Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!



Solid State Drives Break the 50 Cents Per GiB Barrier, OCZ ARC 100 Launched

gaiageek Re:Performance (183 comments)

desktops are dying

LOL. People have been saying that for over a decade and it ain't happening. It seems like the myth lives on by being rekindled in new generations of geeks who weren't around to see the prognosticating last go 'round.

I agree that they're not dying as in becoming obsolete, but they're certainly dying in terms of consumer demand. I'd guess that 90-95% of my friends don't own and desktop and will never buy one again.

Add to that the fact that many companies automatically retire systems after 3 years (warranty expired) resulting in lots of incredibly capable enterprise-class desktops available for under $200 through Craigslist. Really, unless you're a gamer, there's little reason to buy a brand new desktop as a consumer.

about two weeks ago

DARPA Wants To Kill the Password

gaiageek Two-factor authentication solves it. (383 comments)

The problem is already solved, it just needs to be more widely implemented. Secondary authentication by phone (i.e. receiving an SMS) ensures that no one can get into my Gmail account if they happen to have my password. If my phone gets stolen, I'm going to know to take action quite soon, and they still have to get past the lock screen (though this does raise a good argument for making sure calls/SMS are not be answerable/readable without unlocking the device). Regardless, it would solve 99.99% of the problem.

Another idea I could see catching on is some kind of token ring, like a mix of an NFC ring and those RSA SecureIDs that spit out a random 6-digit code every minute to authenticate, but instead of the user having to type in the code, they just tap their phone/palmrest/screen with the ring. Assuming the rings are available in a few varieties for less than $10, I think most people would opt to use one if it meant avoiding annoying secondary security questions and having to keep a list of impossible to remember passwords (which they still have to change because sites get compromised). It avoids biometric requirements and has the possibility for anonymity (buy a ring at the supermarket, link it to any email account).

about two weeks ago

Microsoft Surface Drowning?

gaiageek Re:Love my Pro (337 comments)

How do you typically use your Surface? That "I don't bother to turn on my desktop anymore" comment is the same comment you hear from a lot of people enjoying the instant-on trait of a tablet, and in the tablet and touch screen world, iOS and Android are more familiar if you have one or the other on your smartphone (over 90% of smartphone users) and probably cheaper. "But it has a keyboard" -- but do you actually use it much though? I see that keyboard, and especially that kickstand method of propping up the screen, and immediately think I'd rather have a proper lightweight laptop, or a sub-$200 Chromebook (instant-on, great battery life).

It's an expensive niche product. Hell, even tablets are kind of a niche product. I sold my tablet because between my smartphone and laptop, I found I was never going to the tablet. I imagine that will only become more common with large-screen smartphones becoming the norm.

about two weeks ago

Windows XP Falls Below 25% Market Share, Windows 8 Drops Slightly

gaiageek Re:Mobile Browsers (336 comments)

So what you're saying is that using Chrome will make me invisible? Awesome!

about three weeks ago

Apple Gets Its First Batch of iPhone Chips From TSMC

gaiageek Re:Samsung's slowing sales... (45 comments)

"... blaming 'weak' sales of low- and medium-end smartphones."

I'd suggest that their weak sales has something to do with the fact that their phones are ridiculously overpriced. Samsung seems to think that they're the 'Apple' of Android phones and that they can price their offerings accordingly. Look at their Galaxy S4 Mini and just announced S5 Mini models: mid-range devices (both have only 1.5GB RAM) with flagship prices.

Then there's Samsung's "budget" phones. They also just announced the Galaxy Ace 4. The most obvious difference from last year's Ace 3? They cut the RAM in half, from 1GB to 512MB. That's right, they actually made the specs worse. Maybe we should thank them for not making the processor slower, too (they both have 1GHz dual-cores).

Meanwhile, we've hit the point of having very decent Android phones from the competition available for $100 or less purchased outright (see LG Optimus F6). The S4 Mini, now a year old, is still running $300+ purchased outright. Why would the average buyer spend an extra $200 for incremental upgrades like an 8MP camera vs 5MP, 1.5GB of RAM instead of 1GB?

