Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

New Zealand Court Orders Facebook Disclosure To Employer

dragonsomnolent Re:These are NOT companies ... (243 comments)

But then isn't the only way that your situation could arise is if there are more jobs available than workers to fill those jobs?

about a year ago
top

Did Goldman Sachs Overstep in Criminally Charging Its Ex-Programmer?

dragonsomnolent Re: Lemme get this straight (186 comments)

I wish I had mod points, but in lieu of that, I will say ABSOLUTELY! The criminal justice system in the country is completely messed up. The programs don't work (especially 3 strikes laws) and especially with the treatment of addicts (which is a medical condition) being locked up along with rapists and murderers. The fact that prison rape has become a punchline of jokes shows just how screwed up it all is. The entirety of the system needs an overhaul, from laws to prison conditions.

about a year ago
top

Apple Retailer Facing Class Action Suit Over Employee Bag Checks

dragonsomnolent Re:I have no sympathy (353 comments)

Question, as an airline pilot are you given a flat salary, paid per mile flown, or per hour at the controls?

about a year ago
top

GMO Oranges? Altering a Fruit's DNA To Save It

dragonsomnolent Re:GMO is scary... for now. (358 comments)

Actually Killer Bees are Africanzied Honeybees, they scientist who created them cross-bred the two species in hopes of making a more resilient honeybee. I suppose he succeeded, those killer bees are quite tough to take out (unless you have a flamethrower). http://lmgtfy.com/?q=killer+bees

about a year ago
top

Patching Software on Another Planet

dragonsomnolent Re:Sounds like this was noticed earlier ... (96 comments)

ABS was to stop the brakes from locking up in the first place, regardless of road condition (in other words, brakes work so well they had to invent a way to interrupt them). If you hold your brake pedal down and stomp the gas, your car will stay stationary, if you do it long enough (assuming you have an automatic transmission) You'll blow out your torque converter, your transmission or your engine (depending on the weak link) if you do it in a manual transmission, you'll kill the engine. You missed the point of my post entirely, that the brakes always overpower the engine, that they are so capable of stopping those wheels from spinning, that they had to invent a way to make them not do the job so well (and still be safe enough to drive). ABS isn't as simple as "wheels not spinning, release brakes".

about a year ago
top

Patching Software on Another Planet

dragonsomnolent Re:Sounds like this was noticed earlier ... (96 comments)

Sudden acceleration syndrome was chalked up to operator error. Even revving the engines to full, the brakes supplied more than enough stopping force, every single time. So even from the get go, brakes were over-powering the engine (brakes work so well, in fact, that they had to invent a technology to make them not work so well it's called anti-lock brakes).

about a year ago
top

The Amish Are Getting Fracked

dragonsomnolent Re:Their own fault (367 comments)

I have a friend who is a priest (Catholic) and he insists that the Catholic church is the One True Religion and everything else (including all other denominations) are not, in fact, truly Christian. I once got him to call Jesus a pagan by asking if the Jews were pagan. Personally, I believe in the Cosmos. I can see it, I know I am a part of it, I know that we all are. I don't know that it's "alive" or "intelligent" but I believe it is, others don't, doesn't bother me. Never understood why people get their knickers in a bunch over people not seeing things their way when it comes to religion. After all, you and I can look at a tree and never see it the same, and that's a physical object we can touch, taste, etc.

about a year ago
top

GM Crop Producer Monsanto Using Data Analytics To Expand Its Footprint

dragonsomnolent Re:schitzophrenic summary. (128 comments)

At the risk of invoking Godwin's Law, Germany 1930's. 'Nuff said

about a year ago
top

GM Crop Producer Monsanto Using Data Analytics To Expand Its Footprint

dragonsomnolent Re:schitzophrenic summary. (128 comments)

Ok, as another poster already said, there is an article on /. here that shows weeds naturally developed resistance. Go read through that article, lots of interesting things in there. And yes, indeed, Monsanto did say they wanted his seed stores destroyed. Again, however, you fail to address my question: The farmer knew they were resistant, he knew they blew into his field from somewhere, big f'ing deal. His argument, which I ask you to clearly and logically counter is this: "They grew on my land, they are mine". Can you rationally explain to me why that should not be the case without saying "because the laws say so".

about a year ago
top

GM Crop Producer Monsanto Using Data Analytics To Expand Its Footprint

dragonsomnolent Re:schitzophrenic summary. (128 comments)

And, again, I'm not having the legal argument about what the law says he should have done. My question, which you still haven't answered, is morally, why should he have destroyed his entire crop because a few rows of it contained GM stuff from Monsanto, whether he knew it or not? Because, again, how do you know it's Roundup Ready without spraying your whole field with Roundup? Is Monsanto going to reimburse the farmer for his whole crop being unusable due to this cross pollination? Even the court recognizes that the plants came there via means other than the farmer deliberately planting them. His argument was that because he didn't sign anything with Monsanto, and the plants came there through no deliberate action on his part, they were his. I agree with him, you may not, the law may not, but just because it's legal, doesn't make it right.

about a year ago
top

GM Crop Producer Monsanto Using Data Analytics To Expand Its Footprint

dragonsomnolent Re:schitzophrenic summary. (128 comments)

Actually he only sprayed some of his crops, not all, and found that some of those crops were GM. His argument wasn't that he kept the seeds, it was that the seeds were his to keep, as the plants grew on his land. Again, that's a legal argument I'm not trying to get into, the moral argument I'm making is "If you are a farmer, and Monsanto's stuff gets into your stuff, why should you be on the hook?" Also, how do you know if your stuff contains the GM from Monsanto without killing your crop?

