Why Juries Have No Place In the Patent System
Really? Give me some examples of "legitimate innovation", please. Because I'm really curious as to what you consider innovation? iOS isn't innovative? Pinch-to-zoom, bounce-at-scroll-end, inertial flick scrolling, no keyboard, no-scroll-wheel-no-nav-keys, simple app install-deinstall, tap-and-hold to rearrange, that all existed together in one integrated package? Real innovation only seems "obvious" in hindsight. The best proof is the huge slew of criticisms which came out about the iPhone when it first came out. All the moaning about the shit it was missing or didn't do but absolutely needed.
Before the iPhone, the BlackberryOS was considered the nadir of handheld computing. And Android back then looked a heck of a lot like a Blackberry OS. Now that paradigm considered a backwater. The move to mouse+gui wasn't that natural an extension from keyboard+tty, it was innovation. The move from the Blackberry+Palm+WinCE paradigm to iOS wasn't a "natural extension". It only seems natural in hindsight.
Richard Stallman's Dissenting View of Steve Jobs
First: all these comments calling Jobs a "salesman" and "marketer" don't understand the first thing about Jobs. You can market and sell crappy products for only so long. The MacBook Air, iPod, iPhone, and iPad weren't successful because of the marketing; they were successful because they put the user experience first, they made complex technology easy to use, fun to interact with, and vicerally beautiful to hold. Building stuff like that isn't marketing. Building stuff like that is hardware design+software integration, attention to detail, focus on quality, and precision manufacturing on a scale not seen before. Companies can't copy the MacBook Air and iPhone/iOS experience because they lack that coordination and attention to detail.
Second: see above. Hundreds of companies assumed that all they needed to beat the iPod was to "have a pretty plastic shell" and hit all the bullet points, add a few more (FM Radio! AM Radio tuner! Removable Battery!) and they'd make sales. They didn't. Replace iPod with iMac, iPhone, iPad and you have the same scenario.
Third: Repeat after me: design is not separate from functionality. Design isn't how a thing looks, design is how it works. Which is why despite the fact that the Dell Streak supposedly had all the features needed to be a "iPad killer", it turned into an abortion. Why? It worked like crap. Why is the iPad2 selling in such ridiculous numbers? Because it works! If you took an iPad2, and installed an iOS themed Honeycomb on it, it would work OK, but it wouldn't be great. With iOS, the iPad works amazingly well. The Android market is a joke, very few people I know who own android phones have purchased more than a dozen apps. Everyone I know who has an iPhone has a dozen favorite apps, and some have purchased hundreds of apps. Why? Because it works. Functionality is what the design of the iPad2.
Fourth: Whatever dude.
iPhone 4S Pre-Orders Sell Out
Uh, you're comparing Apple's totally fucked up product line-up, supply chain, and operations from the 1980's when they were hemorraging money like a stuck pig to the problems they're having meeting unprecedented demand right now? Are you kidding me? Apple's supply chain management and operations are why they have margins way above any other PC or tablet manufacturer. And despite those margins, other makers can't sell similar devices without taking a loss.
Yes, Apple has had trouble keeping the pipeline filled, but that's because of absolutely unprecedented demand. Do you remember the problems Nintendo had producing the Wii? The Wii doesn't even come with a cutting edge screen, yet for more the a year Nintendo couldn't meet demand. It took more than a year to increase production from 1.8M to 2.4M. And this for a device which has only 1 constraining component: the CPU+graphics chips. Apple managed to meet iPad demand less than 6 months after the introduction, and even faster for the iPad 2 despite demand being greater than 4M/month. This with a device that has 3 constraining components: memory, display, and cpu+graphics chips. Apple has gone from 0% market share to 5% total market share in worldwide phones in a little over 4 years. Remember the shit Motorola took for being unable to meed RAZR demand for months? And Motorola's been making cell phones since cells phones existed. Every company I've seen that has had a crazy popular hit has trouble meeting demand. Some take a year or more to catch up. Apple takes a couple of months at most.
