Announcing: Slashdot Deals - Explore geek apps, games, gadgets and more. (what is this?)

Thank you!

We are sorry to see you leave - Beta is different and we value the time you took to try it out. Before you decide to go, please take a look at some value-adds for Beta and learn more about it. Thank you for reading Slashdot, and for making the site better!



Central Dogma of Genetics May Not Be So Central

epifreak Disease state (196 comments)

The article does suggest that the mistakes are not random. First thing that crosses my mind is can we have a mutation in RNA that will lead to a disease, although the DNA is wild type normal. I know examples where mutations in RNA lead to splicing errors producing the truncated protein, but what Li describes seems to be quite common phenomenon. Second thing is, were all these mistakes in mRNA or non-coding RNA?

more than 4 years ago

Central Dogma of Genetics May Not Be So Central

epifreak Re:Not so Surprising... (196 comments)

Look at CJD (Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease) or BSE (Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy) the causative agent is a prion. A vital protein that in its normal state is essential to neurological function, which can fold in more that one way, and folded the wrong way destroys brain tissue and ultimately causes dementia and death. I'll bet dollars to donuts, that there is some funny quantum state, or a protein folding problem, or some simple nonbiological chemical process whose probable result is a code misspelling in protein formation. Its an interesting problem, but not at all surprising. We are complex systems, and trying to force the world processes that make us possible into a box is at once myopic and foolish.

Species like rabbits are resistant to prion infections and comparison of the crystal structures of prion protein in rabbits and in hamsters reveals why rabbits cannot get infected while hamsters can - its solely a protein folding problem.

more than 4 years ago

Swine Flu Vaccine In Production

epifreak Early vaccine (147 comments)

My only concern is that the vaccine is developed against the H1N1 virus (likely neuraminidase) that is currently circulating. It does have high human-human transmission rate, but mortality is 0.5% so far, so most of the cases are mild. What is WHO scared of is this virus becoming more virulent, by say mixing with H5N1 - mortality rate 60%, thus mutating and rendering the vaccine ineffective. At least so far based on structural and bioinformatics analysis the active site of neurmainidase (this is where Tamiflu binds and prevents spread of viral particle) is unchanged, so Tamiflu will be effective for now.

more than 5 years ago

Scientists Can Grow Stem Cells In a Petri Dish

epifreak Re:Everything Gives You Cancer (83 comments)

The hard part is differentiating them into the tissue that you want -- safely.

I bet epigenetics and cell memory will have a crucial role here. Genome wide studies showed that many PcG and TrxG genes change their expression levels during differentiation. Also, i find idea of bivalent chromatin to be very attractive - a cell has histone marks that can either silence or activate genes and depending on the context it will be tilted hopefully the "correct" way.

more than 5 years ago

Implant Raises Cellular Army To Attack Cancer

epifreak Re:Unfortunately... (193 comments)

The tumor evolves and all that our treatments do, if they are unable to kill off the entire tumor, is select for cells that are resistant. I'm not an oncologist, although I am involved in medical research, but it seems to me that a more effective strategy would be to select for cells that are specifically weak to conventional treatment prior to administering it.

You are touching on a cancer stem cell theory. There are many labs that work on that and a number of papers demonstrated experiments supporting the theory, at least for a couple of cancer types. And as you said, the best treatment (and possibly cure) for cancer is considered to be a combination therapy: an agent that kills off cancer stem cells (does not exist yet) + chemo/radiation therapy to kill bulk of the cancer cells (variety available and work fine, albeit with considerable side effects). The problem with getting an agent to kill off those CSC is that there is limited info about the molecular and surface markers, genetic makeup, epigenetic regulation of those cells. Once we (as in researchers involved in medical oncology) have pinpointed those, hopefully an effective agent can be designed.

more than 6 years ago


epifreak hasn't submitted any stories.


epifreak has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?