Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Would Scottish Independence Mean the End of UK's Nuclear Arsenal?

iainr Re:Should be interesting RE- Nato (375 comments)

I doubt that they'd have any objections as such (well I suspect Spain will be cagey) but there will have to be negotiations over the UK's opt-outs (the Euro, Schengen, etc) and the UK's rebate. I can't see the EU countries pushing the Euro issue that much but the rebate is currently an issue and I suspect the Schengen opt-out will require some quid pro quos.

about 2 months ago
top

U.S. Drone Attack Strategy Against Al-Qaeda May Be Wrong

iainr Re:If you have the opportunity (433 comments)

It depends on the leader. In N.I. the british army had a policy of leaving one IRA leader alone because his signals security was so bad. if they're have arrested or killed him they'd have lost a huge intelligence lead as whoever replaced him would probably be more competent. At one point this got to the stage that one of them was shagging his wife to keep her quiet as she was threatening to leave him and this was affecting his "work". This isn't new, the OSS produced a manual on sabotage in WWII which included advice for agents in french industries to try and get incompetent managers promoted in order to reduce efficiency.

about 5 months ago
top

NASA's Plan To Block Light From Distant Stars To Find 'Earth 2.0'

iainr "f you look directly at the sun".... (92 comments)

You will damage your eyesight...don't do, it opticians make enough as it is.

about 5 months ago
top

Royal Navy Deployed Laser Weapons During the Falklands War

iainr Re:Yes, but... (139 comments)

No I mean the RAF pilots flying the Sea Harriers with 800 and 801 Squadron. specifically Flt Lts Barton, Leeming and Morgan who were mentioned in the post I replied to.

about a year ago
top

Royal Navy Deployed Laser Weapons During the Falklands War

iainr Re:Yes, but... (139 comments)

The 21s were never meant to be much more than a short term buy for the RN and had little space for additional equipment, that said they lasted from 1974 up to 1994 and were regarded quite favourably by the crew, though the very basic missile fit was always an issue after the 1980s

The batch 1 type 42 were very much built down to a cost and Sheffields commissioning Captain (one Sandy Woodward) had a list of complaints which were almost the main points of difference between the batch 1s and later ships.

Thankfully the lunatic idea of having them coal fired didn't get much further than a D.K.Brown sketch of a 4 funneled type 42

about a year ago
top

Royal Navy Deployed Laser Weapons During the Falklands War

iainr Re:Yes, but... (139 comments)

I meant the RAF pilots not the GR3s

about a year ago
top

Royal Navy Deployed Laser Weapons During the Falklands War

iainr Re:Yes, but... (139 comments)

The missile hit right in the ships main control room putting it out of action and the fire caused by the remaining fuel from the missile burned nicely on the aluminium ship.

And you were doing so well up to this point... Sheffield wasn't an Aluminium ship, not even aluminium superstructure http://www.hazegray.org/faq/smn6.htm#F7
As the link above states none of the RN ships sunk in the Falklands were sunk because of burning aluminium.

In Sheffields case they lost the firefighting ring main more or less immediately and they abandoned when the heat conducted by the steel hull was causing secondary fires in other parts of the ship

about a year ago
top

Royal Navy Deployed Laser Weapons During the Falklands War

iainr Re:Yes, but... (139 comments)

At one point in 100 days Woodward describes how he has to find out if the entrance to Falkland sound has been mined or not. Not having minesweepers his only choice is to choose one of the cheap and cheerful type 21's and see if it gets blown up or not. The ships Captain, Christopher Craig, knowing exactly what was (specifically not) being asked of him pointedly asked Woodward if he wanted him "to zigzag about a bit" to make sure the channel was clear. It was and Alacrity survived. I think Woodward described this action as being very brave and worthy of the highest awards for gallantry, but strangely only if it all had gone wrong.

about a year ago
top

Royal Navy Deployed Laser Weapons During the Falklands War

iainr Re:Yes, but... (139 comments)