Right, ignored by "serious business". got any proof of that? Why would Apple care? They're growing at 6x the rate of the rest of the computing industry. Stop living in the past and look at the present.
The iPad vs. Microsoft's "Jupiter" Devices
OK, I'll bite:
iPad sold 500,000 units after one week. That's a little more than 70,000 units a day. And if you consider that in the five days after the weekend, Apple sold 200,000 units. That's 40,000 a day. Not quite so impressive. I'd bet that all the Netbooks combined sell at least 40,000 units per day.
Doing some quick googling, I get guesstimates of yearly total netbook sales between 22M and 30M. And since 40k units a day is around 15M a year, iPad is selling within a 2x factor of ALL netbooks sales. Still think it's a flop? ref
Of if that measure doesn't work, how about total monetary sales values? 40k per day at $600 per unit is around $9B, which is around 9% of all portable PC sales in 2009, and around half of all mini-note and ultraportable pc sales ($18B). Still think the iPad's a flop? ref
BTW, the Motorola Droid (considered a pretty good success for Motorola during the first few months of sales sold around 1M units the first 74 days it was out (which went for $200, less than half the price of an iPad). That's around 14k a day since you seem to be a bit math deficient.
Name one cell phone, computer, or similar device that sold 300,000 times over on the first day that was considered a failure.
The interesting thing is that Apple sold 300,000 units in it's first weekend--this is after the device had been available for pre-order for one month. So it took Apple one month to sell 300,000 units--about 1,000 units a day.
So name one cell phone, computer, or similar device that sold 300,000 units in one month that was considered a success.
Strawman alert! So which is it- 40k a day or 1k a day? Up above, you deride the drop from 70k/day to 40k/day. Now it's suddenly 1k/day (before people could even try it out, mind you). I fail to see how you convert pre-sales volume into foward sales volume. Especially when the full 3G version isn't out for sale AND sales are US only.
But that's okay. Just sit in your corner, hug your iPad, and keep repeating: "The iPad is successful! The iPad is successful!" It'll make you feel better.
I'm sure you're feeling better too. It's all good.
Psystar Crushed In Court
You missed the next section 117(b) which prohibits the transfer of such modifications without the permission of the copyright owner as noted in this post.
Psystar Crushed In Court
The simple truth is that Psystar DID have to use an image method to perform the installs, and so this should be considered a minimum necessary step towards exercising First Sale rights to do as you like with something you've purchased; but I do agree that they should have been required to use an image based on the same version of OSX that would appear in the box. First Sale law permits you to modify things you've purchased. If I am not permitted to modify Apple software, then arguably I can't even use it. And if I'm not permitted to use images to deploy OSX, then I'm certainly not even going to consider using it in the enterprise. If Psystar isn't allowed to use a custom image, then I must assume I'm not allowed to either.
Good points and I totally agree with your points on the validity of the First Sale law and it's necessity. However, you're missing a crucial point. Pystar not only modified OSX, (as is allowed for personal use), but it sold this modified derivative product, which is not protected by the First Sale law. You can use a modified product, but you can't sell. That's why Pystar lost, and lost big. I personally think that these and other copyright restrictions are too strict, but it is pretty clear in this case (summary judgement and all that) that Pystar broke it.
Analyst Predicts Android Overtaking iPhone In 2012
By that same logic, the iTunes store should have been crushed by rivals (amazon, walmart, emusic et al) in 2007. Guess what? Didn't happen that way. I think that android will gain marketshare, but most of it will be from Symbian and WinCE Mobile (or whatever they're calling it this year). Apple will also gain market share at an equal or greater pace, fueled by the advantage of the app store. Focused competition will beat apple (remember Palm vs Newton?), but unfocused, dispersed competition is going to have a hard time beating Apple at their own game.
Ballmer Scorns Apple As a $500 Logo
1) Adding more screws costs MORE money, not less. It changes the adhesion between the components from a press-fit|tab-fit|glue-fit to a much stronger/deeper connection between components. Being able to "pop" stuff out is design not for strength but economy and convenience.
