×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Kids Can Swipe a Screen But Can't Use LEGOs

butalearner Re:Specialized Pieces (313 comments)

Those same pieces can be used to build what ever you can imagine.

No so easily nowadays. Lego comes with huge numbers of very specialized pieces which are taylor made for that particular model. You can get the basic bricks but most Lego today is aimed at building one model and then playing with it rather than getting a pile of bricks and letting your imagination run wild. There is one exception though: Mindstorms! This is simply brilliant and the new EV3 version even runs Linux! It's one of the few toys that are around today that I really wish I had been available when I was a kid.

I have a six year old, and this is mostly true. There are a large number of non-standard pieces, which makes digging for pieces much more frustrating. On the other hand, there are a lot more possibilities when it comes to building things with articulations. My son builds robots all the time (cannibalized from various robot sets), and I showed him how using a ball-and-socket joint at the shoulders and hips, and a hinge joint at the knees and elbows makes it more like us. And he doesn't know any better, so he uses those non-standard pieces for decorations anyway. Some of that is, as another poster said, partially because of all the tie-in sets out there, but we tend to stay away from those. The Creator series, which literally has full instructions for three different models using the same set of blocks, should be everybody's first stop (and they're cheaper than tie-in sets anyway).

As for the article, my son has played with the smallest size Legos since he was almost 4, and my daughter started even before she turned 3 (to keep up with her brother). Even though they do play on phones and tablets and gaming systems, they spend more time with Legos than anything else...and that's by choice. I'm not saying this in an attempt to brag here, I'm saying, parents, get your kid Legos, and build stuff with them. You know you'll enjoy it, too.

yesterday
top

Nokia Had a Production-Ready Web Tablet 13 Years Ago

butalearner Re:Not a market back then (185 comments)

The reason tablets became popular is because people had begun to use their phones in similar ways, and the price wasn't too outrageous. Microsoft had tablets before they became popular, too, but they didn't kick off the tablet craze. Pioneering technology is one part tech, ten parts timing.

...and a whole lot of marketing, I should have added.

yesterday
top

Nokia Had a Production-Ready Web Tablet 13 Years Ago

butalearner Not a market back then (185 comments)

The reason tablets became popular is because people had begun to use their phones in similar ways, and the price wasn't too outrageous. Microsoft had tablets before they became popular, too, but they didn't kick off the tablet craze. Pioneering technology is one part tech, ten parts timing.

yesterday
top

How 'DevOps' Is Killing the Developer

butalearner Re:whine (207 comments)

You're supposed to have both "Developers who do Ops" and "Ops guys who develop" in one team to do "DevOps".

If you're working in a place that's done "We'll just get the developers to do Operations" then they're doing it wrong.

I just started a new position where they had just figured this out and split the team into two. A couple of our developers trend toward the surly, and they would get a bit short with our customers (who are internal customers, but customers nonetheless) when interrupted. Which totally makes sense, by the way, because it kills productivity, but it was causing issues on all sides. Now we have this separation and process where our customers no longer contact us directly but fill out a quick report that automatically contacts the newly-formed ops team. We don't have to bother the developers except in extreme cases, and the folks who specialize in troubleshooting handle almost every issue. And even though I joined the ops team, but I still squash bugs and add minor features so the dev team can focus on the big stuff. This literally just happened in the past few months, but the improvement in our metrics for the most recent release was pretty impressive.

yesterday
top

Mathematical Proof That the Cosmos Could Have Formed Spontaneously From Nothing

butalearner Re:If you make this a proof of God... (590 comments)

Let's simplify.

Conway's game of life creatures became sentient. They discovered they are made of cells. They said "Look, THE INFINITESIMAL CELL is always created from NOTHING. If things happens FROM NOTHING, there is NO NEED FOR A CREATOR, so THERE IS NO CREATOR, and besides NOBODY ever witnessed something different THAN THE DETERMINISTIC APPLICATION OF RULES. How smart are we?"

So the guy at the PC said to himself "Thank you for nothing, guys" and went making himself coffee.

Note that the guy at the PC doesn't care what happens to the sentient creatures, doesn't interact with them in any way after he starts the universe, and doesn't take any portion of the sentient creature with him for all eternity.

You have it wrong, anyway. The vast majority of these creatures would say that they were Created. Some would simply accept this, having been taught so ever since birth, specifically with the knowledge that questioning their beliefs is one of the worst things they could do. Some others would look at the rules and realize that, had the rules been different, they would not have existed at all. They would see that as proof as a Creator and (through some further leap of logic) the rest of their beliefs, even though such a "proof" of the former does not in any way imply the latter. Still others would simply take Pascal's Wager and hope that their particular religion is the correct one.

