Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

UK Police Warn Sharing James Foley Killing Video Is a Crime

fredprado Re:Thoughtcrime (366 comments)

And censorship is a tool of thought policing. Thank you for reinforcing my point.

5 hours ago
top

UK Police Warn Sharing James Foley Killing Video Is a Crime

fredprado Re:Thoughtcrime (366 comments)

Anytime someone prohibits you from viewing, listening or reading something it is thought crime, and policing thought is barbaric and unjustifiable violence against individuals.

yesterday
top

Professor Steve Ballmer Will Teach At Two Universities This Year

fredprado Re:I'd love to be in his class (178 comments)

Sure it is, but the CEO is a critical part of it.

yesterday
top

WHO Declares Ebola Outbreak An International Emergency

fredprado Re:First.... (183 comments)

Nice theory, unfortunately it is completely removed from reality. Your nice ideas of cooperation and civilization only apply when resources are plentiful and the social structure is in place. In extreme situations where food is scarce and the social structure has collapsed only the strongest survive, and those are likely to be those that are most aggressive, well armed and trained for combat. A single person well armed and well trained can slaughter a whole lot of people. A well trained and coordinated group can slaughter thousands and take everything they want from them.

about two weeks ago
top

WHO Declares Ebola Outbreak An International Emergency

fredprado Re:First.... (183 comments)

Desperate people are all but organized. The guy who has things and cannot defend himself is the first to die, even if he is trying to help everyone. Those that can defend themselves are likely to last or to the the among the last to die.

about two weeks ago
top

Math, Programming, and Language Learning

fredprado Re:Your Results Will Vary (241 comments)

When an Accounting or Biochemistry related subject needs programming is because it needs Mathematics. Programming IS Mathematics. Basic programming is basic Logic, basic Arithmetic and basic Algebra, which are all fields of Mathematics. You don't need formal training to do it, you may use it intuitively, but that is what you do. And the more complex what you are trying to model with your program is the more Math you will need.

about a month ago
top

Math, Programming, and Language Learning

fredprado Re:Your Results Will Vary (241 comments)

It highly depends on what you do. If you work mostly with the common database applications, basic math is enough for you and it is unlikely that you will ever need anything above Calculus or even Calculus.

On the other hand, if you work with RF you will most likely need a lot of math. If you work with high level optimization algorithms you will need Abstract Algebra. If you work with Geolocation you will need a fair amount of high level Geometry, specially Non Euclidean ones.

So in the end the answer is: Higher Math is not necessary in all fields of programming but it is certainly very necessary in many.

about a month ago
top

Judge Shoots Down "Bitcoin Isn't Money" Argument In Silk Road Trial

fredprado Re:When Banks Were Able to Print Their Own Money (135 comments)

f course, as 19th-century observers frequently noted, a poorly capitalized bank that printed notes it couldn't redeem was, in the end, little different from a counterfeiting operation.

As is any government that prints too much money and causes inflation.

about a month and a half ago
top

European Commission Spokesman: Google Removing Link Was "not a Good Judgement"

fredprado Re:Well, duh... (210 comments)

And most of the buts and trade-offs, if not all, are arguably unnecessary and exist solely to give control to bureaucracies over individuals. Other are not in opposition to the rights themselves. Libel laws, for example are not necessarily an exception to free speech, unless they demand the take over of the offending information. Civil consequences for the damage you make by lying are in perfect harmony with total and unrestricted free speech.

Rights as long as they are included in the law should be as unconditional as possible, always, and the difficulty of doing that is just another motive why rights should never exist in the law. The law should be negative only and anything it doesn't deny should be an inviolable individual right.

about a month and a half ago
top

European Commission Spokesman: Google Removing Link Was "not a Good Judgement"

fredprado Re:Well, duh... (210 comments)

It does not need to be a Human Right. Even because the Human Rights Chart makes all countries in the world offenders if taken seriously. What I mean is that as long something is defined as an individual right by any legal chart applicable, it should be absolute as long as the law exists, not dependent upon the whim of the majority, a bureaucracy or whatever.

about a month and a half ago
top

IeSF Wants International Game Tournaments Segregated By Sex [Updated]

fredprado Make it like chess (221 comments)

I am all for a single competition for both sexes, as long as we don`t have people whining that women are being discriminated because there are not "enough" of them at the top.

But if they really think they need a female only competition make it like chess.

Chess has a female ranking and a universal ranking. Any person, woman or man who wants to compete in the universal ranking can as long as they have the necessary ELO.

about a month and a half ago
top

NYC Loses Appeal To Ban Large Sugary Drinks

fredprado Re:Let them drink! (532 comments)

Sure they do. There are laws that regulate every single aspect of society nowadays. What can and cannot be done and how. It is no wonder that you need expensive lawyers, able to find and twist the many loopholes such a complex law code has to have any chance of success in a lawsuit.

