block and worked their way in.

The imagery wouldn't be as scary as limbs blown off, but far, far more people would've died.

about a month and a half ago

TSA Prohibits Taking Discharged Electronic Devices Onto Planes

bugnuts Re:Oh, absolutely .... (702 comments)

Here's a news article on a blog by someone who worked there, which pretty much verifies what you're saying.

about a month and a half ago

TSA Prohibits Taking Discharged Electronic Devices Onto Planes

bugnuts Re:Battery not removeable? No HTC One M8 for me. (702 comments)

Apple's iphone doesn't have a removable battery because (they say) it would take extra packaging, and that would reduce the size of the actual battery. Having taken one of those things apart, I don't think they're being sneaky... it looks true and makes for a far more solid, self-contained product without worries of battery doors falling off.

Does your first paragraph apply to your second paragraph?
Non-removable batteries in phones is not necessarily sneaky or tricky, especially if they provide a painless battery replacement service. ifixit does a breakdown, and says the battery is extremely difficult to replace by the end user, which could imply planned obsolescence. But phones generally go obsolete after 2-5 years anyway as the tech increases, especially with smartphones, and the battery will last that long (although it doesn't have terrific battery life as it is).

about a month and a half ago

TSA Prohibits Taking Discharged Electronic Devices Onto Planes

bugnuts Re:Christmas is coming early this year (702 comments)

If you have actual data to add, e.g. their justification (right or wrong), then post it. Otherwise, add some value with your whiny emotional objection, or else piss off. Coward.

about a month and a half ago

AT&T Charges $750 For One Minute of International Data Roaming

bugnuts original iPhone couldn't turn off roaming (321 comments)

I ran into this issue when my iPhone was downloading email and roaming.

ATT billed me $500 and I wouldn't pay it. They tried to blame Apple and I informed them that the iPhone was their issue, too, as they were the only carrier for it. As it turns out, customer service is really collections, and we had a fine yelling match. Finally the lady agreed to send it up the line, and I had her read me exactly what she was going to send, since she did not have my interests at heart.

They did reverse the charges, and apple added the disable roaming option.

about 2 months ago

Ask Slashdot: What Should Every Programmer Read?

bugnuts Re:Strunk & White: The Elements of Style (352 comments)

That's a good link, and shows that their grammar wasn't perfect. It is, however, a "style" book and discusses how to read n write good like and common misused words; it isn't strictly a grammar book.

One of the biggest complaints I normally see is that S&W is too pedantic, and the claim that English is a living language and changes, and that White screwed up the language when it was published and adopted by so many universities. But, that very claim that it's living and morphable is the same thing they're annoyed with (or rather, "with which they are annoyed"). S&W codified things, to make the language a little more understandable and less willy-nilly for proper writing. They changed it (by deprecating many poor or ambiguous uses) and to most detractors, this is the problem... changing a living language.

I don't see it as a problem.

about 3 months ago

Ask Slashdot: What Should Every Programmer Read?

bugnuts Two unexpected computer science books (352 comments)

I'm gazing across my bookshelf full of O Reilly books, Knuth's series, TCP/IP Illustrated, and others... but the most important books are more mundane:

Godel Escher Bach: an Eternal Golden Braid, and Alice in Wonderland

Both of these books encompass the thinking and mindset which will make you a better programmer by planting the seed of logic, states, and recursion, and nourishing the hell out of it. It will massage the pathways to make someone actually want to be a programmer.

about 3 months ago

U.S. Passenger Jet Nearly Collided With Drone In March

bugnuts Re:We don't have unregulated drone use (151 comments)

you are conflating existing general rules with specific-to-drone rules

I'm extrapolating existing RC rules and overregulation of commercial UAS (i.e., the complete denying of any certificate for commercial use, whether LOS or not).

I've read the FAA rules, several times, over the past 5 years (and the hobbyist rule once for when I was flying RC planes decades ago), specifically how they apply to commercial use. I've spoken with multiple hobbyists and cam operators for movies. I am close friends with the founder of the first affordable heli autopilot.