2) The reason you didn't get it right is because you're a crappy engineer, not because it "doesn't fit together that well".
3) Wiring without the tape-stabilizers can easily come loose due to jarring due to use and expansion/contraction due to temperature changes. It looks cheap to morons but costs a shitload more to tape all that stuff down.
4) "clearly built for cost" and "not well engineered"? Anything more substantial than your say so?
5) The "wiring overall inside is cheaply done". Again, you know this because?
6) Wow. Your point being?
The HP is engineered to be as cheap to manufacture as possible. The MacBook Pro was engineered for many parameters, but it obviously was not engineered for the lowest cost.
What To Do Right As a New Programmer?
Everyone knows that debugging is twice as hard as writing a program in the first place. So if you're as clever as you can be when you write it, how will you ever debug it?
- Brian Kernighan, "The Elements of Programming Style", 2nd edition, chapter 2
Apple-Intel my predictions
- Apple licences Intel to produce PPC G4 and G5 processors.
- Intel to produce portable PowerPC processors using Pentium M technology.
- Apple to use the new Intel manufactured G5 processors in a new line of Powerbooks announced 06/06.
- Apple to use new Intel manufactured G5 processors in new desktop machines announced 06/06.
Highly improbable announcements, lowest probability first:
- Apple to begin phased transition to itanium chips.
- Apple to begin phased transition to x86 chips.
- Apple to begin phased transition to using both G5 and x86 chips.
Columbia shuttle comments
The more is better trend in handhelds.
I wrote this based on some thoughts and comments I had after reading these two slashdot articles. Updated (25-10-2003) after reading posts in this article.
I don't need a $600 Gameboy wanna be. I don't need a crippled ipod. I don't
need a video player for munchkins. I don't need a uber machine that does 6
things badly (and that I need to upgrade all together). I want something that
will store and process information for me. Not media, INFORMATION. Notes,
meetings, phone numbers, addresses, ideas, sketches, references, URLS,
passwords (encrypted natch). For me, this information is still B&W text and
graphics. I want
- long battery life (~1 month)
- tack sharp 320x480 B&W screen, good for outdoor, indoor and in-dark use.
640x480 with anti-aliasing might be even better but would require more power.
- a compact size: Palm V would be ideal, but Anything upto Palm III/Handera
would be great. Narrow bezel Palm V would be perfect.
- CF or at least dual SD slots.
- built in usb port (can be the microsize one).
- flash/static ram backup (so running out of batteries won't lose (illiterate
cretins, please note spelling of lose) all of my data).
- a thumb-keyboard (if it is removable or doesn't add bulk) with vim.
- cheap I-net access (cell, WiFi, GPRS, GSM, I don't care).
- maybe txt2speech capabilities, that would be cool.
- The only reason to have a camera would be if it combined OCI with it. That
way, I could take a picture of a sign and have it type the characters into a
note, and optionally translate it if I'm in Moscow or Istambul (thanks to Dr Cool for the translation idea from this post)
- If there were some way to swap core modules between my "carry PDA" and "work PDA", that would be cool. A work PDA would be a mini-tablet/superPDA sized PDA, perhaps a Newton size with a hi-rez screen (512x768 perhaps) that would be more useful in situations where portability isn't an issue and a large screen is possible. Thanks to ~b1t%20r0t for the idea of a "work PDA" from this post
I absolutely don't want
- battery draining color
- battery draining uber processors (my Mac IIsi had 20MHz and I ran Mathematica on it fer chrissake).
- an over-sized complex to use, battery draining phone.
- a un-ergonomic crappy lens digital camera (unless it has the OCI outlined
- half-assed MP3 playback
- half semi-assed audio recording (unless it has automatic transcription, but
we ain't gonna see that for at least 5 years.)
- half semi-demi-assed video playback.