about a year ago
top

GM Crop Producer Monsanto Using Data Analytics To Expand Its Footprint

dragonsomnolent Re:schitzophrenic summary. (128 comments)

I read through the decision, and it seems this to be the most telling part: "Thus a farmer whose field contains seed or plants originating from seed spilled into them, or blown as seed, in swaths from a neighbour's land or even growing from germination by pollen carried into his field from elsewhere by insects, birds, or by the wind, may own the seed or plants on his land even if he did not set about to plant them. He does not, however, own the right to the use of the patented gene, or of the seed or plant containing the patented gene or cell." It then goes on to state that the thing the defendant did wrong was using the plants that were accidentally planted on his land. In other words, the court seems to have decided that he should have destroyed the crops on his field after discovering that Monsanto's stuff had inadvertently been planted there. Now, I'm not going to say that Monsanto didn't have the laws on their side, because apparently they did, but to say those laws are right is another matter. Your assertion that the defendant was lying is kinda bold, as it implies he stole the seeds or had planted roudup ready canola and kept the seeds, when even the judge says (in paragraph 125) " That clearly is not Mr. Schmeiser's case in relation to his 1998 crop. I have found that he seeded that crop from seed saved in 1997 which he knew or ought to have known was Roundup tolerant, and samples of plants from that seed were found to contain the plaintiffs' patented claims for genes and cells. His infringement arises not simply from occasional or limited contamination of his Roundup susceptible canola by plants that are Roundup resistant. He planted his crop for 1998 with seed that he knew or ought to have known was Roundup tolerant." The farmer's concern (now confirmed by the decision) is that if Monsanto's crap blows onto your field is hosed, because though Monsanto may come and collect the errand plants, it's not like they glow in the dark and are easy to spot.

about a year ago
top

German Court Rejects Apple's Privacy Policy

dragonsomnolent Re:Not a sound juxtaposition (124 comments)

A quick google search turned up that yes, indeed you do have to follow some laws of the US when travelling abroad. I believe the underage sex one is one of the biggies (I've heard rumors that drug use is another, but I can't find anything to confirm it).

about a year ago
top

Are Some of North Korea's Long-Range Missiles Fakes?

dragonsomnolent Re:Let's nuke them to be sure (322 comments)

Ok, let's look at this more closely, because you bring up very good and valid points. While it's true, if you are wrongly incarcerated you won't be happy about it, however, there are things which can be done to repay you for that injustice (financial compensation, and I know it may never be enough to make up for you losing your freedom). What reparations can you make to a man who you executed? He's dead, his body will no longer function, ever, you can't give him anything to make him come back to life or to make up for killing him. I won't say that execution is just as bad as murder, because I don't think it is (though I do think it somewhat barbaric).

about a year ago
top

Repeal of Louisiana Science Education Act Rejected

dragonsomnolent Re: Why? (318 comments)

I actually did this to a priest friend of mine, I've known him since High School, and his response floored me. He informed me that because I would not listen to reason, he would no longer discuss the matter with me (yes his response to me saying gravity is a theory just like evolution was I would not listen to reason).

about a year ago
top

SOPA Creator Now In Charge of NSF Grants

dragonsomnolent Re:ah the anti-NSF crowd again (307 comments)

True enough, I mis spoke. Doesn't change the fact that guns being legal vs illegal seems to have no real impact on whether or not a country has high homocide rates. My point is that the legality of firearms is not the only factor to consider when discussing such things

about a year and a half ago
top

SOPA Creator Now In Charge of NSF Grants

dragonsomnolent Re:ah the anti-NSF crowd again (307 comments)

The metric used here does not differentiate between someone getting shoved and someone getting killed. Seems to me that when discussing gun violence, including playground shoving matches seems rather silly

about a year and a half ago
top

SOPA Creator Now In Charge of NSF Grants

dragonsomnolent Re:ah the anti-NSF crowd again (307 comments)

And Britain disproves it, strict gun laws, low violent crime. So there has to be something more to it than just the laws (again, Switzerland, no regulation, low violent crime rate). It's not as simple as guns legal == safe / guns illegal == not safe

about a year and a half ago

Submissions

top

Someone getting Hybrids right

dragonsomnolent dragonsomnolent writes  |  more than 6 years ago

dragonsomnolent (978815) writes "A company by the name of H-Line conversions in Wichita, Kansas is converting cars to hybrids by ripping out their standard engines, and replacing them with a setup slightly reminiscent of a modern diesel locomotive. He puts in an electric motor powered by batteries, which are in turn charged by a bio-diesel generator. His client list includes Niel Young and Arnold Schwarzenneger, but at a cost of $40,000, it might take a while for this to get to the masses."
Link to Original Source
top

dragonsomnolent dragonsomnolent writes  |  more than 7 years ago

dragonsomnolent writes "Microsoft Corp. has landed in the Wikipedia doghouse after it offered to pay a blogger to change technical articles on the community-produced Web encyclopedia site. Jimmy Wales expressed his fellings on the matter "We were very disappointed to hear that Microsoft was taking that approach," Wales said Tuesday. Microsoft acknowledged it had approached the writer and offered to pay him for the time it would take to correct what the company was sure were inaccuracies in Wikipedia articles on an open-source document standard and a rival format put forward by Microsoft. Read more here: http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/internet/01/24/micros oft.wikipedia.ap/index.html?eref=rss_topstories"

Journals

dragonsomnolent has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?