That is to say, I know exactly what I'm talking about when I say drone rules are overregulated because it even includes aircraft that maintain line of sight and follow all hobbyist rules.

we've had at least TWO OTHER topics about this in the past month, and i keep covering the same ground cause people dont bother to read the actual regulations.

I posted in march, in Feb 2012 where I link to the rules, and in Aug 2011 talking about commercial flight certificates.

You however, are spouting. Every single one of your posts on the first page of your history is a whiny crybaby post completely void of information. It's like you learned a new word, "conflate", and are trying to use that in all your posts to sound intelligent.

about 3 months ago

A Look at Smart Gun Technology

bugnuts Re: And any idiot with a soldering iron can bypass (765 comments)

The smart gun tech has less to do with being disarmed and having the weapon turned against you (although it might be more useful for police), but making the weapon a brick when your kids are playing with it. It also makes the weapon less attractive to thieves.

A primary concern is securing it against your kids and your kids' friends. It's tough. This adds another hurdle for them to screw up and hurt themselves.

about 3 months ago

U.S. Passenger Jet Nearly Collided With Drone In March

bugnuts We don't have unregulated drone use (151 comments)

"Jim Williams, head of the FAA's drone office, said the incident highlights the risk of ubiquitous, unregulated drone use."

Flying that close to an airport is already against FAA rules. Regulations, which already exist on that, won't change the fact that it might occasionally happen that (as another poster said) some fucktard will fly in restricted airspace.

As it stands now, we have overregulated drone rules.

about 3 months ago

Applying Pavlovian Psychology to Password Management

bugnuts Re:Makes sense only if hashed file is public (288 comments)

Dude, the first step to good security is to assume you've been compromised and then construct your defenses based on that assumption.

Not so much. The first step is figuring out what you're protecting.
The next step is figuring out what the fallout is if you're compromised.
The 3rd step is figuring out the likelihood of being compromised, and potential avenues of attack.
Only at that point do you construct your defenses.

Contingency plans are based on assuming the worst has happened. Security plans are not. And a good security plan prevents having to implement a contingency plan, with a high degree of success.

TFA was stating that one should force password changes based on average time to crack. I'm saying this is an artificial burden on the users if they don't figure in probability of getting cracked (or rather, the time to figure out someone stole the file), and force changes 2 stddev earlier, not just the "average" time to crack minus the window of how often one logs in.

To demonstrate TFA was just spouting and not doing themselves or users any favors, if they knew they had been compromised yesterday and lost the hashed file, do you think they'd say "Ok, you guys with the shorter passwords need to change them a day sooner"? No, they'd force a global password change, even on those people with passwords that'd average a year to crack. So this is inconsistent with what the article is even saying, and is basically passing the annoyance on to the users based on fuzzy math.

I think TFA's oversight is intentional, however, although not really presented as that. The idea is to punish those with short passwords, and reward those that are more secure from brute force attacks. This has less to do with security as it has to do with artificially coaxing better passwords.

about 3 months ago

Applying Pavlovian Psychology to Password Management

bugnuts Makes sense only if hashed file is public (288 comments)

The three-day limit is based on calculations showing it would take about 4.5 days to find the password using offline cracking techniques.

If you're assuming your hashed password file is public or you allow unlimited login attempts without shuttering the connections, then this makes some sense. But if your pw file is public you need to force a change far before the average crack time (like 2 stddev), which probably means hours on an average of 3 days to crack.

But if your pw file isn't supposed to be public, then you're setting a policy assuming your system has been cracked and are passing bad math onto the users as annoyance. And then blaming them. If you fail to factor in the likelihood of the password file being taken, then all the "average time to crack" might not matter.

about 3 months ago

Can You Tell the Difference? 4K Galaxy Note 3 vs. Canon 5D Mark III Video

bugnuts Re:No different than asking... (201 comments)

why would I use a DSLR to shoot video?

You wouldn't, because by asking this question you betray that you undoubtedly have never shot a video before.