5 air launched, another 6 or so ship mounted. 2 lorry mounted (no really.. they took two off a ship and put them on the back of an artic).

about a year ago
top

Royal Navy Deployed Laser Weapons During the Falklands War

iainr Re:Yes, but... (139 comments)

HMS Sheffield was sunk by an Exocet from a Dassault Mirage two days later, most likely as revenge

Not really, firstly it was launched from a Super Etendard not a Mirage, secondly the Sheffield attack was the second or third attempt by the Argentinian Navy to attack the carriers using exocet, the Argentinian navy went to a lot of effort to get the Etandarts exocet capable and were intending on using them against the Royal Navy carriers long before the belgrano was sunk. If the exocet attacks were reveng then as advocated by most combat instructors they were trying to get their revenge in first.

. Critics are of the opinion that if UK hadn't been the first to sink an enemy vessel then none would have been lost on either side.

Critics are like arseholes....sorry no Opinons are like arseholes every critic is one. Sorry nope I'll get it right eventually ... Opinions are like arseholes everyone has one, ignore the opinions be guided by the facts. Given that the argentinian Navy was actively seeking out the royal navy carrier battle goup with three task forces and two air attacks on the day the Belgrano was sunk it was obvious that someone was going to come off badly. Unfortunately for those onborad the belgrano she was it. Perhaps ironically as of all the Argentinian navy ships she was best suited to survive a torpedo hit, as some of her sisters did in big mistake II.

about a year ago
top

Royal Navy Deployed Laser Weapons During the Falklands War

iainr Re:Yes, but... (139 comments)

Yeah, but the Belgrano was running because word leaked out that she was a primary target and when she was engaged she was at full speed towards home

No, she was meandering along at cruising speed to a holding area whilst the Argentinian navy decided what to do next since their ari strike on the Carrier battle group couldn't get airborne because of low winds.

Conqueror had destroy orders even though Belgrano had left the field.

Field...? what field, she was at sea and she was a combatant...to paraphrase Shankly "if she wasn't interfering with play what the fuck was she doing on the pitch"

Some say she was in Argentine waters when she was sunk, but this has not been verified either way.

She was sunk at 5524S 6132W that's more than 12 miles away from anything.

about a year ago
top

Royal Navy Deployed Laser Weapons During the Falklands War

iainr Re:Yes, but... (139 comments)

yes, but they had been "Navalised" prior to the war :)

about a year ago
top

Royal Navy Deployed Laser Weapons During the Falklands War

iainr Re:Yes, but... (139 comments)

21 kills for no losses in the air to air role despite being outnumbered by aircraft with superior performance and viewed by the Argentinian Air forces and a difficult and challenging opponent ("La Muerte Negra") not bad going for an aircraft designed to shoot down recon aircraft.

about a year ago
top

Royal Navy Deployed Laser Weapons During the Falklands War

iainr Re:Yes, but... (139 comments)

No, The Fleet Air Arm tactics (calling navy pilots RAF will result in mild joking/ verbal abuse at best) varied throughout the war, before the landings they were part of a standard layered defence and were usually deployed up threat of the radar pickets which in turn were up threat of the carrier battle group. After the landings the Navy effectively defined a large rectangular box around the landing site and declared this a free fire zone for ships missile/gun systems and a no-go zone for aircraft. again Harriers were employed up threat but the lack of AEW meant that they often had to fly round the "box" to catch incoming raids. Also there was a significant difference in experience and performance in the use of the blue fox radar in the SHAR between 800 (Hermes) and 801 (Invincible) squadrons that meant that the 801 pilots could be more effective in the air defense role (see Sea Harrier Over The Falklands: A Maverick at War by Cmrd Sharkey Ward)