I don't care if it's running Palm, WinCE or Linux as long as it doesn't
crash more than once a month and boots up in less than 3 seconds. The closest
thing is STILL the Handera 330 and it came out 2 years ago (and is now no more). I
don't see progress, I see bloated, mediocre products designed with the mantra
of "features good, more features better".
The new Palm T3 is actually pretty close, except for the color screen and resultant atrocious battery life. The T3 is smaller than the 330 and has a higher resolution than the 330 and a nice form-factor. Bluetooth looks to be nice also. Unfortunately, it comes with all that crappy audio/video bullshit. I'd like a Palm E with T3-like full-screen better.
Duffer == Incompetent Programmer
- Find all files in sub-directories of the current sub-directory
- Remove a pre-determined common text item from all of the filenames
- copy said files to the current directory
Note that a 3 line perl program can do this nicely, I believe Mr. Y's
implementation was, needless to say, considerably longer.
Later on, someone asked me what I thought of his code, I said it was
truly astounding. The person then asked "Oh, is it because Y is a perl
hacker?". No, he's more of a perl duffer. Merriam-Webster defines
duffer as "an incompetent, ineffectual, or clumsy person; especially : a
mediocre golfer". I think this meshes perfectly with the intended
meaning: the opposite of a hacker. A quick perusal through to Hacker
Dictionary finds no equivalent term.
So, let's add another word to the hacker lexicon: Duffer meaning
an incompetent programmer or the opposite of hacker (in the skills
What I want from my manager
In work, I want three things from my manager:
- Give me interesting, challenging work.
- Give me honest feedback on how I'm doing.
- Keep people (including my boss) from interfering with me and my work.
In return I do the following:
- Do the work expected of me to the best of my ability.
- Keep the boss informed as to what I'm doing and how it's going.
- Give him honest feedback on him and my work.
I've given this mini-spiel at every interview I've had with whomever would be my immediate supervisor and I can get a good feel for what kind of company it is by their reaction.
Some thoughts on why I buy 10 times more DVD's than CD's
Looking at my amazon orders over the last year, I see that I've ordered about 10 times more DVD's than CD's. Why? Because I feel that I get much more value for the dollar. In fact, I often buy impulse DVD's but almost never buy impulse CD's. I thought about this some and I think my preferences are completely rational from an informational standpoint.
For me at least, my entertainment budget goes to video games, movies, CD's and DVD's. For the sake of simplicity let's just consider the last two, since that's where the largest portions of my entertainment monies go (80%). From my point of view, the two categories (CD's and DVD's) are both purchased for entertainment purposes, and as such are replaceable with each other.
Now, I can buy the re-recorded soundtrack for Koyaanisqatsi for $14.99 at amazon. For just two dollars more, I can get the whole freaking movie. Lets think about this from just a pure informational standpoint.
DVD's (even single DVD's) often have 4-8 gigabytes of compressed data, while CD's have (depending on how you do the compression, let's say a completely lossless compression of 40% or so) at best 450MB of data.
So, when I buy a DVD, I get 5000 MB of information for $20 dollars (and often much more data in the case of multiple DVD releases or pay much less in the case of discount DVD's), or around 250MB/$. When I buy a CD, I pay $15 bucks for 450MB of data (which actually compresses pretty well down to 150MB or so using 192kbps lame) or 30MB/$. Now if you take into account the stuff I'm not particularly interested in seeing/hearing (the extras on the DVD or around 50% and the 8 filler crap songs out of 10 on the CD or 80%), I'm getting 125MB per dollar spent on a DVD and I'm getting 6MB per dollar on a CD. If you include the fact that I can compress my CD down (imperceptibly to me) to one third that size I'm only getting 2MB per dollar spent on a CD.
So, on average I get 125MB of entertainment information per dollar spent on DVD's vs 2MB of entertainment information per dollar spent on CD's or about 60 times more entertainment data for each dollar.
My thought for today
Another Gun Rights Rant
In "A Faulty Rethinking of the 2nd Amendment", Prof. Rakove, puts forth three counter-arguments to those who argue that the Second Amendment applies to all people. I would like to comment on these three counter-arguments.
