×

Announcing: Slashdot Deals - Explore geek apps, games, gadgets and more. (what is this?)

Thank you!

We are sorry to see you leave - Beta is different and we value the time you took to try it out. Before you decide to go, please take a look at some value-adds for Beta and learn more about it. Thank you for reading Slashdot, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

How Intel and Micron May Finally Kill the Hard Disk Drive

crtreece Re:Empty article.. (427 comments)

From the summary, "They can't really spin the drives faster than 7,200 RPM without increasing heat and the rate of failure. "

I don't see an assertion in the summary, or the article, that drives are physically limited to 7200 rpm. You couldn't finish the sentence before replying?

2 days ago
top

Police Body Cam Privacy Exploitation

crtreece Re:We already have laws to cover this (301 comments)

you should want this same sort of camera on all of your senate, congressmen/women, judges, jury, and all the way down to local mayors and governors, and most importantly - the president.

I don't have a problem with those public officials being monitored while they are on the job. The police, who generally carry guns and have a growing reputation for abusing the powers granted by their position, seem like a good place to start.

about two weeks ago
top

VeraCrypt Is the New TrueCrypt -- and It's Better

crtreece Re:Truecrypt is random thief proof (220 comments)

I'm confused. Bitlocker is available starting with Windows 7, just not in all the consumer oriented releases. I'm not trying to suggest that Win7+bitlocker wouldn't be vulnerable to the problem of MicroSoft having the ability to decrypt the data, with suitable persuasion from a government, but just noting that MS does have encryption options available.

about a month and a half ago
top

Could Maroney Be Prosecuted For Her Own Hacked Pictures?

crtreece Re:So any 17 year old can screw their local bank? (274 comments)

I saw it, but didn't make the connection :-( You are correct that judges will often give instructions that make it seem as if jury nullification does not exist, and that the written law and judges orders are the only available options.

In addition, don't dare let on to the judge or DA that you know what jury nullification is during the voi dire (jury vetting and selection process) part of the trial. You'll NEVER sit on a jury if the judge and DA think you are going to judge the defendant AND the law.

about a month and a half ago
top

Could Maroney Be Prosecuted For Her Own Hacked Pictures?

crtreece Re:So any 17 year old can screw their local bank? (274 comments)

the jury would have no choice in the matter but to find the teenager guilty

Not true. The jury has the ability to judge the law unjust, and acquit the defendant, even if they are shown to be guilty of breaking the letter of the law. This is known as jury nullification, and has been a part of western common law for centuries.

about a month and a half ago
top

Ancient Campfires Led To the Rise of Storytelling

crtreece Re:Correlation is not.... (89 comments)

Bumping into things?

There are things, and they are bumping. I guess that makes your statement correct.

about 2 months ago
top

Russian Military Forces Have Now Invaded Ukraine

crtreece Re:Send in the drones! (848 comments)

2006

It goes back further than that. See the Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances. During the breakup of the USSR, Ukraine agreed to give up their nuclear arsenal in exchange for assurances from Russia, the US, and the UK that Russia would respect Ukrainian sovereignty. The memo doesn't require military intervention by the US or UK in the event or Russian hostility, but it does justify a military response if it comes to that.

about 3 months ago
top

California Passes Law Mandating Smartphone Kill Switch

crtreece Re: The worrisome part (233 comments)

Another vote for bambuser.

You can (appear) to close the app, while it will continue to record, even if you lock the phone.

about 3 months ago
top

Put A Red Cross PSA In Front Of the ISIS Beheading Video

crtreece Re:We should publish US military horrors as well (300 comments)

People other than combatants are harmed even when they aren't the intended target.

Shining light on the true horrors should then be a good thing. By not showing the true face of war, the populace cannot make an informed decision about whether to support such actions. If the "war" shown on MSNBCNN looks like a video game with the gore settings turned down to 0, it's much easier to persuade the people to back the true destruction that is happening, but is not being reported.

about 3 months ago
top

Microsoft Cheaper To Use Than Open Source Software, UK CIO Says

crtreece Re:Lock-in? (589 comments)

Did you read the very next line?

Choose Format - Font Size

about 7 months ago
top

To Save the Internet We Need To Own the Means of Distribution

crtreece Re:The quick answer is yes. (338 comments)

We used to have something like that in the US in the late 90s, even if it wasn't advertised or easy to get set up. I recall having some spirited conversations with phone company representatives when trying to set up my DSL connection with a third party ISP.

