Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!



FCC Warned Not To Take Actions a Republican-Led FCC Would Dislike

gstoddart Re:Reality (332 comments)

Why should we-the-people have to wait for a conglomerate to make the business case for bringing service to our communities?

Dear god, man, are you suggesting a consortium of taxpayers decide to compete with a corporation, and take away stock holder value and threaten executive bonuses in order to get better service and introduce competition is a good thing??

Are you some kind of communist bastard?

The corporations are entitled to ridiculous profits without having to work to preserve market share, to suggest anything else is un-American.

Why, corporations are people, and they're entitled to all the speech they can afford. People don't know what they want, it's up to corporations to tell them.

OK, seriously, I don't believe any of that drivel.

But there are a huge amount of people who believe that corporate profits is a moral imperative, and that they should be protected from being undercut by new entrants to the market, and that if it's tax-payer funded it's practically communism.

Those people are, of course, idiots. And they're the ones making damned sure existing corporations get more protection in law, and everyone else gets screwed.

American Democracy has largely become something which is in service of corporate goals.


FCC Warned Not To Take Actions a Republican-Led FCC Would Dislike

gstoddart Re:Pub wants to (332 comments)

That's been shown to be false over and over again. Why do these people get away with a provable false statement.

Uncritical audiences who want these statements to be true because it aligns with their ideology?

If you can equate it with socialism, you can count on a chunk of people agreeing with you even if it's a lie. It doesn't have to be true if the people who vote for you don't care if it's true, and don't want to know or believe it isn't.

This is just about entrenching the notion of corporate profits, and ensuring they never really have to work for it ... because, stock holders. It doesn't matter if people get good service of it they're introducing state granted monopolies ... they must be good.

Increasingly, politicians are entirely in the back pockets of corporations, and will simply not do anything which goes against that.

The oligarchy at this point is pretty much inevitable. Because they can bribe the politicians to do their bidding.

2 days ago

Microsoft Black Tuesday Patches Bring Blue Screens of Death

gstoddart Re:Phew. (179 comments)

In all honesty, I've had to deal with very few of them, and only indirectly. Most notably the heartbleed thing recently. And you know what? It was senior management and IT managers who made that call and accepted the risks. (I'm primarily inside the firewall, so usually not my issue.)

There are times when you have to weigh risks and make choices.

But generally speaking, I don't apply a patch which is fresh and steaming immediately, and then I deploy to a lab and do some testing first.

Assume the worst, and do your best to plan against it. I learned this at the knee of an old neckbeard who'd seen it all, and I think it's served me quite well.

Occasionally, someone accuses me of being a worrier and overly paranoid -- and infrequently someone will override me. On a few of those occasions when it blew up in our faces, I was the one saying this is why I don't do it that way.

There's probably a larger number of times where it would have probably worked just fine.

But I don't get paid to take risks with someone else's stuff, and I work on stuff with a pretty low risk threshold.

So, for me, I will always err on the side of caution of it's an important system.

about a week ago

Microsoft Black Tuesday Patches Bring Blue Screens of Death

gstoddart Re:Phew. (179 comments)

Like Herd-immunity that only works if most people don't do it.

Sure, and there will always be those who do it right away.

But I have no intention of being the first lemming off the cliff. I've been in IT way too long to trust a fresh patch for any vendor.

There was a time when release cycles were much longer, nowadays, you're just as likely to end up in the situation of a busted environment.

At the very least you have non-prod systems which you use as guinea pigs. But I've met people who apply new patches to Production machines right away -- and almost invariably end up getting burned by it.

I'll stick with my old school, overly paranoid approach to release engineering/configuration management. What others do with systems they're in charge of is their own problem.

about a week ago

Ask Slashdot: Should You Invest In Documentation, Or UX?

gstoddart What? (198 comments)

As a customer, how would you feel with a very simple product (much simpler than the competition but still a bit complex) that has no documentation?

So, I guess first off if your product is open source, do you have customers or do you have users?

Second, say I'm evaluating a new product, and I stumble on yours. After looking around I conclude there is no documentation at all.

Now, do you think I'm going to download and install your software so I can play with it and see if it might possibly be useful for me? Or am I going to look at the absence of documentation as a sign that I should look elsewhere?

My honest answer, is I'm going to assume you're like every other open source project with no documentation and keep looking. Because it smacks of either amateur hour, or the bad old days of open source where all you got for help was "RTFM" (which in this case there wouldn't be), or "figure it out for yourself".

