Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

NASA Study: Ocean Abyss Has Not Warmed

cbeaudry Re:Everyone should just say "interesting" (294 comments)

My ignorance is showing? How so?

Name calling, is all you do. Denier, ignorant... Care to add a third?

As everyone else who has bought into the climate change movement, when something is a posted or a question is asked, that they cant easily destroy with their talking points, they'll just ignore it.

Take the time to read the link I posted. Then come back and tell me what you think about it. Then... we'll have a discussion.

Right now, you are just preaching. Preachers use words... like "sinner", sounds allot like denier.

about two weeks ago
top

NASA Study: Ocean Abyss Has Not Warmed

cbeaudry Re:we get it (294 comments)

You are right, CO2 is not the only factor, a difference in CO2 alone can make a difference.

http://wattsupwiththat.files.w...

Source: Susanne von Caemmerer, W. Paul Quick, and Robert T. Furbank (2012). The Development of C4 Rice: Current Progress and Future Challenges. Science 336 (6089): 1671-1672.

about two weeks ago
top

NASA Study: Ocean Abyss Has Not Warmed

cbeaudry Re:Everyone should just say "interesting" (294 comments)

Good, maybe someone will read it.

Do you have anything to say about the content of the information in that link? Instead of stating the obvious?

about two weeks ago
top

NASA Study: Ocean Abyss Has Not Warmed

cbeaudry Re:Everyone should just say "interesting" (294 comments)

I'm sorry, but you have bought into the movement by first, using the term denier, second thinking science is on the side of the righteous climate movement.

Take the time to read this and let me know what conclusions you come to.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/201... Real Science Debates are Not Rare

about two weeks ago
top

NASA Study: Ocean Abyss Has Not Warmed

cbeaudry Re:Everyone should just say "interesting" (294 comments)

You assume there is warming to be found, because the models say so?
Isn't it possible that a chaotic system is just that, chaotic?

In my opinion it describes in a clear and concise way, what the science is not only not settled, but also rests and very shaky ground.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/201...

about two weeks ago
top

NASA Study: Ocean Abyss Has Not Warmed

cbeaudry Re:Everyone should just say "interesting" (294 comments)

I agree.

I dont know how if it its possible to modify ones own posts, so here is a correction.

The link I wanted to post is this:

http://wattsupwiththat.com/201... Real Science Debates are Not Rare.

I think this brings things back to the source and demonstrates why we are so off the mark.

about two weeks ago
top

NASA Study: Ocean Abyss Has Not Warmed

cbeaudry Re:Everyone should just say "interesting" (294 comments)

I agree with your measured position.

I had a long read last night that really put this in perspective and explained why and how the science just doesn't seem to make sense when it comes to the climate change debate.

If you have a little patience, read the following recent link, to get a good grasp of how Science and peer review have been redefined by the climate movement and why.
Also about the "basic" science surrounding climate science which is flawed from the ground up.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/201... [wattsupwiththat.com]

Read it with an open mind and make your own conclusions. Its what I suggest to anyone.
Its just hard to look at the whole subject with the same mindset after reading this.

about two weeks ago
top

NASA Study: Ocean Abyss Has Not Warmed

cbeaudry Re:we get it (294 comments)

Nice way to spin it.
I'm happy and actually quite suprised that NASA decided to write this instead of hide it. However James Hansen is no longer at NASA... so...

But then you go and trash it all up.

CO2 is plant food, as you stated, we all know that. What you might not know is another double of CO2 is exactly what we need to grow the food to feed the growing population we have.

There is nothing to update, as CO2 was, is and always will be plant food.

Now, that aside. The link between CO2 and runaway global warming is a theory with models which does not rest on solid science.

Now before you go and talk about settled this and settled that....

If you have a little patience, read the following recent link, to get a good grasp of how Science and peer review have been redefined by the climate movement and why. Also about the "basic" science surrounding climate science which is flawed from the ground up.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/201... [wattsupwiththat.com]

about two weeks ago
top

NASA Study: Ocean Abyss Has Not Warmed

cbeaudry Re:we get it (294 comments)

Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, yes.
Causing warmer temperatures, still not proven to the extent the models claim.
Warmer temperatures causing economic losses, there is nothing to demonstrate that is true.

