Beta

Slashdot: News for Nerds

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Ask Slashdot: Open Hard- & Software Based Security Token?

grahamsz Re:Smartphone (or feature phone) (101 comments)

I'm inclined to agree. People rarely forget their smartphones

I've been looking at DuoSecurity. Rather than SMS they send a push notification to your phone before clearing your login. No screwing around typing codes, just a "was that you logging in from 1.2.3.4?" popup on the phone that I can use to authorize the connection.

Anyone actually used them? Is it as good as their demos?

yesterday
top

Enraged Verizon FiOS Customer Seemingly Demonstrates Netflix Throttling

grahamsz Re:Could be a different route involved for the VPN (393 comments)

When have consumer ISPs ever been equal peering partners? Most of them offer asynchronous service and actively discourage the running of servers and peer to peer applications. They've always received far more data than they've sent.

Presumably netflix have a boatload of available inbound bandwidth. Maybe they could set verizon users so they streamed all the data back to them. That'd make verizon happy with their untimely claim about traffic ratios

3 days ago
top

Enraged Verizon FiOS Customer Seemingly Demonstrates Netflix Throttling

grahamsz Re:Could be a different route involved for the VPN (393 comments)

But what Verizon aren't really saying is whether the bottleneck on that path is on their side or netflix' side.

I recognize that Neflix hold the power here, they have the popular service, they deliver most of the internet's traffic (in the US at least) and when they say "jump" my ISP should say "how high?". They are the primary reason a lot of us have broadband.

3 days ago
top

Man Booted From Southwest Flight and Threatened With Arrest After Critical Tweet

grahamsz Re:Customer service? (877 comments)

That annoys me too. I usually pay to check my bag specifically so I can feel entitled putting my camera/laptop bag in the overhead bin and getting a little more legroom for myself. Having to cram stuff at my feet because others are too cheap to check cases (or even gate check them when it's free) is frustrating.

5 days ago
top

Aereo Embraces Ruling, Tries To Re-Classify Itself As Cable Company

grahamsz How might their cost structure / roll-out change? (147 comments)

My understanding is that the license would cost at most 1.064% of their gross revenues, and potentially less as there are preferential rates for cable companies with smaller revenue amounts (and I'm unclear if it's done on a per-market basis)

about three weeks ago
top

Netflix Trash-Talks Verizon's Network; Verizon Threatens To Sue

grahamsz Re: I want to see where this goes (364 comments)

Netflix could certainly roll out a p2p model like Spotify does. I'd be quite surprised if they haven't already developed a prototype just in case. I'm any event I doubt Verizon will really push the "balanced traffic ratio" argument because there are many ways it could end badly for them

about 1 month ago
top

How MIT and Caltech's Coding Breakthrough Could Accelerate Mobile Network Speeds

grahamsz Re: Really? (129 comments)

Yeah that could have been more clear. I'm suggesting sending a constant stream of packets until the target asks you to stop. No need for windowing or flow control, but pretty computationally expensive

about 1 month ago
top

Netflix Trash-Talks Verizon's Network; Verizon Threatens To Sue

grahamsz Re: I want to see where this goes (364 comments)

Netflix almost certainly has done tests on actual residential connections where they control for poor Lan setup.

They can also probably reach a statistical conclusion just fine because those customers with bad wifi setups likely exist on well performing isps as well

about 1 month ago
top

Netflix Trash-Talks Verizon's Network; Verizon Threatens To Sue

grahamsz Re: I want to see where this goes (364 comments)

Surely Verizon can't expect balanced peering when they sell asymmetrical service to their customers. Suggesting they should get paid by Netflix because of the imbalance doesn't seem fair.

And really, if Netflix offered cloud backup service they could probably right a whole lot of that balance while causing even more headaches for isps

about 1 month ago
top

After the Belfast Project Fiasco, Time For Another Look At Time Capsule Crypto?

grahamsz Is there something you could do with bitcoin (170 comments)

I can't wrap my head around exactly how, but it seems that the block chain is the closest thing we have to a cryptographic timestamp

about 1 month ago
top

Justice Dept. Names ZeuS Trojan Author, Seizes Control of P2P "Gameover" Botnet

grahamsz Government Control (76 comments)

Since the government have control of all those computers now, would it be ethical for them to go in and actually install the patches to stop them being easily becoming victims next time around?

about 2 months ago
top

How MIT and Caltech's Coding Breakthrough Could Accelerate Mobile Network Speeds

grahamsz A better explanation (129 comments)

The story linked to seems to have an awful explanation of what's going on. This makes a lot more sense:

http://www.codeontechnologies....

