Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!



What Does Everyone Use For Task/Project Tracking?

dooguls Re:Bugzilla and Wiki (428 comments)

I third or fourth the trac. Its pretty easy to set up and is easy to use, once you get to its wiki syntax. I particularly like its code comparison features, showing revisions as they've changed so you can see why something stopped working after a merge.

more than 4 years ago

British Library Puts Oldest Surviving Bible Online

dooguls Re:Potential for translations (568 comments)

I'm sorry you think I'm a nut. My belief is belief, yes. But its also grounded on logic and reasonability. As well as evidence from the Bible. I know it appears to be illogical in that I'm trying to argue from within a particular system of belief instead of arguing from outside the system to attempt to prove my point. But it actually is more logically correct to argue from the standpoint of internal consistency given that I actually do believe that God is really capable of total sovereignty. There is certainly more evidence than just the Bible to corroborate the existence of Jesus and his actions (Josephus, archeological clues, even the Koran). But because I believe that God is really capable of proving His own existence I rely most on the Bible to describe the truth.

As to your particular points/questions.

1)"how do we know which version of the Bible is his word?"
The version that most closely approximates the earliest manuscripts that most consistently agree. As far as English translations go, most scholars would agree that its either New American Standard Bible (NASB) or the English Standard Version (ESV). It turns out that there really aren't that many inconsistencies amongst the different copies we have access to now-a-days. Most of the differences are things like "the Lord Jesus Christ" vs. "Jesus Christ the Lord" it counts as a difference, but its really not meaningfully different. If you're serious about examining this topic, and I hope you are, take a listen to this presentation by Dr. Dan Wallace. It's excellent. Very academic from one of the world's leading scholars.

2)"You have just as much evidence the fairy exists as you do god."
Actually the main reason I believe in God is because there is an empty tomb where the body of Jesus was initially laid. Its empty because He rose from the dead which sort of serves as a receipt of payment for our sins, thus satisfying God's righteous wrath against those sins. Now if you're going to try and make the "the disciples stole the body" argument, I'm sad to say that the evidence is quite stacked against that one. (1) they were a rag-tag group of laborers who were dispersed and scared when their leader was killed and had no ability or courage to try and 'rescue his body' (2) The body was buried in a tomb with a huge rock rolled down hill, sealed by the Roman seal, and guarded by a bunch of Roman soldiers. See point 1, there's no way they were going to move the stone, break the seal, and defeat a bunch of guards. Matthew 27:57-64 describes all of this.

I hope that answers some of your questions. Please feel free to continue this thread if you want to discuss things further.

more than 5 years ago

British Library Puts Oldest Surviving Bible Online

dooguls Re:Potential for translations (568 comments)

I don't understand what you mean. Are you saying that the Bible describes God, but is not His words given to us? How do you deal with 2 Timothy 3:16 "All scripture is God breathed and useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting, and training in righteousness"? This verse seems pretty clearly saying that scripture comes from God and communicates His meaning. You say the Bible is a pointer to the "Word of God", are you saying there is some extra-Biblical revelation that is recorded elsewhere? Please don't mis-interpret my question as baiting you. I've just never heard your argument before and I'm trying to understand it.

more than 5 years ago

British Library Puts Oldest Surviving Bible Online

dooguls Re:Potential for translations (568 comments)

It turns out that if God is really God then He is able to ensure that only His word is actually included in the Bible. We sort of throw this term 'God' around without realizing sometimes what that word means. In orthodox Christianity God is omnipotent (all powerful), omnipresent (everwhere & everywhen), and omniscient (all knowing). If God really has those attributes, then it follows that He would be able to make sure His book was exactly what He wanted it to be. When the authors of the Bible wrote the text they were led by the Holy Spirit to write God's words. When the church fathers got together to assemble the books of the Bible the Holy Spirit led them as well. When I read the Bible today, I can feel the Holy Spirit enlivening the words on the page. You ask how does someone decide what books are in the Bible? My answer is God decides.

more than 5 years ago

Enthusiasts Convene To Say No To SQL, Hash Out New DB Breed

dooguls Parent is right on the money!!! (423 comments)

I just spent 3 months doing cloud computing where we used a 'columner database' similar to big table. We got around the problems because the database was auto indexed lexigraphically by key and we'd make up different keys to help us index the data to find various 'cells' of data quickly and easily. It was beautiful because if we decided a day later that we wanted a new column, we just changed our keys to include the new column and it was there. That way we could quickly prototype, eventually settle on good 'table structure' for lack of a better term, and we could withdraw results very quickly. We could also add new columns much later if we needed to, like if we wanted to store totally different types of data in the same tables later.