5 days ago
top

How Cochlear Implants Are Being Blamed For Killing Deaf Culture

butalearner Re:Let it die (507 comments)

There is no upside with these problems.

To epilepsy, probably not. But blind and deaf people are known to have enhanced other senses to make up for it. Note that they don't just train themselves to pay more attention to senses they do have, but the brain actually "rewires" itself to use visual or auditory processing centers for processing other senses. Incidentally, this is why cochlear implants do not work as well as expected when the person has been deaf for a long time: the person receiving it is already using that part of the brain for other things. (source)

The underlying point still stands, though. The drawbacks of blindness or deafness far, far outweigh the benefits. Only a few potential counterexamples like Stevie Wonder or Ray Charles might exist, though we'll never know how popular they might have been had they not been blind, and certainly not every blind person has musical talent on that level.

about a week ago
top

The Amoeba That Eats Human Intestines, Cell By Cell

butalearner Re:treatment (70 comments)

Ouroborosin would make them eat themselves, which is a whole other thing. The drug you're describing would probably be called cannibalis. I can just see the tagline: "Cannibalis: giving parasites a different kind of the munchies."

about a week ago
top

Mozilla CEO Firestorm Likely Violated California Law

butalearner Re:Bu the wasn't fired (1109 comments)

Could someone patiently explain to me what's going on? Why is it seen as flamebait? Why do people think it's saying Eich should be punished for his private opinions when I say the exact opposite?

I agree that you say the opposite, but there are subtleties in this issue that can easily be missed by someone (like me) who hasn't followed this story very closely. I believe the nuance that mods have missed in your post was that Brendan Eich didn't just donate to some generic Prop 8 campaign as most news stories say. There is no such thing as "the Prop 8 campaign." There were several groups of people running campaigns to support Prop 8, and some of them were...mean-spirited, to put it lightly. The particular group that Eich supported ran ads with the underlying message that gay parents are doing harm to their children, and that rejecting Prop 8 would be harmful to children in general. Once I understood that (see this story, for example), your arguments made a lot more sense.

about a week ago
top

NASA Halts Non-ISS Work With Russia Over Ukraine Crisis

butalearner Re:Politcs vs. Science (291 comments)

The USA has been very good at injecting puppets so that political control remains possible.

I don't know about that. I mean, we try our best, but I wouldn't say we're good at it.

about two weeks ago
top

UN Report: Climate Changes Overwhelming

butalearner Re:Projections (987 comments)

let's take HADCRUT4 as being at least a reasonably honest attempt to evaluate a global surface temperature anomaly even though they do not attempt to correct for e.g. UHI and hence almost certainly have a monotonic warming bias

A November 2013 paper (so, after AR5) pointed out that HadCRUT4 has no data from the polar regions, which might mean the most drastic warming -- in the Arctic -- is not taken into account (source). Obviously this will spur some further research, but whether it's true or not, there is an option c) the global mean surface temperature change has been underestimated.

Which is neither here nor there -- if global warming is disappearing into the oceans, that's fabulous news as the oceans can absorb the heat for a century and still hardly change temperature, if not, well, time will tell.

That might be generically true (I'll take your word for it), but the way it's happening -- absorbing CO2 -- is causing ocean acidification. We know this for sure, and it's a bad thing for current ocean life. Between that, overfishing, and pollution from oil and nuclear accidents, we're messing up a rather important food source. True, it may adapt as you implied in a later post, but it will cause upheaval in the meantime. In addition, I know researchers have proposed links between warmer oceans and extreme weather events like the polar vortices causing the cold snaps this year, that is, warmer oceans weaken the jetstream. But I don't know how much traction that has among climate scientists.

If you bother to actually go out and grab AR5 to read what it actually says instead of what distortions of summaries of paraphrases might have said, you might stop by and read paragraphs 9.2.2.2 and 9.2.2.3. They are sublime. Basically they say "We have no defensible reason to think that the average of all of the climate models in CMIP5 has the slightest actual meaning, and we have excellent reasons not to just take the numerical average of their individual mean predictions with equal weight and to prune out the failing models, but we're going present the numerical average of all of the models, including the ones that are overtly failing, anyway".