His first counter-argument concerning the definition of "militia" as not being composed of all armed males is quite correct, but is not supported by the actual text of the amendment. It is true that the meaning of militia is defined in the first article of the constitution. However, the amendment does not read "the right of the MILITIA to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed", but "the PEOPLE".
His second refutation, centered around the claim that "the people" does not mean "all persons" due to the fact that "the people" who vote are determined by the state, as specifically stipulated by the constitution, is a wonder of selective reading. We also see the phrase "the people" in the first, fourth, ninth and tenth amendments. Surely he doesn't believe that the meaning of the "the people" in the first amendment should only apply to those people determined by state law? Jim Crow, segregation and "un-American activity" laws followed just such an interpretation. As an aside, is he arguing for the right of all people who vote to keep and bear arms?
In his third counter argument he claims that the deletion of the definition of militia as "composed of the body of the people", reduces the broadness of the amdendment. With the addition of this definition, the amendment would then read: "A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." The addition of the phrase does not alter the meaning of the latter half of the amendment.
Although there are many writings by our forefathers concerning the definition of militia, there are also many writings (some by the same persons) upholding the individual's right to bear arms. The forefathers meant the same group of people when they wrote "the people" in the Second Amendment as when they wrote "the people" in the other amendments composing the Bill of Rights.
What freedom is about
Dear Mr. Kristof:
Let me salute your willingness to get even *more*
email than before. I hope my letter is one of the
ones which makes a strong argument. Feel free to
respond through any of the means I provide below.
However, I would like to ask that you don't
disseminate my phone number.
I am a liberal in terms of social policy: I believe
the government has no right deciding what I should be
able to read, write, watch or do in the privacy of my
own home. I support gay marriage and the right of a
women to have an abortion. I am also a gun owner and
enjoy the shooting sports.
Your statement "And if you're so bothered by gun
registration, and so convinced that guns don't kill
people, then consider moving to a nice mud-brick home
here in Suq al-Talh. With you and everybody else
carrying around an assault rifle, with armor-piercing
rounds in your bandolier, with a couple of grenades in
your pockets, you'll really feel safe. You'll love the
freedom!" I find offensive and facile: you equate the
freedom sought by gun owners with lawlessness. A
classic strawman argument; surely you can do better
I have no objection to gun registration (all of my
guns are registered in accordance with all state and
federal laws). I do not object to law and order. If
you are trying to argue that the N.R.A. is against law
and order, one could argue that the A.C.L.U. is
against child abuse laws.
As an intelligent man, you are aware that true freedom
is a balancing act between unrestrained freedom and
respect for other peoples freedom in the form of law
and order. "The right to swing my fist ends where the
other man's nose begins", to quote the great Justice
Holmes. Yemen is one area where people have less
freedom because of the lack of respect for others
rights and a lack of enforcement of that respect. Lots
of bloody noses in Yemen. America has always been a
place where respect for others rights was held in the
highest regard. In last century, some of the
exceptions to this respect have been in the areas of
alchohol, abortion and guns. All of these attempts
criminalized objects or acts which do not affect other
citizens or their rights.
So, how are your rights enhanced by preventing my from
purchasing a target pistol (Hammerli 602) [enkidu: Actually, this
is not true, the Hammerli is exempt from some CA gun laws
due to an Olympic pistol exemption. A correct example would
be a Thompson/Center Arms single shot Contender pistol, a target
pistol used in NRA sanctioned silhouette shooting, but banned
by the CA DOJ.] not approved
by the CA DOJ? Granted, you may feel safer. But I
could also claim that I feel safer if you didn't have
a book on building bombs in your house. Or that I
would feel safer if you didn't have that sports car in
your garage ('cause my kids like to play in the
street). Frankly, I'd feel much much better if you
didn't have that Scotch in your cupboard and the
sports car in your garage. Laws which restrict others
rights with no urgent social neccessity have been
repeatedly struck down by the Supreme Court. And
rightly so. The Bill of Rights exists to protect the
freedoms and rights of the few against the will of the
Laws make it illegal for me to shoot my neighbor. Laws
make it illegal for me to drink a bottle for Scotch
and drive my car on public roads. Laws make it
illegal for me to use a bulldozer to raze my
neighborhood without permission. Laws make illegal my
shouting fire in a crowded theatre. Laws make illegal
my throwing a molotov cocktail at someone's house.