DSLRs have some great features, and potential features if you need them.
0. high quality and cheaper cost than a broadcast quality 2k camera.
1. interchangeable lenses.
2. easy to mount nearly anywhere.
3. large sensor can give a shallow DOF when needed, and decent low-light ability.
4. some can shoot raw footage, when needed.
5. can use comparatively inexpensive vintage lenses.
6. easily maintained and replaced.
7. high enough quality for movies, and getting better.
8. well-supported by 3rd parties.
9. often have very usable ISOs, esp with a little bit of noise reduction (of which there's exactly one good program).
10. have spawned camera offshoots based on DSLR video which is closer to a movie camera/dslr cross.
11. can be operated remotely over usb or wifi. This includes focus pulling.
12. firmware can be hacked on some, unlocking even more features.
13. can be used as a crash camera for larger budgets.
14. can be housed for underwater shooting.

Some of the problems with DSLRs for filming. Not all will apply on any particular shoot.
-1. large sensor can be a big hindrance when you need a large DOF, and requires a lot more light than a small sensor.
-2. most movie modes are afterthoughts. Very few decent still cameras also have decent movie modes.
-3. very few have any sort of usable auto-focus, although some can lock on and track. Autofocus pulling usually sucks.
-4. very few have genlock, SDI, or aux i/o or undecorated uncompressed output
-5. most outputs are in 8 bit 4:0:0 which loses a lot of color information. Some have 10 bit 4:2:2 and this is changing as memory speeds increase.
-6. many don't have a very good codec and bit speed, but this is also changing.
-7. most limit recording to 30 min due to EU taxes. Not usually a problem except for conferences and long interviews.
-8. no global shutter. This is usually a very expensive feature, although at least one offshoot has it for under $10k. Maybe $5k.
-9. limited fps speed adjustment. Some small cameras can shoot up to 1000fps for a short time, but dslrs can't do even a short slo-mo section. Some will do half-speed.
-10. Not as ergonomic as a dedicated movie camera. As a DoP, this can affect things.

All of the above can be found pretty easily if you know what to look for, and that should give you plenty of reasons why it is in many studio's interests to explore what DSLR shooting can bring them. I've shot several shorts, movie videos, and a TV show. Most were with a DSLR.

about 4 months ago

Ask Slashdot: How To Back Up Physical Data?

bugnuts Old tech: xerox machine (245 comments)

Periodic copying, on a copier/xerox, of the contents of your wallet works well. Make sure you copy both sides of credit cards and such, as they have numbers to call for cancellation or replacement. You could even simply scan the contents, then encrypt and store it somewhere.

For contacts, calendar, cellphones: Google works well for contacts, but you can use any caldav application. This handles your "physical" rolodex. And if your phone is destroyed, you can restore the contacts to a new phone.

You don't need backups of your physical stuff, you need to be able to quickly replace it.

about 4 months ago

Ask Slashdot: Are You Apocalypse-Useful?

bugnuts Slashdotters will provide food for the zombies (737 comments)

I plan on being a zombie. I plan on leading the zombies. We are talking zombie apocalypse, right?

Slashdotters tend to have vaguely higher intelligence, judging by their impeccable skill at moderating posts and speed of typing "frist post". Completely ignoring science as any good zombie would, I deduce that their brains must be tastier and more wholesomely satisfying to my soon-to-be-acquired tastes for human brains.

Nobody asked which side I'd be on after the apocalypse. I plan on being on the winning side. Now, go make me a sammich... with your ears as bread.

about 4 months ago

I prefer my peppers ...

bugnuts Re: Habaneros (285 comments)

I don't like the weedy flavor I've found in all ghost peppers, especially compared to the awesome citrus flavors of habaneros, or better yet, scotch bonnets.

about 5 months ago

I prefer my peppers ...

bugnuts Re: Depends on the dish (285 comments)

Yogurt is fine for most people intolerant to lactose.