I just looked at those sections, and to me it reads, "these (Multi-Model Ensembles and Perturbed-Parameter Ensembles) are the types of simulations we've taken into account [9.2.2], these are their weaknesses [9.2.2.1-2], and this is how we combined them to evaluate them as a whole [9.2.2.3]." Perhaps you're referring to the direct quote "...collections such as the CMIP5 MME cannot be considered a random sample of independent models," which is repeating the weakness described in 9.2.2.1, which is that a lot of models in that set use components from other models in the set. To me that makes perfect sense because we do that in engineering all the time: reusing model components that (seem to) work well. I can see why that would seem fishy, though. It'd be nice to see someone dig into that and see what components are reused and how they might bias the results.

about two weeks ago
top

Introducing a Calendar System For the Information Age

butalearner Re:Um no (224 comments)

...a Quart shrunk to a litre, a gallon likewise shrinking to 4l. It still happening as many containers are 3.78 litres so almost a pint and a half shaved off the old gallon.

The quart and gallon you referred to at first are UK measures (I had to read that again to understand, but thankfully a couple posts above you had the conversion), and 3.78 L is a US gallon.

40 odd years later, we drive mostly in metric with most people being bilingual, weather is in metric. Groceries are in litres and pounds, hardware is mostly in standard. So go out and buy a litre of milk, a pound of hamburger then half a kilo of 1/2 in nails, some 8ft 2x4s and 3/8 plywood. Probably varies across the country.

Wow, I never thought I'd say this, but you've just convinced me that "switching" the US to metric (or, more realistically, a horrendous hybrid of the two) would be a disaster.

about three weeks ago
top

I prefer my peppers ...

butalearner Re:Depends on the dish (285 comments)

Actually after you get use to the spiciness, then you are able to get the other flavors as well. I call the heat of a dish is the 6th form of taste Sweet Sour Salty Bitter Umani Heat

To the people who are not use to it, it feels like their mouth is on fire, after you get use to it, and train your brain to say this is actually healthy food, it stops sending the panic and you no longer focus on the heat but all the other flavors in the food, the head just adds to the total taste.

Wikipedia's article on taste is interesting: it points out that the first five are traditional tastes because they're detected the same way, but there are other a number of other sensations that contribute to the "overall taste" of things. "Heat" should probably mean actual temperature, since that is an important part of our expectation when we eat (otherwise we wouldn't care if dinner gets cold). In the article they call it pungency or spiciness when foods give a false sense of heat. Oppositely, things like spearmint and menthol give a false sense of cold. By a similar process we can also tell when something tastes metallic. And of course we also have smell and texture, which are pretty major parts of the eating experience.

This is the reason why I really do feel bad for people brought up eating bland food. They really do miss out on the full experience...though I guess it might make it easier to avoid overeating if you never eat anything spicy, since spicy food releases endorphins. Even if I don't like how some food tastes when I first eat it, I find it helps if I pretend like I'm a food critic and almost clinically focus on identifying the combination of tastes going into it as well as the smell and texture. Of course that probably wouldn't help with the super hot stuff. One Buffalo Wild Wings' Blazin' wing (the sauce is 200,000 to 350,000 SHU) was way too much for me. My wife and I use cayenne pepper (30,000 to 50,000 SHU) like crazy, but the spiciest stuff we usually make probably comes out in the jalapeno range (though recently we made jerk shrimp marinaded in this stuff, which according to the site is somewhere between 15,000 and 100,000 SHU, and those tiny shrimp didn't do much to dilute it!).

about three weeks ago
top

I prefer my peppers ...

butalearner Re:best pepper? (285 comments)

How long until somebody gets their hands on straight capsaicin, then drinks it on camera? That person would automatically win forever.

about three weeks ago
top

Jimmy Wales To 'Holistic Healers': Prove Your Claims the Old-Fashioned Way

butalearner Re:Wikipedia ruined the internet (517 comments)

The placebo effect is very real, it really works, and that's what this is, ie. placebo in the guise of "Energy Medicine" instead of a sugar pill.

Yes, it can cure, it can help people, but not people with real diseases/illnesses.

In no circumstances should it substitute proper science if there's something seriously wrong with you.

It depends on what you mean by real diseases or illnesses. Mental illnesses such as phobias, depression, or anxiety disorders, and partially mental symptoms like pain and nausea, can be treated pretty effectively with placebos and other holistic approaches like exercise and meditation. For example, we know cursing up a storm to be a pain-relieving exercise (as long as you use swear words sparingly the rest of the time). I would almost prefer people turn to some of these things first rather than drugs. But yeah, what makes me wary of the Change.org petition are the references to specific techniques, which probably require expensive certifications for practitioners so that patients have to pay an arm and a leg.