The downside to this database is that its very inefficient for rapid transactions. So you would never use it for something like ebay, where the records change 'status' (from for sale to sold). But you could easily use it for something like craigslist or google which stores __lots__ of data that doesn't change.

more than 5 years ago

Open Source Facing a Difficult Battle For Cloud Relevance

dooguls Re:OSS also not a big player in cheeseburger marke (141 comments)

I've been working on cloud at work and we broke it down this way.

Cloud as a service: Which is like you said a platform to deliver distributed processing on various tasks. For example, do all your virus scanning on a network service that provides virus scanning so that you don't have to bother with keeping virus defs up to date, and provides other benefits.

Cloud as computation engine: Which is where you use the cloud to actually do the compute intensive tasks sort of the way google uses it. Following our AV example, if you use the cloud to do calculations on how many machines have had virus X on it, and then store all the viruses in the cloud to compare their various similarities and evolution and deployment patterns, you might come up with some very interesting conclusions about the sources of malware and their future. This uses the cloud too as a database to store the results for easy query ala BigTable. So in effect you're doing more traditional 'beowulf' type calculations. (insert slashdot joke here about beowulf ;)

more than 5 years ago

Open Source Facing a Difficult Battle For Cloud Relevance

dooguls Node administration is KEY!!! (141 comments)

At work, I just finished a 3 month project where we tried to apply cloud processing power (using hadoop, and internally developed version of bigTable) against a difficult problem set. We were starting to get the hang of things and producing results by the time the project period ended. But the Killer concept we learned after about a month was:

Have good node-provisioning and management software.

We wrote a few python scripts to move config files around and do auto-provisioning, but I think we should have spent more time on this. Given the amount of headache we all had to do to keep the cloud up and running. Stuff would break, and it took us often a long time to figure out the problem and then do something about it.

The office that took on the project after we left, was told to spend some time creating a better system admin, provisioning software suite or give up the project. Its not exactly sexy work to fix the behind the curtain problems, but they will bite you if you don't spend some time on it up-front.

more than 5 years ago

Pentagon Confirms Cyber Command, Under NSA Control

dooguls Re:Concentration (120 comments)

Wow, I don't think I've ever heard such a succinct defense of the 2nd amendment.

Well played sir.

more than 5 years ago

Bill Would Declare Your Blog a Weapon

dooguls Re:Covered By Twenty Percent of the Bill of Rights (780 comments)

I couldn't agree with you more. Why is it that congresspeople think they can circumvent or undermine the constitution?

It blows my mind, for example, that they're trying to make Washington D.C. a state. Article 1, Section 8: "To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places..."

The District is explicitly NOT a state. Without an Amendment, how can they even consider this legislation?

more than 5 years ago

World's Oldest Bible Going Online

dooguls Re:Original (1183 comments)

Wow, I can't quite tell from the post, the internet does have a habit of strangling emotion, but it appears you generally want to know the answer.

That being the case, you're in luck. You can tell whether someone knows what they're talking about, by whether or not what they say lines up with what the Bible teaches.

I know that sounds a bit circular when they come to you with a Bible in their hands and say for instance: "See it says, 'Wives submit to your husbands', so Women have to do everything their Man says." Turns out the person who pedantically holds to that is ignoring the next verse which says Husbands should sacrifice their lives for their wives.

So I guess the point I'm trying to get to is, you have to read the Bible to know if what they're trying to sell you is a bill of goods or not. You have to practice this skill, like any other skill, to be good at it. And honestly its not always easy. Though it was one of the cool things about the Reformation. The reformers said that we didn't need a person to interpret the Bible for us, that God was actually capable of making His meaning clear to us if we seriously asked for it.

Maybe another way to answer this question is to listen to what they're saying and try to see if whatever they're preaching is lifting up God/Jesus or themselves? If it's the former, they're probably Biblically correct. If we assume that God was the true author behind the Bible, then wouldn't He focus on Himself and His glory, not ours? So if someone comes to you and says "God loves you and wants you to be rich" you can bet that the speaker doesn't know his/her Bible well. Because the majority of the Bible tells the story of God's concern for His glory which is magnified by the grace (undeserved favor) he gives to people that try to avoid Him as they pursue their own selfish desires. It speaks only a little about personal wealth, and when it does it usually is warning against the wealth since it fools people into thinking they're safe instead of depending on God.

more than 6 years ago


dooguls hasn't submitted any stories.


dooguls has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>