And you are completely wrong in your assumptions. The more regulations you have the easier is to keep competition out. It has always been this way and you won`t ever find an example of the opposite.

about 2 months ago
top

NYC Loses Appeal To Ban Large Sugary Drinks

fredprado Re:Let them drink! (532 comments)

And why courts would be that way? Maybe because the legislation is overly complex and extensive trying to regulate everything, and government is too busy trying to do 196797698 things that it shouldn't be doing toi do the thing it should correctly.

If the houses in your examples burn it will be a trivial matter to determine the cause and there will be a lot of witnesses. The company will have to pay a lot of money in compensations which will make it much cheaper for them to do it right, even because the maintenance costs for doing it wrong are considerable. Regulations are irrelevant here, the responsibility for any accident generated by their equipment is theirs and that is enough.

The funniest part on your example is that the worse and most irregular electrical installations are those made by State owned power companies in countries where the State tries to do even more than in US, and in these cases there are no consequences at all, you can't even sue them with any hope of receiving anything.

Regulations only serve to create gargantuan regulatory bodies, which basically exist to sell favors, block competition and perpetuate themselves. Bodies that do not grant any measure of increased security compared to a judicial system that works.

about 2 months ago
top

NYC Loses Appeal To Ban Large Sugary Drinks

fredprado Re:Let them drink! (532 comments)

You prevent the poles from becoming like this with the due legal responsibilities for any accidents they produce, and this responsibility does not depend on the existence of regulatory agencies and much less of limited concessions. The same applies to your shooting example. You don't have a regulatory agency verifying if people are shooting well with their registered guns, but if they do misuse them they go to jail. Regulations solve nothing, even because regulators are always for sale. Consequences do.

The truth is: there is no monopoly in the face of the Earth that was able to survive more than a very short time without the help of a government.

The State has very clear roles which is to keep peace (police), protect people from external threats (military) and solve disputes that can`t be solved by mutual agreement (judicial system). That is very far from doing nothing and the only reason that justifies the existence of a an entity that is based on violence and coercion. Everything else is better done by the private initiative, especially when the State keeps out of it.

about 2 months ago
top

NYC Loses Appeal To Ban Large Sugary Drinks

fredprado Re:Let them drink! (532 comments)

You have one power company because the STATE forces you to have a single one. If the state did not regulate and use the concession model you would probably have more, especially if the business is a lucrative one.

Having to work not to starve does not make it non consensual. From the damn of mankind it is a choice every single human being has. Sorry, but nobody has the duty to work to feed you.

In a free market you don't need to sign to work for someone else or starve, you can work yourself without signing for anyone. It is the STATE that forces you to sign by making expensive and too risky any endeavor you decide to start. For example, if you want to be a taxi driver good luck, you won't get a license. Want to open a hair cut shop? I hope you know somebody in the mayor office. And so on.

Oh and if you point a gun at me and say: "Your money or your life", you will be the State, because that is exactly what the state does.

about 2 months ago
top

NYC Loses Appeal To Ban Large Sugary Drinks

fredprado Re:Let them drink! (532 comments)

Sure it is. You have the possibility to "sign here" in many many places and very few people really starve in US. And even if there was a lot of people starving that is a job for charity and voluntary help not coerced help.

about 2 months ago
top

NYC Loses Appeal To Ban Large Sugary Drinks

fredprado Re:Let them drink! (532 comments)

All crazy laws are based on the assumption that it is the govern business to regulate everything and that by doing that it will solve all problems. And by everything I mean not only the economy, which consists basically of consensual deals between two or more individuals which should not be the business of the government in any way or form, but also any relation between individuals and even regarding how a single individual lives his life.

There are several mechanisms used to pass such laws, from the infamous "national security", to the "defense of poor victims of society", to the equally horrible "we are giving this right you didn't ask for and because of that we own you", among many others.

about 2 months ago
top

NYC Loses Appeal To Ban Large Sugary Drinks

fredprado Re:Let them drink! (532 comments)

Sure, current healthcare laws are certainly not THE thing to blame, they are just part of the problem, a problem that started decades ago, when people began to naively think that the government is a magic entity with infinite resources and can solve all of humanities problems.

about 2 months ago
top

NYC Loses Appeal To Ban Large Sugary Drinks

fredprado Re:Let them drink! (532 comments)

For each one of those arbitrary laws that are stopped at least a couple more pass. The number of absurd laws that try to protect people from themselves is inexorably growing.

about 2 months ago
top

$500k "Energy-Harvesting" Kickstarter Scam Unfolding Right Now

fredprado Re:Thanks for the tip! (448 comments)

Exactly. We don't need regulations, we need consequences.

about 2 months ago

Submissions

top

Subcontractor tries to force Fukushima workers to hide their radiation exposure

fredprado fredprado writes  |  more than 2 years ago

fredprado (2569351) writes "Apparently at least one subcontractor hired to clean up the fukushima site has been urging their workers to put their radiation detectors lined under lead shieldings.

A diagram can be seen here.

The authorities decided not to prosecute him, even after one employee presenting them recordings of him trying to talk the said employee into it."

Link to Original Source

Journals

fredprado has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>