Reminds me a little of a random project I started back in college where I'd transmit a file in a bunch of packets where each contained the original file modulo a specified prime number. That way, if the file was split into 10,000 packets, then the transmitter could send out a constant stream of packets module different primes and as soon as the receiver got any 10,000 of them they could use the extended euclidean algorithm to reconstruct the original file.

I was hoping we'd someday be able to multicast udp over the net to multiple random locations and this would be a fast way to send files.

about 2 months ago
top

US Nuclear Plants Expanding Long-Term Waste Storage Facilities

grahamsz Re:Elephant in the Room (187 comments)

Only over a very long timeline.

I almost thing the best solution would be to put something so radioactive right by the door that anyone who enters will be dead within a few days. That way there's much less chance of future archaeologists from pulling out fuel rods and stuff that will cause a slow death to many people.

about 2 months ago
top

Federal Bill Would Criminalize Revenge Porn Websites

grahamsz Re:Freedom of Speech? (328 comments)

You are clearly confusing a legal requirement with a good practice. It's absolutely a good idea to get a model release and I'm not trying to suggest otherwise. However it's mostly required for editorial and advertising photography because the potential lawsuit risks are so high (and typically people doing advertising have the dollars to be forced into big payouts).

Go read up on Arne Svenson - he shot artistic photos of his neighbors through their open windows. A lawsuit against him was dismissed last year and the judge said ”An artist may create and sell a work of art that resembles an individual without his or her written consent".

The Svenson case is even more egregious because it covers photographs taken without any consent (written or otherwise). I see why it's an obvious target but I don't think changing the rights of photographers and other artists is an appropriate response to this.

about 4 months ago
top

Federal Bill Would Criminalize Revenge Porn Websites

grahamsz Re:Freedom of Speech? (328 comments)

Generally no. You can indeed take artistic pictures and hang them in a gallery, for sale, without a release.

It's certainly prudent to have a release and I wouldn't consider shooting someone without one, but you don't NEED one unless the image will be used for advertising or promotion.

about 4 months ago
top

Federal Bill Would Criminalize Revenge Porn Websites

grahamsz Re:Freedom of Speech? (328 comments)

They can indeed sell them to stock agencies without a release, Shutterstock accepts images under an editorial license which aren't subject to the same rules as their commercial license.

about 4 months ago
top

Federal Bill Would Criminalize Revenge Porn Websites

grahamsz Read your own source (328 comments)

Photographers who also publish images need releases to protect themselves, but there is a distinction between making an image available for sale (even via a website), which is not considered publication in a form that would require a release, and the use of the same image to promote a product or service in a way that would require a release. Whether or not publishing a photo via the internet requires a release is currently[when?] being debated in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. It is likely that any and all exposure to the public of unreleased photos via any vehicle will constitute civil liability for the photographer.

It's clear that you (as the photographer) can't license the image for use in advertising without a model release, but for anything considered artistic the rules are much more vague. Now I'm not sure exactly where I'd class revenge porn sites, but art is a broad term.

about 4 months ago
top

Federal Bill Would Criminalize Revenge Porn Websites

grahamsz Re:Freedom of Speech? (328 comments)

Generally a model release is not required for artistic work or for anything that could be considered "newsworthy". It's good practice to get one to cover your ass but unless it's being used in something like advertising then it's not required (in the US)

about 4 months ago
top

Federal Bill Would Criminalize Revenge Porn Websites

grahamsz Re:Freedom of Speech? (328 comments)

The problem is that generally, in the absence of any other agreement, the photographer owns the copyright to the image and can give that image to whatever site he or she chooses. In certain situations they might not be able to accept payment for it, but exhibiting their work is really their right.

If you are letting a partner take images of you then you are, without any further agreement, letting them do what they choose with that image.

Within current law, the only reasonable way to solve that is to have a contractual agreement in place first that allows you to recoup civil damages from the other party if they use the image in a way that you don't expressly consent to.

about 4 months ago
top

Federal Bill Would Criminalize Revenge Porn Websites

grahamsz Re:Freedom of Speech? (328 comments)

Except on cases where the vengeful partner took the pictures and also owns the copyright

about 4 months ago

Submissions

grahamsz hasn't submitted any stories.

Journals

top

Accidental side project

grahamsz grahamsz writes  |  more than 6 years ago

Since I haven't been as active on slashdot as I used to be, I thought i'd throw up a journal entry to explain that I'm still wasting time - just in a different way.

As a direct result of alcohol and the people I drink it with, I though it would be a good idea to set up banniNation as a place for my disaffected farker friends to congregate.

While I am proud that I can create a successful web community while i'm drunk, it also serves as a reminder that I've never succeeded at the same problem when sober.

Perhaps alcohol is key to technology projects.

Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...