If you've got 250 apps with no documentation, what you have is a sea of unintelligible stuff which nobody is going to want to get anywhere near.

And if this is supposed to be a business suite, how are people going to pitch it to decision makers when you say "um, well, there's no actual documentation". If any business lets their IT folks roll out a project based on software with no documentation, they'd be complete idiots.

If you're not documenting it, people who aren't already users of it will never use it.

And, really, 250 frickin' apps without documentation?? Yeah, no.

about a week ago

Microsoft Black Tuesday Patches Bring Blue Screens of Death

gstoddart Re:Phew. (179 comments)

Yet again, those people who get all stroppy about "you should install updates the SECOND they come out".... real life hits you again.

I've never understood that mentality ... usually I give patches from any vendor a few weeks or more to have a shakedown period.

Let someone else do the beta testing.

I've seen more problems caused by applying fresh steaming patches than I have seen problems solved by it.

about a week ago

Gartner: Internet of Things Has Reached Hype Peak

gstoddart Re:Gartner cynic here - enlighten me (98 comments)

Gartner is useless. However you can pay them money and they'll increase your company's rating and this will fool people who trust Gartner's opinions.

Agreed, they make their money evaluating how well people are doing in the overhyped buzzword sector, and making predictions which are of dubious value.

So if they have a section on overhyped buzzwords, it's pressy astounding.

To me, if Gartner is saying this, it's kind of like Bernie Madoff saying an investment is a little sketchy.

I look at 90% of what comes out of Gartner and think "what overhyped drivel", so them saying the same thing boggles the mind.

about a week ago

How to Maintain Lab Safety While Making Viruses Deadlier

gstoddart So ... (213 comments)

They essentially are making biological weapons in violation of international treaties, but they're saying it's all OK because it's for research?

Sorry, but what? If someone in Iran was doing this people would be calling for airstrikes.

The hubris of thinking "it's OK, I'm a trained professional, nothing bad can happen" is mind boggling.

How is it even legal to be making deadlier strains of viruses?

about a week ago

Entire South Korean Space Programme Shuts Down As Sole Astronaut Quits

gstoddart Re:begs FFS (186 comments)

You mean like when you wrote that it was a cliche, a phrase which itself is so overused as to in fact be one?

Ironic, isn't it? ;-)

And, cliche isn't a phrase, it's a word.

about a week ago

Entire South Korean Space Programme Shuts Down As Sole Astronaut Quits

gstoddart Re:begs FFS (186 comments)

Know what else is a cliche? People whining about the relative meaning of a phrase which originated in the 16th century (and was apparently a bad translation from Latin), and a more modern phrase which uses some of the same words.

Unless you are specifically in a context where you're doing formal logic or debating, the former is rarely used. And, if you're in that context, everybody knows the difference between those two things. If you're not, people probably mean the more modern version of it.

So, dealeth with it, lest thee gets presumed for man of excessive pedantry and retentiveness of the sphincter.

about a week ago

Entire South Korean Space Programme Shuts Down As Sole Astronaut Quits

gstoddart Re:begs FFS (186 comments)

Dost thou propose that thine language shall never evolve and change in any manner unless it be so approveth by thee and thine ilk of the Nazis of Grammar? Shall thine language become static and fixed as the firmament and the heavens? Or hath the pinnacle of grammarian excellence been such obtained as to negate further change, owing to it's divine revelation and celestial perfection?

Would such change undo the works that man has wrought under heaven? Would thine countenance still continue as blessed and calm as days of yore? I beseech you, good sir, to ponder the myriad ways in which ones speech no longer resembles that of our forefathers, even as thou pines for a return to the olden ways.

Methinks thine bloomers may have come become ill adjusted leading to your distemper. I prithee, settle thine dyspeptic mood and swallow your bile, lest ye strain thyself. These ill spirits do not become you, and place much strain upon your liver.

I do believe the gentleman doth protest too much over matters of trifling importance.

If you have ever said "let me google that", then you too are guilty of this. If you have ever used any expression which is newer than the dark ages, you're certainly guilty of this.

Language evolves, and the fact that a second entire expression which sounds similar to the first is not the fault of the expression or the people who use it.

Yes, there is the logical fallacy of "begging the question". But there is also the more modern "begs the question" implying "that causes us to ask this", and it has been in use for decades.

Whether the grammar nazis among us accept or not is a different issue.

So, yo dawg, chill and stop griefing, peeps be speaking differently than before. Deal with it.