about 5 months ago



New camera sensor filter allows double the light

bugnuts bugnuts writes  |  about a year ago

bugnuts (94678) writes "Nearly all modern DSLRs use a Bayer filter to determine colors, which filters red, two greens, and a blue for each block of 4 pixels. As a result of the filtering, the pixels don't receive all the light and the pixel values must be multiplied by predetermined values (which also multiplies the noise) to normalize the differences. Panasonic developed a novel method of "filtering" which splits the light so the photons are not absorbed, but redirected to the appropriate pixel. As a result, about twice the light reaches the sensor and almost no light is lost. Instead of RGGB, each block of 4 pixels receives Cyan, White + Red, White + Blue, and Yellow, and the RGB values can be interpolated."
Link to Original Source

Canon introduces world's largest CMOS sensor

bugnuts bugnuts writes  |  more than 3 years ago

bugnuts (94678) writes "Shortly after announcing a 120 megapixel sensor which might be the world's densest CMOS sensor, Canon announced the world's largest CMOS sensor measuring 202 x 205mm. Canon has developed a dense 50 megapixel sensor in 2007, but it was never put into a camera. A larger sensor, however, is starting the rumor-mill about a large format or nighttime video camera in the works. The sensor makes possible the image capture in one one-hundredth the amount of light required by a 35 mm full-frame CMOS sensor, facilitating the shooting of 60 frame-per-second video with a mere 0.3 lux of illumination. Based on the 5Dm2 H1 ISO of 12,800 that means the new sensor has as much light-gathering as an ISO around 819,200!"
Link to Original Source

Hacked email showing climate change fraud?

bugnuts bugnuts writes  |  more than 3 years ago

bugnuts (94678) writes "Following a rather cool spring in North America, another attack on the scientific consensus that humans are largely responsible for climate change has surfaced. A criminal hacker on a UK system leaked apparent emails from climate scientists which imply some sort of deception was going on. Some of the emails are clearly scientific in nature such as, "The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't. The CERES data published in the August BAMS 09 supplement on 2008 shows there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong. Our observing system is inadequate", but which will be grabbed with both fists by the climate change deniers and other zealots. More troubling, however, are excerpts such as "Can you delete any e-mails you may have had with Keith re AR4? Keith will do likewise."
These emails are certainly taken out of context, whether they are legitimate or fraudulent, which adds to the confusion."

Blizzard asserts rights over independent addons

bugnuts bugnuts writes  |  more than 5 years ago

bugnuts (94678) writes "Blizzard announced a policy change to Addons for the popular game World of Warcraft which asserts requirements on UI programmers, such as charging for the program, obfuscation, soliciting donations, etc. Addons are voluntarily-installed UI programs that add functionality to the game, programmed in Lua, which can do various tasks that hook into the WoW engine. The new policy has some obvious requirements such as not loading the servers or spamming users, and it looks like an attempt to make things more accessible and free for the end user. But unlike FOSS, it adds other requirements that assert control over these independently coded programs, such as distribution and fees.

Blizzard can already control the ultimate functionality of Addons by changing the hooks into the WoW engine. They have exercised this ability in the past, e.g. to disable addons that automate movement and "one-button" combat. Should they be able to make demands on independent programmers' copyrighted works, such as download fees or advertising, who are not under contract to code for Blizzard? Is this like Microsoft asserting control over what programmers may code for Windows?"

Warhammer Online fully onlineThursday

bugnuts bugnuts writes  |  more than 5 years ago

bugnuts (94678) writes "The Warhammer Online: Age of Reckoning MMO servers will open to public retail Thursday morning at midnight. The servers have already been open for two days for customers that pre-ordered the game, and four days for those that pre-ordered the Collector's Edition. Those subscribers were given a code, which enabled the open beta client to run on the retail servers early.

In a departure from the norm of highly-advertised games, the official forums contain only announcements, and fans must use unofficial forums to discuss the game."