However, laws don't and shouldn't prevent my owning
gasoline, a bottle and a handkerchief. Laws don't
muzzle me when I'm in a theatre for fear I may falsely
yell "FIRE". Laws don't restrict me from owning both
Scotch and a sports car, or even buying scotch while
driving a sports car. Laws don't restrict me from
owning bulldozers and driving them around on my
property (provided the noise doesn't disturb the
neighbors of course). Laws should not restrict me
(provided I have committed no felony or am not
mentally disabled) from owning firearms which I use in
a safe manner in areas allowed by law.
I object to the increasing criminalization of the
simple ownership of objects and not the acts of using
them in ways which infringe upon the rights of others.
Laws should not make criminals of people who respect
other peoples' rights and freedoms.
Yes, guns are dangerous. So is dynamite. So are
baseball bats. So are bows and arrows. So are fast
cars. So is propane. So is fertilizer. So are
planes. So are knives. So are swords. So is
gasoline. So is alchohol.
Once we start down the slippery path of deciding which
objects for individual use are too dangerous for
individuals to simply own, we start down the dangerous
path of criminalizing people who have not, have not
planned to, and have no intention of committing any
There are other more constitutional arguments with
which I will not bore you, not that they hold any less
validity. There are also arguments centered around
the right to self-defense and the preservation of
one's existence. I feel that all of these are
secondary to one of the most fundamental tenets of
freedom, for which America and it's constitution
stand: the right to be let alone. Leave me alone. I
have committed no crime. I have never conspired to
commit a crime. Why are you trying to criminalize me
simply because of the company I keep and the objects I
I leave you with one more quote from the great
justice: "To have doubted one's first principles is
the mark of a civilized man."
Software Engineer and Independent Voter
Computers I have known...
Sitting here at my latest computer and bored, I decided to make my first
Slashdot journal entry, and make it about the computers I have personally owned. By own, I
mean those for which I had both the equivalent of root on the box and I had
leav to commit acts both natural and unnatural upon them,
even if I didn't own them in a fiscal sense.
Commodore Vic 20 'Vicky' (1981-198?)
- CPU: 6502 (1.01MHz)
- RAM: 3.5KB
- Graphics: 176x184, 8 text colors, 16 bg colors
- Storage: audio tape drive.
I had this when I was around 12. I think my dad got it from the U.S. during
a trip. I did some graphics programming on it, but mostly I played games. I
copied some programs out and later, when we got a miniature pen plotter that
wroteon 3 in strips of paper, I drew lots of cool pictures on it (mainly
kaleidascope style designs). There was no true graphics to speak of, it was
connected to a small old tv set via an RF tuner. I guess the computing power
of the computer was on par with that of the NES.
Being in Korea, there weren't any computer shops to speak of, and the ones
that did exist didn't carry any Commodore stuff. Most of it was knock off
"Kapple" stuff. I do remember getting Commodore computer magazines (God knows
how) and drooling with envy over the Commodore 64. 64KB of memory!
Incredible. About the time it started to get old and rank, I was reading in Newsweek
about the release of the Mac in Cupertino. Eventually, we got a *real* computer but
not a Mac...
IBM XT 'The IBM' (1985-1987)
- CPU: 8088 (4.77Mhz)
- RAM: 640KB
- Graphics: 640x480 8bit greenscale
- Storage: 10MB HD, 5.25" FD
This was, my first truly useful computer. I wrote most (if not all) of my
high school papers on it. (In WordStar if I recall correctly). Naturally I
had some games, but I think the one I played the most was one called "Jet"
which was the only one that really ran because of the strange Hercules graphics
card on it. No that's not entirely correct, I must have spent many
man-months/years playing "Sun Tzu's Ancient Art of War" The original. I don't
know if I programmed on it outside of DOS scripts and such.
