Announcing: Slashdot Deals - Explore geek apps, games, gadgets and more. (what is this?)

Thank you!

We are sorry to see you leave - Beta is different and we value the time you took to try it out. Before you decide to go, please take a look at some value-adds for Beta and learn more about it. Thank you for reading Slashdot, and for making the site better!



The Very Worst Uses of Windows

failure-man Re:WARNING (816 comments)

65536 actually. (aka 2^16)

So I guess that means the Office division finally ported their code to 32-bit. Windows has been 32 bit for . . . . . how many years now? With any luck it'll be ported to 64-bit no later than 10 years after we're all using 128-bit chips!

more than 6 years ago



failure-man failure-man writes  |  more than 8 years ago

failure-man writes "In a time when the US patent office is more typically used as an offensive weapon than anything else it is prudent for engineers to seriously think about how to fight back if the lawyers call.

In the course of my work I produce a substantial amount of source code, CAD drawings, and 3D models. Since little of it is ever published I'm left looking for a good way to prove that the backup copies of these files existed on a given date and have been unmodified since.

Proving that the files are unmodified is trivial enough. We have a number of fine hashing functions for that. The issue is in proving the date. The file date stamps are, of course, quite useless. Lacking any other clear options I've been taring up the file sets for my completed projects, printing out their checksums, and getting that notarized.

While this is something, it's not exactly ideal. This process is tedious, and may not hold as much weight in court as one would hope. (Coming up with clever ways to explain to the judge just how big 2^[whatever] is all well and good, but this method does not prove the date with similar confidence.)

My ideal solution would be to send the checksum list to some trusted-third-party and have them sign it for me with GPG or something. Does anyone know of a reputable service that will do this for a reasonable fee, or perhaps a better scheme entirely?

(If it doesn't exist please nobody patent a "business model" based on it. We have enough problems already, and I think this Ask Slashdot constitutes some sort of prior art.)"


failure-man has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?