Link to Original Source

Soon to be IANAL Jack Thompson visited by Marshals

bugnuts bugnuts writes  |  more than 6 years ago

bugnuts (94678) writes "At airports everywhere, they say "No Jokes", and take even off-color non-joke comparisons as seriously as a tornado. Thompson's latest letter, hand delivered to Chief Judge Federico Moreno, contained a comparison of his treatment to Al Queda which was not taken lightly. Thompson wrote:

We find yesterday that enemy combatants at Guantanamo are to get more due process from federal judges than what I am to have. I guess my "mistake" was not killing 3000 people to make my point...
Marshals visited Thompson, probably to determine if it was a credible threat, which invoked an inevitable long-winded response."

bugnuts bugnuts writes  |  more than 7 years ago

bugnuts (94678) writes "A ruling that remote DVRs are not the same as personal DVRs may have some farther-reaching consequences on the Betamax defense of "timeshifting". Cablevision wanted to offer the ability to record programs on their own hardware at the user's request, which the user could playback later. Although it sounds innocuous (simply duplicating the DVR capabilities), it constitutes a service — which therefore does not get the protections of the Betamax case."



iPhone landmine updated

bugnuts bugnuts writes  |  more than 6 years ago

I took up the fight to recover the $550 data bill I received while on travel for 10 days, while my iphone dutifully and silently received lots of email and spam and so on every 30 minutes.

Initially, ATT offerred a $150 courtesy credit, which I took but mentioned that I'd be calling them back. I did so when they threatened to cut off my service. My terms were actually forgiving. While on travel, it was possible to get wifi for $15/day, so if I had purchased it there it would've cost $150. That is what I offered to pay ATT for the data charges. An argument with the customer representative ensued, but I did not back down. My point was simple: I couldn't turn it off without losing functionality unrelated to the data service. Forcing me to turn the phone off completely means I lose the iPod features, and leaving it in airplane mode means I lose the wifi and bluetooth features.

The customer service rep filed a dispute on my behalf, but I had little confidence she would forward my complaint and reasons (since she had been arguing against them with me for 10 minutes). However, she told me what was in the report and it included what I had stated.

I'm happy to report that ATT reversed all the data charges from what I can tell. I may have been charged interest for late payment, but I'm not even certain of that until I see the full itemized bill. It appears they didn't take my offer of paying $150.

My recommendation if this happens to someone else is to remember that this is a financial issue... do not lose your cool. There's always someone higher you can take this to, even if that means a judge. Like an insurance adjuster, the customer service rep is not your friend and will do everything possible to screw you, but it's not personal. Don't take offense or be offensive, because in my case this person actually forwarded my complaint to a higher department. You don't want this person emotionally involved enough to want you to lose. Have your defense in mind, and always fall back on it if you are being dragged into a different argument... that may even involve simply repeating yourself every few minutes. If it's clear you are going nowhere, ask to escalate it up the chain and ask if you need to send a written request. Good luck.


iPhone Hidden Landmine, and other Pros and Cons

bugnuts bugnuts writes  |  about 7 years ago

Several people have written tomes about the technological advancements and "revolution" the iPhone will bring to cellphones, both in software and hardware. Many have written tomes of the evils of it, and how they are in bed with AT&T, known to ignore your privacy. As an early adopter, I was expecting some shortcomings. What I came across, however, was a hidden landmine that will cost me hundreds of dollars paid to one of my least-favorite companies, ATT.

For those that don't know, the iphone will automatically search for wifi, and piggy-back onto those networks if allowed. If it doesn't find any, or if it can't connect for whatever reason, it falls back onto the slower cellular Edge network. This seems like a very good default and it works really well for most cases. Browsing on the iphone still amazes me on the clarity and fact that if I'm ever bored, I can just fire up a browser no matter where I am. It even downloads my email locally, and pulses when I receive a new message. You can be perpetually connected to your websites and email.

It is a geek's dream, and I'm living the dream.

Recently, however, this dream turned into a nightmare. I was on travel in the Caribbean. As soon as I powered up my iphone and took it off of the airplane mode, the iphone dutifully retrieved my email automatically incurring roaming data charges. This is, of course, despite having unlimited data in my contract with ATT. This was also happening unbeknownst to me, and there was nothing I could do about this even if I had known, except turn the radio completely off! Even if I purchased local wifi use or used a free hotspot, if it ever lost wifi connectivity it would fall back on the Edge network and incur roaming charges. Turning off the radio would prevent roaming, but would also disable use of local wifi and bluetooth. There is simply no way to tell a registered iphone to never roam without disabling the radio completely.