The Lean College Years (1987-1992)
During my colledge years, I didn't have a computer of my own, but I did make
liberal use of the many Macs scatterred around the Carnegie Mellon campus. At
almost all times, one of my many roommates had a computer (for two years I
lived in a 6 bedroom house with 10 guys), usually a Mac. The games I really
enjoyed playing were "Strategic Conquest", "Pirates!", but the one that sticks
out in my mind is "Armor Alley". We went to many a computer cluster and played
2 on 2 across the digital plain.
Grad School and Beyond (1992-1997)
Mac IIsi (1992-1997)
- CPU: 68030 20MHz
- RAM: 17MB
- Graphics: 640x480 16bit
- Storage: 40MB HD, 3.5MB FD
After going to graduate school at Stanford (having met in the meantime, my
future wife "Eunyoung Chung" at a concert of hers during a visit to Korea), I
realized I needed a PC. I invested $3000 dollars in a
new MacIIsi with color monitor (shunning the more economical B&W monitor).
I upgraded the IIsi to 17MB via 4 4MB 32pin SIMMs. The main program I used on
this computer were terminal apps and Andrew Welch's fabulous Maelstrom. It ran
Wolfram's Mathematica like a champ, and I finished many a homework on it. Most
of my work, however, was done with a Word 5.1 (or was it 4?) and Excel.
I later upgraded it to a 66MHz 601 PowerPC via Daystar's excellent
accelerator, an external SCSI CD player (2x I think) and a SCSI zip drive. But,
the IIsi having a fundamentally slow bus, as the years went by, I felt more and
The Multi-platform Years (1997-)
PowerMac 7200/75 (1997-1999)
- CPU: PowerPC 601 (75MHz)
- RAM: 36MB
- Graphics: 1024x768 24bit
- Storage: 500MB, 100MB zip, 3.5MB FD
This computer, I scrounged from work where they were transitioning from Macs
to PC's. There seemed to be alot of that going on around this time. This
computer served me very well attached to my various peripherals. Mathematica
still ran on it, and I upgraded it through Mac System 8.1. But, in many ways,
it didn't have the grace of the IIsi. Apple seemed to have lost it's way.
Later, I augmented it with another computer, Hugin (also scrounged from
PowerBook 520c 'Hugin' (1997-1998)
- CPU: 68LC040 (25MHz)
- RAM: 12MB
- Graphics: 800x600 8bit greyscale
- 160MB HD, 3.5" FD
Named after Odin's raven Hugin (I thought appropriate since the code name
from 520 series was "BlackBird"). I only used it for a short time since about
a year after I got it, I got another cast off laptop 'sleipnir', and Hugin's
display light failed, crippling the computer. I did manage to rescue the
contents of the disk by downloading to Zip disks. Still, it ran well and was a
pretty nice computer, small and elegant.
HP Vx 'Odin' (1997-1999)
- CPU: PentiumPro (200MHz)
- RAM: 32MB
- Graphics: 1024x768 16bit
- Storage: 200MB HD, 3.5" FD
This was the first desktop I put Linux on. RedHat 5.2. Setting up the
graphics cards and networking was a great bother but very educational. Linux
2.0 ran like a champ and I had uptimes of 9 months and more. And very fast to
boot. I compiled many a program on it and wrote many a script on Odin. I also
used it as a Poscript printer server for my 7200. I also tinkered with lilo
enough to multi-boot with Win95, although I don't think I ever booted into
Windows after I got things running.