We have no losses to cut, yet. However going towards carbon trading schemes will definitely generate losses for the population and society as a whole.

If you have a little patience, read the following recent link, to get a good grasp of how Science and peer review have been redefined by the climate movement and why.
Also about the "basic" science surrounding climate science which is flawed from the ground up.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/201... [wattsupwiththat.com]

If you don't want to take the time to read it = I would suggest you should stop all discussion as you are n

about two weeks ago
top

NASA Study: Ocean Abyss Has Not Warmed

cbeaudry Re:phase change (294 comments)

Your belief, does not give you a right to be intolerant towards others.
Your beliefs do not make you righteous, no matter what they are.
They are beliefs.

Your comparison to religion is apt. as you make the point of those that state AGW and the CC movement is more akin to a religious movement and dogma than it is to actual science.

If you have a little patience, read the following recent link, to get a good grasp of how Science and peer review have been redefined by the climate movement and why.
Also about the "basic" science surrounding climate science which is flawed from the ground up.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/201...

about two weeks ago
top

35,000 Walrus Come Ashore In Alaska

cbeaudry Re: The problem with double standards. (292 comments)

It is her field of expertise and you are being disingenuous.

This is about walrus behaviour, she knows about animal behaviours and knows this is not a new phenomena.

She also knows that the WWF trying to tie this in to climate change is a self-serving lie, because it can and HAS already been explained or observed before.

about three weeks ago
top

35,000 Walrus Come Ashore In Alaska

cbeaudry Re: The problem with double standards. (292 comments)

We are not talking about climate.

The WWF made it about climate, but it is NOT.

This event is about walrus behavior. A Zoologist is the right scientist in this context.

The problem today with the climate alarmist movement is they tie themselves into everything, making everything about them, and the gullible population have bought into this.

about three weeks ago
top

35,000 Walrus Come Ashore In Alaska

cbeaudry Re:Nothing new here ... (292 comments)

The whole article and WWF statements are jumping to conclusions.

The link IS sufficient evidence with citations from peer reviewed papers having observed similar events multiple times dating all the way back to the 1950's and anecdotal evidence from Inuits dating to before that.

I don't understand why every time an event or statement made to get bleeding heart environmentalists to cry is ALWAYS accepted (even with proof that its a bald faced lie) however anything that does not 100% support AGW, CC or any enviro propaganda is automatically ignored or branded as denier lies.

Seriously and skeptics are blamed as the ones with confirmation bias???? I mean REALLY??? Pseudo-Environmentalists need to take a long hard look in the mirror.

about three weeks ago
top

Forest Service Wants To Require Permits For Photography

cbeaudry Re:Numbers (299 comments)

You think you can get the picture back from the internet once it has been posted?

about three weeks ago
top

Scotland Votes No To Independence

cbeaudry Re:Canada & Quebec (474 comments)

We dont have A referendum in Quebec.

We call it the NEVER'ENDUM.

If it was up to the dirty seperatists, they would have a referendum every 3 years for ever, or until the dirty anglos and anglo lovers cave in.

about a month ago
top

Extent of Antarctic Sea Ice Reaches Record Levels

cbeaudry Re:Warmists never bother debating anymore (635 comments)

Apparently it is because you don't understand any of it.
All you do is spout the same tibits the news tells you. Or your favorite propaganda blog.

Did you even take 2 mins to watch the video I posted?

Using the same data all climatologists use, he blew everything you just said above out of the water.

Not just prehistoric data but starting from a few hundred thousand years ago, to 10000 years ago.
If you dont like that, he went over the last 2000 years (Christianity) and the last 700 hundred to hit it closer to home.

There is NOTHING unusual about the climate we are currently experiencing. NOTHING.

Now look at the same data and tell me Im a denier with a straight face.

about a month ago
top

Extent of Antarctic Sea Ice Reaches Record Levels

cbeaudry Re:What this proves is: (635 comments)

Id like your thoughts on this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Starting at about 5mins 55 seconds for about 2mins.
Watch the whole thing if youd like. However those 2 mins are quit important.

about a month ago

Submissions

cbeaudry hasn't submitted any stories.

Journals

cbeaudry has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?