Beta

Slashdot: News for Nerds

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Possession of Cantenna Now Illegal?

dcm1101 Re:Transmitting vs. receiving (502 comments)

Um, 802.11 devices are, by definition, duplex. In other words, in order to actually establish a link, every node has to be both transmitting and receiving. One that acted as a receive only device wouldn't do anything useful (except to eavesdroppers). That said, violations of Part 15 rules are beyond the scope of the local PD, and the FCC is unlikely to pursue the matter unless they receive complaints of interference related to your transmissions.

about 9 years ago

Submissions

dcm1101 hasn't submitted any stories.

Journals

dcm1101 has no journal entries.

Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...