At best English is a bastardization of a several languages, thrown together with a hodge podge of rules which require you to know which language gave us the word and why, and it is entirely possible to construct phrases which sound similar but which convey an entirely different meaning.

My advice to you, get over it.

about a week ago

DEFCON's Latest Challenge: Hacking Altruism

gstoddart Re:Hmmm ... what? (47 comments)

Cargo shorts are ubiquitous.

Piercing, tattoos and henna are part of the hacking culture these days though

looks down Hmmmm ... I'm not wearing any henna now, and my hair is my natural color, and I no longer have an eyebrow ring ... but really, this has been nerd chic since I was in junior high school, which is really only a subset of shabby punk from the 70s.

Or as I like to call it, clothing.

As far as wizards and elves

Mmmmm .... Skyrim ...

ZOMG, I 4m teh hax0r!! Or, as my wife puts it ... " hey dork".

Let's be honest here, this isn't exactly new.

about two weeks ago

DEFCON's Latest Challenge: Hacking Altruism

gstoddart Re:Hmmm ... what? (47 comments)

Damn, suddenly I was a lot more interested in attending ... who doesn't like disco-bondage headgear, leather, and steampunk?

Yes honey, I have to go to Vegas for work. No, I really do need my steampunk goggles and leather chaps, it's for, um, safety. Yes, for safety. Have you seen my cape?

about two weeks ago

DEFCON's Latest Challenge: Hacking Altruism

gstoddart Re:Pacemakers (47 comments)

Yeah, like I'm supposed to believe he had a heart.

That's just where they topped up the evil. ;-)

about two weeks ago

DEFCON's Latest Challenge: Hacking Altruism

gstoddart Re:Hmmm ... what? (47 comments)

Nerds in t-shirts and glasses, now that's what I expected ... the whole leather thing threw me a little.

about two weeks ago

DEFCON's Latest Challenge: Hacking Altruism

gstoddart Re:Hmmm ... what? (47 comments)

"my wizard impales your elf".

I don't even know where to start with how wrong that statement is.

Why, thank you.

about two weeks ago

DEFCON's Latest Challenge: Hacking Altruism

gstoddart Hmmm ... what? (47 comments)

still tons of leather, piercing, and body art

Is this a security convention, or an S&M one?

I'm confused ... I've never been to one, is this one of those 'it can be two things' deals?

Is everybody walking around in their disco-bondage headgear and steampunk outfits talking about security?

I'm just imagining a keynote speaker in leather chaps, and suddenly I'm very afraid. No wonder the rest of the world still thinks we're all running around playing D&D and shouting "my wizard impales your elf".

about two weeks ago

NASA's Greenhouse Gas Observatory Captures 'First Light'

gstoddart Re:How is CO2 leading cause of warming? (143 comments)

And based on your completely ignorant and idiotic posts, I assume you have nothing at all to refute any of this, other than your firmly held idiocy and conviction that they must be wrong?

Why don't you go visit the creation museum or something, you might find other people who care about what you say.

about two weeks ago

NASA's Greenhouse Gas Observatory Captures 'First Light'

gstoddart Re:fast forward 5 years.... (143 comments)

If they don't get the results they're looking for they'll "adjust" the data or "calibrate" the instruments until they show what they want NASA to show.

Cite your facts and your science, because otherwise we conclude you're doing nothing more than making an ad hominem attack on science.

Oh, wait, you don't have any facts, right?

Sorry, but if you want to be given any credibility, you need to show some science which refutes it.

Otherwise, it's the same as if I said "Pino Grigio will reject any science which doesn't fit in with his childish worldview, and nothing he says can be taken as more then the rantings of a deluded idiot".

If I had to choose between the integrity of the NASA scientists and the intelligence of your post, I'm going to have to go with NASA on this one.

about two weeks ago

Xbox One Will Play Media from USB Devices, DLNA Servers

gstoddart Re:Wow, flash drives? (112 comments)

I don't really understand why you have so much love for the 360, but so much hate for the X1

My XBox 360 hasn't been plugged into a network in several years, and the XBone isn't backwards compatible with my existing library of games.

Microsoft has sent so many mixed messages about this platform that I don't know what to believe about it any more.

I don't care about DLC, I don't care about on-line gaming, I don't care about multi-player, I don't care about pretty much anything they said was a "feature" of this new console. It brings zero value for me.

about two weeks ago


gstoddart hasn't submitted any stories.


gstoddart has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>