Samsung's had a great run, but I think we're seeing the beginning of the end, with the competition nipping at their ankles.

about a month and a half ago

AT&T Charges $750 For One Minute of International Data Roaming

gaiageek Re:50MB = 750$ (321 comments)

Deutsche Telekom is still the majority shareholder of T-Mobile US, and they don't use matching GSM or W-CDMA frequencies. They do both use GSM and W-CDMA though, so the phones are compatible, though European smartphones are often lacking the correct W-CDMA bands for 3G use in the US. It's even worse with LTE.

about 3 months ago

Curiosity Rover May Have Brought Dozens of Microbes To Mars

gaiageek Great (97 comments)

So if humans ever do populate Mars, they'll face strains of bacteria which even NASA can't kill. Wouldn't this make an argument for not going to such extremes to try to rid such rovers of any and all bacteria?

about 3 months ago

The Feature Phone Is Dead: Long Live the 'Basic Smartphone'

gaiageek Terminology (243 comments)

I can't tell if some people really haven't heard these terms before or it's some deep sarcasm. Feature phone = your average dumb phone. The phone you had before you had a phone that you could download and run mobile-OS specific applications. Its "features" probably included a calculator, calendar, camera and built-in WAP browser (even if you never used it), and probably allowed you to download and run Java apps (even if you never did). It may have even had a built-in music player. No options to install a new browser or media player, though there were some decent Java apps, like language-translation dictionaries. Basic smart phone = budget Android phone or maybe something from the Nokia Asha line. We're already seeing Android phones in the $50 range. Most of us would consider them to be crap, but if you live in a developing country and you're coming from a dumb phone, just having something like GPS is a big step up, and probably all you can afford.

about 4 months ago

Russian GLONASS Down For 12 Hours

gaiageek Re:Warning Shot (148 comments)

That's a relief. Everywhere I go I'm close to an area. It's like I'm surrounded.

about 5 months ago

Ask Slashdot: Linux For Grandma?

gaiageek We need one more Linux distro (287 comments)

Shocking as it may seem, I think we actually need one more Linux distro: a lightweight, bullet-proof simple OS that keeps itself securely up to date with little to no user interaction and provides what 95% of grandmas need: an icon to launch a web browser. Something very much like Chrome OS, but which can be easily installed on old laptops and features automatic updates (neither of which apply to Hexxah's builds of Chrome OS).

In absence of such a distro, if you know of a good guide for turning something like Linux Mint 13 (LTS) XFCE into the above, please post here.

about 5 months ago

Microsoft's Ticking Time Bomb Is Windows XP

gaiageek advice on Linux alternatives? (829 comments)

I've got a couple 70-something members in my family who are running XP laptops just to run a web browser: email and the basics. Having moved to Linux myself and being the family computer guy, I'm wanting to switch these two laptops to some lightweight flavor of Linux that will work for them and require little or no support from me. I've tried many different lightweight distros in the past year, but I thought I'd ask here for input from any of you who have actually done what I'm about to do.

- fast and light: will run fine on a Thinkpad T41 (which doesn't support PAE kernel)
- Windows-like interface (I'm thinking LXDE, definitely not Unity)
- easy to use Wi-Fi manager (some of the Wi-Fi managers in lightweight Linux distros are way too technical for a novice)
- once a year if any on-site maintenance (remote maintenance is fine if necessary)
- auto updates in background but with very low chance of system breaking with an update (maybe no auto updates is better?)
- ACPI support (at least lid closed = suspend)
- printer support

Chromium OS seems like a good option, and it will run on one laptop (Thinkpad T61) but I'm pretty sure it uses a PAE kernel, ruling out the T41. I've been looking at Lubuntu, Peppermint OS, Porteus, Slax, Puppy Linux. All seem like viable options with a 30-minute test drive, but this is where I'm seeking feedback: on how some of these distros might be good or bad choices in the long-term, especially given that I won't be able to be physically present if something goes wrong.

about 8 months ago

Multidrug Resistance Gene Released By Chinese Wastewater Treatment Plants

gaiageek Progress (111 comments)

It's nice to see that China is finally releasing dissidents.

about 8 months ago

FCC To Consider Cellphone Use On Planes

gaiageek legality doesn't make it reality (183 comments)

The FCC making it legal is one thing. Airlines allowing it is another. Given the overwhelmingly negative response I've seen on this so far today, I think it's pretty safe to say that any airline that decided to allow passengers to make calls on their phones would risk losing business -- especially the business of frequent flyers. People who fly a lot tend to be quite familiar with the annoyances of flying, so why would they want to fly an airline that potentially adds another?

What I haven't seen mentioned is whether you'd have to pay a premium for such calls. Assuming you have to pay cruise ship rates (over $2 a minute), that would definitely discourage people from making long chit-chat phone calls to pass the time of their flight. Likewise, I'm sure a time limit on calls could be easily implemented. With such conditions in place, I'd probably be ok with it, and I'd certainly appreciate it if I was ever in a situation where I really needed to make a phone call en route to my destination.

about 9 months ago

Texas Drivers Stopped At Roadblock, Asked For Saliva, Blood

gaiageek Re:Food for thought (783 comments)

He did do something: he was born not white.

about 9 months ago

How Many Android OEMs Cheat Benchmark Scores? Pretty Much All of Them

gaiageek Re:And Apple (189 comments)

Posting anonymously since I'm a motoroogle employee... you'll be disappointed. I certainly am. At this point, I expect google to shut us down or spin us off.