Sure enough, after I typed this, I looked up Wikipedia's page on "Thought Field Therapy" and found this:

[Roger Callahan, the inventor of Thought Field Therapy] also asserts that his most advanced level, Voice Technology (VT) can be performed over the phone using an undisclosed "technology". Training for the advanced VT is provided by Callahan. The fee listed on Callahan's website for this training is $100,000. Trainees must sign a confidentiality agreement not to disclose the trade secret behind VT.

about three weeks ago
top

Back To the Moon — In Four Years

butalearner Re:NASA needs SpaceX. SpaceX doesn't need NASA. (292 comments)

Well, that and you could make some badass telescopes on the dark side.

You mean on the far site.

Or perhaps he means in a crater near one of the poles, like Shackleton crater. These are known as "craters of eternal darkness," by the way, which obviously sounds way cooler than "the dark side of the Moon."

about a month ago
top

Back To the Moon — In Four Years

butalearner Re:Yeah, too bad there's no real reason to do so.. (292 comments)

The moon is a symbol, but there's no *practical* reason to go there, establish a base, a colony, or a really good restaurant. Near earth orbital stations, in contrast, might be developed profitably for power stations, zero G manufacturing of exotic materials, ubiquitous satellite-based internet, and so on.

The focus on the moon and Mars is just cold war era, retro silliness. We have limited resources to throw at space. This is the time to throw them at something that will give us some return.

It's relatively close, placing a colony underground is cheap and easy radiation protection, the presence of gravity will reduce the amount of required exercise (and avoid the other issues with zero-g environments), it would be inspiring in ways that robotic explorers are not, and it will provide us with experience extracting resources from and growing food on other planets, which is critical for humans to become a space-faring species. And this is something we can do with today's technology. Sure, at some point in the near future we will have developed improved radiation protection and centripetal acceleration-based artificial gravity, thereby making space stations a better environment in the long-term (assuming the food issue is solved), but we haven't done those things yet.

Call that "space nuttery" if you will...I accept that establishing a Moon colony isn't cost-effective at the moment, but establishing a permanent, self-sufficient colony outside of Earth is something we as a species need to do at some point. Since there are still so many ways humanity can be destroyed, taking steps toward that goal sooner would be better than later.

about a month ago
top

Back To the Moon — In Four Years

butalearner Re:Lets divert some military funds (292 comments)

You know just 1% of our military budget diverted to NASA could do amazing things.. imagine if we diverted half of that budget!

To put that in perspective, you're talking about diverting about $5 billion from military spending, which would increase NASA's budget by about a quarter. If they put it all toward space stuff, it's an even larger increase. Check out the NASA 2015 budget request summary. No, seriously, check it out, it's actually a really interesting document with pictures, details, and progress of all of their programs.

Whenever people talk about cutting or diverting budgets, it usually means shaking up and losing jobs, which is bad for productivity all around. But, if you cut the budget for certain military programs and give it to civilian space programs, a lot of the same players, needing a lot of the same engineering talent, are involved. There would still be shake-ups as contracts are lost by one company and picked up by another, but it's a far better situation than simple budget cuts or taking money away from one industry to spend in another.

about a month ago
top

The Myth of the Science and Engineering Shortage

butalearner Re:A myth indeed. (392 comments)

Additionally just because the planet hasn't warmed in 17 years...

Wow, do people still actually point at the anomalous 1998 data and ignore the decades before that? I didn't think anybody did that anymore, ever since GWB finally admitted global warming was a real thing (though he never accepted it was man made).

about a month ago
top

Pluto Regains Its Title As Largest Object In Its Neighborhood

butalearner Re:Ah, the Planet Pluto (138 comments)

It seems to me there should be a fourth category: gas giants. They are considered planets, but there's more differences between Earth and Uranus than there are between Mars and Pluto.

To add to the confusion, Uranus and Neptune are sometimes considered "ice giants," since their composition is so significantly different than Jupiter and Saturn.

about a month ago

Submissions

top

OpenPandora sells for $1875

butalearner butalearner writes  |  more than 3 years ago

butalearner (1235200) writes "After two years of delays, the first Pandora handheld consoles are finally arriving in the hands of the thousands of patient supporters. Of course, it was only a matter of time before the Pandora made its first appearance on eBay. The auction opened at a modest $330 — the preorder price — but five days later, one of the first Pandoras in existence netted the seller a whopping $1875 after a bidding war. I'm sure we'll see a slew of copycats attempt to replicate the success of this auction."

Journals

butalearner has no journal entries.

Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Sign up for Slashdot Newsletters
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...