×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

OKCupid Warns Off Mozilla Firefox Users Over Gay Rights

guspasho Re:Irony (1482 comments)

Mod parent up! I heartily agree, there is absolutely no equivalence between being a bigot and opposing bigotry. And it's disappointing that this fairly obvious distinction even needs to be pointed out.

about two weeks ago
top

OKCupid Warns Off Mozilla Firefox Users Over Gay Rights

guspasho Re:Desperate for advertisment (1482 comments)

Also, Slashdot commenter feigns cynicism in a desperate attempt at seeking attention.

about two weeks ago
top

IRS Admits Targeting Conservative Groups During 2012 Election

guspasho Re:on a serious note (719 comments)

"... I detest Islamic culture..."

Don't equate Islam and Islamic culture interchangably with al Qaida and jihadism and 7th century bullshit. Islamic culture is very rich and has contributed much to civilization. Your own culture isn't without its own flaws and stained past either. People don't go around judging your culture by the Westboro Baptist Church or Hitler. You'd do well to remember there's a LOT more to Islamic culture than jihadism and bin Laden.

about a year ago
top

IRS Admits Targeting Conservative Groups During 2012 Election

guspasho Re:on a serious note (719 comments)

By "open" Gitmo I mean begin using it as a gulag. I realize it's been around for a while. Obviously.

about a year ago
top

IRS Admits Targeting Conservative Groups During 2012 Election

guspasho Re:on a serious note (719 comments)

Mod parent up!

Bush had no problem steamrolling over the process to do whatever the fuck he wanted. He didn't ask Congress or anyone if he could open Gitmo. He just did it. He claimed his commander in chief authority. When you're the most powerful man in the free world, you can do a lot without asking permission. Obama is president and commander in chief now, and he's used that authority to start foreign wars and assassinate US citizens without asking the courts or Congress, among many other controversial and probably very illegal things. Obama could close Gitmo in a day if he wanted to. He doesn't want to. Simple as that.

That he claims his hands are tied is simply bullshit to avoid the embarrassment of admitting he broke a core promise of his campaign.

about a year ago
top

IRS Admits Targeting Conservative Groups During 2012 Election

guspasho Re:Accountability (719 comments)

OH HEY LOOK! They backtracked and apologized! What do you want, a pound of flesh?

about a year ago
top

The Text-Your-Parents-Your-Drug-Deal Experiment

guspasho Re:In related news... (267 comments)

Followed by: The FBI has seized and taken down a drug-dealing website posing as a technology news website, slashdot.org, for associations with a ring of probable drug dealers.

about a year ago
top

The Text-Your-Parents-Your-Drug-Deal Experiment

guspasho Re:All iPhone screenshots? (267 comments)

Probably because Android users can't figure out how to take screenshots (Zing!)

But seriously, as a mobile QA tester, it's a pain in the butt to figure out and remember how to take a screenshot with any given phone, since it isn't standardized, and some phones have no screenshot-taking ability short of connecting it to a dev console.

about a year ago
top

Eric Schmidt: Regulate Civilian Drones Now

guspasho Re:i call bs (420 comments)

This was my first thought as well. Why is *Eric Schmidt* so concerned about *private* drone use, as opposed to governmental? Smells like an anti-competitive effort to me.

1 year,3 days
top

Stephen Hawking Warns Against Confining Ourselves To Earth

guspasho Re: Earth isn't delicate, (414 comments)

> If you can't survive and thrive in the very worst conditions this planet has to offer, then you won't do better off outside the atmosphere.

Says who?

1 year,3 days
top

Stephen Hawking Warns Against Confining Ourselves To Earth

guspasho Re:Paradox (414 comments)

> we're not overpopulated now, but in a few generations we will be.

They said that a few generations ago, too. Hell, Thomas Malthus said that we already were, and he said that centuries ago. We always seem to be on the brink of a catastrophic population explosion that will result in mass starvation and misery. Maybe it's time we admit that Malthus was dead wrong.

You might say that we'll soon run out of room, but why is no one saying we ran out of room a long time ago? The natural human condition is to live off the land as nomadic hunters and foragers, in groups of no more than a few hundred, not live sedentarily in cities of many thousands if not millions of people. Is that way of life feasible now, with how many people there are now?

We've been adapting for about 10,000 years, or 500 generations, to live sustainably with overpopulation. We've dealt with famine and plague. We will continue to innovate and find new ways to deal with them. And, as population grows exponentially, so does human innovation, so long as we continue to provide the means for humans to innovate.

