Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!



AT&T Quietly Introduces $10/Month DSL

gavink42 Re:Other problems (258 comments)

I hadn't thought about your very good point. Even if that's the case, there's still no reason to require a phone number change. The existing number could be ported into the new CO (local number portability).

If the original poster explained the situation to a supervisor, any extra fees could probably be waived.

more than 7 years ago


gavink42 hasn't submitted any stories.


gavink42 has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?