Toshiba Tecra 520CDT 'Sleipnir' (1997-2000)
- CPU: Pentium MMX (166MHz)
- RAM: 32MB
- Graphics: 800x600 24bit color
- Storage: 2GB HD, 10x CD-ROM, 3.5" FD
This was my workhorse computer for many years. It provided great
performance under RedHat 5.2, especially once I recompiled the kernel to be
leaner and switched to using the AfterStep window manager. I used it to browse
the web using my ricochet (may it rest in peace) network connection.
Unfortunately, towards the end of it's tenure, Sleipnir could no longer maintain
a charge in its batteries. It would report 3 hours of battery life after a full
charge and then promptly shutdown 20 minutes later because it ran out of
Palm Pilot Personal 'Munin' (1997-1999)
- CPU: Dragonball (16MHz)
- RAM: 512KB
- Graphics: 160x160 1bit
- Storage: 512KB
Some people may not consider them computers, but hey, this is my list so
I'll add what I want. Munin was my main handheld for two years. Munin was the
other of Odin's Ravens, and the name means 'Memory'. I thought it very
appropriate for my backup memory device. I later replaced it with a
Gateway Solo 9100 'Sleipnir2' (1999-2000)
- CPU: Pentium MMX (266MHz)
- RAM: 196MB (woohoo!)
- Graphics: 1024x768 24bit
- Storage: 4GB HD, CDROM, FD
This was an awesome kickass machine (and at 8 pounds plus could be used to
bash a car window in case of emergency). I installed Mandrake 7.0 on it and had
considerable trouble setting up XFree86 and sound (lots of trouble with the
sound). Once I had it set up and running, it ran great. It had/has a bright
big display. It was one of the few laptops (then and now)
which allowed you to have both CDROM and floppy drive in at the same time. I
did have some strange errors with sleeping and the harddrive, but an obscure
apm option in the apm-scripts cleared this up. Running Mandrake, I did lots of
development and research on Sleipnir2 (Once I find a good name, I stick with
it). Like Sleipnir I, it's battery continued to deteriorate and in the end, I
only was getting around 2 hours of uptime from two batteries. Unfortunately, it
really wasn't mine, and I turned it in to upgrade to a lighter/faster laptop,
Palm III 'Munin2' (1999-
- CPU: Dragonball (16MHz)
- RAM: 2MB
- Graphics: 160x160 1bit
- Storage: 2MB
Munin II was my main handheld up until recently. The case creaked alot and
I had lots of intermittent digitizer problems. I don't think the PalmIII's were
engineered as well as the Palm Personal/Professionals were. I did get a Palm
Keyboard for it and it proved to be useful.
PowerMac G4/450 AGP 'G4'
- CPU: G4 (450MHz)
- RAM: 704MB
- Graphics: 1280x1024 24bit
- Storage: 60GB, DVD-ROM
This is my current desktop. I'm running MacOSX and couldn't be happier.
When palm was running short on releasing the desktop software, I compiled the
pilot-xfer package and was able to backup and install software on my computer.
It started out as a 350, but I picked up a 450 processor board for about $100
bucks a couple of years ago.
Dell Latitude CPx 'Sleipnir3' (2001-)
- CPU: Pentium III (650MHz)
- RAM: 256MB (wheee)
- Graphics: 1024x768 24bit.
- Storage: 6GB, CDROM, FD
This is my current workhorse, with two batteries I can get close to 6 hours
of uptime. Installing Linux 7.1 was a snap and it compilies our current work
code base in about 80% of the time of a 1.2GHz Pentium III. It is lighter than
Sleipnir the 2nd and has a better screen. I really like the easy modularity of
the batteries and cdroms. I'm even considering adding a DVD-Rom drive (around
Handera 330 'Munin3'
- CPU: DragonBall-VZ 33MHz
- RAM: 8MB
- Graphics: 320x240 4bit
- Storage: 8MB, 128MB CompactFlash
Munin the Third was a birthday present from my wife of 7 years (I chose of
course). With the great (I mean GREAT) QVGA screen and backlight, compact flash
expandability and sound recording capability. I think it's the best Palm clone
out there. Highly highly recommended.
Hope this brings back some memories for people.