I'm not sure how or when comcast/verizon/att/whoever managed to get this squashed.

about 7 months ago
top

NYPD's Twitter Campaign Backfires

crtreece Re:Some of these are overreaction (173 comments)

it should be legally obvious that you can't be arrested *only* for "resisting arrest"

Logically, that makes complete sense. However, police officers and District Attorneys, and the legal system in general, do not operate on a purely logical basis.

"Resisting arrest" should probably be renamed "Contempt of Cop"

about 7 months ago
top

F.C.C., In Net Neutrality Turnaround, Plans To Allow Fast Lane

crtreece Re:Rope-a-dope (410 comments)

Not every ISP is comcast.

No, they are not. Do you think it's any different with Verizon, CenturyLink, or any other regional or national ISP? Every one of them has received the tax breaks that started with the Telecom Act of 1996, and instead of using that additional money to build infrastructure as mandated in the law, have generally used it to line the pockets of they executives with cash.

I'm not really convinced that the internet will end without net neutrality. It could potentially make a few things inconvenient, but I'm not convinced that we need to get out our pitchforks and torches over it.

This is the beginning of turning the internet into Cable TV 2.0. In a few years you will be buying an internet plan based on whether you get high speed access to Netflix, Hulu, Facebook, or whatever hot new web service shows up. You want to use "old school" internet tools that run on ports other than 80, 443, 25, 465/587? That'll be extra, or maybe you'll have to get the "Business" package.

it only ever takes actions towards ending it

I'm no Obama fan, nor did I vote for him, but for the first few years of his presidency, he seemed to be trying to get the FCC to enforce net neutrality. This was met with resistance from every major national ISP. Some examples include Verizon arguing that "it had a first amendment right to block content on its network." and "like a newspaper, it provides you with news but has a right to cover whatever it wants and say whatever it wants." Another would be Comcast suing the FCC to overturn the FCC order censuring Comcast from interfering with subscribers' use of peer-to-peer software

The part of the 1996 Telecom Act that excludes ISPs from being covered under common carrier rules would seem to support this. I think amending the law to remove this restriction would then give the FCC more legal ability to actually implement some form of net neutrality, and keep us from having to "get out our pitchforks and torches over it."

about 7 months ago
top

NYPD's Twitter Campaign Backfires

crtreece Re:Some of these are overreaction (173 comments)

I love how they tase the passenger, which causes loss of voluntary muscle control. This is then written up as "resisting arrest" for not putting your hands behind your back or not following whatever other orders are given. Now they have "justification" for further beating. You could spend all day on youtube watching similar examples.

about 7 months ago
top

F.C.C., In Net Neutrality Turnaround, Plans To Allow Fast Lane

crtreece Re:Rope-a-dope (410 comments)

It could possibly happen that ISPs might actually upgrade their networks for once if they're getting paid more.

In the years 2010-2013, Comcast has seen net income, after taxes and expenses, of between $3.6B and $6.8B. Part of this was earned by operating a service that is delivered over physical infrastructure that they didn't build and have effective monopoly control over. Tell me again how they haven't had enough cash to do any upgrades.

What I see happening is more extortion of the content providers like we saw with Netflix.

  • Comcast: "That's a nice data stream you're sending to our customer. It'd be a shame if something were to throttle it. You should buy some of our data transmission insurance. Then we'll make sure nothing like that happens"

All the while, they'll be complaining about how their customers are trying to actually use the bandwidth they purchased and how streaming services (other than those sold by comcast) continue to put stress on the comcast network.

about 7 months ago
top

AT&T's Gigabit Smokescreen

crtreece Re:I can order "Giga" power... but havent (129 comments)

Simple answer to their unreasonable inspection of your data, Virtual Private Network. Route your entire connection through a VPN, and let them try their deep packet inspection on that link.

about 7 months ago
top

AT&T's Gigabit Smokescreen

crtreece Re:Applause for Google (129 comments)

Have you tried routing your traffic through a VPN? I hear Netflix works a lot better when your ISP isn't able to identify and throttle their traffic.

about 7 months ago

Submissions

crtreece hasn't submitted any stories.

Journals

crtreece has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?