The fact that ships carried LDS is not news, it's mentioned in Woodwards book and various other Falklands war literature and when I went aboard HMS Plymouth in Glasgow in the 1990's they had some details about it on dispay boards. AFAICR it was mounted in the bridge wing and was on the "wrong side" of the ship when she was attacked. Most publications I've seen LDS mentioned state that it was never actually used.

about a year ago
top

Julian Assange Says Google's Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen Are "Witch Doctors"

iainr Re:who cares (253 comments)

given that he could be directly extradited from the UK to the US fairly easily, why bother messing with Sweden.

about a year ago
top

New Best Way To Nuke a Short-Notice Asteroid

iainr Re:But Why? (311 comments)

No no, I can suggest some really great roads for reading/posting whilst driving...some of the ones round Lashkar Gah are ideal for that kind of thing.

about a year ago
top

US House Science Committee Member: Evolution Is a Lie From Hell

iainr Re:Post bigotry here (1113 comments)

I knocked on the pearly gates
Neatly side-stepping the long queue
Waved hi to St. Peter
Who checked my card and let me through
I smiled, threw my hands in the air
Laughed and got arrested
They said hey man, you're in the wrong place
Your behaviour is a disgrace
Here we pray every hour, on the hour
Read extracts from the Bible and look solemn'
What, says I, no party?
No party?
Let me out

(Gillan,McCoy, Torme, Towns, Underwood) No Laughing in heaven

I guess Heaven or Hell is in the eye of the beholder

about 2 years ago
top

Photo Reveals UK Plan: "Assange To Be Arrested Under All Circumstances"

iainr Re:"Leaving country with permission" == "Fleeing"? (847 comments)

it would appear the OP is pointing out the unusual tenacity with which they're pursuing someone for a rape charge,

Perhaps you noticed that the "unusual tenacity" came to be when Assange became a fugitive from justice? Think about it. ... What did Assange do? Broke his bond and fled the police.

No bond was broken, no fleeing occurred.

As part of the extradition process Assange was released on bail, part of his conditions of bail were that he should remain overnight in the residence of one of his supporters who (from memory) guaranteed the majority of the bail. His residence in the Ecuadorian embassy means that a bunch of people are likely to be out of pocket.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/9343739/Julian-Assange-celebrities-could-lose-thousands-from-WikiLeaks-founders-bail-breach.html

Assange left Sweden weeks after the incident in question, with the express permission of the prosecutor's office. For that matter, he isn't even wanted on a rape charge, he's wanted for questioning in relation to a possible charge. He has offered numerous times to talk with the Swedish prosecutor or a representative while in the UK. None of this is terribly consistent with the actions of someone purportedly on the lam.

Worth noting, from a transcript of a Democracy Now discussion, emphasis mine:

"...Sweden and the United Kingdom both refused to provide assurances that once matters were dealt with in Sweden, that Julian would be permitted to leave the country and would not be extradited to the United States. They refused to provide those assurances."

This is probably the more salient point regarding Assange's reluctance to step again on Swedish soil.

Cheers,

The UK can't give any such assurances if he were to be transferred to Swedish custody, we don't have any control over Sweden. If the US wanted to extradite him from the UK they've had months to make a case.

more than 2 years ago
top

Police Charge News of the World Editor Over Voicemail Hacking

iainr Re:It's the coverup (131 comments)

Right, because all they did, AFAIK, is spoof caller-ID information to gain access to the voicemail without a password, and IT WAS NOT ILLEGAL at the time. .

The "This wasn't illegal at the time" comment has been made a number of times but surely gaining access to voicemail, whether by caller-ID spoofing or guessing passwords is going to be illegal under the computer misuse act which predates RIPA by a decade.

more than 2 years ago
top

Was the New Dr. Who Leaked on Purpose?

iainr Re:Heh... (370 comments)

I know that's why I said I'd seen about a dozen, the mention of billboards was to indicate that the BBC are obviously willing to spend real money in promoting this series

more than 9 years ago

Submissions

iainr hasn't submitted any stories.

Journals

iainr has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?