Care to elaborate on why we'll be disappointed? I ask because this thread is focused on (perceived) performance of smartphones, and I know Motorola caught some criticism for not giving the Moto X better silicon to compete with other flagships, but personally, I think their tactic is pretty smart: focusing on functionality for the average user instead of performance capabilities which most people don't care about. I'd actually consider buying a Moto X if it weren't for the non-removable battery (deal breaker for me).

about a year ago

U.S. Government: Sorry, We're Closed

gaiageek Paul Revere (1532 comments)

"The Britsh are laughing! The British are laughing!"

about a year ago

Apple Unveils iPhone 5C, iPhone 5S

gaiageek Re:Surprising they're sticking with 64GB (773 comments)

Exactly. How would a larger chunk of flash require more power?

They didn't go to 128GB because they need that for next year's tiny list of "vast improvements".

about a year ago

Nokia Insider On Why It Failed and Why Apple Could Be Next

gaiageek Re:Fail (420 comments)

3. Switch to Android, and become yet another Android also-ran with Huawei, HTC, LG, ZTE, and Motorola all fighting for sunlight behind Samsung's shadow. Nokia had some of the best designers in the business, but they would have been late to the game fighting other vendors for consumer attention. And they wouldn't even save much money, because Microsoft would have hit them with the same lawsuit it's used to extort patent fees from all of the other Android manufacturers.

- Even just two years ago, Samsung was not the massively dominant Android manufacturer it is today, and back then, most people had never heard of ZTE or Huawei, and HTC and LG didn't have anywhere near the brand recognition that Nokia has.

- While I think Samsung phones are good, they are often criticized for their unoriginal design and sub-par (plastic) build quality. Nokia, on the other hand, has long had a reputation for making phones of great build quality AND original (even "crazy") designs. They could have easily distinguished themselves in the Android marketplace.

- They would have been late to the game, but with their loyal brand following and great reputation, they could have easily pulled it off as being fashionably late.

- All the other Android manufacturers are not Nokia, which I think it's safe to say, has a massive war chest when it comes to mobile device patents, putting them in a great position had Microsoft gone after them for patents -- and this is assuming Google wouldn't have helped them out.

I think a previous comment nailed it: Nokia could have been the Samsung of Europe. I'm not even a staunch Nokia fan and I think it's sad to see what's become of them. It does give me hope to hear the news mentioned above about Newkia (though I'm guessing they won't be able to keep that name).

about a year ago

Samsung Unveils Galaxy Gear Smartwatch

gaiageek The question now is... (244 comments)

which makes you look like a bigger tool: holding your over-sized phone up to your ear, or holding your watch up to your ear?

(I'll stick with my 3.3"-screen smartphone, thank you.)

about a year ago



Ask Slashdot: Do you want a smartphone that can fit in your pocket?

gaiageek gaiageek writes  |  about a year ago

gaiageek (1070870) writes "By means of an online petition, popular mobile phone website GSMArena is looking for support in their quest to get Android manufacturers to buck the trend and produce devices with flagship specs in a pocket-friendly form factor. Are you also annoyed that the high-end smartphones have gotten so big?"

Ask Slashdot: Could old Android phones be repurposed as pocket Wi-Fi repeaters?

gaiageek gaiageek writes  |  about a year and a half ago

gaiageek (1070870) writes "In the interest of putting outdated or damaged (i.e. cracked screen) smartphones to good use, would it be possible to convert old Android devices into pocket Wi-Fi repeaters either through an app or via a dedicated ROM? Couldn't DD-WRT or similar linux-based router firmware run on even the lowest spec Android devices?"

Hard Drives: To Smash or Not to Smash?

gaiageek gaiageek writes  |  more than 5 years ago

gaiageek writes "The BBC is featuring an article citing a Computing magazine study claiming that the only way to keep your data from being recovered off an old hard drive is to physically smash it. I've heard this argument before and have never bought into it knowing that disk wipe utilities exist, but since I'm not an expert on hard drive storage, I'd like to raise the question: If a hard drive is wiped using a disk wipe utility, such as the open-source Darik's Boot and Nuke, is there any way of finding previous data on it?"


gaiageek has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>