1 year,3 days
top

Stephen Hawking Warns Against Confining Ourselves To Earth

guspasho Re: Earth isn't delicate, (414 comments)

As if those are the only two options. Neither of them even make any sense. We are far, far from depleting the Earth's resources, so much that it isn't even in the realm of realistic possibility. And as far as "surviving" on this planet, can we learn to tame and prevent every possible external threat that can take Earth out, like a nearby supernova? Absolutely not.

How about looking at things realistically, rather than in such irrationally absolutist terms? Something, anything could happen to Earth, from nuclear war to unchecked global warming to an increase in volcanic activity to meteorite impact to a freak solar or interstellar event. The survival of humanity, our descendants and the only intelligent species we are aware of, depends on colonizing space. We've lived on Earth as a species for hundreds of thousands of years without coming close to depleting its resources, we are getting quite a lot better at learning to live sustainably without damaging the environment than we were even 40 years ago, and we haven't realized any imagined dystopian futures yet. What precedent is there for imagining that, if it suddenly becomes easier to colonize new worlds that we will simply toss away the ones we're already living on?

Your false dichotomy is both false and terribly ridden with inaccurate smuggled premises.

1 year,3 days
top

Six Retailers Announce Recall of Buckyballs and Buckycubes

guspasho Re:Seriously? (343 comments)

So if an infant or toddler is too stupid to not eat toys, they deserve whatever they get from these things? Fuck you, you are an asshole. I hope to god that you aren't and won't ever be a parent.

1 year,3 days
top

Will the Supreme Court End Human Gene Patents?

guspasho Wrong approach (228 comments)

All the arguments in the summary are economic ones. Creating monopolies, raising prices, and market distortions are what patents are for. It's a reward to the creator that is supposed to drive creativity and innovation.

The real argument against gene patents is that they shouldn't be patentable in the first place. They are natural phenomena, not inventions.

1 year,3 days
top

Creationist Bets $10k In Proposed Literal Interpretation of Genesis Debate

guspasho Re:Sigh, this is not what a Christian should be do (1121 comments)

It's disappointing how many self-proclaimed Christians ignore what Jesus said in favor of what's in the Old Testament, which was written before Jesus Christ. It's like they don't want to be Christians at all.

1 year,21 days
top

Google Reportedly Making a Smartwatch, Too

guspasho Re:is there just NO originality anymore? (196 comments)

> (and the Prada's original UI was vastly inferior).

And isn't that kind of part of the point? There were smartphones around for years before the iPhone came out, but they all sucked horribly. I struggled to do any kind of Internet browsing with my Blackberry Pearl to do the kinds of things that I can do on my iPhone just by talking to it. I had a geek friend who was so proud of his Windows phone that had a stylus. I remember another had an iPaq that could play movies. There were also tablets before the iPad, but no one wanted to use them either. And in both cases, any competition lagged well behind Apple in terms of being able to come up with a product that anyone actually wanted to use.

Apple knows how to make products that people want to actually use. No one else can seem to figure that out without waiting to see what Apple does and copying that.

1 year,26 days
top

Rand Paul Launches a Filibuster Against Drone Strikes On US Soil

guspasho Re:The enemy of my enemy (693 comments)

It's one thing to use it in a military context but the administration refuses to rule out using it in place of law enforcement. Or do you think that the military should be deployed against American citizens on American soil instead of law enforcement? Perhaps we should deploy them against all wanted murderers and rapists since we *know* they're guilty. The government has never been wrong about that before.

about a year ago
top

Netflix Using HTML5 Video For ARM Chromebook

guspasho Re:Chrome sync is dangerous. (232 comments)

I had this problem with iCloud and importing bookmarks from Safari on my Mac to Safari on my iPhone. I tried clearing them off of one, and bam, gone on both, irretrievably so. So annoying. Anyone know what the proper procedure for this is supposed to be? I'm very suspicious of trying to use iCloud now.

about a year ago
top

Court: 4th Amendment Applies At Border, Password Protected Files Not Suspicious

guspasho No provision for borders (194 comments)

It's about time something like this happened. The rights established in the Constitution are binding on the government, wherever you are and whoever you are. There is no provision for different rules at the border or outside the border, nor for citizens as opposed to non-citizens. Any attempt at limiting those rights is in violation of any clear reading of the Constitution, especially attempts to define the border as 100 miles wide, an area that encompasses several whole states and 2/3 of the country's population.

about a year ago

Submissions

guspasho hasn't submitted any stories.

Journals

guspasho has no journal entries.

Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Sign up for Slashdot Newsletters
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...