Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

The Ugly State of ARM Support On Linux

gcl Re:Wow some errors in this article (94 comments)

We did talk about device tree, but I didn't dwell on it because it is just another piece of the puzzle in cleaning up arm. Device tree support for ARM is now in mainline, and it is full steam ahead to adapt many of the current ARM subarchitectures.

more than 3 years ago
top

The Ugly State of ARM Support On Linux

gcl Re:ARM and x86 Products are Fundamentally Differen (94 comments)

As such, where minimizing differences by processor was clean and relatively straightforward for x86, expecting it to continue to work well for ARM is nonsensical. I really think Linus is missing the forest on this one.

Not true. Pretty much all of us maintainers agree that the duplication of code and infrastructure in arch/arm is ridiculous. It has to be fixed, and we're actively working on it. Linus was perfectly correct in his statements.

more than 3 years ago
top

Who Wrote, and Paid For, 2.6.20

gcl Re:Secretlab? (238 comments)

Hehehe. No, we do embedded Linux projects. Nothing specifically security related.

more than 7 years ago

Submissions

gcl hasn't submitted any stories.

Journals

gcl has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?