I discovered this only after I received a $550 bill for roaming data charges. Not once did I make an actual phone call, although I did intentionally send a couple photos I took. Most of this data transfer was from things like the phone automatically downloading my email (which I subsequently read), a little bit of web browsing, and even checking the local weather report. After a somewhat shocked call to ATT, they offered to forgive $150 of it which I accepted, but I did so without agreeing that I wouldn't pursue this further. I'm hoping this article will help prevent others from having such a surprise and financial burden.

[added 13-sep] My case of ignorance coupled with Apple's failure to program an anti-roaming feature is not unique. Rules lawyers argue that the defaults for email had been changed, or that "the phone wasn't off". But what use is a phone that has to be disabled in order to prevent racking up roaming charges? I would have still gotten roaming charges had I used the local wifi. That's because the wifi antenna is not particularly sensitive, and it's extremely unlikely it wouldn't fall back on Edge at some point. And heaven forbid my local wifi drops while I'm not actively using the phone, or once again, it'll do exactly what it's programmed to do: fall back on the Edge network and continue downloading. Works great in the US, but is a horrible default outside the local network boundaries.

Although I'm very disappointed and quite annoyed at the roaming fees, here is a quick rundown on the pros and cons of the iphone from my perspective. More importantly, it is weighted with the perceived importance. Some big "problems" that iphone detractors proclaim really are not very significant in practice, and there are several problems I've encountered that I never see stated.

I purchased my iphone knowing it would be hacked/opened at some point in the short future. It is intuitive and made for the masses, but also a perfect device for hackers - a hand-held Unix device with a radio and camera. Potentially completely programmable. Multiple inputs, bright and colorful display, a glass screen, and damn sexy, too.

The reasons I bought an iphone are largely self-explanatory:

  • Multiple touchscreen inputs (probably the first COTS handheld device with this).
  • Excellent hardware and looks (no moving parts, bright glass screen, responsive, built tough, and damn sexy).
  • Geek factor - runs Unix (which was destined to be hacked).
  • Full web browser. (Except for flash, which I don't use anyway. Or Java, but again, I'm a luddite in some ways.)
  • 2 Megapixel camera has about double the pixels of older phonecams.
  • Video playback with sound.
  • Wifi and data.
  • iPod functionality.

In addition, here are some great features I discovered after owning the iphone:

  • Icebreaker. It's like carrying around a cute puppy - people love it.
  • UI: scrolling voicemail allows you to listen out of order. Surprisingly useful.
  • UI: scrolling through ipod songs and videos makes it really easy to find the song you want.
  • UI: google maps is great fun, and quite useful.
  • Hardware is even better than I thought it would be. The screen is nothing short of amazing, and the touchscreen works great.

Here are the problems, with my comments on the significance:

