Beta

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Horizontal Scaling of SQL Databases?

cheesedog Re:Ebay isn't Internet scale? (222 comments)

eBay's multi-petabyte relational database is massively sharded. Once you partition, you lose a most of your "relational" advantages anyway. This is how virtually all "large databases" end up, and once you go there, you are essentially nosql anyway (but with a much hairier and harder-to-incrementally-scale architecture).

It's for exactly this reason that smart players recognize that a traditional relational database approach doesn't really buy you anything in the eventual case when you need to scale. It's why google/facebook/et al have pioneered nosql approaches, and it's why Amazon uses Dynamo for their shopping cart app (and many others) instead of oracle/sqlserver/postgres.

more than 3 years ago
top

Horizontal Scaling of SQL Databases?

cheesedog Re:Is this a slashvertisement or so? (222 comments)

Google isn't the only company in the world that has to deal with petabytes of data. It's also not the only company that has to deal with incredibly large volumes of structured data.

I speak from experience, son. Your relational DB can't handle successful internet-scale loads, no matter how many awesome dbas you hire, and no matter how much money you fork over to Oracle.

more than 3 years ago
top

Horizontal Scaling of SQL Databases?

cheesedog Losers mock (222 comments)

You guys posting that traditional relational databases can handle the load of internet scale applications kill me. You mock this guy who has a legit problem that everyone who has ever run an internet scale technology is very familiar with.

NoSQL isn't some passing fad invented by high school kids.

Luckily, most of you will probably never discover that fact for yourselves, because you'll never have experience with a successful internet-scale architecture. Relational DBs are just fine for internal "enterprisey" apps, or for your hobby website that drives an astounding 1200 page views/month, or for your failed attempt at launching a web service that only ever garners 300,000 users, so you can continue to delude yourselves that there just isn't a problem here, and SQL is the only skillset you'll ever need.

For the elite few who actually achieve success, you'll totally know where the OP is coming from. Intimately. And you'll either be very glad that there is a path (hadoop, cassandra, mongodb, etc) to migrate to that solves your problems, or you'll be very glad that you started with one of those solutions in the first place.

more than 3 years ago

Submissions

top

Chromium to break Mac/Linux Conventions

cheesedog cheesedog writes  |  more than 4 years ago

cheesedog (603990) writes "The Google Chromium team wants to break important OS conventions for both Mac and Linux. Specifically, the URL omnibar will select all text on a single-click. On Mac and Linux, the correct convention for text fields is:
  1. single-click = place the cursor
  2. double-click = highlight current word (could justify highlighting full URL here, if you consider it a single word)
  3. triple-click = highlight entire line

Currently, these conventions are honored on OSX, but Chromium developers want to "fix" that. On Linux, omnibar is hopelessly broken. Even worse than just breaking the principle of least surprise, by highlighting the text Chromium messes with X's PRIMARY clipboard, clobbering any previous selection you might have had from the highlight/middle-click option. No other major browsers break behavior this way on Linux or Mac The Chromium team likes it this way, wants to keep it broken on Linux, and wants to re-break it on OSX. SPEAK NOW. Let the Chromium team know how you feel about this by either piping up in the chromium-dev mailing list or by commenting on one of the tickets."

Journals

cheesedog has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?
or Connect with...

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>