Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!



The Tuesday Birthday Problem

eloisefreya Re:Rubbish (981 comments)

But yet we interpret the "two children" as meaning exactly two.

"two children" is an unambiguous statement ... it can't mean one child, it can't meant three children, neither can it mean two dogs.

"one of whom" can be ambiguous ... it can mean only one (of the children), or just the one I am describing. Nowhere in the original statement is it said that the second child was not a boy born on a Tuesday. You can argue it's implied, but it's not stated.

Just because you say that the first child was a boy born on a Tuesday doesn't mean that the second can't be the way the statement is worded. This is a mathematician using English badly to prove his point!

more than 4 years ago

The Tuesday Birthday Problem

eloisefreya Re:Rubbish (981 comments)

I agree - by saying "one of whom" doesn't in English preclude the fact that both of them could be boys born on Tuesday!

more than 4 years ago


eloisefreya hasn't submitted any stories.


eloisefreya has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?