  • Sometimes hangs/crashes, needs a full restart. This bit me a few times, especially at first. The system crashed continually, I received no voice messages or SMS messages, and it was very frustrating. A simple reboot (holding down the power key for 6 sec) solved all the problems. Although a BIG issue, I solved it by accident. And this is happening to a lot of people.
  • Sweaty fingers don't work so well. Anyone with sweaty hands knows how difficult most laptop touchpads can be -- this is not quite as bad, but noticable. Also, the smudges on the screen are not an issue like many people thought it would be. My glass screen is still pristine, and just takes a simple wipe on the pant leg to clean.
  • No "thumb" on the webpage. Scrolling to the bottom of a large webpage is simply stupid. Am I missing something?
  • Where's the tilde? Finding some of the special characters on the typewriter took some work. (Hint: you have to hit shift after going to the symbols page.)
  • No addons to Safari. This concerns me, but I suspect this will be solved soon enough. I can't wait for someone to port firefox, though.
  • No Flash in Safari. This really doesn't bother me. Flash has very little user-control, except through addons to prevent it from running, and I definitely don't want it installed if I can't disable it somehow. In the rare cases I allow it on my normal browser, I would miss it on the phone. But for the most part, I see flash as an annoyance, used by advertisers and idiots to ram content down your throat. For the most part, flash makes my browsing less enjoyable, not more, so I don't miss this at all. Besides, it'll be ported soon enough, I'm certain.
  • No flash on the camera, either. Despite having more pixels than most older phones, the camera is not really that high of quality, especially compared to some cellphones coming out today. It'll take great pictures in good indirect light. But if you put a bright spot anywhere, or take pictures in subdued lighting, your colors and pictures will be poor. Impressive in good conditions with good colors and clarity, but lack of any programmability of light sensitivity or zoom means you get mediocre pictures in all but perfect conditions. Also, the capture is a little slow (perhaps 1/2 second, which is enough to lose the perfect shot). Lastly, the shutter button is on the screen so it's more difficult to hold the phone in awkward positions to take photos (e.g. of yourself or over your head).
  • No video recording. For some people, this killed the iphone for them. This is not the case for me -- I don't really mind not having video. All current phone video is such poor quality that I question the ability as simply a useless bell and whistle. Use a real camera to make real videos.
  • Poor speakerphone. Rarely mentioned is the low volume of the speakerphone. Or for that matter, the low volume of the ringer, too. The tiny speaker just cannot belt out the sound. And this is annoying if you're trying to use the speakerphone while driving. Get a bluetooth headset which will work really well.
  • 2G, not 3G radio. Apple could have used a more modern radio and a faster data network, but did not. They use the Edge network, which is a bit pokey, and the fact you can do full browsing makes it feel even slower ... it downloads the pictures so webpages take much longer to load. But that's the price for the quality of the browser. I can live with this, but it is annoying.
  • No GPS. What was apple thinking? Integrate maps into it, but not tell you where you are? And how the heck can you save the current location as a bookmark in the maps, to look up later? IMHO, the intuitive interface loses a bit in the mapping software.
  • No 3rd party apps. Not an issue... they're coming whether Apple likes it or not! Already you can get screenshots of web pages, voice recording, arbitrary ringtones, etc. You can even ssh into your iphone, and *gasp* run apache on it. No, really.
  • Lack of "buttons" makes it difficult to type. Minor issue, and noticable when using the camera. Most of the time when you'd be fumbling around (like driving) you can use the "favorites" to make calls and not the keypad. The typewriter is easy to make typos, but the software works surprisingly well to correct errors and typos. Seriously, it's good. After playing with it a weekend, you'll be typing like a pro. Well, not a pro, but you can do 20-30 wpm which is plenty good enough for a handheld.
  • No voice dialing. I'd bet someone will be able to make an app to do this in the future. It's a big oversight by apple, but only a moderate problem.
  • Mono-only bluetooth. Not an issue for me, but could be for others who use bluetooth headphones to listen to music.
  • Incompatible with many ipod addons. This is a big issue which I think will affect many people. Not only do the ipod functions not send sound through the docking port (so most ipod speakers and car kits will not work), but the earphone jack is recessed which makes most minijack plugs incompatible.
  • Cannot set your own background image. This is false, but I see a lot of people claiming it. You can set a background image easily. You simply tell itunes to sync photos to a folder on your computer, and drop your background image into this folder. Then you can view it on the phone and set it as your background.
  • No Instant Messaging. I suspect this will be coming soon, through a 3rd party app. Someone will port gaim or write one. But then your battery life will probably go to hell.
  • Poor support for sending photos. No MMS support at all, and you cannot crop photos sent via email. A big oversight for a phone that is supposed to integrate such features.
  • Battery replacement requires mailing the phone in. To me, this is only a minor issue. The reason why it's minor is that I reap huge benefits from it. Because apple did not have to invest in packaging the battery and terminals, they could make the battery significantly larger. And I'm happy to lose my phone for a week, in order to have an extra hour or two the rest of the two-year expected battery life. It is a good tradeoff, although granted, could be an annoying one to some people.

There seems to be a lot of "cons" compared to the "pros". So, would I buy an iPhone knowing what I do now? The answer is still a solid "Yes".


bugnuts bugnuts writes  |  more than 10 years ago

I've been on slashdot for quite a while, and my goal is to have a comment moderated by at least five different categories, including Troll, Funny, and Interesting.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>